JayJuanGee
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 10240
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
 |
March 17, 2014, 05:02:04 PM |
|
isn't this the part where fonzie is supposed to come out and spread fud?? wehre is he?  fonzie is a btc bagholder now.. getting drunk and praying at the Shrine of Satoshi, like rest of the sheep... oh yeah, thats right lol. he said he went all in not too long ago when a perma-bear goes all in, you know where we are heading next. Where? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Your bitcoin is secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter a majority of miners, no matter what." -- Greg Maxwell
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dreamspark
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:02:56 PM |
|
Could we make the polls a little bit more serious ?
That is, leave "yes", "no" and "idk" but remove the moronic all caps options ?
poll? serious? you must be joking  |
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 10240
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:13:14 PM |
|
It's just like in Bitcoin's early days, when people could tip 10BTC for an interesting post here ....
Maybe bitcoin should move to the satoshi.. in order that people can feel like they are tipping big..... and say... I liked you so much, I just tipped you 1,036,000 satoshi. |
|
|
|
|
rebuilder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1615
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:22:54 PM |
|
[Reddit tipping stats]
Is there any way to find out the amount of tips withdrawn from the system? Is there a fee for sending a tip? I ask because people tipping each other back and forth could easily run up the volume, especially if they didn't consider their tips of much financial value. |
|
|
|
|
oda.krell
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:23:06 PM |
|
Could we make the polls a little bit more serious ?
That is, leave "yes", "no" and "idk" but remove the moronic all caps options ?
poll? serious? you must be joking adam, how about the following poll: "Should wall observer polls be more serious, and without the moronic all caps options?" a) yes, I mean: no! Never! b) never. c) HODL ALL THE COINS! (also: never) |
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:32:51 PM |
|
Could we make the polls a little bit more serious ?
That is, leave "yes", "no" and "idk" but remove the moronic all caps options ?
poll? serious? you must be joking adam, how about the following poll: "Should wall observer polls be more serious, and without the moronic all caps options?" a) yes, I mean: no! Never! b) never. c) HODL ALL THE COINS! (also: never)  |
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:45:41 PM |
|
...since there are NOT too many big ticket items to buy...
https://www.bitpremier.com/ |
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:50:55 PM |
|
Could we make the polls a little bit more serious ?
That is, leave "yes", "no" and "idk" but remove the moronic all caps options ?
i think those options weed out the not so serious voters trolls can't help but hit the troll options, which give more meaningful results to the yes,no,idk option. its a troll trap and it works, when i'm not sure, and i feel like trolling the poll i hit buy buy buy. |
|
|
|
|
|
KeyserSoze
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:58:54 PM |
|
Could we make the polls a little bit more serious ?
That is, leave "yes", "no" and "idk" but remove the moronic all caps options ?
i think those options weed out the not so serious voters trolls can't help but hit the troll options, which give more meaningful results to the yes,no,idk option. its a troll trap and it works, when i'm not sure, and i feel like trolling the poll i hit buy buy buy. Aside from your reasoning, it is your fucking poll. Do what you want. So many nannies want to control other people in this world. If solarflare wants a poll with his 3 serious options, solarflare can go make his own fucking poll elsewhere. |
|
|
|
|
|
cbutters
|
|
March 17, 2014, 06:22:42 PM |
|
I'm probably wrong, but I'm smelling a choo choo up to 656 within the next 24hrs....... Based on the new triangulation of the trendlines. I'm most likely wrong on this though.
|
|
|
|
|
manfred
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
Energy is Wealth
|
|
March 17, 2014, 06:27:20 PM |
|
It's just like in Bitcoin's early days, when people could tip 10BTC for an interesting post here ....
Maybe bitcoin should move to the satoshi.. in order that people can feel like they are tipping big..... and say... I liked you so much, I just tipped you 1,036,000 satoshi. Tipping is akin to this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHPlnMwgA_gMit Geld spielt man nicht Translated: Serious Money is not something to play around with. |
|
|
|
|
ShroomsKit_Disgrace
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
Yeah! I hate ShroomsKit!
|
|
March 17, 2014, 06:29:18 PM |
|
I'm probably wrong, but I'm smelling a choo choo up to 656 within the next 24hrs....... Based on the new triangulation of the trendlines. I'm most likely wrong on this though.
Sooo..if you are "most likely wrong on this though" why dont you just state the opposite and tell us that you are "most likely right on that though"  |
|
|
|
|
|
cbutters
|
|
March 17, 2014, 06:31:54 PM |
|
I'm probably wrong, but I'm smelling a choo choo up to 656 within the next 24hrs....... Based on the new triangulation of the trendlines. I'm most likely wrong on this though.
Sooo..if you are "most likely wrong on this though" why dont you just state the opposite and tell us that you are "most likely right on that though" LOL, sorry for my ambiguity. I'll try to avoid phrasing things that way in the future. The correct term was probably " take this with a grain of salt, but..." Being "most likely wrong", doesn't mean that the exact opposite will happen, I expect a swing upwards, but it just might not be all the way to 656 like my prediction. |
|
|
|
|
|
zyk
|
|
March 17, 2014, 06:35:42 PM |
|
of course even a blind bull will find some seed corn to throw at the shorts....it´ll go 662 even....and then Gox and the TBF criminals come roaring back as two bit idiot waves a flag  and then there will be few suckers to sell to  |
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
March 17, 2014, 06:48:53 PM |
|
I'm probably wrong, but I'm smelling a choo choo up to 656 within the next 24hrs....... Based on the new triangulation of the trendlines. I'm most likely wrong on this though.
Sooo..if you are "most likely wrong on this though" why dont you just state the opposite and tell us that you are "most likely right on that though" LOL, sorry for my ambiguity. I'll try to avoid phrasing things that way in the future. The correct term was probably " take this with a grain of salt, but..." Being "most likely wrong", doesn't mean that the exact opposite will happen, I expect a swing upwards, but it just might not be all the way to 656 like my prediction. so far so good. |
|
|
|
|
|
renodaret
|
|
March 17, 2014, 07:07:58 PM |
|
looks neat
|
|
|
|
|
|
KFR
|
|
March 17, 2014, 07:14:58 PM |
|
Could we make the polls a little bit more serious ?
That is, leave "yes", "no" and "idk" but remove the moronic all caps options ?
i think those options weed out the not so serious voters trolls can't help but hit the troll options, which give more meaningful results to the yes,no,idk option. its a troll trap and it works, when i'm not sure, and i feel like trolling the poll i hit buy buy buy. I think your logic here is very sound Adam. I suspect Dan Ariely would approve. |
|
|
|
|
mah87
Donator
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
-Bitcoin & Ripple-
|
|
March 17, 2014, 07:55:41 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
March 17, 2014, 08:02:12 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 10240
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
March 17, 2014, 08:12:45 PM |
|
OK.... I will, in part, take back what I said... I meant to suggest big ticket items and the ability to remain somewhat untargeted. Through a site, such as bitpremier, it does seem possible to liquidate some coins through a site... and it does seem possible to stay somewhat anonymous... However, if bitpremier is engaging in know your customer practices (and I base that on its various affiliates), then it may NOT be easy to relieve oneself of ill-acquired bitcoins... From what I can see, I would NOT feel very confident going through bitpremier... unless they just put you in contact with each other... and say, go at it on the side.... harder for any service to make money, if they let parties engage in their own interaction(s).... Craigslist seems to do o.k. by letting parties engage in their own interactions... |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
