Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 11:08:53 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 6542 6543 6544 6545 6546 6547 6548 6549 6550 6551 6552 6553 6554 6555 6556 6557 6558 6559 6560 6561 6562 6563 6564 6565 6566 6567 6568 6569 6570 6571 6572 6573 6574 6575 6576 6577 6578 6579 6580 6581 6582 6583 6584 6585 6586 6587 6588 6589 6590 6591 [6592] 6593 6594 6595 6596 6597 6598 6599 6600 6601 6602 6603 6604 6605 6606 6607 6608 6609 6610 6611 6612 6613 6614 6615 6616 6617 6618 6619 6620 6621 6622 6623 6624 6625 6626 6627 6628 6629 6630 6631 6632 6633 6634 6635 6636 6637 6638 6639 6640 6641 6642 ... 33320 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26371653 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
studio1one
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 500


BintexFutures


View Profile
May 27, 2014, 10:52:35 PM

Its obviously a W bottom - will breakout soon Wink

chart?  Smiley

the bounce up from the 550/551 level seems like a correction to me. looks like we might head down from here. what do you guys think?




If you are NOT trolling, you seem to be too short term, in your thinking/charting.

i am saying that the bounce = corrective in formation. this suggests that the dominant direction is down. it has nothing to do with short term/long term, but rather the formation of the waves.

http://www.elliottwave.net/educational/basictenets/basics3.htm


yes but you are on a 15 min chart

here is the same formation on a 2hr chart. the length of the candles will not change the characteristics of the formation. will it? i don't think so.



2 things jump out here

1. 15 min is too short to separate noise from trend, it just can't be done.

2. Your trend lines cut through candles and wicks all over the place anyway.

To get a seinsible view of the support and resistance of the run itself (ignoring previous support and resistance)

 you need to run a 4 hour chart



Furthermore to see how the correction is performing inline with the bull run you need to run fib retracements on it



and look at volume

nothing to me suggests that we will see any kind of real test of the run until about 640

but who knows really.
You get merit points when someone likes your post enough to give you some. And for every 2 merit points you receive, you can send 1 merit point to someone else!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714777733
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714777733

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714777733
Reply with quote  #2

1714777733
Report to moderator
1714777733
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714777733

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714777733
Reply with quote  #2

1714777733
Report to moderator
Gimmelfarb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 27, 2014, 10:59:48 PM


2 things jump out here

1. 15 min is too short to separate noise from trend, it just can't be done.

2. Your trend lines cut through candles and wicks all over the place anyway.

To get a seinsible view of the support and resistance of the run itself (ignoring previous support and resistance)

 you need to run a 4 hour chart

[snip]

Furthermore to see how the correction is performing inline with the bull run you need to run fib retracements on it

[snip]

and look at volume

nothing to me suggests that we will see any kind of real test of the run until about 640

but who knows really.

on "noise from trend" i disagree. 15m is the lowest i will use that i consider to have acceptable noise/signal ratio. to each his own. the lines only cut through wicks to the extent that they are minor violations. precision is not the purpose -- to reiterate again, i am looking at the shape of the formation. i have fibs on my regular charts, i do not normally chart on wisdom, but we had tagged .786 before falling out of the wedge, which also contributed to my thinking that more down is coming.

like you said, who knows.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
May 27, 2014, 11:00:39 PM


Explanation
studio1one
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 500


BintexFutures


View Profile
May 27, 2014, 11:07:08 PM


on "noise from trend" i disagree. 15m is the lowest i will use that i consider to have acceptable noise/signal ratio. to each his own. the lines only cut through wicks to the extent that they are minor violations. precision is not the purpose -- to reiterate again, i am looking at the shape of the formation. i have fibs on my regular charts, i do not normally chart on wisdom, but we had tagged .786 before falling out of the wedge, which also contributed to my thinking that more down is coming.

like you said, who knows.


Yeah but you know...

there is strict moderate and lax when accepting the support and resistance of trend lines....

then there is just ignoring them entirely and drawing a shape.
Gimmelfarb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 27, 2014, 11:12:50 PM


on "noise from trend" i disagree. 15m is the lowest i will use that i consider to have acceptable noise/signal ratio. to each his own. the lines only cut through wicks to the extent that they are minor violations. precision is not the purpose -- to reiterate again, i am looking at the shape of the formation. i have fibs on my regular charts, i do not normally chart on wisdom, but we had tagged .786 before falling out of the wedge, which also contributed to my thinking that more down is coming.

like you said, who knows.


Yeah but you know...

there is strict moderate and lax when accepting the support and resistance of trend lines....

then there is just ignoring them entirely and drawing a shape.

who is ignoring them entirely? it was just sloppily drawn. i find it difficult to see how one could deny that this is a wedge, and that the trend line was clearly broken to the downside.



it seems pretty clear to me looking at this that we retraced the high of 597. that doesnt look bullish to me.
windjc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070


View Profile
May 27, 2014, 11:14:39 PM


on "noise from trend" i disagree. 15m is the lowest i will use that i consider to have acceptable noise/signal ratio. to each his own. the lines only cut through wicks to the extent that they are minor violations. precision is not the purpose -- to reiterate again, i am looking at the shape of the formation. i have fibs on my regular charts, i do not normally chart on wisdom, but we had tagged .786 before falling out of the wedge, which also contributed to my thinking that more down is coming.

like you said, who knows.


Yeah but you know...

there is strict moderate and lax when accepting the support and resistance of trend lines....

then there is just ignoring them entirely and drawing a shape.

I think both of you have valid arguments. There is a case to be made for us going down to 520-550. There is a case to be made for us seeing 600+ before 560.

I am split in the middle here. I will probably buy back more at 520-550 or 600+.

I do think we are getting pretty heavy at this current top. We look like we will probably close the daily candle back under the upper bollinger band, which often means more downside first.

But there is no clear picture, only what people want to see.
dnaleor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000


Want privacy? Use Monero!


View Profile
May 27, 2014, 11:22:16 PM

Pump and dump.
how many times do you post that? Every hour?
You will be the first one I put on ignore...
RandomPedestrianN9
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 27, 2014, 11:27:37 PM

Pump and dump.
how many times do you post that? Every hour?
You will be the first one I put on ignore...

repeat untill 0
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
May 28, 2014, 12:00:38 AM


Explanation
Arghhh
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 28, 2014, 12:02:52 AM

Looks like the next 12-48 hours will test this rally's local support line.



If that support fails, then the next stop is the 2013 support.
frienemy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 235
Merit: 100

I was promised da moon


View Profile
May 28, 2014, 12:12:02 AM

Hey guys,

we have the 3d EMA crossing at last. Celebrate!
byronbb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000


HODL OR DIE


View Profile
May 28, 2014, 12:40:19 AM

Wow.

4 pages of Jorge discussions. Amazing, simply fucking amazing.

Is there a way to ignore posts with related words? Like the word "Jorge" for example.

Would be great.

bigdave
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 28, 2014, 12:51:22 AM

Just a gut feeling, but I think we're going to revisit the 550-560 range here soon...
Gimmelfarb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 28, 2014, 12:54:07 AM

so i'm wondering. it seems many are expecting the next bubble rally to take off shortly... next couple weeks or months. and i am not saying that it'll happen or it won't. but i wonder, for those of you that expect this to come soon... what kind of price movement would dissuade you? what support level, or support trend line, would it take for you to revise your prediction, if broken?
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
May 28, 2014, 01:00:37 AM


Explanation
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
May 28, 2014, 01:09:35 AM

so i'm wondering. it seems many are expecting the next bubble rally to take off shortly... next couple weeks or months. and i am not saying that it'll happen or it won't. but i wonder, for those of you that expect this to come soon... what kind of price movement would dissuade you? what support level, or support trend line, would it take for you to revise your prediction, if broken?
0 or lower
wachtwoord
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125


View Profile
May 28, 2014, 01:13:59 AM

so i'm wondering. it seems many are expecting the next bubble rally to take off shortly... next couple weeks or months. and i am not saying that it'll happen or it won't. but i wonder, for those of you that expect this to come soon... what kind of price movement would dissuade you? what support level, or support trend line, would it take for you to revise your prediction, if broken?
0 or lower

That was exactly what I thought. At zero can i have dibs? Tongue
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
May 28, 2014, 01:18:46 AM

1. Since the last post BY @JorgeStolfi some six hours and four pages ago,  there may have been 30 posts ABOUT @JorgeStolfi.  I am flattered and moved.  Sorry @fonzie, but as the poet wrote

  Cesse tudo o que a antiga Musa canta
  Que outro valor mais alto se alevanta  Cheesy

2. Thanks again for the offer, but I would rather not have any bitcoins, and I do not intend to help distributing bitcoins to anyone, my students or not.  I am sure you will find charities or other worthy projects that will make much better use of the money.

3. I got to 65k tweets before knowing about bitcoin; mostly on politics, a bit of thechnology, humor, etc.  I was looking forward to commemorate my 65535th tweet, but then Twitter switched to the approximate "65K" count format.  Darn. But I was bored of politics anyway and decided to take a long twitter vacation.  By the way, it was through Twitter (specifically @falkvinge's tweets) that I first learned of bitcoin.  Since December I have been mostly wasting the stolen taxpayer's money here instead, using twitter only once in a while to warn people about bitcoin.

4. Why do people assume that I "still do not understand" bitcoin?  In my view, it is the shrillest bitcoin enthusiasts who do not understand much about it and how the world works.  Like those who still claim that bitcoin will let people evade taxes and buy illegal things, or that bitcoin is a safer investment than plain cash, or that China is irrelevant, or that the volume in the blockchain shows that people are using bitcoin --- or that the right technology, by itself, can save people from corrupt politicians and greedy bankers.
GreekGeek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 577
Merit: 500


Jesus was a (Goddamn) hippy socialist


View Profile
May 28, 2014, 01:22:53 AM

so i'm wondering. it seems many are expecting the next bubble rally to take off shortly... next couple weeks or months. and i am not saying that it'll happen or it won't. but i wonder, for those of you that expect this to come soon... what kind of price movement would dissuade you? what support level, or support trend line, would it take for you to revise your prediction, if broken?


According to my TA the 2013-2014 uptrend will be broken if we get to ~450 in 1-2 days
actually this 7-day rally started when the price was about to cross (but didn't) my trendline (430 @ 20th May)
williamj2543
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500

Get ready for PrimeDice Sig Campaign!


View Profile WWW
May 28, 2014, 01:28:46 AM

I really want the bitcoin price to skyrocket. I am saving up for a triple monitor setup and right now i have ~0.23 BTC, and I want the price to be at LEAST 1000$ when I cash out, until then, I won't be cashing out, and I will be left with less money to spend...
Pages: « 1 ... 6542 6543 6544 6545 6546 6547 6548 6549 6550 6551 6552 6553 6554 6555 6556 6557 6558 6559 6560 6561 6562 6563 6564 6565 6566 6567 6568 6569 6570 6571 6572 6573 6574 6575 6576 6577 6578 6579 6580 6581 6582 6583 6584 6585 6586 6587 6588 6589 6590 6591 [6592] 6593 6594 6595 6596 6597 6598 6599 6600 6601 6602 6603 6604 6605 6606 6607 6608 6609 6610 6611 6612 6613 6614 6615 6616 6617 6618 6619 6620 6621 6622 6623 6624 6625 6626 6627 6628 6629 6630 6631 6632 6633 6634 6635 6636 6637 6638 6639 6640 6641 6642 ... 33320 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!