ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 05:02:43 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
yolalanda
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 05:05:20 PM |
|
Can we stop it with the bickering and try to keep the price above 250? Stay focused, everyone, the price ain't gonna sustain itself.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3836
Merit: 10793
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 05:08:02 PM |
|
my numbers are mainly based on ta. I believe that the scaleability problem can be solved and that the final auction won't effect the price much because it's the final one, ...no more easy bulk deals after it. these are the lines I am watching since a while and why i said 250 was obvious. I think 260+ would be another signal that we have left the bear market and I would expect 340 as new target with a chance of a real rally. Then its time to get excited. The other scenario is that we go back down the yellow line for some time, prolly again to 220 or 208 massive support https://www.tradingview.com/x/DtIPkXLg/[/img] Referring to the part of your statement that I have bolded above. Even though this is the final auction of this particular series of ceased coins, I would NOT put it past the Feds and/or other Governments from time to time come across BTC and/or other crypto assets in large quantities and to have similar future auctions.
|
|
|
|
oda.krell
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 05:09:38 PM |
|
Unloading of the blockchain for txs that don't need to be persisted forever in the main blockchain. Helping scalability. Which seems to be a bit of a deal these days (more because of fabricated crises than reality, but it's the way it is). Improvements are always welcome to me.
Agreed, and bit of a miscommunication I suppose: "big deal?" as in "what's the panic about?" The XT narrative is that we are about to collapse because of capacity problems. This undermines that fabricated crisis narrative. This is why you'll see an incredibly negative reception of this development in the XT sub and by the XT brigade. Well, since I'm mostly on the sideline of the XT issue (because I don't consider max block a significant enough economic factor), I'll add that the protocol literalists have spun a respectable number of fabricated crisis narratives themselves (uncontrollable spam, lack of LT mining reward, etc.). IMO, it replaces one potential pitfall (mostly technical) with another one (mostly psychological): turning the Blockchain into a pure high-stake clearing network before it had a chance to establish itself as a useful, reliable tool for smaller transactions is not without risk either.
|
|
|
|
muyuu
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 05:15:37 PM |
|
Well, since I'm mostly on the sideline of the XT issue (because I don't consider max block a significant enough economic factor), I'll add that the protocol literalists have spun a respectable number of fabricated crisis narratives themselves (uncontrollable spam, lack of LT mining reward, etc.). IMO, it replaces one potential pitfall (mostly technical) with another one (mostly psychological): turning the Blockchain into a pure high-stake clearing network before it had a chance to establish itself as a useful, reliable tool for smaller transactions is not without risk either.
For the spam justification of the limit you have to ask Satoshi. Spam attacks have also been proven a very real threat. Okrent's law: "The pursuit of balance can create imbalance because sometimes something is true" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_to_moderation
|
|
|
|
Wings1987
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 05:18:25 PM |
|
my numbers are mainly based on ta. I believe that the scaleability problem can be solved and that the final auction won't effect the price much because it's the final one, ...no more easy bulk deals after it. these are the lines I am watching since a while and why i said 250 was obvious. I think 260+ would be another signal that we have left the bear market and I would expect 340 as new target with a chance of a real rally. Then its time to get excited. The other scenario is that we go back down the yellow line for some time, prolly again to 220 or 208 massive support https://www.tradingview.com/x/DtIPkXLg/[/img] Referring to the part of your statement that I have bolded above. Even though this is the final auction of this particular series of ceased coins, I would NOT put it past the Feds and/or other Governments from time to time come across BTC and/or other crypto assets in large quantities and to have similar future auctions. I am sure this is a possibility but any seizures in the future would likely result in auctions a few years down the road right. Doesn't it take that long for the process to play out?
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 05:23:53 PM |
|
Turning the Blockchain into a pure high-stake clearing network before it had a chance to establish itself as a useful, reliable tool for smaller transactions is not without risk either.
The XT approach was pretty odious but no more odious than the twitching whack jobs who believe the planetary population will skip Christmas so they can afford those gorgeous Bitcoin transaction fees.
|
|
|
|
oda.krell
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 05:25:36 PM |
|
Well, since I'm mostly on the sideline of the XT issue (because I don't consider max block a significant enough economic factor), I'll add that the protocol literalists have spun a respectable number of fabricated crisis narratives themselves (uncontrollable spam, lack of LT mining reward, etc.). IMO, it replaces one potential pitfall (mostly technical) with another one (mostly psychological): turning the Blockchain into a pure high-stake clearing network before it had a chance to establish itself as a useful, reliable tool for smaller transactions is not without risk either.
For the spam justification of the limit you have to ask Satoshi. Spam attacks have also been proven a very real threat. Okrent's law: "The pursuit of balance can create imbalance because sometimes something is true" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_to_moderationOn 1: Wouldn't refer to him. Remember: "if (blocknumber > 115000) maxblocksize = largerlimit"? On 2: As is the lack of confidence when (not if) we hit a proper, non-artificial bottleneck. Think I'll stay with the moderate position, thanks.
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 05:26:05 PM |
|
He is clearly not displaying panic. That's why I provided the context, so you can make your own mind on the subject. For me, that is panic together with this: What was expected or hoped for in both camps was a decentralized distributed sidechain solution. It has lately become clear that BS was working on a ripple-like private blockchain instead, and now it's been confirmed. I see disappointment more than anything else. On both sides of the debate. If anything, some on the XT-side might think this strengthens their case, but I think it just adds confusion.
|
|
|
|
oda.krell
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 05:27:40 PM |
|
Turning the Blockchain into a pure high-stake clearing network before it had a chance to establish itself as a useful, reliable tool for smaller transactions is not without risk either.
The XT approach was pretty odious but no more odious than the twitching whack jobs who believe the planetary population will skip Christmas so they can afford those gorgeous Bitcoin transaction fees. You put into few hilarious words what I think and express clumsily and convolutedly. /reacharound
|
|
|
|
tarmi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1010
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 05:52:08 PM |
|
do you remember the story about that stupid and dead whale that sold 30 k @ 300 $?
lel
these days the entire bitstamp's bid side is like 5k.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1801
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 06:03:13 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
yolalanda
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 06:03:40 PM |
|
do you remember that story about that stupid and dead whale that sold 30 k @ 300 $?
lel
these days the entire bitstamp's bid side is like 5k.
You mean when we snapped up his cheap coinz & laughed at the cl00less n00b for making $9 mil? Too painful for me to think about.
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 06:04:52 PM |
|
do you remember the story about that stupid and dead whale that sold 30 k @ 300 $?
lel
these days the entire bitstamp's bid side is like 5k.
That was an attempt by an early adopter to create a false bottom. It didn't work.
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 06:09:44 PM |
|
That was an attempt by an early adopter to create a false bottom. It didn't work.
Or it might have been a panicking/bored tweenie doing a final runner. Either way 9 mil buys a lengthy holiday from staring at charts and bids.
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 06:11:08 PM |
|
That was an attempt by an early adopter to create a false bottom. It didn't work.
Or it might have been a panicking/bored tweenie doing a final runner. Either way 9 mil buys a lengthy holiday from staring at charts and bids. I don't feel sorry for him/her either way.
|
|
|
|
muyuu
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 06:13:35 PM |
|
Well, since I'm mostly on the sideline of the XT issue (because I don't consider max block a significant enough economic factor), I'll add that the protocol literalists have spun a respectable number of fabricated crisis narratives themselves (uncontrollable spam, lack of LT mining reward, etc.). IMO, it replaces one potential pitfall (mostly technical) with another one (mostly psychological): turning the Blockchain into a pure high-stake clearing network before it had a chance to establish itself as a useful, reliable tool for smaller transactions is not without risk either.
For the spam justification of the limit you have to ask Satoshi. Spam attacks have also been proven a very real threat. Okrent's law: "The pursuit of balance can create imbalance because sometimes something is true" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_to_moderationOn 1: Wouldn't refer to him. Remember: "if (blocknumber > 115000) maxblocksize = largerlimit"? On 2: As is the lack of confidence when (not if) we hit a proper, non-artificial bottleneck. Think I'll stay with the moderate position, thanks. There is nothing radical in not supporting XT. Being on the fence as in "half adopting" XT is simply a disingenuous stance. Sort of like the "atheism is a religion" argument. Or being on the fence about the Pol Pot genocide because opposing all murders is radical, "let's compromise and murder just half of the opposition and their families".
|
|
|
|
S3052
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 06:20:21 PM |
|
Nice rally guys. Was kind is evident that it breaks out :-)
|
|
|
|
Patel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1321
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 06:30:10 PM |
|
Slow and steady rallies are the best ones
|
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3668
Merit: 5233
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 06:35:12 PM |
|
Ah yes, the ol' familiar fake price pegging of $249.999999999999999 Seems legit (And they say the American whales aren't in control of the price, yeah right)
|
|
|
|
|