Bitcoin Forum
June 26, 2025, 08:24:40 AM *
News: Pizza day contest voting
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 7 (7.9%)
$120K - 15 (16.9%)
$130K - 13 (14.6%)
$140K - 9 (10.1%)
$150K - 15 (16.9%)
$160K - 1 (1.1%)
$170K+ - 29 (32.6%)
Total Voters: 89

Pages: « 1 ... 7272 7273 7274 7275 7276 7277 7278 7279 7280 7281 7282 7283 7284 7285 7286 7287 7288 7289 7290 7291 7292 7293 7294 7295 7296 7297 7298 7299 7300 7301 7302 7303 7304 7305 7306 7307 7308 7309 7310 7311 7312 7313 7314 7315 7316 7317 7318 7319 7320 7321 [7322] 7323 7324 7325 7326 7327 7328 7329 7330 7331 7332 7333 7334 7335 7336 7337 7338 7339 7340 7341 7342 7343 7344 7345 7346 7347 7348 7349 7350 7351 7352 7353 7354 7355 7356 7357 7358 7359 7360 7361 7362 7363 7364 7365 7366 7367 7368 7369 7370 7371 7372 ... 34663 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26798207 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
BTCfan1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 03:03:06 AM

I like how optimistic this thread is right now
Bitcoin_is_here_to_stay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 03:10:26 AM

I like how optimistic this thread is right now

Sarcasm? U shorting?
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 03:17:10 AM


The last times the exponential baseline defined by the lows on a bitstamp chart was redefined were 9 Jul, 24 Jun, 1 Oct 2013, 5 Jul 2013, 11 Apr 2013.
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 03:22:03 AM

I like how optimistic this thread is right now

Sarcasm? U shorting?

I think that merely exponential growth is disappointing to the devotees of the super-exponential curve fit.

When you are disappointed in the performance of BTC/fiat, it means that you are shocked and saddened at how foolish and short-sighted are the other members of your species.

The correct action then, is not to short BTC (which continues its inexorable exponential rise) but to short mankind, which apparently peaked around 1969.
Bitcoin_is_here_to_stay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 03:25:15 AM

I like how optimistic this thread is right now

Sarcasm? U shorting?

I think that merely exponential growth is disappointing to the devotees of the super-exponential curve fit.

When you are disappointed in the performance of BTC/fiat, it means that you are shocked and saddened at how foolish and short-sighted are the other members of your species.

The correct action then, is not to short BTC (which continues its inexorable exponential rise) but to short mankind, which apparently peaked around 1969.


LOL on shorting mankind. What happened in 1969?
Wary
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


Who's there?


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 03:28:17 AM


The last times the exponential baseline defined by the lows on a bitstamp chart was redefined were 9 Jul, 24 Jun, 1 Oct 2013, 5 Jul 2013, 11 Apr 2013.

So it's good tradition to keep redefining it.
Chef Ramsay
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 03:30:42 AM

I like how optimistic this thread is right now

Sarcasm? U shorting?

I think that merely exponential growth is disappointing to the devotees of the super-exponential curve fit.

When you are disappointed in the performance of BTC/fiat, it means that you are shocked and saddened at how foolish and short-sighted are the other members of your species.

The correct action then, is not to short BTC (which continues its inexorable exponential rise) but to short mankind, which apparently peaked around 1969.


LOL on shorting mankind. What happened in 1969?

I think '71 was the year Nixon severed the dollar from silver once and for all.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 2221


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 04:00:21 AM


Explanation
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 04:01:58 AM
Last edit: July 13, 2014, 04:15:40 AM by aminorex

The correct action then, is not to short BTC (which continues its inexorable exponential rise) but to short mankind, which apparently peaked around 1969.


LOL on shorting mankind. What happened in 1969?

I think '71 was the year Nixon severed the dollar from silver once and for all.

From gold.  Silver certificates could no longer be redeemed for metal after 24 June 1968.

IIRC we made it to the moon in July of '69.  Also, I think the U.S. median standard of living peaked about that time.  

MLK Jr. was assassinated in 1968, Nixon elected, Timothy Leary arrested. Elvis went to Las Vegas.  AIDS came to the U.S.  Overall the end of the '60s was a very unfortunate turning point.
But the deathknell for mankind was undoubtedly captured on videotape, thusly:  What's New Pussycat?
Stevenrm87
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 403
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 04:27:34 AM

LTC!!!! CCMF!
CEG5952
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500

Buy and sell bitcoins,


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 04:30:11 AM

The correct action then, is not to short BTC (which continues its inexorable exponential rise) but to short mankind, which apparently peaked around 1969.

Haha, okay I am sort of with you on this. But how does one short mankind, exactly? I've got some funds set aside. Smiley
nioc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 04:36:04 AM

The correct action then, is not to short BTC (which continues its inexorable exponential rise) but to short mankind, which apparently peaked around 1969.


LOL on shorting mankind. What happened in 1969?

I think '71 was the year Nixon severed the dollar from silver once and for all.

From gold.  Silver certificates could no longer be redeemed for metal after 24 June 1968.

IIRC we made it to the moon in July of '69.  Also, I think the U.S. median standard of living peaked about that time.  

MLK Jr. was assassinated in 1968, Nixon elected, Timothy Leary arrested. Elvis went to Las Vegas.  AIDS came to the U.S.  Overall the end of the '60s was a very unfortunate turning point.
But the deathknell for mankind was undoubtedly captured on videotape, thusly:  What's New Pussycat?


You do know the motivation for going to the moon don't you?

The following is a better example of Tom from 1969 although he was second fiddle. Cool
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXlP7PyaHdA
rebuilder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1615
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 04:58:51 AM


You do know the motivation for going to the moon don't you?


So... No moon without commies?
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 2221


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 05:00:21 AM


Explanation
BTCfan1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 05:02:12 AM

I like how optimistic this thread is right now

Sarcasm? U shorting?

nope. always hodling. Grin
nioc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 05:13:02 AM


You do know the motivation for going to the moon don't you?


So... No moon without commies?

Yes, the US was scared shitless when Sputnik was launched.  Any science was an after thought mostly done on the later missions.   

I hear some people are looking to go back to the moon Grin Grin Grin
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 05:38:50 AM
Last edit: July 13, 2014, 05:53:19 AM by JorgeStolfi

if you don't mind sweaty fat men in tutus.
Speaking of which, @Phinnaeus_Gage, the most prolific poster on this forum by far, has been absent since 2014-06-17.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=24792  
People who miss him or not have been speculating https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=667460.0
keithers
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1001


This is the land of wolves now & you're not a wolf


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 05:50:58 AM

if you don't mind sweaty fat men in tutus.
Speaking of which, @Phinnaeus_Gage, the most prolific poster on this forum by far, has been absent in since 2014-06-17.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=24792 
People who miss him or not have been speculating https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=667460.0


Funny, i was just thinking how we hadn't heard from him in awhile
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 05:51:50 AM

I hear some people are looking to go back to the moon Grin Grin Grin
I read hundreds if not thousands of posts about that around 1990 in the old sci.space forum. People were confident that in a couple of years one could launch and assemble a self-sufficient Moon base, distilling oxygen from rocks with solar power and mining helium-3 for export, if only the politicians saw the light.

But those plans were technically unfeasible at the time, of course. How could one go to the Moon without Bitcoin? Grin
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 2221


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 06:00:22 AM


Explanation
Pages: « 1 ... 7272 7273 7274 7275 7276 7277 7278 7279 7280 7281 7282 7283 7284 7285 7286 7287 7288 7289 7290 7291 7292 7293 7294 7295 7296 7297 7298 7299 7300 7301 7302 7303 7304 7305 7306 7307 7308 7309 7310 7311 7312 7313 7314 7315 7316 7317 7318 7319 7320 7321 [7322] 7323 7324 7325 7326 7327 7328 7329 7330 7331 7332 7333 7334 7335 7336 7337 7338 7339 7340 7341 7342 7343 7344 7345 7346 7347 7348 7349 7350 7351 7352 7353 7354 7355 7356 7357 7358 7359 7360 7361 7362 7363 7364 7365 7366 7367 7368 7369 7370 7371 7372 ... 34663 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!