Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[suda123]

Coke and Pepsi both provide rehydration and a sugar boost in pretty much identical quantities. The only difference between them is a slight flavor difference. IOW, they fulfill exactly the same use cases.

Pepsi has considerably more sugar, coke is far more acidic.  Both dehydrate you.

Coke is far more effective if you want to dissolve iron, so they do not similar for some use cases.

wow interesting, I always wondered why im thirsty as fuck when I drink pepsi or coke

[fisheater22]

If we're happy about today's # of uses, users, and transactions... 1.75MB equiv will be plenty.

When all of the world's wealth is stored in bitcoin (sometime in 2017), fewer users = richer users. That's the third law of thermodynamics.

 Lambie, in this iteration of your shell, you seem to be such a passive aggressive kind of FUD spreading troller, who still seems to be quite detached from reality in your exaggerated ways to make negative points regarding bitcoin.

Even though bitcoin enthusiasts are expecting grandios networking possibilities with bitcoin, which ultimately causes exponential growth (and price appreciation), there is almost no way that bitcoin could subsume or absorb any majority proportion of the world's wealth, even in the the next 5-10 years, and even in the best case scenarios for bitcoin.

If Bitcoin were to subsume, even 1% to 5% of various wealth storage and/or payment systems in the next 3-5 years, that would result in bitcoins valued over a million dollars per BTC.. so your exaggeration of 2017 seems out of this world in its level of preposterousness and trying to suggest that any bitcoin bull would believe such fantasies.

TL;DR? (What I mean is make it longer, blander, with more words, so I'd feel totally used if tricked into reading.)
ty

@notme: not true re. dehydration. Also not iron, rust (FeO), and even that shittily.

[JayJuanGee]

If we're happy about today's # of uses, users, and transactions... 1.75MB equiv will be plenty.

When all of the world's wealth is stored in bitcoin (sometime in 2017), fewer users = richer users. That's the third law of thermodynamics.

 Lambie, in this iteration of your shell, you seem to be such a passive aggressive kind of FUD spreading troller, who still seems to be quite detached from reality in your exaggerated ways to make negative points regarding bitcoin.

Even though bitcoin enthusiasts are expecting grandios networking possibilities with bitcoin, which ultimately causes exponential growth (and price appreciation), there is almost no way that bitcoin could subsume or absorb any majority proportion of the world's wealth, even in the the next 5-10 years, and even in the best case scenarios for bitcoin.

If Bitcoin were to subsume, even 1% to 5% of various wealth storage and/or payment systems in the next 3-5 years, that would result in bitcoins valued over a million dollars per BTC.. so your exaggeration of 2017 seems out of this world in its level of preposterousness and trying to suggest that any bitcoin bull would believe such fantasies.

TL;DR? (What I mean is make it longer, blander, with more words, so I'd feel totally used if tricked into reading.)
ty

@notme: not true re. dehydration. Also not iron, rust (FeO2), and even that shittily.

TL; DR:  You are a fucking idiot if you have concluded that 3 short paragraphs is too long for you to read/comprehend.

[fisheater22]

...
TL; DR:  You are a fucking idiot if you have concluded that 3 short paragraphs is too long for you to read/comprehend.

See, you're finally learning to condense your thoughts.
You have nothing to say, so 3 short paragraphs is 3 short paragraphs too long

[JayJuanGee]

...
TL; DR:  You are a fucking idiot if you have concluded that 3 short paragraphs is too long for you to read/comprehend.

See, you're finally learning to condense your thoughts.
You have nothing to say, so 3 short paragraphs is 3 short paragraphs too long

Yes, you still avoided engaging with any substance of my earlier response, and resort to lame attempts at personal attacks, which seems to indicate that you really don't know much of anything in regards to your bitcoin-related commentary (to the extent that any of your previous comments could arguably be categorized as "bitcoin-related")   

[Oblodo]

Aaaargh , I am all for a rocket to the moon, but not today. Please drop at least $100 before midnight CET. I have to pay tax on the value of my BTC based on what they are worth in my currency at midnight today. I know I am getting audited this spring because of the BTC I own, so please drop.

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[YourMother]

Coke and Pepsi both provide rehydration and a sugar boost in pretty much identical quantities. The only difference between them is a slight flavor difference. IOW, they fulfill exactly the same use cases.

https://youtu.be/dBnniua6-oM?t=790

[fallinglantern]

https://youtu.be/dBnniua6-oM?t=790

Shockingly enough, not a troll and I 100% agree with you.

[ssmc2]

Aaaargh , I am all for a rocket to the moon, but not today. Please drop at least $100 before midnight CET. I have to pay tax on the value of my BTC based on what they are worth in my currency at midnight today. I know I am getting audited this spring because of the BTC I own, so please drop.

Jesus, where do you live? That sucks

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

Mars is the only known planet (so far) inhabited solely by robots. Why would a robot, an 8-foot-tall robot, want to live on Mars, with a bunch of robots? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with the blocksize debate? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with the blocksize debate! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a blind mayor defending the rights of a robot, and I'm talkin' about Bitcoin! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed thread, it does not make sense! If robots live on Mars, Happy New Year!!!

[sAt0sHiFanClub]

7 mins to 2016 (GMT anyway) Champagne at the ready...

Happy new year to all, may 2016 be a prosperous one for you.

[Fatman3001]

Happy New Year!!!

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[soullyG]

Happy New Year!

[Arcteryx]

break that barrier then it will be a happy one indeed for me 

Anyhow,
happy one to the ones who are celebrating, am not there yet as I am on the dark side of the moon in Yukon 

[jbreher]

I provided an explanation, not a definition.

You can't examine people's intentions because, in a sense, that's the core of the issue here. Does the person initiating the transaction actually want to send money, or does he want to spam the blockchain? How the hell can I know that?

Thank you. Exactly.

If there is no observable objective criteria for discriminating between 'legit transactions' and 'bogus transactions', then it is absolutely meaningless to speak of encoding a mechanism in the protocol for rejecting 'bogus transactions'.

[rjclarke2000]

Just a heads up but Bitcoin is still 430ish as it turns 2016. I'm in the UK (so basically the future)


Just letting you Americans know.

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

break that barrier then it will be a happy one indeed for me 

Anyhow,
happy one to the ones who are celebrating, am not there yet as I am on the dark side of the moon in Yukon 

Inference to the best explanation: You must be terribly cold.