|
zoinky
|
 |
November 30, 2015, 11:03:46 PM |
|
We movin'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
November 30, 2015, 11:26:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dotto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 981
Merit: 1005
No maps for these territories
|
|
November 30, 2015, 11:38:45 PM |
|
Monkey likes BTC for the next 5 days at least.
This normally means down... so i'll get to cover then? good i'll double down now
... but this normally means up. I'm confused. LOOOOL |
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 30, 2015, 11:43:19 PM |
|
Heh, still can use bitcoin.  |
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2348
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
November 30, 2015, 11:48:25 PM
Last edit: December 01, 2015, 12:08:35 AM by marcus_of_augustus |
|
Why now BearSwamp?
I think they are net short BTC and looking at some serious losses if bitcoin breaks out above $400 ... everytime bitcoin price gets a run on we get yet another "Big Block yesterday!" controversy whipped up by a single article followed by legions of vote brigading and the usual suspects and useful idiots running around like headless chooks.
The original GavinHearn XT fork was released as the price was challenging $300 on an upswing ...
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
December 01, 2015, 12:01:12 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
peonminer
|
|
December 01, 2015, 12:08:28 AM |
|
A little choo choo, a little m'fkers, and there ya have it! Headed to $420!
|
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
December 01, 2015, 12:50:38 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 10180
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
December 01, 2015, 12:53:07 AM |
|
No need to worry. False alarm (a fake out). It's NOT doing NOTHING.  |
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
December 01, 2015, 12:55:08 AM |
|
Is GMAX right? You're right though that the question is substantially political: A fully centralized system could easily handle gigabyte blocks with the work we've do to make megabyte blocks barely viable in a highly decentralized world. Such a system could also happily institute excess inflation, censor transactions, and other moves "for the good of the system" and "to assure widest adoption". If Bitcoin is to survive in the long run we just stand by the principles we believe in, and which make the system valuable in the first place. -- Even against substantial coercive pressure. Otherwise the transparent system of autonomously enforced rules risks devolving into another politically controlled trust-based instrument of expedience that we see with legacy monetary instruments.
 |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
December 01, 2015, 01:00:59 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 10180
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
December 01, 2015, 01:09:20 AM |
|
Is GMAX right? You're right though that the question is substantially political: A fully centralized system could easily handle gigabyte blocks with the work we've do to make megabyte blocks barely viable in a highly decentralized world. Such a system could also happily institute excess inflation, censor transactions, and other moves "for the good of the system" and "to assure widest adoption". If Bitcoin is to survive in the long run we just stand by the principles we believe in, and which make the system valuable in the first place. -- Even against substantial coercive pressure. Otherwise the transparent system of autonomously enforced rules risks devolving into another politically controlled trust-based instrument of expedience that we see with legacy monetary instruments.
hahahahahahahahaha This response post reminds me of the symbiotic alliance between HD and BJA. Whatever happened to BJA to be informing us about the doom and gloom of BTC if we do not adopt XT... etc etc etc... scale or die, no? Maybe we lost BJA in the first run up to $500, while he was shorting at $280 and asserting that without an immediate fix, we will never see $300.....  Go figure!!!! |
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2348
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
|
December 01, 2015, 01:20:11 AM |
|
BJA stopped posting after I asked him if he could confirm or deny he was being paid to post on various memes/topics (shilling) ... his reply was evasive, imho.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TReano
|
|
December 01, 2015, 01:33:34 AM |
|
place your bet with s/l and t/p and leave for a week or so |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
December 01, 2015, 02:01:22 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
December 01, 2015, 02:35:43 AM |
|
some sell 50K BTC all at once quick it'll be fun!
oh wait that's right no single individual owns that much bitcoin anymore, ah fuck.
sooo....mmmm. I KNOW! call wallstreet tell them leocoin is the future, whatever it takes to get them to convinces all there clients to all sell all at once.
|
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
December 01, 2015, 02:45:38 AM |
|
 Those were the days.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
