RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:27:03 AM |
|
Will someone explain me why at over 30% increase in price in the last 7 days at bitstamp and over 50% increase at mtgox people are still selling big time? What's the logic there? Why not hold?
|
|
|
|
barbs
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:27:36 AM |
|
1.7 -> 2.13 here ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) and 0.79$ I just hope the whales don't crash the market please ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
|
maz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:27:47 AM |
|
you're confused about what liquidity means
Are you referring to my preferring to consider USD volume? If so, I'd like to hear your thinking there. It'd be pretty amazing to see both, BTC volumes from a year ago and today's prices right now. Yet today, selling enough to, say, buy a house compared to selling the same a year ago isn't a very big chunk of the daily trade volume. Or maybe you take exception to my ribbing about the general idea here that speculation should increase liquidity, therefore decreasing volatility. I could have phrased that better to begin with, but my point was: if that's true, then given the barrier to speculate has now been significantly lowered, volatility should decrease. I guess we'll see! you sarcastically said: "So... increased liquidity leads to decreased volatility, right?" do you believe that statement to be true or not? if so, then if you think that we are currently volatile, then that means we must not have increased liquidity someone is wrong. either you or your quote. you can't have it both ways. Dude, just quit being a pedantic dick. Its tiring.
|
|
|
|
kajigger
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:28:06 AM |
|
Will someone explain me why at over 30% increase in price in the last 7 days at bitstamp and over 50% increase at mtgox people are still selling big time? What's the logic there? Why not hold?
Mostly greed, some fear, some stupid, some uninformed, some need the money?
|
|
|
|
hyphymikey
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:28:38 AM |
|
Big money players: "Oh look a bear! Finally! Dump bear dump!"........"Thats it you only sold into my bids down $100?"......."I think the bear is done, well I guess ill take us back up".... boom 1200 again Over and over and over. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) lol no. how stupid can you people be Smarter than you.... look at the charts stupid. We keep bouncing back and forth. Weak hands handing over to strong hands, mostly because of the zero fees. You could always try and prove me wrong though! But looking at your recent posts, I doubt I will need to check back on this.
|
|
|
|
Davyd05
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:29:26 AM |
|
Well, my 0.76 has become 0.71 - like I said, even with 0% fees, I'll still end up with squat. It always, without fail, goes the opposite to what I do. Maybe I should get a bot and set up to Crazy Ivan....
..well you should probably be re entering now.. if you sold in the 1100+ range.. and you'd be up. Remember watch those candle sticks.. you aiming to sell on a high part of green and a re-enter on a low part of a red.
|
|
|
|
johnblaze
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:30:00 AM |
|
Smarter than you.... look at the charts stupid. We keep bouncing back and forth. Weak hands handing over to strong hands, mostly because of the zero fees.
You could always tryand prove me wrong though! But looking at your recent posts, I doubt I will need to check back on this.
i wasn't aware you could look at a chart and figure out who was the weak hand and who was the strong hand bitcoinlogicftw
|
|
|
|
seldon
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:31:46 AM |
|
Beginning to think 0 fees might have been a bad idea
|
|
|
|
maz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:32:41 AM |
|
Beginning to think 0 fees might have been a bad idea
That's all a matter of perspective ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
rebuilder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1615
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:34:01 AM |
|
you sarcastically said:
"So... increased liquidity leads to decreased volatility, right?"
do you believe that statement to be true or not?
if so, then if you think that we are currently volatile, then that means we must not have increased liquidity
someone is wrong. either you or your quote. you can't have it both ways.
I don't particularly believe one way or the other at the moment. Looking at the charts for the last few hours, the swings seem to be much wider than before, but it's pretty early to say. What I'm getting at here is: -The general consensus answer I've seen here is that speculation is good since it provides liquidity. -Similarly, the general consensus answer seems to be that liquidity decreases volatility. (makes sense on the face of it) -Ergo, increased speculation should lead to decreased volatility. And lo, we have a live experiment! That's all, really. If my point was fuddled before, I apologize. It is late.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoines
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:36:05 AM Last edit: January 04, 2015, 04:38:58 AM by Bitcoines |
|
Well, my 0.76 has become 0.71 - like I said, even with 0% fees, I'll still end up with squat. It always, without fail, goes the opposite to what I do. Maybe I should get a bot and set up to Crazy Ivan....
..well you should probably be re entering now.. if you sold in the 1100+ range.. and you'd be up. Remember watch those candle sticks.. you aiming to sell on a high part of green and a re-enter on a low part of a red. and keep a close watch at http://trading.i286.org/ , bitcointicker.co and the mtgox candles eat, breath and sleep on them xD
|
|
|
|
oroboras
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:36:22 AM |
|
It would help if Gox's new UI didn't suck balls. Every time I go for a market order, it says I don't have enough funds, when I clearly do. It's so frustrating. By the time I've refreshed the page, and re-entered the same volume of cash that I put in first time, the market has run off without me (again)
|
|
|
|
crazy_rabbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:38:56 AM |
|
It would help if Gox's new UI didn't suck balls. Every time I go for a market order, it says I don't have enough funds, when I clearly do. It's so frustrating. By the time I've refreshed the page, and re-entered the same volume of cash that I put in first time, the market has run off without me (again)
I think it's a vast improvement (although it could have been even better but whateve's) I'm happy that it tells you the fee you will pay.
|
|
|
|
barbs
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:41:56 AM |
|
It would help if Gox's new UI didn't suck balls. Every time I go for a market order, it says I don't have enough funds, when I clearly do. It's so frustrating. By the time I've refreshed the page, and re-entered the same volume of cash that I put in first time, the market has run off without me (again)
having this problem too. Make sure you hit MTGOX link over again (hit refresh on the page could do the same thing) I think the engine is just going mad. That being said I dont think the tops and bottoms are as easy to call as earlier and I've learned when i'm up to walk away so good luck, taking my 0.42 BTC profit and going to bed PLEASE DONT CRASH THE MARKET. THanks!
|
|
|
|
oroboras
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:42:51 AM |
|
What frustrates me about the UI is that I have exactly 0.71480550 BTC, and when I type in that I want to sell 0.71480550 BTC, it says I don't ahve enough funds to proceed.
THAT is why the new UI sucks. Oh, and also how you can't copy/paste values any more. That makes everything so slow.
|
|
|
|
gtabmx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:43:05 AM |
|
It would help if Gox's new UI didn't suck balls. Every time I go for a market order, it says I don't have enough funds, when I clearly do. It's so frustrating. By the time I've refreshed the page, and re-entered the same volume of cash that I put in first time, the market has run off without me (again)
If you're putting a market order in because the price is swinging like crazy or just dropped fast, you're likely not going to get filled anywhere near the bottom due to the gox-lag. Count yourself lucky that it prevented you from sending a market order or else your order might have only got there at a price you don't want. and cancelling it would take another lag time. Also, I don't understand why you are using market orders during any kind of swing. Never use them, its a terrible and stupid thing to do. Place a limit order at the highest price you are comfortable with and it will take the lowest ask (or highest bid) once it gets there. -Mike
|
|
|
|
kajigger
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:43:35 AM |
|
Good Night. Don't let the Bed Bugs bite.
|
|
|
|
maz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:46:14 AM |
|
What frustrates me about the UI is that I have exactly 0.71480550 BTC, and when I type in that I want to sell 0.71480550 BTC, it says I don't ahve enough funds to proceed.
THAT is why the new UI sucks. Oh, and also how you can't copy/paste values any more. That makes everything so slow.
Make sure you have no open trades?
|
|
|
|
Vigil
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:46:42 AM |
|
Well, I can see that algo-trader is still at work on Gox. At least you can tell when the pumps and sell-offs are coming.
|
|
|
|
gtabmx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 29, 2013, 12:47:55 AM |
|
What frustrates me about the UI is that I have exactly 0.71480550 BTC, and when I type in that I want to sell 0.71480550 BTC, it says I don't ahve enough funds to proceed.
THAT is why the new UI sucks. Oh, and also how you can't copy/paste values any more. That makes everything so slow.
Also, copy paste does work and you should make sure you don't have any opened or pending orders.
|
|
|
|
|