[ENDED] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | Sr Member+

[Juggy777]

Amazing how'd you opened an slot tentatively to accept the new DT member whom you declined an entry earlier.

What's the point of this post? That's what DarkStar said when he "declined" The Pharmacist last time:

Username: The Pharmacist
Post Count: 6951
BTC Address: 1As24mzicrYQLXDEWKGQ8ZjeyvYhgWLRAx

I realize the campaign is full, but I'm giving it a shot here.  

I'd *probably* accept you if we had open slots, but not under the exception unfortunately.

Now that there was an open slot, he accepted him. What's the issue?

wait a minute... The Pharmacist = DarkStar = Lauda = actmyname = thermos confirmed? :0

I don't think there's anything wrong, he already specified if a slot came up he would give him, I don't see any wrong in here. It's simple someone either left the campaign or was removed due to bad post, and he must have liked the applicant post quality so it's not difficult to see how a spot was opened and why it went to him. Just be positive if your posts are good you may be selected next time.

[1714470389]

1714470389

[1714470389]

1714470389

[1714470389]

1714470389

[1714470389]

1714470389

[1714470389]

1714470389

[jseverson]

Hi DarkStar_, I'm switching to a Segwit address.

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Jan 24 2018, This is jseverson, switching to the address bc1qh95vf43w8y7423j5ccawcxaql6205p6qyqgekp for the Chipmixer campaign
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Current Address: 1PsEmeSg7nxJPvzgWhiQAxunggJZtX4N8m
Signature : IIQD5z8FV+ob1qQxTUbhld1sVqofWIi/IB5g4QWvzWYTQX2FYkhG+YAzIlCFBsNx5Yht8m/W0obFkfo27QIeshk=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Thanks!

[DarkStar_]

Hi DarkStar_, I'm switching to a Segwit address.

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Jan 24 2018, This is jseverson, switching to the address bc1qh95vf43w8y7423j5ccawcxaql6205p6qyqgekp for the Chipmixer campaign
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Current Address: 1PsEmeSg7nxJPvzgWhiQAxunggJZtX4N8m
Signature : IIQD5z8FV+ob1qQxTUbhld1sVqofWIi/IB5g4QWvzWYTQX2FYkhG+YAzIlCFBsNx5Yht8m/W0obFkfo27QIeshk=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Thanks!

Updated, thanks for making the switch.

wait a minute... The Pharmacist = DarkStar = Lauda = actmyname = thermos confirmed? :0

Oh no, I've been exposed

[richardsNY]

Made the switch to SegWit.

bc1q98s2468e5saemj8v9qv64gcuewur32wxs6m273

It's an address generated with Electrum. Proof is nearly all the funds have been sweeped to the SegWit address.

[iluvbitcoins]

0.00075 BTC/post

Is the OP missing a zero?

[LoyceV]

0.00075 BTC/post

Is the OP missing a zero?

No.

[DarkStar_]

00.00075 BTC/post

Is the OP missing a zero?

No.

There, I added one.

Side note: having 2 leading zeros looks really weird

Made the switch to SegWit.

bc1q98s2468e5saemj8v9qv64gcuewur32wxs6m273

It's an address generated with Electrum. Proof is nearly all the funds have been sweeped to the SegWit address.

Updated, thanks for making the switch.

[jackg]

@Darkstar_ Can you change this week's payment temporarily to the bech address in my personal message. I want to experiment with segwit a bit before making the switch and to do that I need something in the address (as my coins currently won't transfer to them without me having to sweep them). I appear to have made 10 posts on one day (yesterday) so if you want to pay for only half of that 10 or something then that's fine with me.

Message

Code:

This is jackg changing a bitcoin address for chipmixer to the bech32 address in his personal message on 27.01.12

Code:

Address: 1JRmjyGo3kpdXcQeAeTBmGtgkC1AomHKED
Signature: IJ5F3Xz5DJ7vSdTqs+ckJSj0N7Ev7CKx/ip9pxS2EF+JGqjTE53Ise/u8LYJRD/qYiKP/J0MKgOEMFQLXSEUuZw=

[DarkStar_]

Payments have been sent for this week. You can view the payment transaction here.

I appear to have made 10 posts on one day (yesterday) so if you want to pay for only half of that 10 or something then that's fine with me.

That's perfectly reasonable. (as in posting 10 in one day). Address also updated.

[BTCforJoe]

Another successful payment after another week. Kudos.

just for confirmation, I can vouch that I have, indeed, received 000.0007500BTC per post.

[dothebeats]

Another successful payment after another week. Kudos.

just for confirmation, I can vouch that I have, indeed, received 000.0007500BTC per post.

You still lack zeroes, though. Nice try.

[SFR10]

Payments have been sent for this week. You can view the payment transaction here.

I confirm receiving this weeks (my 6th week) payout, Thanks to DarkStar_ and ChipMixer

[richardsNY]

Payments have been sent for this week. You can view the payment transaction here.

Received. I gave you 1 merit, and I see jackg did the same -- does this mean that we both are a confirmed alt of you?

Also, now people have been shifting to SegWit addresses, what is the direct (positive) result that you noticed?

[LoyceV]

Received. I gave you 1 merit, and I see jackg did the same -- does this mean that we both are a confirmed alt of you?

It think you used Merits as a "Like", but that's not how it's supposed to be used:

I'm hoping that this system will increase post quality by:
~
 - Highlighting good posts with the "Merited by" line.

Please try to merit posts that other people might find interesting, since top-merited posts show up on the stats.

Also, now people have been shifting to SegWit addresses, what is the direct (positive) result that you noticed?

Bitcoin fees went down already, although I don't think there is a direct relationship. Three weeks ago DarkStar_ paid $188 fee, today $5. SegWit addresses don't safe on fees when receiving transactions, the savings happen when you make a payment from a SegWit address.

[richardsNY]

It think you used Merits as a "Like", but that's not how it's supposed to be used:

It doesn't specifically say that you MUST use it in that exact way -- there are more examples of this happening. I however understand the point and will refrain from doing so from now on. I'll save the merits for worthy posts as reward for contribution.

[jseverson]

You could probably use it as a "Like". It looks like theymos wants the bar lowered for posts that should get a merit:

@DooMAD
If they're really not adding anything, then they shouldn't get merit. But it doesn't need to be mind-blowing, either. Someone suggested a feature where all umerited posts would be hidden (which I may do at some point) -- I think that it'd be good to look at it as asking what posts you would want in such a summary. So not just incredible posts which might've taken an hour or more to write (those should probably get 10+ merit), but also the questions, arguments, jokes, etc. which couldn't be removed from a thread without starting to lobotomize it.

It's all very new, of course, so maybe this strategy will not actually be the best, but it is what I had in mind when designing the system.

@TMAN, I have been adding sources, and I will continue.

[pooya87]

SegWit addresses don't safe on fees when receiving transactions, the savings happen when you make a payment from a SegWit address.

When sending to a P2PKH the pk_script is:

Code:

OP_DUP OP_HASH160 Size PubKey_hash OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG

bytes: 1 + 1 + 1 + 20 + 1 + 1 = 25

When sending to a Bech32 address the pk_script is:

Code:

OP_0 Size PubKey_hash

bytes: 1 +1 + 20 = 22

paying ~58 people with Bech32 means 174 bytes smaller

[Denker]

Since the former signature campaign, in which I was more than a year a part of, closed it doors yesterday I am looking for a new campaign.
I know this campaign doesn't have any places left, but maybe there exists some kind of watchlist for potential future participants.
I'm part of this community since 2014, have participated in many signature campaigns over the last 3 years and never had any problems or complaints with anyone.
Thanks in advance.

[jackg]

SegWit addresses don't safe on fees when receiving transactions, the savings happen when you make a payment from a SegWit address.

When sending to a P2PKH the pk_script is:

Code:

OP_DUP OP_HASH160 Size PubKey_hash OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG

bytes: 1 + 1 + 1 + 20 + 1 + 1 = 25

When sending to a Bech32 address the pk_script is:

Code:

OP_0 Size PubKey_hash

bytes: 1 +1 + 20 = 22

paying ~58 people with Bech32 means 174 bytes smaller

Loyce is referring to the legacy address that pays us from DarkStar_. That's why the fee won't fall due directly to it being bech32.

Also @DarkStar_ do you know if you can convert your address with the 1Chip in it to a bech address or a non-native segwit address and then it won't have too many issues if people pay to exchanges (as most exchanges don't support native segwit).

[stompix]

Time for me to make the address change also finally

Message:

Code:

This is a message signed by Stompix on 2018-02-01 changing my address to bc1q5wlj8t8pjp6qsmdphstfee5d3lvg9f25yw7mmj

Signature:

Code:

HwgIzcnXwlebx4nJmdDtzy/pmfDkTt915/ArCWLAYAX4dp4r8eVdS32fNi36Shn/qvRmjzx+DZmGe47bNER3jRs=

Address:

Code:

16oCA1eorLqYHVji75Fn1wRZ2q9rheZmF

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg22726423#msg22726423