hodl_2015
Member

Offline
Activity: 371
Merit: 57
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 11:17:36 AM |
|
tldr 5 million BTC did not move. Someone with 10k BTC moved it 500 times.
That sounds like a fun afternoon.  Try that with dollars :-) a) getting the transfer processed 500 times in one afternoonen, and b) have anything left to transfer after 499x transaction costs.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4200
Merit: 12848
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 11:29:07 AM |
|
tldr 5 million BTC did not move. Someone with 10k BTC moved it 500 times.
That sounds like a fun afternoon.  Try that with dollars :-) a) getting the transfer processed 500 times in one afternoonen, and b) have anything left to transfer after 499x transaction costs. Yeah. The total fees for that block was less than .6 btc.
|
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 11:35:00 AM |
|
tldr 5 million BTC did not move. Someone with 10k BTC moved it 500 times.
That sounds like a fun afternoon.  Somebody heard the first move here: http://www.bitlisten.com/Probably scared the hell out of him. try instrument Planet (with Dope) or Wikki (with Alcohol)! 
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 11:41:46 AM |
|
tldr 5 million BTC did not move. Someone with 10k BTC moved it 500 times.
That sounds like a fun afternoon.  Somebody heard the first move here: http://www.bitlisten.com/Probably scared the hell out of him. try instrument Planet (with Dope) or Wikki (with Alcohol)!  Naw, I got a bad batch of mud once. Nearly cost me my arm. Never again.
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 11:49:26 AM |
|
tldr 5 million BTC did not move. Someone with 10k BTC moved it 500 times.
Seems like high volume spam. Instead of spamming the blockchain with dust, now we have XXXX btc moving back and forth, for the lolz, also creating meaningless "output" spikes. In the meantime: (cointape.com) The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 30 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top. For the median transaction size of 369 bytes, this results in a fee of 11,070 satoshis (=0.04$ USD for first block inclusion).And that with the mempool having a 43 mb backlog. Obviously those moving coins for the lolz to say "ohhh the blocks are full", "the mempool is full", aren't in any rush to pay - they are just clogging the system with spam as cheaply as they can get away with it.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 12:01:31 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 12:07:57 PM |
|
tldr 5 million BTC did not move. Someone with 10k BTC moved it 500 times.
Seems like high volume spam. Instead of spamming the blockchain with dust, now we have XXXX btc moving back and forth, for the lolz, also creating meaningless "output" spikes. In the meantime: (cointape.com) The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 30 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top. For the median transaction size of 369 bytes, this results in a fee of 11,070 satoshis (=0.04$ USD for first block inclusion).And that with the mempool having a 43 mb backlog. Obviously those moving coins for the lolz to say "ohhh the blocks are full", "the mempool is full", aren't in any rush to pay - they are just clogging the system with spam as cheaply as they can get away with it. Yeah, looks like we need to increase block size limit.
|
|
|
|
roslinpl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1199
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 12:11:50 PM |
|
And another exciting weekend for the Price Movement Watchers  My predictions for the upcoming week is: BTC/USD $420 before the Friday. Still I'm wondering when we will hit the another price record ... Maybe it's a time to make a new poll with a question "When BTC/USD will set the new world record?"  Have a great Sunday, best regards.
|
|
|
|
sAt0sHiFanClub
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 12:26:53 PM |
|
tldr 5 million BTC did not move. Someone with 10k BTC moved it 500 times.
Seems like high volume spam. Instead of spamming the blockchain with dust, now we have XXXX btc moving back and forth, for the lolz, also creating meaningless "output" spikes. In the meantime: (cointape.com) The fastest and cheapest transaction fee is currently 30 satoshis/byte, shown in green at the top. For the median transaction size of 369 bytes, this results in a fee of 11,070 satoshis (=0.04$ USD for first block inclusion).And that with the mempool having a 43 mb backlog. Obviously those moving coins for the lolz to say "ohhh the blocks are full", "the mempool is full", aren't in any rush to pay - they are just clogging the system with spam as cheaply as they can get away with it. Yeah, looks like we need to increase block size limit. Indeed, I was wavering for a while (  ) but AlexGR has convinced me of the need for bigger blocks. well played, Son.
|
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 12:35:28 PM |
|
If anything, it shows most of the transactions are bogus, conducted just to bloat the blockchain or be used as a "factoid" that "ohhh blocks are full, the mempool is full" bullshit propaganda.
You can make a quantity analysis or a quality analysis.
The quality analysis of the txs is very revealing of what is going on right now. The costs involved to process txs are extremely low at 4 cents for first block inclusion and yet floods of transactions that aren't seemingly in any hurry, are queued up to be processed for zero / near-zero cost. Why?
|
|
|
|
CuntChocula
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 12:38:12 PM |
|
+1 AlexGR! That totally wasn't legitimate mixing/money laundering, simple spam. As are all transactions, when you think about it. A bunch of antisocial manchildren playing with their WoW gold. If they seriously needed to move money, they would've used CC, or mailed a paper check.
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 12:51:42 PM |
|
If anything, it shows most of the transactions are bogus, conducted just to bloat the blockchain or be used as a "factoid" that "ohhh blocks are full, the mempool is full" bullshit propaganda.
You can make a quantity analysis or a quality analysis.
The quality analysis of the txs is very revealing of what is going on right now. The costs involved to process txs are extremely low at 4 cents for first block inclusion and yet floods of transactions that aren't seemingly in any hurry, are queued up to be processed for zero / near-zero cost. Why?
Bitcoin Magazine on Wences Casares: "The Argentinian-born entrepreneur has been able to create one of the most well-capitalized companies in the space, and he was able to mystify the likes of Dick Costolo, Marc Andreessen, Reid Hoffman and other Silicon Valley giants by transferring roughly $250,000 worth of bitcoin between multiple smartphones within a matter of minutes. "That was back when Bitcoin was worth a fraction of what it's worth now. How do you think that party trick looks like today? Do you think it's of no value?
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 01:01:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
sAt0sHiFanClub
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 01:39:17 PM |
|
meh. He is again describing segwit as a scaling solution, when that was never the intention. To rely on a latent side effect as the primary reason to implement it so quickly is simply poor engineering practice. Also, his space saving projections are optimistic.
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 01:43:54 PM |
|
If today's daily candle stays green, it will be the first time this year that we have 2 consecutive up days.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 02:01:32 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
bargainbin
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 02:25:45 PM |
|
meh. He is again describing segwit as a scaling solution, when that was never the intention. To rely on a latent side effect as the primary reason to implement it so quickly is simply poor engineering practice. Also, his space saving projections are optimistic. Streaming to >50 people is an engineering problem too. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/42bdwm/consensus_round_table_meeting_in_miami_going_on/cz962q7 (open the collapsed comment for extra lel) luke-jrLuke Dashjr - Bitcoin Expert: It won't let me without giving Google my phone number... Other guy: Is there something stopping you from registering a google voice number and then giving it to them? luke-jrLuke Dashjr - Bitcoin Expert: Dunno, sounds like a lot of steps/time that would distract me from the actual topic. TL;DR: Expert fails, but not after trying to break TOS & h4xx0r all things.
|
|
|
|
designerusa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1028
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 02:33:44 PM |
|
do you think may the bitcoin prices go up again like today ? i bought little bitcoin but prices start to drop again. i am nervous.. what are your predictions ?
|
|
|
|
molecular
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1023
|
 |
January 24, 2016, 02:36:54 PM |
|
do you think may the bitcoin prices go up again like today ? i bought little bitcoin but prices start to drop again. i am nervous.. what are your predictions ?
maybe you invested too much? If you're getting nervous about every little price swing, what will you do when bitcoin goes -30% or +50% like it will surely do again some time in the future? Panic? Act on emotion? make a plan (something like dollar cost averaging every week) and stick to it! Don't invest what you can't afford to lose. If you don't have enough money: try to earn more and cut expenses. Also cut expenses. EDIT: oh and my personal favorite: whatever you do, don't ever commit all available funds/resources. Always leave some room for the possibility of a bad decision. (I will never understand people who go "all in", or "fully out")
|
|
|
|
|