Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[LFC_Bitcoin]

This shit is not breaking down. Big money is buying. They are patient. It will creep up till ETF approval on 31/03. Bakkt will come when we least expect. Big alts will push up. Retail will prick up its ears. Hats will happily be eaten. Resistance is futile.

so engines getting fueled, V8's going to step in push this SH*T up......
    

Soon gentlemen.....

[Torque]

Hmm. I don't see it as doing 'everything I can', I see it as bringing some semblance of balance.

Crimes? What crimes? Has he been incarcerated? Convicted? Tried even? (Other than in the court of public opinion, that is) Hyperbolic much?

Defending a known narcisstic lying charlatan in an effort of "bringing some semblance of balance" is trolling. The very definition of trolling.

Which, let's face it jbreher, we've all known you to be a full on troll since the very beginning. We can all see through your bullshit.

[jbreher]

...

I'm just trying to bring some sense of balance among the near-universal Craig derangement syndrome.

Fuck off dude. CSW is an lying idiot charlatan, and you are an idiot if you support him or defend him in any way. Makes you look even more stupid.

^^^Case in point.

[Last of the V8s]

as a sideshow

Then why did you post on the topic?

Torque answered the rest

[jbreher]

More chance of Mila Kunis & Margot Robbie sucking my dick this weekend than CW being Satoshi. He’s a fraudster, a charlatan, a snake oil salesman. Hopefully he’ll be totally irrelevant regarding crypto in a couple of years (if he isn’t already).  

So you're of the opinion that CSW is not the author of any patents?

[jbreher]

By Satoshi Nakamoto

Dedicated to all trolls.

After reading this ....
I will drink a beer.

Beste quote in the whole BTC history.....

A contender therefore, for sure.

Some here might benefit from pondering the context in which that statement was delivered.

which quote could be better??

I dunno. I was agreeing that it could be best. How does one pick The Best?

More relevant is the rest of the post, which refers to the rest of the email, where satoshi explains that in time, nodes would be operated mostly by well-funded enterprises dedicating large capital to the task.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

More chance of Mila Kunis & Margot Robbie sucking my dick this weekend than CW being Satoshi. He’s a fraudster, a charlatan, a snake oil salesman. Hopefully he’ll be totally irrelevant regarding crypto in a couple of years (if he isn’t already).  

So you're of the opinion that CSW is not the author of any patents?

He may or may not be. I think more lies come out of his mouth than truths though. He’s discredited himself throughout the entire community though hasn’t he with the wild, outlandish statement that he is Satoshi.

I think he’s a conman preying on morons to invest in his shitcoin.

I have no doubt that he’s making a lot of money for himself & whoever else is backing his antics over the last 12 months.

[HairyMaclairy]

He can't simultaneously have a mound of patents (for which core sycophants regularly excoriate him), and not have any patents.

There is no impediment to him having a mound of invalid patents.

Sure, there's an impediment. While the bar isn't so high as to be infallible, passing patent review is at least prima fascie evidence of validity. So are you claiming all of nChain's patents are invalid?

Bahahahaha not in this day and age

[jbreher]

Hmm. I don't see it as doing 'everything I can', I see it as bringing some semblance of balance.

Crimes? What crimes? Has he been incarcerated? Convicted? Tried even? (Other than in the court of public opinion, that is) Hyperbolic much?

Defending a known narcisstic lying charlatan in an effort of "bringing some semblance of balance" is trolling.

So, in your world, the assumption that a given party is a liar is sufficient grounds for propagating any number of other lies about that party? Got it.

[Last of the V8s]

More relevant is the rest of the post, which refers to the rest of the email, where satoshi explains that in time, nodes would be operated mostly by well-funded enterprises dedicating large capital to the task.

"The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate."

satoshi distinguishes between miners -'nodes'
and nodes -'client nodes'

[jbreher]

He can't simultaneously have a mound of patents (for which core sycophants regularly excoriate him), and not have any patents.

There is no impediment to him having a mound of invalid patents.

Sure, there's an impediment. While the bar isn't so high as to be infallible, passing patent review is at least prima fascie evidence of validity. So are you claiming all of nChain's patents are invalid?

Bahahahaha not in this day and age

So you are not claiming that all of nChain's patents are invalid. Got it.

Are you claiming that any of nChain's patents are invalid? If so, which ones?

[jbreher]

More relevant is the rest of the post, which refers to the rest of the email, where satoshi explains that in time, nodes would be operated mostly by well-funded enterprises dedicating large capital to the task.

"The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate."

exactly.

[LFC_Bitcoin]

This infographic was initially posted here: "2020 Bitcoin Halving: 7 Facts You Ned to Know"

[Globb0]

"Patent factories" patent lots of stuff

Then ransom peoples good inventions.

Main  requirement is a lot of money, eg like google et al.

I don't see why that cant be CSW he clearly has some funding channels ?


He said something about coin teams being technically unlimited companies.

Unlimited, in my recollection of company law, was the liability of any 1 individual. Ie a limited partnership can be 50% each limited liability. Unlimited means 1 person leaves and 1 person caught they pay the lot.

So can he end up suing some coin teams members? possibly
 

[HairyMaclairy]

He can't simultaneously have a mound of patents (for which core sycophants regularly excoriate him), and not have any patents.

There is no impediment to him having a mound of invalid patents.

Sure, there's an impediment. While the bar isn't so high as to be infallible, passing patent review is at least prima fascie evidence of validity. So are you claiming all of nChain's patents are invalid?

Bahahahaha not in this day and age

So you are not claiming that all of nChain's patents are invalid. Got it.

Are you claiming that any of nChain's patents are invalid? If so, which ones?

I am claiming that Craig is a known con man who is a fugitive from Australian authorities for tax fraud [fact]

I am claiming that the US Patent Office is grossly underfunded [fact] and was highly unlikely to have had any crypto expertise at the time the patents were taken out [supposition]

I am claiming that that a known conman might just make up a bunch of bullshit troll patents and gotten them past the Patent Office which has no idea what it is doing [supposition]

For you to be defending someone who is on the run from the authorities for fraud, and claiming that his patents must be valid is laughable.  Why don’t you use your clearly impressive intellect for something worthwhile.  

[El duderino_]

He can't simultaneously have a mound of patents (for which core sycophants regularly excoriate him), and not have any patents.

There is no impediment to him having a mound of invalid patents.

Sure, there's an impediment. While the bar isn't so high as to be infallible, passing patent review is at least prima fascie evidence of validity. So are you claiming all of nChain's patents are invalid?

Bahahahaha not in this day and age

So you are not claiming that all of nChain's patents are invalid. Got it.

Are you claiming that any of nChain's patents are invalid? If so, which ones?

I am claiming that Craig is a known con man who is a fugitive from Australian authorities for tax fraud [fact]

I am claiming that the US Patent Office is grossly underfunded [fact] and was highly unlikely to have had any crypto expertise at the time the patents were taken out [supposition]

I am claiming that that a known conman might just make up a bunch of bullshit troll patents and gotten them past the Patent Office which has no idea what it is doing [supposition]

For you to be defending someone who is on the run from the authorities for fraud, and claiming that his patents must be valid is laughable.  Why don’t you use your clearly impressive intellect for something worthwhile.  

good post to set you're merit on 1111 

[Globb0]

I get so emotional baby

[Biodom]

Get some ^TM

Get just 0.226 BTC and you will be among top 1% of possible btc holders^*.

^*assuming that btc will be wildly accepted and EVERYONE will have some of it.


PS

I am not saying that 0.226 will make you a top 1% of current btc holders (to be 1% among current holders you need about 15BTC).
Top 1% in fiat (by wealth) have just $871K according to Credit Suisse, so invest at least $814 (0.226 BTC), then do nothing.
If btc would "consume" fiat, then you are golden, or rather "bitcoined".

I might send this simple message to some of my no-coiner friends.
If they ignore it now...oh, well.
$814 is a sum most people in OECD countries can afford to "invest" on a risky venture.

[Last of the V8s]

Globb0 I am very sorry.
the nocoiner slur was from where you recently said you were 100% XMR, which maybe i got wrong too
fwiw your quips are funny and your knowhow respected by me and others and you should behave as you choose
if you have that much in btc it is perfectly respectable
assure you i'm quite the nobody too
apologies again
V8s

[LFC_Bitcoin]

Globb0 I am very sorry.
the nocoiner slur was from where you recently said you were 100% XMR, which maybe i got wrong too
fwiw your quips are funny and your knowhow respected by me and others and you should behave as you choose
if you have that much in btc it is perfectly respectable
assure you i'm quite the nobody too
apologies again
V8s

Awwwww guys!

I think to make friends again you should go docking

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=docking&utm_source=search-action