Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[JayJuanGee]

Link?

Is everything alright Jay?

It seems that most posters in this thread will provide some kind of attribution to the various substantive quotes that they make, but there are some members who do not.  That posting behavior seems to be misleading at best and arguably bordering on plagiarism under certain purposeful neglect cases... especially when such posting without attribution seems to be willful and persistent.

Edited to add my response to the following post.

Does it matter who said it initially? He posted it as a screenshot so it's clear he's not claiming it is his and it's not news or information that needs sourcing as it's self-contained and therefore interpretable without context.

Who cares who said it. I mean if a random hobo in the street said it would that change how you interpret the statement? You either agree or disagree. You are either receptive to the argument (insofar as present) or not.

Yes, it does matter, in part, for the reasons that I stated above.

[1714011985]

1714011985

[1714011985]

1714011985

[1714011985]

1714011985

[1714011985]

1714011985

[Torque]

You all are really a bit obsessed with your roach toyboy, aren't you?

No.  Actually most of us (try to!) ignore him.  For us this thread is only 47 pages long too.

Mmm so you have on ignore to ?

Everybody does.

Sometimes I forget I'm not logged in, and I'm like "FFS why am I see this shit from that fkn idiot troll again?" Lol

[HairyMaclairy]

Link?

Is everything alright Jay?

It seems that most posters in this thread will provide some kind of attribution to the various substantive quotes that they make, but there are some members who do not.  That posting behavior seems to be misleading at best and arguably bordering on plagiarism under certain purposeful neglect cases... especially when such posting without attribution seems to be willful and persistent.

Welcome back JJG.  Good to see you are rested and ready for action.  

[JayJuanGee]

I miss JJGs voluminous posts.  

I be like this:

Link?

Is everything alright Jay?

JJGs shortest post ever, and an answer that made me laugh.

I do so prefer his new short style.

If I am trying to catch up, then there be no time for elaborationings.  

Must be a New Years resolution, or the AI program is completed now.

Now, I be like this:

[bitserve]

Link?

Is everything alright Jay?

It seems that most posters in this thread will provide some kind of attribution to the various substantive quotes that they make, but there are some members who do not.  That posting behavior seems to be misleading at best and arguably bordering on plagiarism under certain purposeful neglect cases... especially when such posting without attribution seems to be willful and persistent.

Glad to see you back JJG.

I will solve this right now: Mic, JJG has a point here, you should *always* post a link to the source of your memes/twitter quotes.

Happy now?

P.S.: I needed almost a couple of minutes to make sense of your post. Please consider there are some non-english speakers here. Mic isn't. Neither me.

[JayJuanGee]

[edited out]

......I have repeatedly indicated that the chance seems unlikely, but there is no proof per se that CSW is not satoshi. Given the evidence we have at this time, that would be tantamount to disproving a negative. That ain't how logic works.

Your statement here, jbreher, borders on crazytalk.

There is absolutely no burden for anyone to prove that CSW is NOT Satoshi.

The burden is 100% (or at least fucking close to 100%) upon CSW to prove that he is satoshi, if that is what he intends to claim (or continue to claim). 

Furthermore, decent and reasonable means of attempting proof through signing of a known satoshi block have been outlined many times, and CSW fails and/or refuses to even attempt the most reasonable acceptable means to accomplish such identification verification.

[Syke]

Sometimes I forget I'm not logged in, and I'm like "FFS why am I see this shit from that fkn idiot troll again?" Lol

Most other people on my ignore list fade away. It's hard to believe he's still here.

[El duderino_]

Link?

Is everything alright Jay?

It seems that most posters in this thread will provide some kind of attribution to the various substantive quotes that they make, but there are some members who do not.  That posting behavior seems to be misleading at best and arguably bordering on plagiarism under certain purposeful neglect cases... especially when such posting without attribution seems to be willful and persistent.

Glad to see you back JJG.

I will solve this right now: Mic, JJG has a point here, you should *always* post a link to the source of your memes/twitter quotes.

Happy now?

P.S.: I needed almost a couple of minutes to make sense of your post. Please consider there are some non-english speakers here. Mic isn't. Neither me.

In Some cases I understand, and I provide the link.... but when its just Some random that says a Nice “line of Words” whiteout any further info, Then i say WTF is the big deal jjg?
If i would say on twitter ....

I like BTC the most its better than gold... be fast and buy blabla...
What does it matters who wrote that? Its just about that line, about those Words

I know when there is an article like an ETF thing, that 23th rich Guy on BAKKT, that Russian thing, in those cases i provide a link

Is that so BAD?

[ivomm]

1000 BTC sell wall on Finex at 4079.. was being eaten so it was pulled.  Hmmm, may be going up.   Someone really wants the price lower.   Hopefully all the weak people already dumped in the low 3k's.

Earlier today I noticed that someone was hitting the sell button multiple times from the local peak of 4160 on Bitfinex. This is not the first time for me to recongize a single seller, rather than multiple simultenous sells. It was at first like a gut feeling, but now it is seen clearly that someone with >3000 (may be >10K) bitcoins is satisfied with this price and is impatient to sell. Same ol' same ol'. It happened so many times in 2018, the worst of which was the insane selling of fake Satoshi (CW) to pump his pathetic shitcoin. I really don't understand these people. If I was an early adopter/investor/miner with thousands of bitcoins, I would never sell for 80% less from the last ATH! This shows weak hands and lack of belief in the future of the king of all decentralized money. Of course, I know that there are miners who have to pay for their electricity bills, margin and futures shorters, etc. All this combined with the lack of good news (ETF) brought us here. But all this will not be enough to hold the price after the next halving, even without ETF. In fact, an early approval in 2019 can cause a pump and dump like in Dec 2017. It will be best if sometime after the next halving when staying at least 1 year well above 10K, the ETF be approved. Then we may witness prices which seem somewhat unrealistic now (100K party, cough, cough  ) I don't know for you, but I would like to see and enjoy those flickering ATH's signs everywhere and every day with all my stash intact! (I miss them so much that I am almost tempted to post one of those now  )

[El duderino_]

https://i.imgur.com/XVxigGY.gif

+1 (this merit thing is starting to get annoying for WO leechers)

send him yours

especially you with that pacman avatar

why isn't that on a HAT yet ??

 It would probably be too small in the patch plus he can't part with his avatar.

Aaah ok
Otherwise it would be something perfect to work on .....

[HairyMaclairy]

[edited out]

......I have repeatedly indicated that the chance seems unlikely, but there is no proof per se that CSW is not satoshi. Given the evidence we have at this time, that would be tantamount to disproving a negative. That ain't how logic works.

Your statement here, jbreher, borders on crazytalk.

There is absolutely no burden for anyone to prove that CSW is NOT Satoshi.

The burden is 100% (or at least fucking close to 100%) upon CSW to prove that he is satoshi, if that is what he intends to claim (or continue to claim). 

Furthermore, decent and reasonable means of attempting proof through signing of a known satoshi block have been outlined many times, and CSW fails and/or refuses to even attempt the most reasonable acceptable means to accomplish such identification verification.

He also happens to be on the run from the Australian taxation authority. 

[El duderino_]

 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.0 Topic: DefaultTrust changes

He’s removed from DT?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.msg49141095#msg49141095

seems to be(for now?), and seems to be because Lauda is back in lol
but i understand it less now than the old version....

Lauda shouldn’t be anywhere near it, based on well publicised ‘allegations’

Agree 100%. Also philipma1957 has fallen off and he's the only decent guy left. Madness.
But respect for theymos for tryna get something moving..


edit: ok maybe trust a couple more guys than that

I also don’t know how it really works, but i do see, there are no RED Numbers under V8 anymore
So you are to be trusted from know?

Edit: HaHa LoL⬇️

[Last of the V8s]

^don't trust a soul

https://github.com/CultOfCraig/cult-of-craig/

[El duderino_]

Its my time to take the

HODLnap

Good night fellow WO’s

#keepHODLING

[JayJuanGee]

Cute.

[HairyMaclairy]

Kek

[xhomerx10]

?
DT= deep throat, drunk tank, don’t trip,double team, dream theater,  don’t TROLL.... ??

The forum - Default Trust system

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5095156.0

 Delirium tremens and it will manifest itself due withdrawal from absolute power over others' trust ratings.

[xhomerx10]

Kek

Mmmm soaring... chec and soaring 

We need a drooling emoji

[JayJuanGee]

thanks JJG, I like your new style. people will now actually read your posts

What new style?

I am the same, me.  Now look what you did. 

I have to pinch myself, just to verify.

[Toxic2040]

1h


*edit*

Whoops, sorry folk's. Not sure how that got past the editing department...  We will be back next hour with more updates.