explorer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
|
|
December 05, 2013, 09:54:32 AM |
|
Gox goes 12 hours at $1230, but hit $1050 and they can't sell fast enough
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
|
December 05, 2013, 09:54:44 AM |
|
CHEAP COINZZZZZZ!!!
|
|
|
|
MicroFi
|
|
December 05, 2013, 09:54:52 AM |
|
Gox flirting with $1000 now ...
|
|
|
|
keewee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1025
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 05, 2013, 09:56:01 AM |
|
Gox flirting with $1000 now ...
999 now
|
|
|
|
seanneko
|
|
December 05, 2013, 09:56:16 AM |
|
Now look how everyone will try to downplay BTCChina's role.
Thanks for the intellectual rebuttal to my argument.
|
|
|
|
Nemo1024
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1014
|
|
December 05, 2013, 09:56:18 AM |
|
This was nerve wreaking, and I though I botched it, but finally managed to get back in lower than I sold, making 0.5BTC in the process Note to self: In a flash-crash, unless I am selling during the first minute of it, don't bother selling and just hold. And if I sold, I should immediately place a buy order lower down as there won't be time placing an order when the bottom is reached.
|
|
|
|
Vigil
|
|
December 05, 2013, 09:56:27 AM |
|
1000+ Bitcoin sell wall at $1000. Bitcoins are being off-loaded like crazy.
|
|
|
|
600watt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106
|
|
December 05, 2013, 09:58:06 AM |
|
wow, how deeeeeeeep can it go ?
|
|
|
|
Shak
|
|
December 05, 2013, 09:59:20 AM |
|
reminds me of the silk-road flashcrash
|
|
|
|
solex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1006
100 satoshis -> ISO code
|
|
December 05, 2013, 09:59:32 AM |
|
God it's hard passing that gold price. Better luck in the New Year.
|
|
|
|
maz
|
|
December 05, 2013, 10:00:04 AM |
|
haha look at all these deluded bulls talking about resistance and floors.
The ship is sinking guys, get the hell out !
China started this from 150, thats where we are going back to!
|
|
|
|
Manna
|
|
December 05, 2013, 10:01:06 AM |
|
Lol Chinese are pushing back ^^ Over 1030 in Price atm
|
|
|
|
maz
|
|
December 05, 2013, 10:01:54 AM |
|
Lol Chinese are pushing back ^^ Over 1030 in Price atm
Those are the ones that havnt read the news yet. Wait til they find out bitcoin is useless in their country.
|
|
|
|
Rampion
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
|
|
December 05, 2013, 10:02:13 AM |
|
wow, how deeeeeeeep can it go ? Wouldn't mind to see $350 coins
|
|
|
|
creekbore
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Lazy, cynical and insolent since 1968
|
|
December 05, 2013, 10:02:32 AM |
|
This isn't good. The exchanges see some real volume and BTCChina at least cannot cope (anyone having issues elsewhere?), can't get any accurate charts/data (bitcoinWisdom completely broke) - all the infrastructure is inadequate at present.
|
|
|
|
NamelessOne
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 05, 2013, 10:02:57 AM |
|
Lol Chinese are pushing back ^^ Over 1030 in Price atm
Those are the ones that havnt read the news yet. Wait til they find out bitcoin is useless in their country. Useless like gold is useless right?
|
|
|
|
adsdas
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 337
Merit: 250
https://streamies.io/
|
|
December 05, 2013, 10:03:06 AM |
|
muhahahaha this is beautiful!
|
|
|
|
Rampion
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
|
|
December 05, 2013, 10:03:14 AM |
|
Lol Chinese are pushing back ^^ Over 1030 in Price atm
Those are the ones that havnt read the news yet. Wait til they find out bitcoin is useless in their country. Good. Let's shake out all those who did not understand what's BTC real role and purpose, and that BTC is resilient to any kind of ban. Satoshi choose to be anonymous for a reason.
|
|
|
|
Vigil
|
|
December 05, 2013, 10:04:31 AM |
|
Someone is selling hundreds of coins at lower than the max bid price.
|
|
|
|
maz
|
|
December 05, 2013, 10:05:19 AM |
|
Lol Chinese are pushing back ^^ Over 1030 in Price atm
Those are the ones that havnt read the news yet. Wait til they find out bitcoin is useless in their country. Useless like gold is useless right? USELESS AS IN USELESS
|
|
|
|
|