[ENDED] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | Sr Member+

[Amph]

You too Dark Star, using the same old strategy by using people for a few days and then removing them with an excuse of bad quality to have a few members/days free advertising or did chipmixer extended the slots?

There's 2 slots available, the last time I checked applicants was yesterday and I try to check at least once every day. No one, except for those who have removed their signatures has been kicked without pay to date. There's 55 slots, we were full last week, 6 were removed, 4 more were accepted so now there are 2.

You too Dark Star, using the same old strategy by using people for a few days and then removing them with an excuse of bad quality to have a few members/days free advertising or did chipmixer extended the slots?

well brother,
we should respect other people and can not judge them in that way,you said removing them with an excuse for free advertising ?
seems like you got it wrong brother,he's paying them but he didn't extend their spot. and indeed chipmixer extended the slots from 50 to 55.

^ This
Very normal for campaigns to remove people. Check the payment transaction - you will see that they were paid.

Hello Good day,

I will just ask few question here: is there any slot available in campaign chip mixer? I am good for joining in the campaign?, my previous altcoin campaign was done and hope to promote next this chipmixer.

Godbless!

No, the title is 100% a lie and you shouldn't trust anything said on the forum.
/s

Then you likely fall under this:

Others are denied.

he also said this "6 people were removed, so we now have open slots. Not going to be looking at previous applicants as that will get too messy, please reapply."

well i dunno i'll reapply

Username: Amph
Post Count: 28683
BTC Address: 3HhzHsefZSR6caKz5tXk1C3HwbvMTedZDL

I said that first, you reapplied after, I said "Others are denied", which includes you like hilarious said. Reapplying every time you get rejected is not a good way to get into this campaign.

i didn't reapply at all after, i applyed only 1 time here and i aksed if it was missed(which can not be counted as a reapply...), and this is another one, maybe you need to check my post history better

[1714476886]

1714476886

[1714476886]

1714476886

[1714476886]

1714476886

[1714476886]

1714476886

[1714476886]

1714476886

[utkuy]

Hello, i want join this sign campaign.

Username: utkuy
Post Count: 325
BTC Address: 127K9HhaBjYtahXMs6d8F2qi63fER88qqx

 Regards

[InvoKing]

Hi Darkster
I would like to join ChipMixer signature campaign
Username: invoking
Post Count: 962 (including this)
BTC Address: 1EYT3LbpsgKyfXPdyHyS88r5obR8VUZBJS
Thanks

Edit
Will add the signature later if I was accepted
Good luck with the signature campaign

[bitart]

Hereby applying for the 1 open spot:
Username: bitart
Post Count: 571 (including this)
BTC Address: 13V3Bj2vHsQYesm633KVgFtQ2zA8NmCJpM
Waiting for the feedback, thanks in advance!
Bitart

[Aleister Crowley]

maybe 1 spot can I fill?
Reserved

[DarkStar_alt]

Hereby applying for the 1 open spot:
Username: bitart
Post Count: 571 (including this)
BTC Address: 13V3Bj2vHsQYesm633KVgFtQ2zA8NmCJpM
Waiting for the feedback, thanks in advance!
Bitart

Accepted, welcome!

Campaign is now full.

[digaran]

Let me get this straight, you first look at people's post history and quality and then accept them but later you remove them because of their shitty quality?
So either they were good before joining this campaign and after joining went bad or you don't actually try to see if some body posts with quality after joining the campaign, you rather deny or accept as you wish, just when feels like it, if you like some body you'd accept them regardless of their quality.

When somebody applies for a campaign, you as a manager accept them if they are general quality posters and then if they turned bad, you just put them on a blacklist much like SMAS as I believe it was created for a reason, but denying users which were not blacklisted and never giving them any chance is not something a manager should do.
Even with your hand picking of participants you had to remove them, you'll have to remove more in the future I'm sure of it unless you ignore their bad quality which as well will hurt your reputation and if you kick them, then why not accepting non SMAS users in order of their applications being posted?

[DarkStar_]

Let me get this straight, you first look at people's post history and quality and then accept them but later you remove them because of their shitty quality?

Yes. If someone is not a scammer, does that mean that they are still not a scammer after they scam someone? No.

So either they were good before joining this campaign and after joining went bad or you don't actually try to see if some body posts with quality after joining the campaign, you rather deny or accept as you wish, just when feels like it, if you like some body you'd accept them regardless of their quality.

Some people were removed because their quality went down after being accepted, or for post bursting. I do check everyone that applies. If I didn't bother checking, then how come so many people were denied before the campaign was full?

if you like some body you'd accept them regardless of their quality.

If this is referring the me accept hilarious, do you really think a Global Moderator that complains about spam will become a spammer?

When somebody applies for a campaign, you as a manager accept them if they are general quality posters and then if they turned bad, you just put them on a blacklist much like SMAS as I believe it was created for a reason, but denying users which were not blacklisted and never giving them any chance is not something a manager should do.

People can change, and I don't like having a blanket ban just because someone had lower quality posts once. I think SMAS is a good initiative, but I prefer to use my own judgement. IIRC TryNinja is SMAS banned, but has a good post quality.

Even with your hand picking of participants you had to remove them, you'll have to remove more in the future I'm sure of it unless you ignore their bad quality which as well will hurt your reputation and if you kick them, then why not accepting non SMAS users in order of their applications being posted?

Someone mad they didn't get accepted? People that were removed started with a good post quality - that's why they were accepted. Again, people can change!

All of the well known campaign managers have removed people after they were accepted - go complain about them as well.

Why are you applying anyway? Sudden change of heart now that BitMixer is gone? (Though I don't see how them shutting down makes ChipMixer not controlled by the government/other stuff you complained about)

[AtheistAKASaneBrain]

Well this is confusing. Im applying again just in case:

Username : AtheistAKASaneBrain
Post Count : 2070 (including this one)
Bitcoin Address : 1NSjLtsizuiVbDM8SfaReo9K87XZvTiXxk

Why im being ignored? can I at least get some input?

Im also reapplying again because it says 2 slots free in the title.

[warningsigns]

Username: warningsigns
Post Count: 407
BTC Address: 1CYCtmSpSbfbvzgKgUTJdVLSQUdJFycLF8

Accepted, welcome!

Thank you for accepting me.

Is there anything else I need to do apart from being accepted here? Do I have to let ChipMixer know I added their signature? Or is being added here the only procedure?

[HCP]

Well this is confusing. Im applying again just in case:

Username : AtheistAKASaneBrain
Post Count : 2070 (including this one)
Bitcoin Address : 1NSjLtsizuiVbDM8SfaReo9K87XZvTiXxk

Why im being ignored? can I at least get some input?

Others are denied. That means that if you applied before this post, and weren't accepted, you are not accepted.

Pretty sure you come under "others", given that Darkstars post was almost 14 hours after you applied. Seems fairly obvious.

[JanpriX]

Hi, I would like to apply for this campaign. Will wear the necessary signature once accepted. Thanks

Username: JanpriX
Post Count: 554 (including this one)
BTC Address: 3Pqx9kNMQGVYMwdnVoYsDWmufTeTaxdEpr

[freebutcaged]

Hi, I would like to apply for this campaign. Will wear the necessary signature once accepted. Thanks

Username: JanpriX
Post Count: 554 (including this one)
BTC Address: 3Pqx9kNMQGVYMwdnVoYsDWmufTeTaxdEpr

Hi, I would like to inform you that campaign's title says full. @manager, if people were denied then why did you ask to reapply when spots were opened?

Are current participants post 50 times all of them or there are people posting less? if they are not posting the max amount of posts weekly then I'd like to

Suggest you accepting a few more people, for instance I could never post 50 times a week, maybe 35-40 and I see there are some members with 0 or just

A few weekly posts, they're just wasting opportunities, while taking a spot but not fulfilling their task.

[DarkStar_alt]

Hi, I would like to apply for this campaign. Will wear the necessary signature once accepted. Thanks

Username: JanpriX
Post Count: 554 (including this one)
BTC Address: 3Pqx9kNMQGVYMwdnVoYsDWmufTeTaxdEpr

Hi, I would like to inform you that campaign's title says full. @manager, if people were denied then why did you ask to reapply when spots were opened?

Are current participants post 50 times all of them or there are people posting less? if they are not posting the max amount of posts weekly then I'd like to

Suggest you accepting a few more people, for instance I could never post 50 times a week, maybe 35-40 and I see there are some members with 0 or just

A few weekly posts, they're just wasting opportunities, while taking a spot but not fulfilling their task.

I had 10ish slots open when BitMixer shut down. BitMixer had many good posters who applied (more then 10). I only had a certain number of slots, so there were people I would have accepted if I had more slots. That's why I asked people to reapply if they were denied and still interested. If you check my posts, you will see that I stated that many of the applicants weren't denied because of post quality.

I don't expect people to post 50 times a week. 50 is just there as a cap, as it's a pay per post campaign. You do realize the spreadsheet is public and you can see how many times people posted, right? If I had only allowed people who post 50 times a week, there would be a lot of spam.

People that don't reach close to the cap aren't "not fulfilling" their task.

Username: warningsigns
Post Count: 407
BTC Address: 1CYCtmSpSbfbvzgKgUTJdVLSQUdJFycLF8

Accepted, welcome!

Thank you for accepting me.

Is there anything else I need to do apart from being accepted here? Do I have to let ChipMixer know I added their signature? Or is being added here the only procedure?

Nope, nothing more for you to do expect post if you want to.

Well this is confusing. Im applying again just in case:

Username : AtheistAKASaneBrain
Post Count : 2070 (including this one)
Bitcoin Address : 1NSjLtsizuiVbDM8SfaReo9K87XZvTiXxk

Why im being ignored? can I at least get some input?

Others are denied. That means that if you applied before this post, and weren't accepted, you are not accepted.

Pretty sure you come under "others", given that Darkstars post was almost 14 hours after you applied. Seems fairly obvious.

That is correct.

Well this is confusing. Im applying again just in case:

Username : AtheistAKASaneBrain
Post Count : 2070 (including this one)
Bitcoin Address : 1NSjLtsizuiVbDM8SfaReo9K87XZvTiXxk

Why im being ignored? can I at least get some input?

Im also reapplying again because it says 2 slots free in the title.

Title says FULL. Only shows 2 slots free because you quoted a post that was made when there was 2 slots free.

[DarkStar_alt]

Post counting will be finished soon, and payments will follow.

Since I'm guessing many will ask, the reason your denied posts are higher than usual is likely because of the posts about BCC in the Altcoins section.

[DarkStar_]

Post counting is finished and payments have been sent.
tx: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/0a927f86e75129a312d1e756cc1ded476fae6855aadec801c9885ed7c2f290f0

2 slots are open now.

[jtipt]

Username: Jtipt
Rank: Hero member
Post count: 971
BTC address: 1JtiptJgw1vTteB66ocAXAQQcdgcT3yUcb
Will change signature once accepted.

[SONG GEET]

I would like to participate. Will change signature if accepted.

Bitcointalk user : SONG GEET
Post Count: 630
BTC Address: 1AcLhTabxKqZ37x5JoahrqGBeiZ3qXk2mG

[RoommateAgreement]

Username: RoommateAgreement
Post Count: 1629
BTC Address: 1GBo56BS9x1NHaf2tNTWcTrm6KbSsnYzgX

[Aamir1]

Re-applying. It is allowed, right?

Username: Aamir1
Post Count: 2710+1
Bitcoin address: 3BaDysqjHcL3R1HYZFfkLbuYnr9HEaaaFW

I'll wear the signaute if accepted.