Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 05:38:10 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »
  Print  
Author Topic: BITSTAMP eXchange wall Observer. second biggest and best exchange  (Read 89275 times)
rampantparanoia
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 516
Merit: 283



View Profile
September 18, 2013, 02:51:28 PM
 #341

the gox whale has migrated to bitstamp for the winter
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715449090
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715449090

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715449090
Reply with quote  #2

1715449090
Report to moderator
1715449090
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715449090

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715449090
Reply with quote  #2

1715449090
Report to moderator
1715449090
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715449090

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715449090
Reply with quote  #2

1715449090
Report to moderator
eiswuerfel
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 267
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 18, 2013, 08:56:28 PM
 #342

Iam working currently on a simple Stamp wall tracker:
http://walltracker.bplaced.net/bitstamp/
endlessdark
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 18, 2013, 09:46:25 PM
 #343

ASKS
Price           Amount            Value
$127.96   0.50000000           $63.98
$127.99   81.82353198   $10,472.59
$128.00   865.38759445   $110,769.61
derpinheimer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 19, 2013, 12:34:42 AM
 #344

 Oh look, someone ate most of the bidwall. Btw that 800 ask isn't particularly large, and i  don't think its new either
prophetx
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010


he who has the gold makes the rules


View Profile WWW
September 19, 2013, 12:40:46 AM
 #345

Oh look, someone ate most of the bidwall. Btw that 800 ask isn't particularly large, and i  don't think its new either

yea and then they bought it right back 60 seconds later for a $ less minus fees...
derpinheimer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 19, 2013, 12:47:14 AM
 #346

Oh look, someone ate most of the bidwall. Btw that 800 ask isn't particularly large, and i  don't think its new either

yea and then they bought it right back 60 seconds later for a $ less minus fees...

History graph doesn't show any indication of that...?
prophetx
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010


he who has the gold makes the rules


View Profile WWW
September 19, 2013, 01:08:30 AM
 #347

Oh look, someone ate most of the bidwall. Btw that 800 ask isn't particularly large, and i  don't think its new either

yea and then they bought it right back 60 seconds later for a $ less minus fees...

History graph doesn't show any indication of that...?

yes there is no way to prove that it was the same actor, but someone came in and bought 900ish right after around 1100 was dumped
TERA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 19, 2013, 02:59:08 AM
 #348

Oh look, someone ate most of the bidwall. Btw that 800 ask isn't particularly large, and i  don't think its new either

yea and then they bought it right back 60 seconds later for a $ less minus fees...

History graph doesn't show any indication of that...?

yes there is no way to prove that it was the same actor, but someone came in and bought 900ish right after around 1100 was dumped

That would be some expensive manipulation.

Let's say he's gotten his fee all the way down to 0.25% To trade 2000 coins in both directions:

2 x 2000BTC x .0025 = 10BTC * $125/BTC = $1250.
DavidBAL
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


Always riding the Bull...


View Profile WWW
September 19, 2013, 03:10:07 AM
 #349

Oh look, someone ate most of the bidwall. Btw that 800 ask isn't particularly large, and i  don't think its new either

yea and then they bought it right back 60 seconds later for a $ less minus fees...

History graph doesn't show any indication of that...?

yes there is no way to prove that it was the same actor, but someone came in and bought 900ish right after around 1100 was dumped

That would be some expensive manipulation.

Let's say he's gotten his fee all the way down to 0.25% To trade 2000 coins in both directions:

2 x 2000BTC x .0025 = 10BTC * $125/BTC = $1250.

The cost of doing business. Expensive is a relative word...

I am an investor, entrepreneur, and CEO @BTC Inc http://www.linkedin.com/pub/david-bailey/22/641/b53 ...
Bitrated user: davidbtcmedia.
derpinheimer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 19, 2013, 04:24:29 AM
 #350

Oh look, someone ate most of the bidwall. Btw that 800 ask isn't particularly large, and i  don't think its new either

yea and then they bought it right back 60 seconds later for a $ less minus fees...

History graph doesn't show any indication of that...?

yes there is no way to prove that it was the same actor, but someone came in and bought 900ish right after around 1100 was dumped

Okay, so the guy sold and then put up an ask wall? Because doing an 1100 sell caused $3 slippage. A 900 buy would have probably moved the price to eating into the $128 askwall.
thoughtfan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 506


View Profile
September 19, 2013, 06:16:28 AM
 #351

Oh look, someone ate most of the bidwall. Btw that 800 ask isn't particularly large, and i  don't think its new either

yea and then they bought it right back 60 seconds later for a $ less minus fees...

History graph doesn't show any indication of that...?

yes there is no way to prove that it was the same actor, but someone came in and bought 900ish right after around 1100 was dumped

Okay, so the guy sold and then put up an ask wall? Because doing an 1100 sell caused $3 slippage. A 900 buy would have probably moved the price to eating into the $128 askwall.

Could also just be someone painting the ticker for vol, bringing stamp usd 24hr volume up to 50% which looks impressive for anyone not realising there's only peanuts being traded virtually anywhere atm.

xxjs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 19, 2013, 08:12:36 AM
 #352

It seems USD13 is the price per bitcoin to do arbitrage between gox and stamp.
oda.krell
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007



View Profile
September 19, 2013, 03:46:54 PM
 #353

Instead of looking at walls unfiltered, I prefer to see how the bid/ask ratio changes over time. 3 days ago I posted here that this ratio went up drastically, and price followed (125 to 128).

The reversal of that ratio, starting yesterday, was even sharper. And price is already following again. Here's the corresponding 1w graph from coinorama:



How do you read this? And don't just say "manipulation", but specify what's the goal of it. 'cause it sure doesn't look like straight-forward pump-and-dump, the increase was too incremental, and there was no huge sell-off at the peak either.

I admit, I'm unsure what the reason is behind this. Could be an attempt to artificially prop up price, before the July uptrend finally breaks down. Could be an attempt to actively *bring down* the July uptrend. Could be plain old market insecurity ("is the trend over? or not?"). Your guess is as good as mine.

Not sure which Bitcoin wallet you should use? Get Electrum!
Electrum is an open-source lightweight client: fast, user friendly, and 100% secure.
Download the source or executables for Windows/OSX/Linux/Android from, and only from, the official Electrum homepage.
MoreFun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1003


WePower.red


View Profile
September 19, 2013, 06:51:36 PM
 #354

That $123 wall is going to fall or be removed in 24 hours. We are sliding down.
manfred
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1001


Energy is Wealth


View Profile
September 21, 2013, 07:36:22 PM
 #355

Quote
mtgox isn't dead yet it still has volume during volatile movements.
Your right Gox is't dead yet, but it may has cancer. There was a time it had more or less 100% market share. The way things are evolving gox plays second fiddle to Bitstamp in the US soon. 
prophetx
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010


he who has the gold makes the rules


View Profile WWW
September 21, 2013, 08:47:46 PM
 #356

Quote
mtgox isn't dead yet it still has volume during volatile movements.
Your right Gox is't dead yet, but it may has cancer. There was a time it had more or less 100% market share. The way things are evolving gox plays second fiddle to Bitstamp in the US soon. 


doubt it bitstamp does not have the people to set up shop in the usa, perhaps they would but why bother with the massive regulatory costs involved
ElectricMucus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057


Marketing manager - GO MP


View Profile WWW
September 21, 2013, 11:42:29 PM
 #357

Nice chart, thanks. It seem to follow natural exponential decay.
joesmoe2012
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882
Merit: 501


Ching-Chang;Ding-Dong


View Profile WWW
September 22, 2013, 05:42:06 PM
 #358

Not in the US, but in USD. BitStamp isn't located in the US and services many currencies as well as USD (converted upon deposit/withdraw).

Check out BitcoinATMTalk - https://bitcoinatmtalk.com
derpinheimer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 23, 2013, 04:54:24 AM
 #359

Quote
mtgox isn't dead yet it still has volume during volatile movements.
Your right Gox is't dead yet, but it may has cancer. There was a time it had more or less 100% market share. The way things are evolving gox plays second fiddle to Bitstamp in the US soon. 


doubt it bitstamp does not have the people to set up shop in the usa, perhaps they would but why bother with the massive regulatory costs involved

Does this graph NOT disprove that theory of volume migrating to bitstamp? Because.. it sure looks that way. Looks like bitcoin trading volume has just simply plummeted from the April highs.

Also, does http://trading.i286.org/bitstamp/?item=btc&currency=usd function for any of you? MTGox version loads fine for me. Bitstamp one stopped working yesterday for me.
dserrano5
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1029



View Profile
September 23, 2013, 06:14:17 AM
 #360

If volume was moving to bitstamp, shouldn't it be increasing in that chart? I see it is quite flat…
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!