lovesmayfamilis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 4543
✿♥‿♥✿
|
|
March 19, 2021, 06:04:24 PM |
|
Second request to ban this account. This is already a new story. The word shock can describe several different situations. Medical shock happens when the body’s cells do not get enough oxygen-rich blood. It is not a disease but a result of an illness or injury.A person may also feel shocked when they experience something unexpected. This shock is psychological and usually does not cause any medical problems.Causes of an electric shock include faulty electrical equipment, lightning strikes, and contact with electricity and water.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5660/56602969.htmlhttps://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/326959 Bitcoin was the first cryptocurrency to successfully record transactions on a secure, decentralized blockchain-based network. Launched in early 2009 by its pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin is the largest cryptocurrency measured by market capitalization and amount of data stored on its blockchain. The Bitcoin software is free and available online to anyone who wants to run a Bitcoin node and store their own copy of the Bitcoin blockchain.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5659/56597447.htmlhttps://dev.to/manbir/top-10-high-potential-cryptocurrencies-2021-b66
|
|
|
|
FatFork
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1778
Merit: 2671
Crypto Swap Exchange
|
|
|
|
|
examplens
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3472
Merit: 3501
Crypto Swap Exchange
|
|
March 21, 2021, 05:44:09 PM |
|
User fortune1002Using LoyceV's Search Tool for Deleted Posts/Replies I got these: [1]Binance is one of the best exchanges for buying dogecoin as it has a large infrastructure and very low fees. The same can also be said of Changelly, ShapeShift and Bittrex.
[2]Investing or trading in Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies can be intimidating at first. There is frequently news about scams and people losing money. While this is true, and many scams have happened and continue to happen, it has never been so simple to invest in and safely trade in cryptocurrency as it is today.
//bitfort edit orig. source: https://www.investopedia.com/best-crypto-exchanges-5071855[3]I certainly doubt that we will see ETH going to 100k in this hype cycle as this is just too much when you evaluate the market cap that it will be if it reaches such price levels. True, that there is most likely going to be a lot of demand for ETH on exchanges like Coinbase, Primexbt, Kraken due to staking which will result in a lot of ETH getting locked which will diminish the circulating supply and end up in ETH being more scarce than usually.
//bitfort edit orig. source: https://www.quora.com/Can-Ethereum-reach-100kThese posts are all merited by the user you mentioned, but was deleted for some reason. Not sure if sold account, as I don't think there's point in selling a Newbie rank if he/she only posted a single reply in 2016 or I could be missing some lines in here. It looks a bit sus from the merits though, in my opinion. Those posts ain't worth 3-4 merits. In addition two of them were plain copy paste (added sources). If loyce.club can be considered trusted source then we have a proof of plagiarism. Obviously these merits to user fortune1002 were bought or exchanged for some service and posts were made solely for such purpose. IMO some merit seller requires making any posts that looks like informative/usefull but also has a condition to delete it after (to sweep the tracks).
|
|
|
|
cryptoperkele
Member
Offline
Activity: 889
Merit: 60
|
|
March 22, 2021, 12:31:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
LoyceV (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3500
Merit: 17686
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
|
March 22, 2021, 02:43:29 PM |
|
User fortune1002Using LoyceV's Search Tool for Deleted Posts/Replies I got these: [1]Binance is one of the best exchanges for buying dogecoin as it has a large infrastructure and very low fees. The same can also be said of Changelly, ShapeShift and Bittrex.
[2]Investing or trading in Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies can be intimidating at first. There is frequently news about scams and people losing money. While this is true, and many scams have happened and continue to happen, it has never been so simple to invest in and safely trade in cryptocurrency as it is today.
//bitfort edit orig. source: https://www.investopedia.com/best-crypto-exchanges-5071855[3]I certainly doubt that we will see ETH going to 100k in this hype cycle as this is just too much when you evaluate the market cap that it will be if it reaches such price levels. True, that there is most likely going to be a lot of demand for ETH on exchanges like Coinbase, Primexbt, Kraken due to staking which will result in a lot of ETH getting locked which will diminish the circulating supply and end up in ETH being more scarce than usually.
//bitfort edit orig. source: https://www.quora.com/Can-Ethereum-reach-100kThese posts are all merited by the user you mentioned, but was deleted for some reason. Not sure if sold account, as I don't think there's point in selling a Newbie rank if he/she only posted a single reply in 2016 or I could be missing some lines in here. It looks a bit sus from the merits though, in my opinion. Those posts ain't worth 3-4 merits. In addition two of them were plain copy paste (added sources). If loyce.club can be considered trusted source then we have a proof of plagiarism.Obviously these merits to user fortune1002 were bought or exchanged for some service and posts were made solely for such purpose. IMO some merit seller requires making any posts that looks like informative/usefull but also has a condition to delete it after (to sweep the tracks). In general, I vote against using my deleted posts archive as evidence for plagiarism: - I scrape posts within seconds, before any editing. I too make mistakes quoting once in a while, and if the user edits it later, my archive is outdated.
- If the user corrected their own plagiarism, I don't think it should still be punished.
- If the user deleted their own post, that also resolves the plagiarism.
|
| | Peach BTC bitcoin | │ | Buy and Sell Bitcoin P2P | │ | . .
▄▄███████▄▄ ▄██████████████▄ ▄███████████████████▄ ▄█████████████████████▄ ▄███████████████████████▄ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ▀███████████████████████▀ ▀█████████████████████▀ ▀███████████████████▀ ▀███████████████▀ ▀▀███████▀▀
▀▀▀▀███████▀▀▀▀ | | EUROPE | AFRICA LATIN AMERICA | | | ▄▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀▄▄▄ |
███████▄█ ███████▀ ██▄▄▄▄▄░▄▄▄▄▄ █████████████▀ ▐███████████▌ ▐███████████▌ █████████████▄ ██████████████ ███▀███▀▀███▀ | . Download on the App Store | ▀▀▀▄ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▀ | ▄▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀▄▄▄ |
▄██▄ ██████▄ █████████▄ ████████████▄ ███████████████ ████████████▀ █████████▀ ██████▀ ▀██▀ | . GET IT ON Google Play | ▀▀▀▄ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▀ |
|
|
|
Poker Player
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 2263
|
|
March 22, 2021, 03:05:27 PM |
|
In general, I vote against using my deleted posts archive as evidence for plagiarism:
I scrape posts within seconds, before any editing. I too make mistakes quoting once in a while, and if the user edits it later, my archive is outdated. If the user corrected their own plagiarism, I don't think it should still be punished. If the user deleted their own post, that also resolves the plagiarism.
It is good to know for next time but that user confessed: Please Don't do anything. So I can banned. Please I am a bounty hunter so I bought Merit for Earning not for any other purpose. please don't Report me . Please. I hope you understand my feeling.
I only copied my first 3 posts which were deleted. Because I was newbie i did not know what have I to post for merit. That's why I copied from site. But Now I understood What I have to write So you can now see my all Posts are not copied from anywhere all are Written by me.
|
|
|
|
bakasabo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1215
|
|
March 23, 2021, 10:41:01 AM |
|
Dont know what is worse, plagiarism, shilling or topic bumping? This gang has a full house. I checked the price of MCO2 tokens. It is growing. I think that now many people understands how it is important to protect a nature and buy carbon tokens.
I check the price of MCO2 token. It is growing. It means that many people understands how it is important to protect a nature and buy MCO2 tokens. We live in one planet and this planet must be clean.
I checked the site of MOSS I see that many preople buy MCO2 tokens. It means that more and more people understands how it is important to protect a nature and buy carbon credits. Hope in future the demand in MCO2 tokens will increase.
I checked MOSS. The price of its tokens is growing. I think that many people now start to understand how it is important to protect a nature. MOSS help to protect Amazon forests.
I checked the price of MCO2 token. It is growing. It mean that a lot of people understand how it is important to protect a nature and buy MCO2 tokens.
I checked the price of MCO tokens it is growig. And many people buy MCO2 tokens, it means that people understand how it is important to protect a nature from CO2 pollution and buy carbon credits.
|
| █▄ | R |
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▄▄ ████████████████ ▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀█████ ████████▌███▐████ ▄▄▄▄█████▄▄▄█████ ████████████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀▀ | LLBIT | ▀█ | THE #1 SOLANA CASINO | ████████████▄ ▀▀██████▀▀███ ██▄▄▀▀▄▄█████ █████████████ █████████████ ███▀█████████ ▀▄▄██████████ █████████████ █████████████ █████████████ █████████████ █████████████ ████████████▀ | ████████████▄ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████ █████████████ ▄████████████ ██▄██████████ ████▄████████ █████████████ █░▀▀█████████ ▀▀███████████ █████▄███████ ████▀▄▀██████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████ ████████████▀ | ........5,000+........ GAMES ......INSTANT...... WITHDRAWALS | ..........HUGE.......... REWARDS ............VIP............ PROGRAM | . PLAY NOW |
|
|
|
lovesmayfamilis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 4543
✿♥‿♥✿
|
|
March 24, 2021, 10:02:36 AM Last edit: March 24, 2021, 10:20:30 AM by lovesmayfamilis |
|
Plagiarism (copy paste).User: Egartius Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5326061.msg56635815#msg56635815[ archive ] Looking closely at technology development that has happened in the past few years, you can see transformation in the world. Bitcoin has a vital impact on the financial world. It is the most trusted and one of the secure digital and best currencies among thousands of others
https://www.telemediaonline.co.uk/how-android-bitcoin-and-blockchain-are-changing-the-world/Unsuccessful attempt by a beginner to create a quality message. another plagiarismGlobally, political parties have become unavoidable institutions playing pivotal roles in the public administration advancement of nations. The importance of these roles have made it a subject of debate and concern among stakeholders on the best ways to finance political parties that will maintain equality and equity during elections. This is to argues that electoral success in the world is expected to be influenced by personality values and traits. Despite the canonic belief in integrity, people of integrity, professionals, and retired civil servants appear to be abstaining from party politics as they do not see it as an avenue through which they can make their contribution to the building of a nation because of the presumption that politics is for those who have the wherewithal different from integrity and expertise. The political competition is always economically demanding with a lot of victories and failures against the backdrop of expectations and speculations. This interrogates the key issues responsible for election victory and failure with special reference to party funding in nation's.
[ archive ] https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2158244019855855
|
|
|
|
lovesmayfamilis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 4543
✿♥‿♥✿
|
|
March 25, 2021, 11:59:05 AM |
|
Plagiarism (copy paste).User: Dutchyyy Position: Legendary5 or more cases of copying and paraphrasing textDeFi's markets have grown 143% so far in 2021. This equates to $ 37.69 billion, combining lending protocols, decentralized exchanges, derivatives, payments and asset protocols.
Although DeFi's growth in 2021 appears to be extremely rapid, there are signs that this growth may be sustainable. Institutional asset manager Greyscale Investments also lists DeFi-related assets such as Aave, Cosmos and Polkadot to expand its portfolio.
Against the background of these data, and many others, I think Polkadot is one of the almost certain targets for investment this year.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5647/56477132.htmlPlagiarismhttps://18digits.com/defi-markets-showing-unprecedented-growth-in-2021/----------------------------------------------------1 One of the most recommended strategies for investing in the crypto world involves investing 40-50% of your budget in popular altcoins.
Some of these popular altcoins include NEO, Tron, DASH, etc. Some experts believe that altcoins are likely to outperform Bitcoin and other established coins. This is because they have a strong foundation along with great growth potential, profit structure, utility mechanism, etc.
There are many other similar altcoins with great potential. The risk of these coins is minimal and the potential for return is high in the long run. So most of your investment should go there.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5646/56469583.htmlPlagiarismhttps://bitcoinwarrior.net/2019/07/the-secret-to-maximize-returns-from-cryptocurrency-investments/----------------------------------------------------2 An interesting coin is Apollo Currency (APL), they released database sharding, which also has quantum attack-resistant wallets. Apollo was developed by Apollo Fintech together with GSX, is built on the Apollo blockchain, it is the first quantum-stable chain of its kind with database sharding. APL also uses Apollo's patented technology for atomic swaps, adaptive forging, Apollo updater, node synchronization and much more.
APL is a very fast cryptocurrency, making transactions in less than 2 seconds and will soon be the first platform for decentralized applications with unlimited storage. The most significant cases of Apollo use are mainly commercial and governmental.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5664/56642795.htmlPlagiarism https://bitnewstoday.com/news/which-crypto-investments-you-should-consider-for-2021/ ----------------------------------------------------3 In the last few weeks, the price of Golem's GLM token has risen sharply, pushing it to a three-year high of $ 0.65. Maybe it would not be bad to look at this project.
Golem is a Ethereum-based decentralized application that allows consumers to rent computing energy resources. From November 2020, the project migrated from GNT to GLM tokens after the implementation of a new contract for ERC-20.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5643/56438654.htmlPlagiarismhttps://cointelegraph.com/news/golem-glm-price-rallies-230-to-hit-a-3-year-high-after-protocol-upgrade----------------------------------------------------4 One of the most recommended hardware crypto wallets on the market is Trezor. According to many people, it is the best hardware portfolio for digital currencies. It is super secure, while supporting Windows, Linux and Mac, and has one of the best applications available for Android.
Trezor has full two-factor authentication. Also, Trezor supports a number of different cryptocurrencies. It's quite easy to use, just plugs into a USB adapter. You connect through the computer and you can reset it using the included management software. Complete control, complete security and complete peace of mind. In general, it is not so expensive - the newer version Trezor Model T costs about 180 euros.
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5663/56639844.htmlPlagiarismhttps://www.bitdegree.org/crypto/best-cryptocurrency-wallet----------------------------------------------------5
|
|
|
|
|
lovesmayfamilis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 4543
✿♥‿♥✿
|
|
March 31, 2021, 08:51:40 AM |
|
Two alternative accounts with a third red trust account in their history.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg56681986#msg56681986Plagiarism (copy paste).User: Mistafreeze Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5313704.msg56256104#msg56256104[ archive ] India Minister Suggests Modi Government Not Planning Outright Crypto Ban.
The Indian government has hinted how it might move to regulate cryptocurrencies rather than an outright ban.
Talking in the nation’s upper house, the Rajya Sabha, Tuesday, a minister specified that the aim would be to curb illicit cryptocurrency transactions and bar their use in payments.
“The government does not consider cryptocurrencies legal tender or coins and will take all measures to eliminate use of these crypto-assets in financing illegitimate activities or as part of the payment system,” Minister of State for Finance Anurag Singh Thakur said during a question and answer session.
Plagiarism https://finance.yahoo.com/news/india-minister-suggests-modi-government-151949485.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Plagiarism (copy paste).User: KryptoKings Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5313220.msg56312780#msg56312780[ archive ] Govt committee recommends ban all cryptocurrencies, except those issued by state: FM
The central government will take a decision on the recommendation of committee and legislative proposal, says FM
A cryptocurrency bill is being finalised and it will be sent to cabinet soon, minister of state for finance Anurag Singh Thakur said
A high-level committee suggested that all the private cryptocurrencies, except any virtual currencies issued by state, will be prohibited in India, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman said on Tuesday.
In a reply to a question in Rajya Sabha whether central government is planning to issue strict guidelines on cryptocurrency trading, Sitharaman said, "A high-level Inter-Ministerial Committee (IMC) constituted under the Chairmanship of Secretary (Economic Affairs) to study the issues related to virtual currencies and propose specific actions to be taken in the matter recommended in its report that all private cryptocurrencies, except any virtual currencies issued by state, will be prohibited in India.
Plagiarism https://www.livemint.com/market/cryptocurrency/govt-committee-says-ban-all-cryptocurrencies-except-those-issued-by-state-fm-11612866715432.html#box_11612866715432
|
|
|
|
acroman08
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1112
|
|
April 01, 2021, 10:22:14 AM |
|
this user sinanda777 plagiarised an article from the new york times. just a note, the link OP shared on his thread wasn't the source of the article. it was a link directed to his gambling site. [url=https://sinanda777.com]바카라사이트[/url] plagiarised postThe security camera video was shocking in its brutality. A 65-year-old Filipino immigrant was walking down a street near Times Square when a man, in broad daylight, suddenly kicked her in the stomach She crumpled to the sidewalk. He kicked her once in the head. Then again. And again. He yelled an obscenity at her, according to a police official, and then said: "You don't belong here." As the violent scene unfolded in Manhattan, three men watched from the lobby of a nearby luxury apartment building. When the woman struggled to stand up, one of the men, a security guard, closed the front door to the building. Even as reports of anti-Asian hate crimes escalated in recent weeks, the video released by police officials on Monday (March 29) evening touched a fresh nerve. The sheer brazenness of the attack - combined with the seeming indifference of the bystanders - caused another wave of fear for many Asian Americans already worn down by a steady drumbeat of assaults. "This feels like an emergency happening in real time over weeks," said Mr Chris Kwok, a board member of the Asian American Bar Association of New York. "People are in a state of panic. Everybody is on edge." As the video went viral online, the attack provoked a torrent of condemnation from public officials and seemed to underscore the difficulty the government faces in curbing unprovoked assaults against Asian Americans. 바카라사이트 original article from the new york timesThe security camera video was shocking in its brutality. A 65-year-old Filipino immigrant was walking down a street near Times Square when a man, in broad daylight, suddenly kicked her in the stomach.
She crumpled to the sidewalk. He kicked her once in the head. Then again. And again. He yelled an obscenity at her, according to a police official, and then said, “You don’t belong here.”
As the violent scene unfolded in Manhattan, three men watched from the lobby of a nearby luxury apartment building. When the woman struggled to stand up, one of the men, a security guard, closed the front door to the building.
Even as reports of anti-Asian hate crimes have escalated in recent weeks, the video released by police officials on Monday evening touched a fresh nerve. The sheer brazenness of the attack — combined with the seeming indifference of the bystanders — caused another wave of fear for many Asian-Americans already worn down by a steady drumbeat of assaults.
“This feels like an emergency happening in real time over weeks,” said Chris M. Kwok, a board member of the Asian American Bar Association of New York. “People are in a state of panic. Everybody is on edge.”
As the video went viral online, the attack provoked a torrent of condemnations from public officials and seemed to underscore the difficulty the government faces in curbing unprovoked assaults against Asian-Americans.
|
|
|
|
nullius
|
|
April 02, 2021, 12:01:26 AM |
|
User: #317618 “nutildah” ( trust summary) First mentioned on the thread where it occurred. Nullian Original (archive.is) (archive.org)Subject: [WO] NFTs are good!Proof that NFT technology will succeed: I see WOers slinging the exact same FUD against NFTs as has always been used against Bitcoin. Let’s see just how much this technology will totally take over the world: - “It’s a Ponzi.” ✔
- “The scarcity is artificial. Anyone can make perfect copies of it.” ✔
- “Drug dealers will use it to launder money.” ✔
- “Those fools will be burned when it is shut down by regulators (SEC, et al.).”2 ✔
I anticipate that as I keep reading WO posts about NFTs, I will be adding to this list... Paraphrased plagiarism—replete with Unicode checkmarks paraphrased as different Unicode checkmarks (archive.is) (archive.org)What's struck me as a touch ironic is that bitcoiners are criticizing NFTs for the exact same reasons nocoiners criticize bitcoin:
"Anybody can make one." ✓ "It's a bubble and a fad that will never catch on." ✓ "It's a highly illiquid market, or else it's all wash trading." ✓ "Its only used by money launderers and criminals." ✓
What am I forgetting?
That would get you expelled from any academic environment. To me as an original thinker, it is discouraging: Why should I contribute my original thoughts to this forum, so that nutildah can rip me off without even the slightest acknowledgment? There is only one nullius. nutildah’s unattributed paraphrase of my ideas is conceptually a half-step away from Faketoshi’s claim that he wrote the Bitcoin whitepaper. (nutildah does get extra chutzpah points insofar as he pretends to have me ignore-listed. Cue the plagiarism bingo card: “We had similar thoughts, including even the placement of Unicode checkmarks!”) I will report it on the plagiarism thread.
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 8574
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
April 02, 2021, 12:41:54 AM Last edit: April 02, 2021, 12:56:49 AM by nutildah |
|
Hate to break it to you but I never read your posts, nullius. Any time we engage its because I'm responding to your attacks on me and correcting your outright lies. I'm not some bounty hunter who can't form an original thought, and I won't get paid for it as its past the 5th page in that thread (campaign condition). So why would I plagiarize your post?? Do you honestly believe you were the first and only person to notice the highlighted coincidences? edit for some evidence from the defendant: only 2 of the 4 items are similar observations ✔ I used a different type of checkmark ✓ go fuck yourself nullius ✅
|
|
|
|
nullius
|
|
April 02, 2021, 02:00:06 AM Last edit: April 02, 2021, 02:11:51 AM by nullius |
|
Hate to break it to you but I never read your posts, nullius. Any time we engage its because I'm responding to your attacks on me and correcting your outright lies. I'm not some bounty hunter who can't form an original thought, and I won't get paid for it as its past the 5th page in that thread (campaign condition). So why would I plagiarize your post?? Do you honestly believe you were the first and only person to notice the highlighted coincidences? Your blustering ad hominem counterattack and irrelevant excuses are quoted for reference. Anyone who reviews the above-quoted evidence can see that you ripped off my post; and it’s sad that every scammer you have ever tagged is better than you at flimsy evasions when caught red-handed. “We had the same thoughts” is a classic. And it’s a tough sell when your post so closely follows mine in substance, in structure, and in style: [General observation that Bitcoiners are attacking NFTs with the same arguments used against Bitcoin.] - [A checklist of exactly four (4) quasi-quoted examples, punctuated with Unicode checkmarks...]
- [...the examples provided are substantively almost identical, but slightly tweaked and shuffled.]
[Suggestion that this list can be extended.] A professor of textual analysis could do much better than that in collating the similarities of our posts. I needn’t bother. Your aping of my list with Unicode checkmarks is especially telling. ✔✓ I have done that in several posts. It is a relatively rare * style of delivery. By so noting, I do not wish to detract attention from how closely you copied the substance and structure of my post. You are known to follow the Wall Observer, where I made my post. Thus, you cannot even claim the amazing coincidence of “having the same thoughts” as some website (or forum thread) that you never even knew about. Why would you do it? If I had to guess, I’d say that you wanted to apply my arguments—but you did not want to reference my post, because you personally dislike me, and you pretend that you “never read” my posts. However, the question of “why” is mostly irrelevant: It is obvious what you did. (* Amusingly enough, I think that it is probably much more rare than use of the English literary stock phrase “sow discord”; among other places, minor grammatical variations of that phrase are used in the King James Bible, in English translations of Dante’s Divine Comedy, and in one of my own Newbie-ranked posts from 2017. So much for reasonably assessing the weight of evidence in various cases.)
Edited to add one additional observation above, and to quote the edited version of nutildah’s reply: Hate to break it to you but I never read your posts, nullius. Any time we engage its because I'm responding to your attacks on me and correcting your outright lies. I'm not some bounty hunter who can't form an original thought, and I won't get paid for it as its past the 5th page in that thread (campaign condition). So why would I plagiarize your post?? Do you honestly believe you were the first and only person to notice the highlighted coincidences? edit for some evidence from the defendant: only 2 of the 4 items are similar observations ✔ I used a different type of checkmark ✓ go fuck yourself nullius ✅ (I had a reply tab open before that edit, but didn’t post till later because I was busy with something else. I quote nutildah’s posts in full, because I have observed that he sometimes edits or deletes his own posts in a dishonestly misleading way.)
|
|
|
|
nullius
|
|
April 04, 2021, 04:30:31 PM |
|
It is unusual for the victim of a plagiarism to be the one to one to report it here. Has that ever happened before in this thread? As presented above, the quotes of the posts present a visual punch in the face. That is such an obvious rip-off. It is reasonable to infer that nutildah deliberately avoided acknowledging me, out of personal spite. Quote nullius? Never! If ever there was a reason to have a rule against plagiarism, this is it!
|
|
|
|
lovesmayfamilis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 4543
✿♥‿♥✿
|
|
April 10, 2021, 09:55:57 AM |
|
Plagiarism (copy paste)Paraphrased.User: Philips@3112 Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5329629.msg56749020#msg56749020[ archive ] As you become involved in the new digital monetary market known as crypto currency, it doesn't take long to recognize there's risk involved in its transactions. Scams ere everywhere online and crypto currency exchanges are not different. As you consider investing in different start ups and exchange platforms, be aware of the possiblity of loosing your crypto currency exchange investments. When you're looking for digital crypto currency companies and start ups, experts recommend that you confirm if they are blockchain related, which means they have track detailed transaction informations and data. Also check if they have solid business plans that solve real problems. There should be real people behind the company if the start up you're investing lacks some these features, then think through your decisions more carefully. Here's a look at the more common scams and ways to avoid been a victim as you join the crypto currency exchange business. 1. IMPOSTER WEBSITE You may be following someone with a great expertise but still fall a victim by coincidence visiting a fake website. Their have been a number of websites that have been set to resemble the original start up companies. If there isn't a small lock icon indicating security near the URL bar and no "https" in the address, think twice. Even if the site looks much like the one you think you visited, you may find yourself directed to another platform for payment. 2. BAD TWEETS AND OTHER SOCIAL MEDIA UPDATES if you're fund of following celebrities and prominent people in the social Media, you can't be sure you're not following an imposter account. This also applies to crypto currency exchange where impersonators are rampant and active. Don't trust offers that come from Facebook and Twitter, especially if there seems to be an impossible results. Fake accounts are everywhere. If someone on these platforms ask for even a small amount of your crypto currency, it's likely you might not be able to get it back. Because you see others replying to an offer don't assume its legit. So, be extra careful
Plagiarism https://www.kaspersky.com/resource-center/definitions/cryptocurrency-scams
|
|
|
|
friends1980
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1059
nutildah-III / NFT2021-04-01
|
|
April 11, 2021, 09:47:06 AM |
|
"Suggesting" to read an article is not the same as actually clearly saying that this link leads to the source of your post.This profile is one of the alts of this shitposting gang; there's been a lot of copypaste posts written by this gang, but the source was mentioned every time, so I think it was no real plagiarism (worthless shitposting nonetheless), and I have only reported them as such. But this time, he's walking on a very thin line. (...)
of course bitcoin become more popular if we comparing with other cryptocurrencies, because bitcoin is the first cryptocurrency in this world this mean bitcoin is the first decentralized cryptocurrency mate Bitcoin vs altcoins is becoming an increasingly prominent battle in the world of cryptocurrency. While Bitcoin still takes up the majority of the market, its alternatives are becoming increasingly popular. Altcoins are often created to resolve some of the limitations of Bitcoin. As a result, altcoins often use different protocols and encryption algorithms. They also have a different focus, whether that’s: - Privacy
- Stability
- Alternative payment methods
i suggest you to read this article https://coinrivet.com/guides/what-is-an-altcoin/bitcoin-vs-altcoins-the-differences-you-should-know/regards This dude is playing with fire.
|
|
|
|
nullius
|
|
April 12, 2021, 12:53:25 AM |
|
Tolerance for plagiarism is a deterrent against constructive contributions by people who are capable of making them; it is poison to the lifesblood of any site that derives its value from “user-generated content”. I am currently left to draw my own inferences. In prior discussions, I have seen it said that the administration avoids letting the plagiarism rule be used as a weapon in personal disputes; and in another thread, some idiot is accusing me of that. As a precaution, I must therefore ask what the reaction would be if I were to make a report as follows: Proof that NFT technology will succeed: I see WOers slinging the exact same FUD against NFTs as has always been used against Bitcoin. Let’s see just how much this technology will totally take over the world: - “It’s a Ponzi.” ✔
- “The scarcity is artificial. Anyone can make perfect copies of it.” ✔
- “Drug dealers will use it to launder money.” ✔
- “Those fools will be burned when it is shut down by regulators (SEC, et al.).”2 ✔
I anticipate that as I keep reading WO posts about NFTs, I will be adding to this list... What's struck me as a touch ironic is that bitcoiners are criticizing NFTs for the exact same reasons nocoiners criticize bitcoin:
"Anybody can make one." ✓ "It's a bubble and a fad that will never catch on." ✓ "It's a highly illiquid market, or else it's all wash trading." ✓ "Its only used by money launderers and criminals." ✓
What am I forgetting?
If the hypothetical Newbie were to cry the cliché, “We had the same thoughts!”, then—well, if that were to be accepted, then this thread should be locked as a waste of time. Anyone can use that excuse. Many do. In the future, not-so-hypothetical Newbies may take the handling of my complaint as a precedent. As is clear from the above, I would have reported any user for this; and my report was motivated by my dislike for being ripped off. If anyone assumes that I made report because nutildah did it, such is a reflection of that person’s thought process—not mine. It only adds insult to injury that I have a long-running dispute with the other user, who must wish to avoid acknowledging me for a post that he evidently saw and imitated.
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 8574
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
April 12, 2021, 01:31:41 AM |
|
Tolerance for plagiarism is a deterrent against constructive contributions by people who are capable of making them; it is poison to the lifesblood of any site that derives its value from “user-generated content”. I am currently left to draw my own inferences. In prior discussions, I have seen it said that the administration avoids letting the plagiarism rule be used as a weapon in personal disputes; and in another thread, some idiot is accusing me of that. As a precaution, I must therefore ask what the reaction would be if I were to make a report as follows: Proof that NFT technology will succeed: I see WOers slinging the exact same FUD against NFTs as has always been used against Bitcoin. Let’s see just how much this technology will totally take over the world: - “It’s a Ponzi.” ✔
- “The scarcity is artificial. Anyone can make perfect copies of it.” ✔
- “Drug dealers will use it to launder money.” ✔
- “Those fools will be burned when it is shut down by regulators (SEC, et al.).”2 ✔
I anticipate that as I keep reading WO posts about NFTs, I will be adding to this list... What's struck me as a touch ironic is that bitcoiners are criticizing NFTs for the exact same reasons nocoiners criticize bitcoin:
"Anybody can make one." ✓ "It's a bubble and a fad that will never catch on." ✓ "It's a highly illiquid market, or else it's all wash trading." ✓ "Its only used by money launderers and criminals." ✓
What am I forgetting?
If the hypothetical Newbie were to cry the cliché, “We had the same thoughts!”, then—well, if that were to be accepted, then this thread should be locked as a waste of time. Anyone can use that excuse. Many do. In the future, not-so-hypothetical Newbies may take the handling of my complaint as a precedent. As is clear from the above, I would have reported any user for this; and my report was motivated by my dislike for being ripped off. If anyone assumes that I made report because nutildah did it, such is a reflection of that person’s thought process—not mine. It only adds insult to injury that I have a long-running dispute with the other user, who must wish to avoid acknowledging me for a post that he evidently saw and imitated. Let's look at it logically so we can help you understand why I'm not banned: Only 2 of the 4 items are at all similar. ✓ The 2 items that are similar are worded very differently. ✓ None of the rest of the post is plagiarism in any way. ✓ Also, it's not that I re-arranged your post to avoid plagiarism, I never saw your post to begin with, and you're a bit loonie tunes to continue on in your fantasy where people can't independently form ideas similar to your own. And yes, I took you off ignore because I knew you were posting about me. You just can't let it go when you are wrong, which is unfortunate, and it's part of the reason why nobody takes you seriously. I guess you were sad I ignored you in your earlier post where you tagged me, so you felt like you had to try harder. Well, congrats, you win again, for the infinity time in a row.
|
|
|
|
|