Rest are denied for having bad post quality.
I would like to know how you measure and what are the criteria for quality of the posts?
Previously, when this feature was still available, my posts were marked as very good on bitcointalk account price estimator. So, I think this is just personal and subjective judgement and estimation.
Of course it's subjective judgement. There is no way to determine how good a post is with a formula, and do it accurately. The bitcointalk price estimator marked you as very good post quality if the characters exceed a certain number (I think it was 120 originally), but you can have a spammy post above that or a good post below that number of characters. Achow101 (who develops the estimator) has even said that it is inaccurate.
Update #5: To avoid people from using the post quality quantifier here as proof that they have good post quality (because they usually don't and the quantifier is not accurate), I have removed it from the display and changed the character count to be higher.
I found that many of your posts were on megathreads, and are along the lines of
<Some form of I agree, or nothing>. <repeat a point mentioned already, worded differently> <repeat another point mentioned already, worded differently> <repeat another point mentioned already, worded differently>
They wouldn't be counted, so I would prefer to reject people instead of having them complain to me that all their posts were counted and they wasted all their time.
All above applicants are denied.