Bitcoin Forum
November 02, 2024, 02:42:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will BTC get back above $70K:
7/14 - 0 (0%)
7/21 - 1 (0.8%)
7/28 - 11 (9.1%)
8/4 - 16 (13.2%)
8/11 - 7 (5.8%)
8/18 - 6 (5%)
8/25 - 8 (6.6%)
After August - 72 (59.5%)
Total Voters: 121

Pages: « 1 ... 5574 5575 5576 5577 5578 5579 5580 5581 5582 5583 5584 5585 5586 5587 5588 5589 5590 5591 5592 5593 5594 5595 5596 5597 5598 5599 5600 5601 5602 5603 5604 5605 5606 5607 5608 5609 5610 5611 5612 5613 5614 5615 5616 5617 5618 5619 5620 5621 5622 5623 [5624] 5625 5626 5627 5628 5629 5630 5631 5632 5633 5634 5635 5636 5637 5638 5639 5640 5641 5642 5643 5644 5645 5646 5647 5648 5649 5650 5651 5652 5653 5654 5655 5656 5657 5658 5659 5660 5661 5662 5663 5664 5665 5666 5667 5668 5669 5670 5671 5672 5673 5674 ... 33873 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26485048 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
fonzie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


Moderator


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:03:03 PM

Never forget:

Bitstamp:


Whole bid volume
11,146,031.76 USD

Ratio
1 : 2.83


Bitfinex:

Total sum of active swaps
USD    15,794,084.87 USD

 Smiley
derpinheimer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:04:21 PM

On stamp there are 115.98btc order all down the order book. In intervalls of 5$, so 69. I think this is one guy and he is biding for around 8000btc. Can somebody explain this to me.Why does he use always the same amount. So that people know that it is from one guy?

Easier to do it by making all the USD sums the same or all the BTC sums the same.

He (or, possibly someone else with that same amount- no guarantee) has a 115.98btc ask as well, so they are probably just trying to flip for a quick profit.
kurious
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 1643



View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:22:32 PM

On stamp there are 115.98btc order all down the order book. In intervalls of 5$, so 69. I think this is one guy and he is biding for around 8000btc. Can somebody explain this to me.Why does he use always the same amount. So that people know that it is from one guy?

Easier to do it by making all the USD sums the same or all the BTC sums the same.

He (or, possibly someone else with that same amount- no guarantee) has a 115.98btc ask as well, so they are probably just trying to flip for a quick profit.

One alternative theory...   as Bobby Lee suggested in a discussion at Coinsummit, it is a 'possible way' the exchange can make the order book look fatter than it is, and these coins all disappear as the price nears them.

He was suggesting this is how dodgy exchanges boosted the books (and price).  It was in response to questions about 'fake volume' in China.  He said it was the reason you saw Litecoin drop to a dollar at one point recently.  A market sell order dropped in and all the 'fake' coin buys under the price disappeared as they were nearly hit, meaning an apparently 'freak' crash happened (there were far less coins to sell into than it appeared).

But of course, 'Western' exchanges would never do things like bolstering prices like that.
roslinpl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1199


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2014, 10:22:51 PM

Promising ... much better than a chart from -12h.

But this is now impossible to predict what would be next.
So far I was predicting that price will go up Smiley from it was 480$...
And now I dunno what would be next.
cbutters
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:25:30 PM

can we ban fonzie yet? I know most have him on ignore and I do too, but he is LITERALLY in every single thread today spouting nonsense. I know he posts normally now and then, but today is ridiculous and everyone keeps quoting him. he must be short and trying to get the market to crash any way he can.
fonzie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


Moderator


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:25:43 PM

On stamp there are 115.98btc order all down the order book. In intervalls of 5$, so 69. I think this is one guy and he is biding for around 8000btc. Can somebody explain this to me.Why does he use always the same amount. So that people know that it is from one guy?

Easier to do it by making all the USD sums the same or all the BTC sums the same.

He (or, possibly someone else with that same amount- no guarantee) has a 115.98btc ask as well, so they are probably just trying to flip for a quick profit.

One alternative theory...   as Bobby Lee suggested in a discussion at Coinsummit, it is a 'possible way' the exchange can make the order book look fatter than it is, and these coins all disappear as the price nears them.

He was suggesting this is how dodgy exchanges boosted the books (and price).  It was in response to questions about 'fake volume' in China.  He said it was the reason you saw Litecoin drop to a dollar at one point recently.  A market sell order dropped in and all the 'fake' coin buys under the price disappeared as they were nearly hit, meaning an apparently 'freak' crash happened (there were far less coins to sell into than it appeared).

But of course, 'Western' exchanges would never do things like bolstering prices like that.

Interesting, especially the conjunction to the LTC drop. That makes a lot of sense now. Thanks
fonzie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


Moderator


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:27:37 PM

can we ban fonzie yet? I know most have him on ignore and I do too, but he is LITERALLY in every single thread today spouting nonsense. I know he posts normally now and then, but today is ridiculous and everyone keeps quoting him. he must be short and trying to get the market to crash any way he can.

Just burn the books, kill the commies. Let´s get rid of all these annoying problems.
cee-euros
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:32:10 PM

china attempting pump again, the west unfazed. good to see
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2014, 10:33:23 PM

windjc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:33:30 PM

Never forget:

Bitstamp:


Whole bid volume
11,146,031.76 USD

Ratio
1 : 2.83


Bitfinex:

Total sum of active swaps
USD    15,794,084.87 USD

 Smiley


Do you have buy orders set with your shorts Fonzie or do you have a number you are waiting for?
fonzie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


Moderator


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:36:37 PM

Never forget:

Bitstamp:


Whole bid volume
11,146,031.76 USD

Ratio
1 : 2.83


Bitfinex:

Total sum of active swaps
USD    15,794,084.87 USD

 Smiley


Do you have buy orders set with your shorts Fonzie or do you have an number you are waiting for?

I´m long term shorting.

25% will be closed @360
25%  "                 @310
25% "                  @255
25% "                   @200

stop loss for my shorts is actually @ 519
edwardspitz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 250


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:41:53 PM

can we ban fonzie yet? I know most have him on ignore and I do too, but he is LITERALLY in every single thread today spouting nonsense. I know he posts normally now and then, but today is ridiculous and everyone keeps quoting him. he must be short and trying to get the market to crash any way he can.

Just burn the books, kill the commies. Let´s get rid of all these annoying problems.

I don't think Fonzie wants the market to crash and I don't see him campaigning against Bitcoin outside of these forums. I think Fonzie has has benefited many people on this forums whether they will admit to or not. Just understand his perspective.
windjc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:44:06 PM

Never forget:

Bitstamp:


Whole bid volume
11,146,031.76 USD

Ratio
1 : 2.83


Bitfinex:

Total sum of active swaps
USD    15,794,084.87 USD

 Smiley




Do you have buy orders set with your shorts Fonzie or do you have an number you are waiting for?

I´m long term shorting.

25% will be closed @360
25%  "                 @310
25% "                  @250
25% "                   @200

stop loss for my shorts is actually @ 519

I have my shorts scattered from 426 - 406 at $2 intervals.  If figured the market would peck away from $425-$400 and swing back up a few times. So the market closed out 5 of my 10 positions last night. Before I went to bed, I then open 3 more shorts at each of the 3 Fib retracement levels. I woke up, two were hit, one missed by a $1.

So its rinse and repeat for me until we get to 405ish - where I expect we will have a final battle. I'll decide where to go from there.
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2014, 10:45:32 PM

I´m long term shorting.

lmao
nrd525
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1868
Merit: 1023


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:47:58 PM

can we ban fonzie yet? I know most have him on ignore and I do too, but he is LITERALLY in every single thread today spouting nonsense. I know he posts normally now and then, but today is ridiculous and everyone keeps quoting him. he must be short and trying to get the market to crash any way he can.

How is the possible liquidation of long positions on Bitfinex, and thus a corresponding decline in the market, "nonsense"?


btw - I'm long.
fonzie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


Moderator


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:48:27 PM


I have my shorts scattered from 426 - 406 at $2 intervals.  If figured the market would peck away from $425-$400 and swing back up a few times. So It closed out 5 of my 10 positions last night. Before I went to bed, I then open 3 more shorts at each of the 3 Fib retracement levels. I would up, two were hit, one missed by a $1.

So its rinse and repeat for me until we get to 405ish - where I expect we will have a final battle. I'll decide where to go from there.

That´s a good strategy, i did similar between the 720-550$ ping pong time , but i don´t have the time and energy to watch the market that close right now. And i think a drop to 250$ could happen anytime now, so i wan´t to be all in with shorts when the time comes.
klopper
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:49:01 PM

chessnut
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1001



View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:50:27 PM


stop loss for my shorts is actually @ 519

Thats not what I'd call long term shorting. 519 will be too easy to break.
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
April 03, 2014, 10:50:31 PM


very good summary
we've been getting it in bits and pieces as the news's came in
some traders here have reported they are not willing to trade with such uncertainty in the air, so i think we have pretty much priced out china now.
mah87
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 500

-Bitcoin & Ripple-


View Profile
April 03, 2014, 10:50:34 PM


Bad news are gone ! Time to plunge to 200$ ? what do you think adam ?
Pages: « 1 ... 5574 5575 5576 5577 5578 5579 5580 5581 5582 5583 5584 5585 5586 5587 5588 5589 5590 5591 5592 5593 5594 5595 5596 5597 5598 5599 5600 5601 5602 5603 5604 5605 5606 5607 5608 5609 5610 5611 5612 5613 5614 5615 5616 5617 5618 5619 5620 5621 5622 5623 [5624] 5625 5626 5627 5628 5629 5630 5631 5632 5633 5634 5635 5636 5637 5638 5639 5640 5641 5642 5643 5644 5645 5646 5647 5648 5649 5650 5651 5652 5653 5654 5655 5656 5657 5658 5659 5660 5661 5662 5663 5664 5665 5666 5667 5668 5669 5670 5671 5672 5673 5674 ... 33873 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!