Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[JimboToronto]

Be honest. Are the MILFs the main reason you still play live music?

One of the reasons for sure, actually a very big one.

Other reasons are exercise and a deep love of music.

I also feel a responsibility to keeping live music (especially older stuff) alive.

I remember some 35 years ago seeing a group of old-timers, all in their 70s, playing music from the 1920s and '30s in a local bar.

I was blown away with how authentic it sounded, just like the old shellac 78RPM records. The drummer was especially amazing, sounded like Chick Webb or someone like that. Nobody drums like that anymore.

I told myself that some day I'd be treating some younger generation to what real rock-and-roll (I don't mean rock!) sounded like.

Now my time has come. I love it when the faces of the under-25-year-olds light up and they jump on the dance floor. There's an energy there that you don't get from records or DJs.

That's why I play bass. It's not about being heard. It's about being felt.

[JimboToronto]

on a 1 minute chart of course

LOL  

Sometimes you've gotta step back and look at the bigger picture. Then again, I'm an investor not a day-trader.

I tend to look at the 1 day candles, or the 15 minute candles for a close-up.

Sometimes I step right back and check out the weekly candles.

[pfrtlpfmpf]

on a 1 minute chart of course

LOL  

Sometimes you've gotta step back and look at the bigger picture. Then again, I'm an investor not a day-trader.

I tend to look at the 1 day candles, or the 15 minute candles for a close-up.

Sometimes I step right back and check out the weekly candles.

Ok, for investors: 15500 . Don´t splatter your brain matter all over my keyboard, if you can.

[lightfoot]

Just to put this in perspective:

S7's are profitable
KNC Neptunes are profitable
Fucking JUPITERS are profitable.
I'd be willing to bet Monarchs are profitable.

It's that weird....

[arklan]

i'm either insane, or...seeing the obvious rise clearly, i guess? just put in half my paycheck, with hopes of that not being a mistake.

course i screwed myself here, as i hadn't done the paperwork required for a whole WEEK to count towards this check, so it's just the days before thanksgiving...

come on bitcoin, go baby, go.

[arklan]

Just to put this in perspective:

S7's are profitable
KNC Neptunes are profitable
Fucking JUPITERS are profitable.
I'd be willing to bet Monarchs are profitable.

It's that weird....

when the BFL singles are profitable, THEN it's flatly insane.

[lightfoot]

It's like the undead, rising up from the graves to challenge the blockchain just one more time.....

[jojo69]

Where are these posts with that fkng cool woman, you know which one i mean. she´s soo hot.

FRIDA FRIDA FRIDA FRIDA

[xhomerx10]

It's like the undead, rising up from the graves to challenge the blockchain just one more time.....

 I might have to fire up a couple of Saturns to warm up the house then.... it's getting chilly.

[arklan]

It's like the undead, rising up from the graves to challenge the blockchain just one more time.....

 I might have to fire up a couple of Saturns to warm up the house then.... it's getting chilly.

hey, if you ever want to part with them, let me know eh? i'd be happy to take old, not being used miners off of peoples hands.

[TERA2]

So who is considered an early adopter these days? Is it still people who bought in 2010, or is it now people who bought in 2012 or 2013? And dont give me that bull answer of we're all still early adopters.

[pfrtlpfmpf]

Where are these posts with that fkng cool woman, you know which one i mean. she´s soo hot.

FRIDA FRIDA FRIDA FRIDA

What does "FRIDA" mean ? It was your intention, having me to ask ?

[realr0ach]

your antisemitism and misogyny

Is this a joke?  There's no so called irrational bias of men called "misogyny".  There is only evolution and natural selection which has created a thing called patriarchy - the hierarchal living structure of most organisms.  If matriarchy was valid, nature would give it to you, but nature apparently thinks it's retarded.  Calling someone a "misogynist" is like complaining that the sky is blue when you think it should be red.  

But that's why it's a waste of time talking to most women as it's about as useful as talking to a dog.  They only care about perceived popular opinion and trying to adhere to whatever they think it is because beng ostracized from the collective tribe or group is usually a death sentence for women in evolutionary terms, while not so for men.  Sure, men can be sheep too, but trying to adhere to popular opinion is about the only way a female brain works at all.

Your bonobo brain has perceived that militant SJW cuckoldism is somehow the main popular opinion you must adhere to currently, even though it's just irrational propaganda originating from only 2% of the US population, an evil cult called jews.  It's rather disgraceful you're trying to guilt trip other people claiming they must act like you or they're a bad person when you're the one who has fallen for the equivalent of an evil Charles Manson cult.

[xhomerx10]

So who is considered an early adopter these days? Is it still people who bought in 2010, or is it now people who bought in 2012 or 2013? And dont give me that bull answer of we're all still early adopters.

 Textbook answer:

Early Adopters (13.5%) – This is the second fastest category of individuals who adopt an innovation. These individuals have the highest degree of opinion leadership among the other adopter categories. Early adopters are typically younger in age, have a higher social status, have more financial lucidity, advanced education, and are more socially forward than late adopters. More discrete in adoption choices than innovators. Realize judicious choice of adoption will help them maintain central communication position

~Rogers 1962 5th ed, p. 283

 literally

 

[gentlemand]

So who is considered an early adopter these days? Is it still people who bought in 2010, or is it now people who bought in 2012 or 2013? And dont give me that bull answer of we're all still early adopters.

≥ bull answer

[JimboToronto]

So who is considered an early adopter these days? Is it still people who bought in 2010, or is it now people who bought in 2012 or 2013? And dont give me that bull answer of we're all still early adopters.

I consider those in before June 2011 to be innovators and anyone from then until very recently to be early adopters.

We're just crossing over into the early mainstream phase.

I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the notion that we're still somewhat early adopters, although the events of the last few weeks seem to indicate an increased awareness worldwide. Mainstream adoption is just beginning IMO.

There's no clear line, just an ongoing transition.

[HairyMaclairy]

Global cellphone penetration was 63% in 2016.  That puts cellphone penetration close to half way through late majority stage.

I think we can say that Bitcoin is still very much in the innovator stage today measured against global population.  The more important question is whether global adoption is the right standard.

[RealMachasm]

So who is considered an early adopter these days? Is it still people who bought in 2010, or is it now people who bought in 2012 or 2013? And dont give me that bull answer of we're all still early adopters.

 Textbook answer:

Early Adopters (13.5%) – This is the second fastest category of individuals who adopt an innovation. These individuals have the highest degree of opinion leadership among the other adopter categories. Early adopters are typically younger in age, have a higher social status, have more financial lucidity, advanced education, and are more socially forward than late adopters. More discrete in adoption choices than innovators. Realize judicious choice of adoption will help them maintain central communication position

~Rogers 1962 5th ed, p. 283

 literally

 

I guess that means the more people that come on board, the more early adopters we get. Sep 2013 for me.

[JayJuanGee]

So who is considered an early adopter these days? Is it still people who bought in 2010, or is it now people who bought in 2012 or 2013? And dont give me that bull answer of we're all still early adopters.

Don't give me that bear framework for your presumptive question that assumes that mass adoption has either occurred or is close to occuring, when the fact of the matter is that we are no fucking place even near mass adoption.

Therefore, the "bull answer" that you don't want to hear is the correct answer.

Sure, there are levels of "early adopter,"  and there is relativity, so someone who got in at $10k is more of an early adopter than someone who got in at $15k, so yeah, let's agree that it is way fucking better to have gotten in at $10 or $100 or $500 or $1,000 than it is to have gotten in at $10k, or $15k.. but whatever, even those who got in at $10k are currently more than 50% in the green... so they have a bit of a cushion, and perhaps we will never see 4 digits again, perhaps?  

 I do have a sense that we will see 4 digits again, but gosh, the way things are going it remains possible that we won't.... so let's see, let's see.

I will concede that I devolved into a conversation of price rather than timeline or even making assessments of how much penetration the BTC market has made, yet I think that part of my devolution has to do with the lack of proper framing of your question and the wrong in-built assumptions, so in that regard,  when you have less than 1% of world adoption in bitcoin (which seems to be where we are at, currently), you are stretching the subject matter to be either asserting or assuming that mass adoption has either already taken place or is in any kind of close proximity..... and your question about early adoption-hood, is still very much in the works, and like jimbo said above, we are likely still in early adoption, but we are experiencing some mass awareness, even though few of the fucks have actually begun to buy into bitcoin.


So, TLDR:::::   


  GET a fucking GRIP, TERA-beara!!!!        

[gembitz]

So who is considered an early adopter these days? Is it still people who bought in 2010, or is it now people who bought in 2012 or 2013? And dont give me that bull answer of we're all still early adopters.

I consider those in before June 2011 to be innovators and anyone from then until very recently to be early adopters.

We're just crossing over into the early mainstream phase.

I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the notion that we're still somewhat early adopters, although the events of the last few weeks seem to indicate an increased awareness worldwide. Mainstream adoption is just beginning IMO.

There's no clear line, just an ongoing transition.

early adopters got in below $150 weeee