[ANN] [ICO] MONETHA - Decentralised reputation with built-in payments

[dinc]

UTRUST part of the FUD --> Many users report the CEO advising members to spread fud against Monetha, user captured screenshot below
https://i.imgur.com/DdHaRaT.png

Nice try, but no.

That's how nuno message  looks.
Your attempt, only proves that your project is a scam with 19-year-old "developer"  and compare it with 15 middle or senior devs from Utrust - looks funny.

[1714848402]

1714848402

[1714848402]

1714848402

[1714848402]

1714848402

[SonaraBeta]

don't believe the Troll, they want to buy your coins on the cheap, it's just a game, in the future, I think the price for one coin can be $ 50

[revenant2017]

You can't please a persons accusation specially if the FUD was intended to manipulate the market. FUD campaign is definitely not new here on Bitcointalk. Worst, an Extortion can happen. All of this FUD's are for their own personal interest. So i suggest to everyone to not entertain any kind of FUD as it will only continue to be more widespread until it satisfy the person who FUD.

[mehar_gee]

don't believe the Troll, they want to buy your coins on the cheap, it's just a game, in the future, I think the price for one coin can be $ 50

monetha price is now going low but my coclusion its stable not going that low
i think every finished ICO like in one or two months after going low like double low
but monetha is very good project and its team is working on so soon monetha will recover not only its ICO value but will be more then that
just need some time and i hope monetha will show it strenght in march 2018 so i will hold my monetha
and also hoping some gib exchange will list monetha in that time

[Bonanzacoin]

Couple questions for Monetha and others:

So... could it be that Justis is simply put in front of the project? In that video he doesnt really debunk anything. All he says is, dont listen to the fud.

Is it so that others are really behind the project only to led it bleed a slow death so they can run away with millions without being portrayed as scammers?

IS JUSTIS A REAL CEO is what i would like to know. What emphasisis does he has with crypto? Is he just a horse in front of a carriage? And what carriage is that.

[George.kv]

UTRUST part of the FUD --> Many users report the CEO advising members to spread fud against Monetha, user captured screenshot below
https://i.imgur.com/DdHaRaT.png

Nice try, but no.
http://i.piccy.info/i9/a57aad68e512341f582813448b724d74/1506359551/74151/1182717/utrust1.png
That's how nuno message  looks.
Your attempt, only proves that your project is a scam with 19-year-old "developer"  and compare it with 15 middle or senior devs from Utrust - looks funny.

Ha ha nice try u fucking ass hole. In fact the utrust guys where pricing that monetha is a good project in their live event. They don't have to fud like you guys. Please don't send your slaves to do fud in there therd we are ashamed of you monetha.

[maxwelllord]

Couple questions for Monetha and others:

So... could it be that Justis is simply put in front of the project? In that video he doesnt really debunk anything. All he says is, dont listen to the fud.

Is it so that others are really behind the project only to led it bleed a slow death so they can run away with millions without being portrayed as scammers?

IS JUSTIS A REAL CEO is what i would like to know. What emphasisis does he has with crypto? Is he just a horse in front of a carriage? And what carriage is that.

I have bases to believe that most of members of the so-called Monetha team don't exist in reality.

Erikas Malisauskas
Product design/Front end developer

Martynas Adomaitis
Smart Contract developer

Andrej Davidovic
Software engineer

Eric Duprat
Payments lead

Kellogg N. Fairbank
Sales and Merchant Acquisition Lead

Dr. Jean-Marc Seigneur
Decentralised Trust and Reputation lead

Where all these people? We see only the dancer of Justas Pikelis who works as a talking head, and words to him are written by Andrej Ruckij.

Where other members of the team? It doesn't seem to you it is suspicious? Their photos aren't even, except their names on the website.

[Bonanzacoin]

Nvmind i  forgot this article:

http://www.the-blockchain.com/2017/09/08/monetha-signs-partnership-deal-leading-central-european-food-delivery-company/

U need to be pretty convincing to make a partnership out of thin air.

And the first two people i checked are definitly real.

Justis i guess is just the main spokes person. There is no need to have more faces.

Then another question:

Is that Nuno message real or not?

[coinz101]

Then another question:

Is that Nuno message real or not?

Of course its FAKE. Do you think a Nuno as CEO would post this kind of garbage on the official channel of utrust? That screenshot is FAKE and its simple to prove for someone that uses slack on daily basis. On slack it should say ----Today---- above the message and not -----Monday 25 September----- since the screenshot was 'taken'(FAKE) at 12pm from today. 100% fake propaganda. now they are spreading fud about utrust and don't even know how to do a fake image. pump/dump groups targeted monetha today

ps: if you follow utrust daily as I do you will understand that they don't care about monetha and they even said multiple times its a decent  project. everyone is concerned about what is the best project instead of realizing they are totally different.

[Bonanzacoin]

Then another question:

Is that Nuno message real or not?

Of course its FAKE. Do you think a Nuno as CEO would post this kind of garbage on the official channel of utrust? That screenshot is FAKE and its simple to prove for someone that uses slack on daily basis. On slack it should say ----Today---- above the message and not -----Monday 25 September----- since the screenshot was 'taken'(FAKE) at 12pm from today. 100% fake propaganda. now they are spreading fud about utrust and don't even know how to do a fake image. pump/dump groups targeted monetha today

ps: if you follow utrust daily as I do you will understand that they don't care about monetha and they even said multiple times its a decent  project. everyone is concerned about what is the best project instead of realizing they are totally different.

So who exactly are u then?? U are a newbie, but from the getgo ur posts are on UTRUST and Monetha topics.... UR FIRST POST WAS THIS ONE:

So many people asking so here you go. My personal review of Monetha vs UTRUST:

The Monetha Team:
- Small and not even a single software engineer
The UTRUST Team:
- Large and with a highly technical background

Monetha Whitepaper:
- Confusing and hard to understand if this is something really needed
UTRUST Whitepaper:
- Very clear to understand the model just by glancing at the paper summary

Monetha fees for seller:
- 1.5%
UTRUST fees for seller:
- 1%

Monetha Concept:
- Simplistic view and solves no intrinsic problem.
UTRUST Concept:
- Solves a major problem in crypto payments - Buyer protection for cryptocurrency. This is something that is needed for the mass adoption and doesn’t exist. Can be easily used by merchants and private sellers alike.

Monetha accepts:
- Just ETH.
UTRUST accepts:
- All major cryptocurrencies.

Monetha adoption by merchants:
- Limited to merchants that wish to accept ETH and no other cryptocurrencies. Amazon, Ebay, Ali, and many more already have feedback scores, therefore Monethas model will not gain tracking and be adopted by any major merchants. Since it solves no problem, very low appeal to buyers.
UTRUST adoption by merchants:
- Buyers can pay with multiple cryptocurrencies and have a safety net when making their payments, with sellers having a higher selling rate. Will gain organic traction, bringing more clients by referral as they feel more satisfied and protected.

-Monetha adoption by buyers:
- Buyers can only pay with ETH. Feedback score system already exists and solves no problem in practice. Feedback rate is unreliable and subject to false reports and paid bias, as many others.
UTRUST adoption by buyers:
- Buyers can pay with multiple cryptocurrencies. Buyers feel safer making payments with cryptocurrencies knowing that if something goes wrong they can appeal, escalate and be refunded.

If you pay with Monetha and an vendor scams you, the only thing you will be able to do is put a negative review and your money is gone. With UTRUST you will get your money back.

 
How come this is a newbie´s first post? Wouldnt u like to explore the forum a bit more before u come out with stuff like this?

What is ur motive?

[nalpagutt]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgjA27iHPaU

Monetha came to the explanation

🚨 Don't fall for this... 🚨Don't fall for the FUD manipulation

And https://twitter.com/ericduprat Eric duprat following altcoins '' only '' Monetha

 

[jhannlenris]

Monetha will charge a 1.5% transaction fee from merchants. Of that, 0.5% will go to a “Voucher Smart Contract” in a for of MTH for Monetha token holders for an ability to use that in the Monetha’s ecosystem and other 1% will go to the company as revenues. (Coinbase also enables merchant to receive payments with a working API, they charge 0 fees to use their services)

On top of that only 50% of the tokens issued in the ico go to investors, this also means if Monetha were to sell all of their tokens, they would still pocket 66% of all future revenues. At this current model, investors are really only getting 16.5% (33% x 50%) of the revenues generated from Monetha. This is not even considering the massive competition they have in this space from Omise, Tenx and Metal. There is really no point in having an ICO if the project is this centralised and unfair, this project sounds more like a cash grab.

[AdventureCoin]

Couple questions for Monetha and others:

So... could it be that Justis is simply put in front of the project? In that video he doesnt really debunk anything. All he says is, dont listen to the fud.

Is it so that others are really behind the project only to led it bleed a slow death so they can run away with millions without being portrayed as scammers?

IS JUSTIS A REAL CEO is what i would like to know. What emphasisis does he has with crypto? Is he just a horse in front of a carriage? And what carriage is that.

looks like you earn 100 point!

See here GITHUB, there is nowhere any update:
https://github.com/monetha
whitepaper is not clear!
some team member is not full time or nothing to do with this company, crypto!

They will use magento gateway,,this is basic 08-15 payment solution for e-commerce!
CTO have only ethereum basic knowledge and knowhow!

co founder and ceo js is a speaker and he have nothing to do with this business! he is justin bieber from crypto
they can't deliver any working product in next 2-3 years. And any good programmer or advisor will not help a company with out a working team!

so you can look on etherscan the investor:
https://etherscan.io/token/tokenholderchart/0xaf4dce16da2877f8c9e00544c93b62ac40631f16

this post finally clear facts about monetha feature
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1978067.1780


http://www.warszawa.sport.pl/sport-warszawa/51,125726,12728465.html?i=2

stay away from this company!
something is FUD but longtherm this company will SCAM every investor! only cash grab!

[Yury1]

On top of that only 50% of the tokens issued in the ico go to investors, this also means if Monetha were to sell all of their tokens, they would still pocket 66% of all future revenues. At this current model, investors are really only getting 16.5% (33% x 50%) of the revenues generated from Monetha.

You are not right. The developers left 50% tokens itself to equally with investors to bear the risks for the success of the project. With the increase in the price of the token will increase the profit of developers. This is a very strong motivation.

[nalpagutt]

Eric Duprat Send Tweets Monetha !

[rudystyle]

On top of that only 50% of the tokens issued in the ico go to investors, this also means if Monetha were to sell all of their tokens, they would still pocket 66% of all future revenues. At this current model, investors are really only getting 16.5% (33% x 50%) of the revenues generated from Monetha.

You are not right. The developers left 50% tokens itself to equally with investors to bear the risks for the success of the project. With the increase in the price of the token will increase the profit of developers. This is a very strong motivation.

No you are wrong.  They are already taking 66% of the revenues and only 33% is distributed to token holders. Even if they hold 0 tokens they would still take 66% of the revenues. Out of the 33% they give to token holders they again take 50% from that since they hold 50% of the tokens. And they didn't buy those 50% tokens and took risks, they got their 50% tokens  for free.

[Yury1]

On top of that only 50% of the tokens issued in the ico go to investors, this also means if Monetha were to sell all of their tokens, they would still pocket 66% of all future revenues. At this current model, investors are really only getting 16.5% (33% x 50%) of the revenues generated from Monetha.

You are not right. The developers left 50% tokens itself to equally with investors to bear the risks for the success of the project. With the increase in the price of the token will increase the profit of developers. This is a very strong motivation.

No you are wrong. They are already taking 66% of the revenues and only 33% is distributed to token holders. Even if they hold 0 tokens they would still take 66% of the revenues. Out of the 33% they give to token holders they again take 50% from that since they hold 50% of the tokens.

You're already caught in a lie. Stop to lead people astray.

[nalpagutt]

Guys , I Talked to Eric Duprat twitter ,

[rudystyle]

On top of that only 50% of the tokens issued in the ico go to investors, this also means if Monetha were to sell all of their tokens, they would still pocket 66% of all future revenues. At this current model, investors are really only getting 16.5% (33% x 50%) of the revenues generated from Monetha.

You are not right. The developers left 50% tokens itself to equally with investors to bear the risks for the success of the project. With the increase in the price of the token will increase the profit of developers. This is a very strong motivation.

No you are wrong. They are already taking 66% of the revenues and only 33% is distributed to token holders. Even if they hold 0 tokens they would still take 66% of the revenues. Out of the 33% they give to token holders they again take 50% from that since they hold 50% of the tokens.

You're already caught in a lie. Stop to lead people astray.

Dude don't just bark like a dog and tell me where I am wrong

[Yury1]

On top of that only 50% of the tokens issued in the ico go to investors, this also means if Monetha were to sell all of their tokens, they would still pocket 66% of all future revenues. At this current model, investors are really only getting 16.5% (33% x 50%) of the revenues generated from Monetha.

You are not right. The developers left 50% tokens itself to equally with investors to bear the risks for the success of the project. With the increase in the price of the token will increase the profit of developers. This is a very strong motivation.

No you are wrong. They are already taking 66% of the revenues and only 33% is distributed to token holders. Even if they hold 0 tokens they would still take 66% of the revenues. Out of the 33% they give to token holders they again take 50% from that since they hold 50% of the tokens.

You're already caught in a lie. Stop to lead people astray.

Dude don't just bark like a dog and tell me where I am wrong

It is time to contact the forum administrator to get your account blocked