Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[d_eddie]

I've stopped arguing with "Schwurbler", I think that is what vaccination opponents are called in your country, but this Nazi comparison still gets my goat. Unpackbar.

Fine. I stopped arguing about topics with people that stopped arguing about topics. I still value your opinion and i also understand your point.

EDIT: You could have looked that up for yourself: Schwurbler  explanation (german). I also don't like it when people reduce anybody with a different opinion to a single word.
The current meaning of "Schwurbler" is a trending term for "Querdenker". I don't consider myself anywhere near those.
But it's always easy to fall for prejudice, which is exclusive to humans.

It was not my intention to reduce you to a single word, sorry for that. Your Schwurbler definition is wrong. Not all Schwurbler are Querdenker, but all Querdenker are Schwurbler Please feel free to continue researching the word

+1 WOsMerit each.

[1714873516]

1714873516

[BobLawblaw]

You'll have to point out where the Nazis were vaccinating people with a vaccine that is 99% effective in keeping people from dying a rather sad and painful death.

Would you like to take a shower in Treblinka?

[somac.]

Also: about peer reviewed papers - make sure you check who it was that reviewed the paper and where it was published. I could send in a paper which states human shit cures cancer to an "institute" in India and get it published in some BS "science journal" with 50 peer reviews from some indian scientists nobody has ever heard of and probably don't even exist or who do exist and only care about making money.

I would only have to pay a few thousand dollars.

Best way to deal with this is to look up the journal's "Impact Factor". This shows how many times papers have been cited in other journals and their resultant quality.

IF >20=Science, Nature, JAMA
IF <2=Indian Times, DUH, etc.

This is not as good a guide as it once was. There is a lot of stuff that is absolutely not reproduciable in the higher up journals. Publishing has always been somewhat political and a who you know type thing and I feel that it is only getting worse. Though in this case I imagine the Indian Times is indeed shitter. But certainly don't trust the leading journals.

I myself am listed as a author (not first or last) in a recent enough paper published in Nature communications and currently have another paper in the same journal under review.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[naim027]

Guys, Am I invisible today? Just attention-seeking.

Yes... you are a bit annoying, and hopefully, you will be able to grow the fuck up at some point.. sooner rather than later would be better, but many of us realize and appreciate that growing up takes time and cannot be rushed, even if we have some expectations and hopes in regards to someone like you who may well need grandma to come down and to shut off your computer for a while... but yeah, maybe even grandma lost control of the situation...

Well, I am not going to argue with you. I believe you are a typing Bot. Who doesn't have any sense (?). The Typing Bot uses the Internet resources to write their shit.

Are you afraid? Just because I am here for almost 18 hours a day? I believe you are afraid of me, at the same point you could lose your position to me in this forum? My grandma is not alive anymore, so, you could send your's so she can shut down my PC.
I believe she cannot shut down my PC since I am not under 18 anymore.

Thanks to @cAPSLOCK, He is the real guy and he knows what to do with whom?

[bitcoinPsycho]

Bitcoin eyeing up 60K

[Biodom]

Also: about peer reviewed papers - make sure you check who it was that reviewed the paper and where it was published. I could send in a paper which states human shit cures cancer to an "institute" in India and get it published in some BS "science journal" with 50 peer reviews from some indian scientists nobody has ever heard of and probably don't even exist or who do exist and only care about making money.

I would only have to pay a few thousand dollars.

Best way to deal with this is to look up the journal's "Impact Factor". This shows how many times papers have been cited in other journals and their resultant quality.

IF >20=Science, Nature, JAMA
IF <2=Indian Times, DUH, etc.

This is not as good a guide as it once was. There is a lot of stuff that is absolutely not reproduciable in the higher up journals. Publishing has always been somewhat political and a who you know type thing and I feel that it is only getting worse. Though in this case I imagine the Indian Times is indeed shitter. But certainly don't trust the leading journals.

I myself am listed as a author (not first or last) in a recent enough paper published in Nature communications and currently have another paper in the same journal under review.

I also published in Nature, both as a first and last author (not recently, though) and it was very tough to get done as they receive vastly more papers than they could publish.
Many people in our field never had a paper published there and several of mine were rejected as well, then published in lesser journals.

[HI-TEC99]

4-hr RSI oversold, double bottom.

Going to eat catfood if it doesn't rebound.

[Arriemoller]

I have eat your cat food
His that delicious

All your base are belong to us

[Syke]

Is tuna cat food?

[Richy_T]

Straw. Man. Try harder.

Nope. I'm just curious how people now are behaving like Nazis. I have met some real Nazis, both in the US atomic bomb programs and from the ex-Vichy regime.

They were quite unlike people who wish to vaccinate people these days, you might call them.... chilling, if you had met them.

We've had vaccinations for more than two centuries. The issue is not with the 'vaccine' itself. Indeed, many of those having issues with what is going on are vaccinated themselves. So yes, strawman as independently called out by someone else too.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[naim027]

4-hr RSI oversold, double bottom.

Going to eat cat food if it doesn't rebound.

Please don't. We will be in shortage of cat food then.
For your kind information, here in my country, Cat food is more expensive than human food. IDK what about in your country.

Cat food - 1KG - $10
Rice- 1 KG - $0.80

1 KG Rice could be a good meal for a 4 member family.

So please don't eat cat food. 🙏🙏

[HI-TEC99]

Is tuna cat food?

No, they eat McDonald's,

[lightfoot]

We've had vaccinations for more than two centuries. The issue is not with the 'vaccine' itself. Indeed, many of those having issues with what is going on are vaccinated themselves. So yes, strawman as independently called out by someone else too.

I've stopped on this one. No more Nazis in this thread.

Hey, bitcoin seems to be back. Wonder when it will pass 120k.

[naim027]

Is tuna cat food?

No, they eat McDonald's,

They eat Weed too

[somac.]

Also: about peer reviewed papers - make sure you check who it was that reviewed the paper and where it was published. I could send in a paper which states human shit cures cancer to an "institute" in India and get it published in some BS "science journal" with 50 peer reviews from some indian scientists nobody has ever heard of and probably don't even exist or who do exist and only care about making money.

I would only have to pay a few thousand dollars.

Best way to deal with this is to look up the journal's "Impact Factor". This shows how many times papers have been cited in other journals and their resultant quality.

IF >20=Science, Nature, JAMA
IF <2=Indian Times, DUH, etc.

This is not as good a guide as it once was. There is a lot of stuff that is absolutely not reproduciable in the higher up journals. Publishing has always been somewhat political and a who you know type thing and I feel that it is only getting worse. Though in this case I imagine the Indian Times is indeed shitter. But certainly don't trust the leading journals.

I myself am listed as a author (not first or last) in a recent enough paper published in Nature communications and currently have another paper in the same journal under review.

I also published in Nature, both as a first and last author (not recently, though) and it was very tough to get done as they receive vastly more papers than they could publish.
Many people in our field never had a paper published there and several of mine were rejected as well, then published in lesser journals.

Yep, they would get flooded with papers. We don't often publish in such high ranking journals but if we think we have even a small chance we'll generally take it. No loss if they don't accept, especially if outright rejection (as it's quicker), then just move down the line. Having those high ranking papers does help come grant time so it's definitely worth a shot. Mind you no grants for me this round, but thanks to Bitcoin I really don't care anymore.  

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation

[lightfoot]

[jojo69]

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-11-17/canadian-teen-arrested-in-crypto-theft-worth-36-5-million?cmpid=BBD111821_OUS&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&utm_term=211118&utm_campaign=openamericas&sref=6uww027M