|
ShroomsKit
|
 |
February 11, 2014, 06:34:28 PM |
|
Too bad we live in a practical and not a technical world. That's the thing you'd expect from a lawyer.
what? blitz, u are against btc? No, our mod is one of the biggest and dumbest trolls on this forum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pietje
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:35:16 PM |
|
ok i sent 0.001BTC to the first 3 address posted.
lets see what happens.
Just got the first confirmation. Works perfectly. |
|
|
|
|
|
fonzie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:35:38 PM |
|
Satoshi Nakamoto: "I´m sorry i shouldn´t have released BTC without testing it properly. My next currency will be much better, promised"
|
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:37:18 PM |
|
Satoshi Nakamoto: "I´m sorry i shouldn´t have released BTC without testing it properly. My next currency will be much better, promised"
 |
|
|
|
|
|
fonzie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:37:58 PM |
|
So Bitstamp stated that no coins/money have been lost so far..... It just takes some time to be fixed, (2weeks) :-D We just have to work through that backlog  |
|
|
|
|
|
Mythul
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:38:33 PM |
|
Standard Bank is huge!!!!!!!  |
|
|
|
|
pera
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 261
バカ
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:38:36 PM |
|
Rich South Africans will try anything to avoid the Rand. The Rand isn't even welcome in Zimbabwe now its lost so much value. The link is not working, Probably a well-crafted hoax. what do you mean with "not working"? it is working, but it asks for credentials (obviously) edit: I saved it just in case -> https://web.archive.org/web/20140211184011/https://bitcoin.standardbank.co.za/ |
|
|
|
|
Holliday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1009
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:38:39 PM |
|
I have an aversion against dogmatic and dishonest people. It culminates in outbursts of the opposite order sometimes, even though I like Bitcoin.
So, you call Bitcoin shit because of a bug that affects appearance, not function? Don't you think that's a bit of a dishonest proposition? |
|
|
|
|
|
threecats
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:39:28 PM |
|
seriously. among the top reasons given again and again on this forum for why bitcoin might tank (forever) is exploit in software code. so. we are back to pre - bug news level in less than a half hour. wtf?
|
|
|
|
|
Holliday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1009
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:40:43 PM |
|
seriously. among the top reasons given again and again on this forum for why bitcoin might tank (forever) is exploit in software code. so. we are back to pre - bug news level in less than a half hour. wtf?
This exploit affects the appearance of transactions, not the function of transactions. It's not cool, but it doesn't break Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
N12
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:41:14 PM |
|
I have an aversion against dogmatic and dishonest people. It culminates in outbursts of the opposite order sometimes, even though I like Bitcoin.
So, you call Bitcoin shit because of a bug that affects appearance, not function? Don't you think that's a bit of a dishonest proposition? It just amazes me how it affects all major exchanges. Actually didn't expect that. So yes, from a practical world view, I would say that something has gone wrong that this was not noticed before by any of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
JCviggen
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:41:42 PM |
|
seriously. among the top reasons given again and again on this forum for why bitcoin might tank (forever) is exploit in software code. so. we are back to pre - bug news level in less than a half hour. wtf?
Well obviously harmless exploits aren't going to drive the price to 1$. No-one is losing their funds with this one (unless you left them on a retarded exchange like Gox obviously) |
|
|
|
|
|
threecats
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:42:23 PM |
|
seriously. among the top reasons given again and again on this forum for why bitcoin might tank (forever) is exploit in software code. so. we are back to pre - bug news level in less than a half hour. wtf?
This exploit affects the appearance of transactions, not the function of transactions. It's not cool, but it doesn't break Bitcoin. i get that,but the general public, those who are the potential market support, the unwashed masses etc. the danger is in the perception. and that is being shrugged off. |
|
|
|
|
empowering
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:43:33 PM |
|
Too bad we live in a practical and not a technical world. That's the thing you'd expect from a lawyer.
what? blitz, u are against btc? I have an aversion against dogmatic and dishonest people. It culminates in outbursts of the opposite order sometimes, even though I like Bitcoin. ha ha you mad man! I like it. |
|
|
|
|
|
fonzie
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:43:40 PM |
|
It still doesn't seem as though it will get ANYWHERE near $100 again, and in fact seems to have stopped plummeting now that we're heading back up on Bitstamp.
I think we're still just now absorbing the impact of this. People laughed off Gox's statement at first, maybe because they didn't want to believe it. We're probably going to see more exchanges suspend withdrawals one by one. If it's not resolved soon, we'll have a few more sell offs i'm afraid that will test historic lows. People will be rushing for the exits, it's a mixture of a legitimate bug and mass hysteria. This is shaping up to be the "worst case scenario" I always feared but hoped wouldn't happen. |
|
|
|
|
empowering
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:44:48 PM |
|
this fast recovery seems to say this is a very irrational market ...
markets in th short term are irrational... and quite dumb. |
|
|
|
|
Holliday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1009
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:44:58 PM |
|
seriously. among the top reasons given again and again on this forum for why bitcoin might tank (forever) is exploit in software code. so. we are back to pre - bug news level in less than a half hour. wtf?
This exploit affects the appearance of transactions, not the function of transactions. It's not cool, it will probably break Bitcoin.  If you are going to edit my posts at least put FTFY so people know you've edited it. |
|
|
|
|
|
threecats
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:45:28 PM |
|
It still doesn't seem as though it will get ANYWHERE near $100 again, and in fact seems to have stopped plummeting now that we're heading back up on Bitstamp.
I think we're still just now absorbing the impact of this. People laughed off Gox's statement at first, maybe because they didn't want to believe it. We're probably going to see more exchanges suspend withdrawals one by one. If it's not resolved soon, we'll have a few more sell offs i'm afraid that will test historic lows. People will be rushing for the exits, it's a mixture of a legitimate bug and mass hysteria. This is shaping up to be the "worst case scenario" I always feared but hoped wouldn't happen. "I always feared but hoped wouldn't happen." wow fonzie, never thought i would see your soft side ... |
|
|
|
|
600watt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:45:39 PM |
|
just saw 666 on stamp.
bitcoin is evil, krugman was right this is logic bitcointalk-style. |
|
|
|
|
Miz4r
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 11, 2014, 06:45:44 PM |
|
Too bad we live in a practical and not a technical world. That's the thing you'd expect from a lawyer.
what? blitz, u are against btc? I have an aversion against dogmatic and dishonest people. It culminates in outbursts of the opposite order sometimes, even though I like Bitcoin. Who are the dogmatic and dishonest people you are referring to here? Blind anti-dogmatism can also be a form of dogmatism. |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
