Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3990
Merit: 5429
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
July 04, 2022, 07:45:00 PM |
|
are we rich yet?
are we free yet? are we sane? The definition is debatable.
|
|
|
|
empowering
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
|
|
July 04, 2022, 07:54:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 04, 2022, 08:01:21 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 04, 2022, 09:03:32 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Wilhelm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1265
|
|
July 04, 2022, 09:19:53 PM |
|
The Dutch will go hungry if the farmers keep the protests up. Blocking many food distribution outlets from what I've read. Maybe McDonald's is unaffected. 75% of our food is imported so we will only harm our export. But yes we are expanding the Maasvlakte with poluting petrochemical companies however cow farts and farmers are apparently the problem.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 04, 2022, 10:01:20 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 4455
|
|
July 04, 2022, 10:01:59 PM Last edit: July 04, 2022, 10:43:57 PM by Biodom |
|
The number of non-zero bitcoin addresses and coins in them keeps increasing throughout this bear (i posted the link here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg60504546#msg60504546), which makes me think that it is a fake-out engineered by the Wall street to bankrupt early lending firms (Blockfi, celsius, Voyager) and replace them with THEMSELVES with people like SBF being in kahoots with the banks, most likely. The fact that BIS now allows 1% of funds in banks total assets being bitcoin and etc. points to this dynamic as well. Conclusion: It was all totally FAKE (at least as far as 67.6-69K top is concerned) and very similar to how they pushed Internet stocks deep down in 2001-2002 to take the major positions in them at a deep discount.
|
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4508
Merit: 4094
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
|
July 04, 2022, 10:15:01 PM |
|
are we rich yet?
are we free yet? are we sane? The definition is debatable. well sanity has its downsides anyhow. overrated.
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3990
Merit: 5429
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
|
July 04, 2022, 10:16:18 PM |
|
are we rich yet?
are we free yet? are we sane? The definition is debatable. well sanity has its downsides anyhow. overrated. thats why I like to compliment people by calling them my favorite type of crazy. BTW
|
|
|
|
Gachapin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 2214
bitcoin retard
|
|
July 04, 2022, 10:37:24 PM Last edit: July 05, 2022, 12:36:18 AM by Gachapin Merited by vapourminer (1) |
|
The number of non-zero bitcoin addresses and coins in them keeps increasing throughout this bear (i posted the link here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg60504546#msg60504546), which makes me think that it is a fake-out engineered by the Wall street to bankrupt early lending firms (Blockfi, celsius, Voyager) and replace them with THEMSELVES with people like SBF being in kahoots with banks, most likely. The fact that BIS now allows 1% of funds in a banks assets being bitcoin and etc. points to this dynamic as well. It was all totally FAKE (at least as far as 67.6-69K top is concerned) and very similar how they pushed Internet stocks deep down in 2001-2002 to take the major positions in them at a deep discount. Totally possible The last months of dumping looked rather fake and rushed (e.g. no bounces) in face of not even having had a parabolic spike top... IMO nobody would sell that way, if he didn't want to collapse the price. The question is: Was it to simply hurt Bitcoin or was it to get a big position? Like you, I tend to think it's the latter. Because if it was the former "they" would probably just create some harsh legislation and destroy the market. Also, big players like Intel starting selling ASICs is a hint for me.
|
|
|
|
BTCaesar
Member
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 24
|
|
July 04, 2022, 10:55:26 PM |
|
are we rich yet?
are we free yet? are we sane? are we bored? are we still in Bear Market?
|
|
|
|
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 5272
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
|
|
July 04, 2022, 10:56:35 PM |
|
Taking a stab.
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 4455
|
|
July 04, 2022, 10:57:46 PM |
|
above 20K
|
|
|
|
JimboToronto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4186
Merit: 4855
You're never too old to think young.
|
Benedict Arnold was a patriot, loyal to his king. George Washington was an opportunistic traitor, glorifying himself and furthering his career through treason. Happy 4th.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 04, 2022, 11:04:55 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
goldkingcoiner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2226
Merit: 1974
A Bitcoiner chooses. A slave obeys.
|
|
July 04, 2022, 11:10:10 PM |
|
Just a feeling.
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 4455
|
|
July 04, 2022, 11:31:50 PM Last edit: July 05, 2022, 02:42:01 AM by Biodom |
|
An 'alternative' bullish view that suggests that 69 was a "3", not a "5". https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/YborCh2M-Is-Bitcoin-about-to-rally-to-110-120k/I give this scenario a low chance (make it 20-30%), but it ALSO suggests a 47-48K point in a few mo, then 110-120K thereafter (this is a part of lengthening cycle model that suggest that the current bear is intermittent, like in the summer of 2013)
|
|
|
|
Wilhelm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1265
|
|
July 04, 2022, 11:59:08 PM |
|
Not going to happen, they are probably going to give everyone free guns to prevent shootings
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
July 05, 2022, 12:04:58 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2316
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
July 05, 2022, 12:08:09 AM |
|
Gun laws just got reviewed in the supreme court. Didn't go the way you'd like. Sorry, not sorry.
|
|
|
|
|