Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 12:37:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 [918] 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 ... 33373 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26387786 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
phoenix1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 23, 2013, 07:19:38 PM
 #18341

Testing LTC in the new trading engine  Tongue

No, I expect that would look more like this

klee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 23, 2013, 07:25:48 PM
 #18342

Testing LTC in the new trading engine  Tongue

No, I expect that would look more like this


Fox trap!!!
Dalib
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 101


A Top Web 3 Gaming Layer2 Provider


View Profile
June 23, 2013, 07:26:10 PM
 #18343

This time it's probably not the next "victim of their success"  Wink
phoenix1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 23, 2013, 07:27:32 PM
 #18344

I stand corrected ... here is the first trial of the new smokin' fast trading engine ...



Apparently it did not end well for the snail  Cry
mmitech
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001


things you own end up owning you


View Profile
June 23, 2013, 07:35:30 PM
 #18345


The blockchain size limit is perhaps one of the biggest question/problem in the development right now,
but it seems to be going in the "unlimited" direction.

But this problem is not solved yet.

And right now we are not hitting the hard limit.

When/if we hit it, it will influence the transaction fees.
They will have to go up quite a bit for the "off chain transactions" to be interesting.


And maybe they will solve it by promoting LTC for small transactions.
Or Feathercoin, or Blightcoin, or any other coin.

This is assuming that nothing more elegant than another blockchain can be used for the "off chain transactions" scheme.

Right now small BTC transactions are limited by amount, because of this problem.

No. That's not even related.
The minimum limit is to -temporarily- protect the blockchain from being bloated with unspendable transactions while the developers are working towards a more market-driven solution.


And because Litecoin is a copy of Bitcoin... how are these same problems dealt with?


I respect your point of view, but I think you can hear what I will say here, Bitcoin is the First, biggest and the most secure and successful Crypto, and may be this will be for a long time, but thinking that it will be the only Crypto and payment system is only ignorant. and pretending that some cryptos doesn't bring any innovation is also ignorant,we all know that almost all cryptos are copied of the source of BTC with some editing, sometimes is just the name, but trying to convince people and your self that LTC is nothing special is just wrong.

In fact do you really think that BTC will be the leader for the next lets say 20 years ? with its technology  (SHA256) , have you ever thought about it, in some point SHA256 will be old as my MMX processor or your Pentium 1, just to remind you I still remember using my Pentium 1 and my windows 3.11 like it was yesterday.

BTC is just the opening of a new technology, culture, a free world, it is like the first car ever made or the first plane ever made, we have choices, it is all about choices.

 what do you think it is better for you? if I am buying a car and decided for a brand X lets say Mercedes, this doesn't mean BMW is worthless, they do the same job but they deffer in some specification which leaded me to make my decision.

LTC do the same thing that BTC does, the fast transactions and the encryption make it referent, whether you like it or not, LTC is here to survive and to be used widely the same as BTC .

and one day all this coins (and add to them all the crap coins) will be gone and replaced with something better, and you will be stuck with holding your BTC.

you know what you sound the same as my boss, he fears change, each time we want to change or upgrade a server or software he gives us the what this can do that what we have cant do . but he gives up at the end.        
klee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 23, 2013, 07:37:53 PM
 #18346

How many lives does MtGox have?


Frozenlock
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 23, 2013, 07:49:49 PM
 #18347

I respect your point of view, (...) is only ignorant. (...) is also ignorant,(...) is just wrong.

(...)
you know what you sound the same as my boss, he fears change, each time we want to change or upgrade a server or software he gives us the what this can do that what we have cant do . but he gives up at the end.        

 Roll Eyes

In fact do you really think that BTC will be the leader for the next lets say 20 years ? with its technology  (SHA256) , have you ever thought about it, in some point SHA256 will be old as my MMX processor or your Pentium 1, just to remind you I still remember using my Pentium 1 and my windows 3.11 like it was yesterday.

I also remember how I used the Internet Protocol. Damn this thing is old. Good thing we got rid of it and...
Oh, wait...

You know there's nothing preventing us from changing the proof of work, right?
fr33d0miz3r
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 23, 2013, 07:54:00 PM
 #18348

I also remember how I used the Internet Protocol. Damn this thing is old. Good thing we got rid of it and...

But the first mass computer networks and protocols were older than the Internet. For example, FidoNet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FidoNet).
What if Bitcoin is a FidoNet of cryptocurrencies? Who knows. Time will tell.
mmitech
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001


things you own end up owning you


View Profile
June 23, 2013, 07:55:41 PM
 #18349

I respect your point of view, (...) is only ignorant. (...) is also ignorant,(...) is just wrong.

(...)
you know what you sound the same as my boss, he fears change, each time we want to change or upgrade a server or software he gives us the what this can do that what we have cant do . but he gives up at the end.        

 Roll Eyes

In fact do you really think that BTC will be the leader for the next lets say 20 years ? with its technology  (SHA256) , have you ever thought about it, in some point SHA256 will be old as my MMX processor or your Pentium 1, just to remind you I still remember using my Pentium 1 and my windows 3.11 like it was yesterday.

I also remember how I used the Internet Protocol. Damn this thing is old. Good thing we got rid of it and...
Oh, wait...

You know there's nothing preventing us from changing the proof of work, right?

to what ?  scrypt ?  Wink  LTC already use that tech  Wink

and yes I do respect your point. in fact when i say you are ignorant, this means that there is some facts you should consider but most likely you are ignoring for some reason.

PS: I loved my MMX it was a top that time same as BTC now  Wink

Edit : about internet, if you were an IT engineer you should know that the internet was first used in US army I think around 195x it never used the "todays protocol", and there was a massive improvments all the time , (check the 195x because i am not sure about it but it should be close)
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1778


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
June 23, 2013, 08:00:26 PM
 #18350

fr33d0miz3r
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 23, 2013, 08:01:04 PM
 #18351

Meanwhile @ MtGox:

Frozenlock
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 23, 2013, 08:06:34 PM
 #18352

to what ?  scrypt ?  Wink  LTC already use that tech  Wink

If for some reason that's what needed, sure, why not?

In some sense that would be funny; I can already imagine the Litecoiners saying
"But, but, we had it first! Don't upgrade... just come to us!"

and yes I do respect your point. in fact when i say you are ignorant, this means that there is some facts you should consider but most likely you are ignoring for some reason.

You guys...
I'm the one who's been schooling you on the blockchain.
Frozenlock
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 23, 2013, 08:09:08 PM
 #18353

I also remember how I used the Internet Protocol. Damn this thing is old. Good thing we got rid of it and...

But the first mass computer networks and protocols were older than the Internet. For example, FidoNet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FidoNet).
What if Bitcoin is a FidoNet of cryptocurrencies? Who knows. Time will tell.

Sure, and before Ethernet there was other competing network communication architectures, such as token passing.

What you're saying is true, but doesn't help Litecoin in any way: it's basically the same thing!

It's like saying "The internal combustion engine won't be here forever... you should drop your Nissan and take a Ford instead!"
fr33d0miz3r
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 23, 2013, 08:11:26 PM
 #18354

In some sense that would be funny; I can already imagine the Litecoiners saying
"But, but, we had it first! Don't upgrade... just come to us!"


Competition between projects is always good. Maybe, Litecoin developers will make something excellent with LTC tomorrow, who knows?
It's like a competition between Apple & Microsoft.

We don't need ONE project with ONE group of developers. We need at least 3 or 4 big competitive projects (maybe some of them will be forks) for real growing, mass adoption and building the new effective ecomony (not only speculation).

And, of course, we need more different cryptoprojects in the future. But the fact is that today LTC is growing and intending to be adopted by MtGox and then by mass people.
phoenix1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 23, 2013, 08:12:16 PM
 #18355

Meanwhile, on the other side, Bitcoin tries to play ball with TPTB ...

mmitech
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001


things you own end up owning you


View Profile
June 23, 2013, 08:12:21 PM
 #18356

I also remember how I used the Internet Protocol. Damn this thing is old. Good thing we got rid of it and...

But the first mass computer networks and protocols were older than the Internet. For example, FidoNet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FidoNet).
What if Bitcoin is a FidoNet of cryptocurrencies? Who knows. Time will tell.

Sure, and before Ethernet there was other competing network communication architectures, such as token passing.

What you're saying is true, but doesn't help Litecoin in any way: it's basically the same thing!

It's like saying "The internal combustion engine won't be here forever... you should drop your Nissan and take a Ford instead!"

yes this is true, you drive your car until it is time to change , and the owner of a Nissan cant just say we have Nissan why to use ford
Loozik
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


Born to chew bubble gum and kick ass


View Profile
June 23, 2013, 08:41:51 PM
 #18357

Meanwhile, on the other side, Bitcoin tries to play ball with TPTB ...



LOL  Cheesy
prof7bit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 500


https://youengine.io/


View Profile WWW
June 23, 2013, 08:55:13 PM
 #18358

Code:
2246      @MagicalTux [05:40:58] <Cusipzzz> they will be awake in a few hours guys, it's still early there <- already awake   
                      and working on the issue since ~1 hour ago                                                             
2248            rfish can you confirm if this is a DDOS or not?                                                               
2249      TuxBlackEdo sup with mtgox                                                                                         
2249                  bad gateway?                                                                                           
2249      @MagicalTux rfish: it's a hardware issue                                                                           
2249         Subo1978 down from germany                                                                                       
2249      @MagicalTux system was back online for a few secs, then the traffic killed it                                       
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1778


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
June 23, 2013, 09:00:16 PM
 #18359

prof7bit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 500


https://youengine.io/


View Profile WWW
June 23, 2013, 09:00:44 PM
 #18360

Code:
2246      @MagicalTux [05:40:58] <Cusipzzz> they will be awake in a few hours guys, it's still early there <- already awake   
                      and working on the issue since ~1 hour ago                                                             
2248            rfish can you confirm if this is a DDOS or not?                                                               
2249      TuxBlackEdo sup with mtgox                                                                                         
2249                  bad gateway?                                                                                           
2249      @MagicalTux rfish: it's a hardware issue                                                                           
2249         Subo1978 down from germany                                                                                       
2249      @MagicalTux system was back online for a few secs, then the traffic killed it                                       
Code:
2259      @MagicalTux ok, got access back to the system, need to fix one thing and we'll go back up
(time is CEST)
Pages: « 1 ... 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 [918] 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 ... 33373 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!