Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[adamstgBit]

kinda feels like the next 24 hours are citiral

[Gyrsur]

kinda feels like the next 24 hours are citiral

next two weeks^TM are critical!

[Elwar]

I see a trend here.

Price starts going up:
"Woo hoo! Moon gifs!"

Price starts to fall:
"Hi I'm a blocksizetard, here is my opinion on development issues"

[bargainbin]

Thank you Adam, you're the first Classic/2MB shill who has been polite enough to ask. Please leave.

Carlton, where have you been? Your direct approach was missing in some of these discussions (for a while).
Anyhow, you do make a point. The majority of the users do not like the people supporting controversial hard forks in addition to all of them being moved to the altcoin section. Things would be much more simpler if people like Veritas, Adam, etc. just left. Forums have been created to suit the needs of the people supporting such forks, they might as well use them.

Right on! We never liked him anyhow.

Bitcoin needs to shrink!

[PoolMinor]

Full astern!

Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

 

[blunderer]

...
Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

0hai. That entity "accumulat[ed] all in one go"? Wonder if it knows how stupid "accumulating all in one go" in an illiquid market is?

[PoolMinor]

...
Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

0hai. That entity "accumulat[ed] all in one go"? Wonder if it knows how stupid "accumulating all in one go" in an illiquid market is?

Think past the obvious.......Now that your head is clear, formulate a query that actually shows you took some time to think....

[marcus_of_augustus]

I see a trend here.

Price starts going up:
"Woo hoo! Moon gifs!"

Price starts to fall:
"Hi I'm a blocksizetard, here is my opinion on development issues"

... you forgot the sad ether-pumpers who crawl out when it goes down too.

[inca]

... you forgot the sad ether-pumpers who crawl out when it goes down too.

Because seeing the price rise from a single large order somehow confirms your point of view on the matter.

Hopefully we break upwards out of this enormous flag.

[blunderer]

...
Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

0hai. That entity "accumulat[ed] all in one go"? Wonder if it knows how stupid "accumulating all in one go" in an illiquid market is?

Think past the obvious.......Now that your head is clear, formulate a query that actually shows you took some time to think....

Sry. Didn't mean to spoil your "one or more entities ... accumulating all in one go" fantasy. Of course they're accumulating, Sweetness!  They want your Beanies so hard, why, they don't even care about slippage

[PoolMinor]

Sry. Didn't mean to spoil your "one or more entities ... accumulating all in one go" fantasy. Of course they're accumulating, Sweetness!  They want your Beanies so hard, why, they don't even care about slippage

Still showing your less than stellar brain capacity and leading with your ignorance. You still haven't discovered the underlying theme behind such a purposeful buy. But you should probably go back to your other threads you seem to mindlessly attack.

[blunderer]

... You still haven't discovered the underlying theme behind such a purposeful buy. ...

... they were [totally] not pumping the price [I'm super srs!]

[JayJuanGee]

Full astern!

Captain Obvious here again:
The price increase was due to one or more entities simply purchasing BTC, they were not pumping the price as we normally see, they were accumulating all in one go; The reason the price faltered afterward.

  

Yeah, right.... That's great logic, and this one entity chose to make such a purchase during a very low volume time in order that they wouldn't have to pay the same price for every single coin.  



Edit:  Looks like Blunderer beat me to the punch on this theme..... funny that I may have been reading this thread so long that I am beginning to parrot some of the ideas of Lambie...   

[marcus_of_augustus]

I notice that the trolls never ever once mention the halving ... or anything else positive, wonder why that is? 

[Chef Ramsay]

Sry. Didn't mean to spoil your "one or more entities ... accumulating all in one go" fantasy. Of course they're accumulating, Sweetness!  They want your Beanies so hard, why, they don't even care about slippage

Still showing your less than stellar brain capacity and leading with your ignorance. You still haven't discovered the underlying theme behind such a purposeful buy. But you should probably go back to your other threads you seem to mindlessly attack.

And the dozen or more threads she OP'd the last 7ish days that were pure Fart, I mean FUD, that got axed by mods for the degenerative content (or the same spiel each time) and laid to rest. When you post to get that many threads over time, deleted, you know you must have a life full of shit. Time to get a life you would think.

[USB-S]

Sry. Didn't mean to spoil your "one or more entities ... accumulating all in one go" fantasy. Of course they're accumulating, Sweetness!  They want your Beanies so hard, why, they don't even care about slippage

Still showing your less than stellar brain capacity and leading with your ignorance. You still haven't discovered the underlying theme behind such a purposeful buy. But you should probably go back to your other threads you seem to mindlessly attack.

And the dozen or more threads she OP'd the last 7ish days that were pure Fart, I mean FUD, that got axed by mods for the degenerative content (or the same spiel each time) and laid to rest. When you post to get that many threads over time, deleted, you know you must have a life full of shit. Time to get a life you would think.

Stop picking on my favorite fudder! His soul may be full of fud but his heart is in the right place, besides bitcoin needs some fud, else everyone would be hodling and price would skyrocket. But then again, I'm no expert on this.

[yefi]

I see a trend here.

Price starts going up:
"Woo hoo! Moon gifs!"

Price starts to fall:
"Hi I'm a blocksizetard, here is my opinion on development issues"

lol, I think you have this thread cracked

[PoolMinor]

Off-Topic but what isn't

[jbreher]

adam, do u have 1G to the desktop ?? in other words, what cat cable are you using ?? are you using cat5 or cat6 cabling throughout your home network ?? do you have 1G ports on your internet modem and your router and switches and pc ??

the tcp window only means how big of a tcp block you are transmitting. in my case for jumbo frames, i am moving a 9014 tcp block rather than a 1500 tcp block

Yeah - about that -

What makes it funny is that the frame size you're talking about is completely unrelated to the TCP window size. Jumbo frames are an Ethernet concept. You're talking about the Ethernet MTU - a lower layer altogether. Has absolutely nothing to do with the TCP window size (which is also not the same as the TCP segment size).

BTW, I ain't Adam, but: Yes, mix of 5e and 6, Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes.

And ookla tells me I get 850 Mbps down and 950 Mbps up.

Not that that has anything to do with current Bitcoin limits.

[deadpoolx]

Most votes pointing price > 440 (April 1st), that's optimism.