Bitcoin Forum
June 22, 2024, 03:29:28 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 16353 16354 16355 16356 16357 16358 16359 16360 16361 16362 16363 16364 16365 16366 16367 16368 16369 16370 16371 16372 16373 16374 16375 16376 16377 16378 16379 16380 16381 16382 16383 16384 16385 16386 16387 16388 16389 16390 16391 16392 16393 16394 16395 16396 16397 16398 16399 16400 16401 16402 [16403] 16404 16405 16406 16407 16408 16409 16410 16411 16412 16413 16414 16415 16416 16417 16418 16419 16420 16421 16422 16423 16424 16425 16426 16427 16428 16429 16430 16431 16432 16433 16434 16435 16436 16437 16438 16439 16440 16441 16442 16443 16444 16445 16446 16447 16448 16449 16450 16451 16452 16453 ... 33470 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26404787 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
bitcoinvest
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1124
Merit: 1000


13eJ4feC39JzbdY2K9W3ytQzWhunsxL83X


View Profile
February 24, 2017, 09:14:32 PM

since you speak about meeting in real life, did you ever meet somebody from here? i would like to meet someday Karpeles and give me my bitcoins back!!! sorry i mean give me an explanation Smiley since he don't have any bitcoins after all right???

no. i think it would probably be a very scary experience.

mark karpeles is being helpful within limits on https://www.reddit.com/r/mtgoxinsolvency/ right now. check him out - https://www.reddit.com/user/MagicalTux/

Yes indeed, i check when i have clean mind what they write and of course what Mark is writing.
I monitor also this topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=179586.6840 regarding Mtgox for news, his blog also and of course i wait for the March creditors meeting....i am sure am not the only one... i read on reedit that the "hack" happened from the hosting provider.... i will write some of my questions tomorrow hopping for answer Smiley

Good night bitcoin land!
HI-TEC99
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 2846



View Profile
February 24, 2017, 09:14:46 PM

Does anyone know how the COIN ETF shares would enter the market?  Is it basically just the Winklevoss twins that start of with all the shares who can then sell however much they want at whatever price and time they want?

Good question, I've been wondering the same thing along the lines of will the ETF offer shares in coins that the Winkies already own (not affecting the market) or will new coins be bought up quickly according to demand (cue market)?

Coindesk says the maximum offering price for each share has been lowered to $10, which suggests they will sell for whatever they can get for their shares, up to a maximum of $10 each.

http://www.coindesk.com/winklevoss-bitcoin-etf-100-million/

Quote
...the size of the offering has increased, from $65m to $100m, as well as a boost in the number of shares being offered, from 1m shares to 10m shares. The filing goes on to indicate that the maximum offering price per share has been lowered, from $65 down to just $10.
starmman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1029



View Profile
February 24, 2017, 09:25:57 PM

I doubt we get past $1500. $10k is another ball game. Not this time, and not in the long time ahead.

i didn't expect it to be where it is now so soon, and especially with so little hype or drama. that means there's a bunch more hysteria that can be stoked. i kinda hope it doesn't happen but there's a chance it might. $1500 is possible if the rest of the world gets excited.


So what is China doing now! Huh

the chinese market is not being permitted to function properly. it's essentially irrelevant. i hope it stays that way too.

I wasn't fully prepared for the rise either - but at least partially prepared - wonder how long the bull ride will continue and how sharp the inevitable bear will be afterwards...
arransiv
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 24, 2017, 09:44:18 PM

I doubt we get past $1500. $10k is another ball game. Not this time, and not in the long time ahead.

i didn't expect it to be where it is now so soon, and especially with so little hype or drama. that means there's a bunch more hysteria that can be stoked. i kinda hope it doesn't happen but there's a chance it might. $1500 is possible if the rest of the world gets excited.


So what is China doing now! Huh

the chinese market is not being permitted to function properly. it's essentially irrelevant. i hope it stays that way too.

Wth man!
It's getting worst now.


Is bitcoin choking now?
sunsilk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2954
Merit: 621



View Profile
February 24, 2017, 09:50:24 PM

I doubt we get past $1500. $10k is another ball game. Not this time, and not in the long time ahead.

i didn't expect it to be where it is now so soon, and especially with so little hype or drama. that means there's a bunch more hysteria that can be stoked. i kinda hope it doesn't happen but there's a chance it might. $1500 is possible if the rest of the world gets excited.


So what is China doing now! Huh

the chinese market is not being permitted to function properly. it's essentially irrelevant. i hope it stays that way too.

Wth man!
It's getting worst now.
-snip-

Is bitcoin choking now?

Chill man it will pumped again. It's normal with bitcoins getting ready for another price pump, ATH.

And besides it will only get worst when it is going to come back with $800-$900 mark but right now I saw it is stable on preev.

Only less than $3  Grin

Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 5079



View Profile
February 24, 2017, 10:18:59 PM

I think that if the COIN ETF does get approved, any price action leading up to it is kinda irrelevant. What would be more relevant and telling is where the price goes after that, and what it would be by the end of the year.
HI-TEC99
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2772
Merit: 2846



View Profile
February 24, 2017, 10:48:31 PM

I've been wondering the same thing along the lines of will the ETF offer shares in coins that the Winkies already own (not affecting the market) or will new coins be bought up quickly according to demand (cue market)?

I noticed bitcoinity showed itBit as the USD volume leader during the pump, although its dropped to third place now. Bitcoin.com claims itBit makes its OTC trades publicly view-able, so I suspect bitcoinity includes its OTC trades in the volume calculations.

Was the fact itBit suddenly took over as volume leader due to somebody buying OTC coins for the ETF?


https://news.bitcoin.com/itbit-tradeblock-blockchains-big-data/

Quote
ItBit’s collaboration with TradeBlock will enable its clientele and the public to view its Over The Counter trading data, which will give more perspective and resolution to the exchanges OTC transactions.


uki
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000


cryptojunk bag holder


View Profile
February 24, 2017, 11:33:06 PM

It only takes a trillion USD market cap for $50k bitcoin. There is a total of ~$25 trillion in USA IRA's. Is it that hard to imagine global speculative bubbles that touch but do not sustain $1 trillion market cap by 2025? 2020?

0.1% of USA IRA funds ($25 billion) into the ETF bring us over $2500/BTC, and that is ignoring speculative buying by people in the trenches (us!).

you're forgetting how meaningless market cap is compared to real money.

25 billion real dollars put into bitcoin would push the price far beyond $2500. right now you could probably reach that price on the exchanges by spending 50-100 million dollars in one shot.

and if sellers sniffed out that there was a buyer with money to burn they'd go on strike and push the price up even further.
Market cap notion used in Bitcoin (and altcoin) sphere is a pure nonsense. It is extremely misleading to multiply the current price by the number of coins, thinking (wishfully) that all of the coins can be, all of a sudden, sold at this price.
blockcha1n
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 185
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 24, 2017, 11:38:40 PM

I am not scared of sudden drop.
I don't hold very much so it doesn't affect me too much.
But alot of people here are betting their lives on the price going up.
Which is not an advisable thing to do.
cmacwiz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 704
Merit: 270


View Profile
February 24, 2017, 11:55:17 PM

It only takes a trillion USD market cap for $50k bitcoin. There is a total of ~$25 trillion in USA IRA's. Is it that hard to imagine global speculative bubbles that touch but do not sustain $1 trillion market cap by 2025? 2020?

0.1% of USA IRA funds ($25 billion) into the ETF bring us over $2500/BTC, and that is ignoring speculative buying by people in the trenches (us!).

you're forgetting how meaningless market cap is compared to real money.

25 billion real dollars put into bitcoin would push the price far beyond $2500. right now you could probably reach that price on the exchanges by spending 50-100 million dollars in one shot.

and if sellers sniffed out that there was a buyer with money to burn they'd go on strike and push the price up even further.
Market cap notion used in Bitcoin (and altcoin) sphere is a pure nonsense. It is extremely misleading to multiply the current price by the number of coins, thinking (wishfully) that all of the coins can be, all of a sudden, sold at this price.

Sure, but it seems less wishfully inaccurate and more conservatively inaccurate, no?

excuse my ignorance, I am not a market man!
European Central Bank
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087



View Profile
February 24, 2017, 11:58:04 PM

Market cap notion used in Bitcoin (and altcoin) sphere is a pure nonsense. It is extremely misleading to multiply the current price by the number of coins, thinking (wishfully) that all of the coins can be, all of a sudden, sold at this price.

i totally agree but it applies to all assets in principle - gold, stocks. they're gonna have more demand of course so will hold up better in a vast dump scenario.

the one that really pisses me off is when alts publicise a total amount of coins and the developer release a tiny fraction of them. suddenly your shitcoin with $1000 daily volume has a higher market cap than bitcoin.

BTCtrader71
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 24, 2017, 11:58:52 PM

It only takes a trillion USD market cap for $50k bitcoin. There is a total of ~$25 trillion in USA IRA's. Is it that hard to imagine global speculative bubbles that touch but do not sustain $1 trillion market cap by 2025? 2020?

0.1% of USA IRA funds ($25 billion) into the ETF bring us over $2500/BTC, and that is ignoring speculative buying by people in the trenches (us!).

you're forgetting how meaningless market cap is compared to real money.

25 billion real dollars put into bitcoin would push the price far beyond $2500. right now you could probably reach that price on the exchanges by spending 50-100 million dollars in one shot.

and if sellers sniffed out that there was a buyer with money to burn they'd go on strike and push the price up even further.
Market cap notion used in Bitcoin (and altcoin) sphere is a pure nonsense. It is extremely misleading to multiply the current price by the number of coins, thinking (wishfully) that all of the coins can be, all of a sudden, sold at this price.

There are two ways to think about the relationship between market cap and how much "real money" is invested into bitcoin.

1) short term. ECB is correct to point out that an injection of 25 billion dollars of "real money" would drive the price to the moon in the short term, due to liquidity issues.

2) long term. If you think in terms of steady state conditions, then cmacwiz's reasoning makes perfect sense.

sirazimuth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3402
Merit: 3518


born once atheist


View Profile
February 25, 2017, 12:00:09 AM

so what exactly is the new official ATH? as of right now 2/24/2017 at 6:55pm EST. I googled 1186 .  Did it not break 1200?

thank you gentlemen...
European Central Bank
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087



View Profile
February 25, 2017, 12:03:07 AM

so what exactly is the new official ATH? as of right now 2/24/2017 at 6:55pm EST. I googled 1186 .  Did it not break 1200?

thank you gentlemen...

over $1220 on bitfinex and bitstamp. i think bfx hit $1222.
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 5079



View Profile
February 25, 2017, 12:08:43 AM

Sheesh, no wonder electricity in China is cheap/essentially free:

http://www.businessinsider.com/china-solar-panels-from-space-photos-2017-2
Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520


Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206


View Profile WWW
February 25, 2017, 12:17:05 AM

so what exactly is the new official ATH? as of right now 2/24/2017 at 6:55pm EST. I googled 1186 .  Did it not break 1200?

thank you gentlemen...

over $1220 on bitfinex and bitstamp. i think bfx hit $1222.

the mt.gox ATH is already not broken.
Spaceman_Spiff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001


₪``Campaign Manager´´₪


View Profile
February 25, 2017, 12:24:12 AM

It only takes a trillion USD market cap for $50k bitcoin. There is a total of ~$25 trillion in USA IRA's. Is it that hard to imagine global speculative bubbles that touch but do not sustain $1 trillion market cap by 2025? 2020?

0.1% of USA IRA funds ($25 billion) into the ETF bring us over $2500/BTC, and that is ignoring speculative buying by people in the trenches (us!).

you're forgetting how meaningless market cap is compared to real money.

25 billion real dollars put into bitcoin would push the price far beyond $2500. right now you could probably reach that price on the exchanges by spending 50-100 million dollars in one shot.

and if sellers sniffed out that there was a buyer with money to burn they'd go on strike and push the price up even further.
Only short term, in the long run, I think market cap is a very useful measure (it might only take a small amount of money to push up a market cap by a big amount, but then you are counting on people not cashing out, which might not happen short term, but long term.... )
GreekGeek
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 577
Merit: 500


Jesus was a (Goddamn) hippy socialist


View Profile
February 25, 2017, 12:24:55 AM

how about that 1000 USD per BTC party guys?
when and where will it take place?
cmacwiz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 704
Merit: 270


View Profile
February 25, 2017, 12:27:12 AM

how about that 1000 USD per BTC party guys?
when and where will it take place?


Does anyone have a sailboat in SF bay? I am good crew!
BTCtrader71
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 25, 2017, 12:28:03 AM

It only takes a trillion USD market cap for $50k bitcoin. There is a total of ~$25 trillion in USA IRA's. Is it that hard to imagine global speculative bubbles that touch but do not sustain $1 trillion market cap by 2025? 2020?

0.1% of USA IRA funds ($25 billion) into the ETF bring us over $2500/BTC, and that is ignoring speculative buying by people in the trenches (us!).

you're forgetting how meaningless market cap is compared to real money.

25 billion real dollars put into bitcoin would push the price far beyond $2500. right now you could probably reach that price on the exchanges by spending 50-100 million dollars in one shot.

and if sellers sniffed out that there was a buyer with money to burn they'd go on strike and push the price up even further.
Only short term, in the long run, I think market cap is a very useful measure (it might only take a small amount of money to push up a market cap by a big amount, but then you are counting on people not cashing out, which might not happen short term, but long term.... )

haha we think alike:


There are two ways to think about the relationship between market cap and how much "real money" is invested into bitcoin.

1) short term. ECB is correct to point out that an injection of 25 billion dollars of "real money" would drive the price to the moon in the short term, due to liquidity issues.

2) long term. If you think in terms of steady state conditions, then cmacwiz's reasoning makes perfect sense.


Pages: « 1 ... 16353 16354 16355 16356 16357 16358 16359 16360 16361 16362 16363 16364 16365 16366 16367 16368 16369 16370 16371 16372 16373 16374 16375 16376 16377 16378 16379 16380 16381 16382 16383 16384 16385 16386 16387 16388 16389 16390 16391 16392 16393 16394 16395 16396 16397 16398 16399 16400 16401 16402 [16403] 16404 16405 16406 16407 16408 16409 16410 16411 16412 16413 16414 16415 16416 16417 16418 16419 16420 16421 16422 16423 16424 16425 16426 16427 16428 16429 16430 16431 16432 16433 16434 16435 16436 16437 16438 16439 16440 16441 16442 16443 16444 16445 16446 16447 16448 16449 16450 16451 16452 16453 ... 33470 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!