[ENDED] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | Sr Member+

[DarkStar_]

SegWit addresses don't safe on fees when receiving transactions, the savings happen when you make a payment from a SegWit address.

When sending to a P2PKH the pk_script is:

Code:

OP_DUP OP_HASH160 Size PubKey_hash OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG

bytes: 1 + 1 + 1 + 20 + 1 + 1 = 25

When sending to a Bech32 address the pk_script is:

Code:

OP_0 Size PubKey_hash

bytes: 1 +1 + 20 = 22

paying ~58 people with Bech32 means 174 bytes smaller

Loyce is referring to the legacy address that pays us from DarkStar_. That's why the fee won't fall due directly to it being bech32.

Also @DarkStar_ do you know if you can convert your address with the 1Chip in it to a bech address or a non-native segwit address and then it won't have too many issues if people pay to exchanges (as most exchanges don't support native segwit).

pooya87 pointed out that the output script of a bech32 is slightly smaller than legacy, which saves a few bytes, per output. So yes, I do save a few satoshi on fees by sending to bech32, but nothing really noticeable. I have talked to ChipMixer about switching to a segwit address, but they didn't say anything about it.

[1714470812]

1714470812

[1714470812]

1714470812

[1714470812]

1714470812

[DarkStar_]

Payments for this week have been sent. You can view the payment transaction here.

1 open slot.

[supermine]

Username: supermine
Post Count: 570
BTC Address (must be SegWit): bc1q57tt2kls8kpxtjfeanlw2zz0cnmkqc20608kea

Will update signature after acceptance.

[SFR10]

Payments for this week have been sent. You can view the payment transaction here.

I confirm receiving this weeks (my 7th week) payout, Thanks to DarkStar_ and ChipMixer

[Jeremycoin]

Username: Jeremycoin
Post Count: 2996
BTC Address (must be SegWit): bc1q8szhyfpsa27t2wr6kwdmyra7dmfeyvq3yfe2k0

[Gyrsur]

Payments for this week have been sent. You can view the payment transaction here.

1 open slot.

Sir, what is the reason for the open slot?

[Avirunes]

Username: Avirunes
Post Count: 2811
BTC Address (must be SegWit): 3HUCMVGFSXEKMifX5GJkRGbz98d8c8Ef7M

[botany]

I am interested.

Code:

Username: botany
Post Count: 2939
BTC Address (must be SegWit): bc1q47v5uq5un582ny45e8e7rp9um7rax90x8l5e5r

[chiggz]

Username: Chiggz
Post Count: 607
BTC Address (must be SegWit): 3PTQateVBgTPjMHaxUCXTS6LvkdyQedH4R

Thanks for your consideration.

[Wind_FURY]

Username: Wind_FURY
Post Count: 2555
BTC Address (must be SegWit): 33s7haWQdfqmEk3eRAucksPt6ZArkmUje9

[Denker]

Username: Denker
post count: 5854
BTC address: 15nuPuPtPo8acVBPPhgTaSfN6X1Kz3zDjm

[ChrisPop]

Username: ChrisPop
Post Count: 1246
BTC Address: 3H8bVwzC4iEjMQNG6nTPNXZfrUYwKwRxMm

[jtipt]

Username: Jtipt
Post count: 1515
BTC Address: 3K792L3owpHNbdYJqmZMRAKsxYkfYpxugp

[AdolfinWolf]

Payments for this week have been sent. You can view the payment transaction here.

1 open slot.

Sir, what is the reason for the open slot?

Take a look at the google spreadsheet, it looks like the user "GreenBits" has been kicked for inactivity ( since he only made 1 post.)

That leaves me wondering if there's actually a minimum amount of posts you should make each week, (which is refuted in the OP actually.)or if this guy was inactive for longer then just this week.

[TheQuin]

Payments for this week have been sent. You can view the payment transaction here.

1 open slot.

Sir, what is the reason for the open slot?

Take a look at the google spreadsheet, it looks like the user "GreenBits" has been kicked for inactivity ( since he only made 1 post.)

That leaves me wondering if there's actually a minimum amount of posts you should make each week, (which is refuted in the OP actually.)or if this guy was inactive for longer then just this week.

According to the spreadsheet: Last 4 weeks - 1,0,0,1 which is pretty inactive.

[okae]

Username: okae
Post Count: 1291 ( including this one )
BTC Address (must be SegWit): 33Yg2biTnXPjHo58depRt6xgrgRPjo1Afx

Let's try to join in this campaign.

[bitzizzix]

Username: bitzizzix
Post Count: 440+1
BTC Address (must be SegWit): 1AUr5FyZJvEL8eV97moDV16WnLQDTUX5Xj

[tomahawk9]

Username: tomahawk9
Post Count: 672
BTC Address (must be SegWit): 3JNskovieBUceb9Q268pK7mXGtpBJvnjEa

[pugman]

I'll give this yet another shot..
Username: pugman
Post Count: 841
BTC Address (must be SegWit): 3B5FXQNSdxizq3P6naJ4XM2BhXu8cx5rZy

snip

Do you even know what a segwit address/segwit is?

For obvious reasons, posts in Ivory Tower and Serious discussion don't count as well.

Ivory tower and Serious Discussion boards are boards where the spam content is almost zero,but not counting posts in such discussions may curb down real,good discussions. Is it a good idea? It has been introduced quite recently only,so...

[1Referee]

Ivory tower and Serious Discussion boards are boards where the spam content is almost zero,but not counting posts in such discussions may curb down real,good discussions. Is it a good idea? It has been introduced quite recently only,so...

ChipMixer solely pays for exposure, and in the stated sections of the forum they don't get that due to disabled signatures, so it makes sense that they don't pay for posts that don't give them that exposure. You can participate as much as you want in said sections, it just won't get paid.