...
Ok so I was just confirming, that basically you are saying BTC wil become irrelevant because it will no longer "do what it says on the tin"
First, some housekeeping.
Sentences end with a period. Ellipsis: three dots. Take the extra dots in your ellipses and stick them at the end of your sentences. Put the rest in your pocket--sell them to your friends.
Again, I did not say "will" (or "wil [sic]").
Try putting moar care into reading than you do into writing.
and you do not know what "a solution to centralization means?"
well, you infer that Bitcoin was only relevant because it is decentralised .........what made it relevant? because it was offering a solution to ...... ... ... centralisation..... right or no?
No. I Bitcoin is a solution to money. It never tried to offer a "solution to centralization" because centralization need to be solved as much as peanut butter.
Being decentralized helps Bitcoin. Being centralized hurts Bitcoin. How can I make this any simpler 4 U?
@empowering: But I have just gave you a concrete, non-trivial, and common example of the semantics not being semantics at all!
...stealing and fraud are still stealing and fraud...
But many people here call taxes stealing. Do you see how petty semantics aren't petty semantics, and that attempting to formalize shit and reconcile different interpretations of "what's right" gave us The Body Of Law?
Your post is funny ....I shall explain why
1st I never said anything about semantics.
2nd Your point about reading more and writing less, in view of my first point above, is quite hilarious.
3rd You say you do not argue semantics, and then do exactly that... again... funny.
.... 4th before you start off on grammar, sort your spelling out, before you start to give the grammar Nazi role a shot... for your info I write different on line than I do in formal work, and also I write in a hurry while normally multi tasking, so my apology if sometimes my posts are a bit "lazy"
Also, I
was talking about decentralisation and centralisation of Bitcoin and money, which IS also
one of the problems with centralisation in a broader sense.
Also the "body of law" you speak of... is not a static thing, it changes and will continue to change and evolve as the world does.
Lastly... I do not know if you have a bee in your bonnet about me, or in general but I have not done anything other than discuss, and disagree with you.. and as far as I know this is not offensive in and of itself and I do not think I have been offensive to you in anyway, so you know... chill out with the vibe and maybe not so much need for the sarcasm and hostile vibe... or not, up to you, just a suggestion, I for one am pretty chilled right now.. I hope you are/can be too.
Poll
