byronbb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
HODL OR DIE
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:03:46 AM |
|
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.
We might not be there yet but it's close. How can we be close to pessimistic? Bitcoin was $100 a year ago. True despair-pessimism is a long WAY DOWN.
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:12:55 AM |
|
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.
We might not be there yet but it's close. How can we be close to pessimistic? Bitcoin was $100 a year ago. True despair-pessimism is a long WAY DOWN. We've been through so many of these rally/corrections that we've learned to front-run the cycle, so it won't go that far down. It always seems different this time but in hindsight it's not.
|
|
|
|
seleme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:14:24 AM |
|
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.
We might not be there yet but it's close. How can we be close to pessimistic? Bitcoin was $100 a year ago. True despair-pessimism is a long WAY DOWN. There are lot of people who entered the game way above those 100$, they are certainly close to pessimistic stage, some of them are in it for some time. The others won't let it go that low, no chance.
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:15:32 AM |
|
oh noz, Bitcoin is only 51% higher than it was three weeks ago- everybody panic!
|
|
|
|
seleme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:16:32 AM |
|
That was nice dump. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) caught me by complete surprise, i didn't think the first small move down to $620 was significant at all ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
lyth0s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
World Class Cryptonaire
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:19:05 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:19:37 AM |
|
oh noz, Bitcoin is only 51% higher than it was three weeks ago- everybody panic!
big green candle, somebody didn't get the panic memo. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
Adrian-x
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:19:55 AM |
|
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.
We might not be there yet but it's close. I'm still living in Bitcoin euphoria, since the CFR took an interest in Bitcoin only 2 of the 4 big predictions have come to pass. 1) the collapse and or outlawing of key exchanges 2) the arrests of known Bitcoin personalities 3) a media smear camping demonising Bitcoin. 4) a collapse in the price. (I'm still coming to terms with Bitcoin leaving double digits) To be honest the only thing that can collapse the price IMO are the week hands, (non believers) stolen Bitcoin and whales redistributing/ facilitating future wealth growth, and I think a lot of coins @ the new order of magnetude have already been flushed. I welcome a drop but if it happens it may take time or if it is quick it will kick some new big players in the balls, if it happens.
|
|
|
|
cbutters
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:25:56 AM |
|
Please save us fairy god-whale.
|
|
|
|
billyjoeallen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:27:18 AM |
|
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.
We might not be there yet but it's close. I'm still living in Bitcoin euphoria, since the CFR took an interest in Bitcoin only 2 of the 4 big predictions have come to pass. 1) the collapse and or outlawing of key exchanges 2) the arrests of known Bitcoin personalities 3) a media smear camping demonising Bitcoin. 4) a collapse in the price. (I'm still coming to terms with Bitcoin leaving double digits) To be honest the only thing that can collapse the price IMO are the week hands, (non believers) stolen Bitcoin and whales redistributing/ facilitating future wealth growth, and I think a lot of coins @ the new order of magnetude have already been flushed. I welcome a drop but if it happens it may take time or if it is quick it will kick some new big players in the balls, if it happens. Big players aren't just traders and they're not putting all their eggs in one basket. Us old hodlers have learned not to panic and newbies with millions have no reason to.
|
|
|
|
seleme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:28:22 AM |
|
To be honest the only thing that can collapse the price IMO are the week hands, (non believers) stolen Bitcoin and whales redistributing/ facilitating future wealth growth, and I think a lot of coins @ the new order of magnetude have already been flushed.
The big question for me is "what really happened to the Gox coins." I'm working on the hypothesis that the coins were stolen along time ago and have already been absorbed by the market. If this is true, I can't see us dipping very deep and in fact think this is quite bullish medium term. On the other hand, if a thief really has 750,000 BTC, I could imagine considerable selling pressure for some time. Those coins are absorbed by market long time ago. It's not that Gox problems started yesterday.
|
|
|
|
MAbtc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:29:52 AM |
|
Such volume. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F6NLoe2el.png&t=665&c=nlhaQDZWOHG1Jw)
|
|
|
|
seleme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:32:40 AM |
|
Buy when everybody is pessimistic.
We might not be there yet but it's close. I'm still living in Bitcoin euphoria, since the CFR took an interest in Bitcoin only 2 of the 4 big predictions have come to pass. 1) the collapse and or outlawing of key exchanges 2) the arrests of known Bitcoin personalities 3) a media smear camping demonising Bitcoin. 4) a collapse in the price. (I'm still coming to terms with Bitcoin leaving double digits) To be honest the only thing that can collapse the price IMO are the week hands, (non believers) stolen Bitcoin and whales redistributing/ facilitating future wealth growth, and I think a lot of coins @ the new order of magnetude have already been flushed. I welcome a drop but if it happens it may take time or if it is quick it will kick some new big players in the balls, if it happens. I've got no much fear left in me, to be honest. I've survived only April 2013 bubble with actually having coins though I watched the stuff in 2011. The biggest fear I had with BTC is how the USA will react it and all our fears about Bitcoin going to zero were around that point last summer. As soon as USA approached Bitcoin and announced to make it legal, I see any price drop as usual market movements. There are bear markets, there are bull markets, we might make some money in each of them or lose in downtrends but Bitcoin is here to stay and that's all I care about. If there is one fear I have is about Bitcoin becoming irrelevant due to some superior technology but I think we have some time until that happens.
|
|
|
|
arepo
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
this statement is false
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:35:08 AM |
|
Such volume. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F6NLoe2el.png&t=665&c=nlhaQDZWOHG1Jw) it's always beautiful to see triangle consolidation patterns on such small scales... the self-similarity in the price function is striking.
|
|
|
|
Peter R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:46:05 AM |
|
If there is one fear I have is about Bitcoin becoming irrelevant due to some superior technology but I think we have some time until that happens.
I think we have a very long time until that happens. I remember when I was first learning about bitcoin in March 2013. People would say how this alt coin was better because it had faster block times, or that alt coin was better because it was proof-of-stake and used less mining energy. Or this coin has demurrage to prevent hoarding or that coin uses ASIC-resistant hashing, or this coin is "Turing complete." What I've come to believe is that this was mostly attempts by alt coin pumpers to appeal to newbies. It seems to make sense that a "second generation" coin would be an improvement, but the more I learn, the more I believe that there are no fundamental improvements that can be made by alt coins and design changes. I've now spent months researching bitcoin at the technical level and I never cease to be amazed at Satoshi's genius. He seemed to give great thought to every detail. My only criticism (and perhaps I'm missing something) is the way the ECDSA signatures are included in the transaction hash (which contributed to the transaction malleability problem). But maybe there was a reason for this too that I've missed. Nevertheless, we should have malleability eliminated over the coming year.
|
|
|
|
lyth0s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
World Class Cryptonaire
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:50:08 AM |
|
If there is one fear I have is about Bitcoin becoming irrelevant due to some superior technology but I think we have some time until that happens.
I think we have a very long time until that happens. I remember when I was first learning about bitcoin in March 2013. People would say how this alt coin was better because it had faster block times, or that alt coin was better because it was proof-of-stake and used less mining energy. Or this coin has demurrage to prevent hoarding or that coin uses ASIC-resistant hashing, or this coin is "Turing complete." What I've come to believe is that this was mostly attempts by alt coin pumpers to appeal to newbies. It seems to make sense that a "second generation" coin would be an improvement, but the more I learn, the more I believe that there are no fundamental problems in bitcoin that can be solved by alt coins and design changes. I've now spent months researching bitcoin at the technical level and I never cease to be amazed at Satoshi's genius. He seemed to give great thought to every detail. My only criticism (and perhaps I'm missing something) is the way the ECDSA signatures are included in the transaction hash (which contributed to the transaction malleability problem). But maybe there was a reason for this too that I've missed. Nevertheless, we should have malleability eliminated over the coming years. Tell me if I'm wrong but wasn't malleability known for years and more of an issue with how the programers of certain exchanges verified that a transaction was sent (the lazy way of just checking the transaction hash)?
|
|
|
|
Peter R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:53:38 AM |
|
Tell me if I'm wrong but wasn't malleability known for years and more of an issue with how the programers of certain exchanges verified that a transaction was sent (the lazy way of just checking the transaction hash)?
Yes, malleability was known for years and, in my opinion, wasn't even a "bug." It was just the way bitcoin was. Competent exchanges could never be affected by malleability. But it seems to me (I should give credit to DeathAndTaxes) that if the ECDSA signatures were not included in the transaction hash, then malleability would have been impossible right from the start. But perhaps I'm missing something and it was important that the signatures were included in the transaction hash.
|
|
|
|
KeyserSoze
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:55:00 AM |
|
Odd that we don't see you here all the times you guess wrong...
|
|
|
|
seleme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 05:55:23 AM |
|
All altcoin advantage talk is marketing stuff. At one point, the word "service" was holly grail. We barely had any bitcoin service people were using yet people were obsessed with altcoin services.
|
|
|
|
lyth0s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
World Class Cryptonaire
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
March 18, 2014, 06:00:45 AM |
|
Odd that we don't see you here all the times you guess wrong... When did I guess wrong? That is my first prediction thread ever as far as I know...It's also the first time I've published my opinion online (GeekCipher).
|
|
|
|
|