Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Hueristic]

~

Still missing an open quote tag

One of his quirks.

Like me he'll go back and fix it.

[JayJuanGee]

big ass snip
........
JJG you are correct I am quirky.

Would I sell my name I am quirky enough to not sell it.

But 333 coins would be tempting.

To be honest if I were offered 333 coins and told I must never post on bitcointalk to keep the coins I am not sure I could refrain from posting with an alias.

First, after nearly 12 years participating in this forum, you are so quirky that you don't even know how to "properly" quote (as also mentioned by promise444c5 and Hueristic).. hahahahhahaa..

or maybe you made a mistake in your quoting?

or maybe you deserve a bat slappening just to shape you up?

or whatever..... you do you.  

Second, I would imagine that you are going to sell out for way less than 333 BTC, and if you seriously had an offer that was legit and unambiguous of at least 50 BTC, I have a hard time imagining you turning down such an offer.. even though sure, I might have the number wrong.. and maybe your actual bottomline price might be in the 70 BTC range, but still think about it, 50-70 BTC is a whole hell of a lot of value, and even just using such an amount in a sustainable withdrawal way.. let's say 60 BTC, with a 7% withdrawal rate, that is going to give you 0.35BTC per month as income.. so that is a whole hell of a lot of value, even at today's BTC prices that might not even be close to reflective of true value.

Third, the imposition of a refrain to post (and let's say it was actually enforceable in some kind of a meaningful way).  Yes, such a restriction could really cause an increase in the amount that you would want to receive for your account, but I still cannot imagine you really turning down a concrete and legitimate receipt of 60 BTC.. they could even be distributed as virgin coins and in whatever UTXO amounts (or wallet distributions) that you would like.. whether that would be 60 1BTC UTXOs and perhaps in different wallets (and maybe some free hardware devices that would facilitate your receipt of the coins) or some other amounts per UTXO or amounts per wallet that you conclude to be convenient and practical for your preferences.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[Torque]

OT:

Fed Chair Powell says "holding rates high for too long could jeopardize economic growth"
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/09/fed-chief-powell-says-holding-rates-high-for-too-long-could-jeopardize-economic-growth.html

Yeah, and in other news...

... people in Hell want ice water.    

[promise444c5]

... people in Hell want ice water.    

Yeah get cooled for some seconds then continue with the burning sensation  

[philipma1957]

big ass snip
........
JJG you are correct I am quirky.

Would I sell my name I am quirky enough to not sell it.

But 333 coins would be tempting.

To be honest if I were offered 333 coins and told I must never post on bitcointalk to keep the coins I am not sure I could refrain from posting with an alias.

First, after nearly 12 years participating in this forum, you are so quirky that you don't even know how to "properly" quote (as also mentioned by promise444c5 and Hueristic).. hahahahhahaa..

or maybe you made a mistake in your quoting?

or maybe you deserve a bat slappening just to shape you up?

or whatever..... you do you.  

Second, I would imagine that you are going to sell out for way less than 333 BTC, and if you seriously had an offer that was legit and unambiguous of at least 50 BTC, I have a hard time imagining you turning down such an offer.. even though sure, I might have the number wrong.. and maybe your actual bottomline price might be in the 70 BTC range, but still think about it, 50-70 BTC is a whole hell of a lot of value, and even just using such an amount in a sustainable withdrawal way.. let's say 60 BTC, with a 7% withdrawal rate, that is going to give you 0.35BTC per month as income.. so that is a whole hell of a lot of value, even at today's BTC prices that might not even be close to reflective of true value.

Third, the imposition of a refrain to post (and let's say it was actually enforceable in some kind of a meaningful way).  Yes, such a restriction could really cause an increase in the amount that you would want to receive for your account, but I still cannot imagine you really turning down a concrete and legitimate receipt of 60 BTC.. they could even be distributed as virgin coins and in whatever UTXO amounts (or wallet distributions) that you would like.. whether that would be 60 1BTC UTXOs and perhaps in different wallets (and maybe some free hardware devices that would facilitate your receipt of the coins) or some other amounts per UTXO or amounts per wallet that you conclude to be convenient and practical for your preferences.

No one is giving me 60 btc I doubt  I could get 5.
.

I will go back and fix the quote a bit later.  the big ass snip was too big.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[serveria.com]

Nice lil pumpie... 

[FinePoine0]

Nice lil pumpie... 

Although it is normal for the bitcoin market to be dumping for a period of time, the main reason for this is the government of the USA and Germany And those who are selling bitcoins. Because they have sold massive bitcoins to escape the dip, it is very likely that bitcoin will go back to the past price and touch $73k.

[OgNasty]

A new mtgox email just went out… The issue I brought up on my previous post on the subject has now been resolved. I had stated an exchange had yet to have their users receive confirmation that deposits were going to be made. That email has now gone out and it is presumed that BTC and BCH repayments will be made in the next 60 days (although the deadline is the end of October).

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

[Zeunerts]

Germany continues - down to 19K bitcoins now.

ETFs inflows continues, $216 million in inflows yesterday.





EDIT: Down to 13K now.
"In the past hour, they have sent another 2000 BTC ($117.3M) to Coinbase, Kraken and 139Po.

They now have 13,360 BTC ($784.96M) remaining - that’s 26.8% of the Bitcoin originally seized from Movie2k."

[Dump3er]

PANAMA CITY, June 28 (Reuters) - A Panamanian court has acquitted 28 people charged with money-laundering under cases linked to the Panama Papers and "Operation Car Wash" scandals, the country's judicial branch said in a statement on Friday.
It did not provide names of the people who were acquitted.

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/panama-court-acquits-28-people-tied-panama-papers-operation-car-wash-2024-06-29/

At least 3 people dead connected to this but bitcoin is the criminal coin.

Well, I assume that Panama would destroy its entire main source of income if they convicted people for money laundering. I am aware they signed double taxation treaties and agreed to exchange financial information with the United States, but this still means nothing. It only means that the US government knows who might be evading taxes, and knowledge gives power. Consequences are only drawn when the tax evading billionaires revolt. The Panama court letting go all these people is the best advertisement they could have put out to the global elites.

I guess the general public would rather not be informed about the US government what's going on there. Maybe the Biden administration would go after some of their tax evaders though. But I wonder why someone would use a Panama setup when there are legal ways for people to pay close to zero tax in the US. At least that is what I think is happening with many of the billionaires. But there is of course the problem that they can amass wealth while not getting taxed for it.