Bitcoin Forum
October 18, 2017, 12:26:13 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][ONC] Onecoin - CPU only - Pools opened!  (Read 71829 times)
xibeijan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952


View Profile
June 11, 2013, 10:26:48 AM
 #121

Awesome!  I am in.

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508286373
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508286373

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508286373
Reply with quote  #2

1508286373
Report to moderator
1508286373
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508286373

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508286373
Reply with quote  #2

1508286373
Report to moderator
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


View Profile
June 11, 2013, 10:26:58 AM
 #122

I'm glad that is it's back i liked the idea. I don't though think cpu only is a good way to go. I think something like digitial coin with perhaps a little more security and a really fair launch. Not saying digi wasn't fair since i can't remember the launch that well. But cpu only is just for those with amazon clusters and modded gpu miners.

████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
     ▄▄████████▄▄
   ▄██████████████▄
 ▄██████████████████▄
██████▀▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀▀█
██████     █████     █
██████     █████     █             ▄▄▄
██████     ▀▀▀▀▀     █        ███  ███
 ▀████                  ▄▄▄   ███  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄
   ▀██     ▄▄▄▄▄      ▄█████▄ ███  ███ ███  ███ ████████████▄
     ▀     █████      ███▄▄██ ███  ███ ███  ███ ███ ▀███ ▀███
           ▀▀███      ███▄▄▄  ███▄ ███ ███▄████ ███  ███  ███
               ▀       ▀████▀  ▀██ ███ ▀███▀███ ███  ███  ███
                   ▀█
████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
|
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
xibeijan
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952


View Profile
June 11, 2013, 10:27:14 AM
 #123

Scrypt-Jane...Good call. That has worked out so well for YaCoin Roll Eyes



Scrypt-jane - awesome choice!

Boxman90
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


View Profile
June 11, 2013, 10:30:39 AM
 #124

Scrypt-jane will kill this coin, because the only thing standing in the way of GPU implementation is a decent coder. There are no hardware restrictions. I'm willing to bet my entire life crypto-earnings that at least one person has successfully implemented GPU support for scrypt-jane, but just has not released it to the public.

LTC: LKKy4eDWyVtSrQAJy7Qmmz61RaFY91D9yC   BTC: 18fzdnCkuUNthCD8hM36UBGopFa9ij78gG
Mr.V
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182


View Profile
June 11, 2013, 10:34:07 AM
 #125

stupidest Idea iv ever heard in my entire existence!

BTC:1NwEE7C2hVLSNGwSrFvsYgTrKddCvfhRwY
HuuHachu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
June 11, 2013, 10:36:37 AM
 #126

Scrypt-jane ? You mean Keccak and chacha as used in Yacoin ?
So those who already implemented them in their private version of GPU miners will benefit and others will get less than their power cost ? ... nice ^^

(especially if using the changing N factor from Yacoin and using the same initial value, GPU miners are around 100 times more powerful than CPU miners ...)
Around 10MH/s for a 7950 at low N ...

noble: 9mKQpsfLeabjFsPv3YR9zYoAVymDPyfjCp
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


View Profile
June 11, 2013, 10:51:10 AM
 #127

yup just forget Jane, digi seems to to be the best design so far. Perhaps just a little slower to clear up the orphan rate.

████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
     ▄▄████████▄▄
   ▄██████████████▄
 ▄██████████████████▄
██████▀▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀▀█
██████     █████     █
██████     █████     █             ▄▄▄
██████     ▀▀▀▀▀     █        ███  ███
 ▀████                  ▄▄▄   ███  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄
   ▀██     ▄▄▄▄▄      ▄█████▄ ███  ███ ███  ███ ████████████▄
     ▀     █████      ███▄▄██ ███  ███ ███  ███ ███ ▀███ ▀███
           ▀▀███      ███▄▄▄  ███▄ ███ ███▄████ ███  ███  ███
               ▀       ▀████▀  ▀██ ███ ▀███▀███ ███  ███  ███
                   ▀█
████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
|
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
cre8r
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100


View Profile
June 11, 2013, 03:13:32 PM
 #128

All right, what do you think about combination of BLAKE 512 and Salsa 64? Salsa 64 doesn't seem to have working GPU implementation yet. I personally don't think that it's exceptionally bad that scrypt-jane will be once mined on GPUs, at least (if you believe in what is said in corresponding topic) Litecoin's scrypt implementation is no more ASIC-proof. That's the way the technologies advance, no algorithm may be considered protected from such events.
Hydroponica
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182


fml


View Profile
June 11, 2013, 03:16:06 PM
 #129

All right, what do you think about combination of BLAKE 512 and Salsa 64? Salsa 64 doesn't seem to have working GPU implementation yet. I personally don't think that it's exceptionally bad that scrypt-jane will be once mined on GPUs, at least (if you believe in what is said in corresponding topic) Litecoin's scrypt implementation is no more ASIC-proof. That's the way the technologies advance, no algorithm may be considered protected from such events.

Why cut out GPU miners at all? It's only $300 for a 7950...If you can't afford that, why are you bothering with Crypto at all?

barwizi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 868



View Profile
June 11, 2013, 03:29:16 PM
 #130

the excuse of gpu implementation is plain stupid, so you want someone to 1, make coin 2 make binary 3 make gpu implementation 4 no premine 5 no instamine

have you ever spent time trying the first three? i'd support the blake 512 idea just to see if it works, but most of the whining here is childish, pump and dump squad gabble that's pulling cryptos behind. IF HE WANTS TO EXPERIMENT, LET HIM!!!

LAUDA = SCAMMER, THE WORST MANAGER IN BITCOINALK, DO NOT TRADE WITH LAUDA
LAUDA = SCAMMER, THE WORST MANAGER IN BITCOINALK, DO NOT TRADE WITH LAUDA
LAUDA = SCAMMER, THE WORST MANAGER IN BITCOINALK, DO NOT TRADE WITH LAUDA
LAUDA = SCAMMER, THE WORST MANAGER IN BITCOINALK, DO NOT TRADE WITH LAUDALAUDA = SCAMMER, THE WORST MANAGER IN BITCOINALK, DO NOT TRADE WITH LAUDA
LAUDA = SCAMMER, THE WORST MANAGER IN BITCOINALK, DO NOT TRADE WITH LAUDA
LAUDA = SCAMMER, THE WORST MANAGER IN BITCOINALK, DO NOT TRADE WITH LAUDA
LAUDA = SCAMMER, THE WORST MANAGER IN BITCOINALK, DO NOT TRADE WITH LAUDA
cre8r
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100


View Profile
June 12, 2013, 10:53:48 AM
 #131

Okay, so now scrypt-jane is using BLAKE 512 and Salsa 64. Also I rewrote GetNfactor() to make Nfactor increase more uniform.
cpuminer for Onecoin is coming soon (it should be a lot faster on 64 bit machines than the built-in miner).
Boxman90
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


View Profile
June 12, 2013, 10:56:26 AM
 #132

Soon™

LTC: LKKy4eDWyVtSrQAJy7Qmmz61RaFY91D9yC   BTC: 18fzdnCkuUNthCD8hM36UBGopFa9ij78gG
MaGNeT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204


Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na


View Profile WWW
June 12, 2013, 10:58:14 AM
 #133

Okay, so now scrypt-jane is using BLAKE 512 and Salsa 64. Also I rewrote GetNfactor() to make Nfactor increase more uniform.
cpuminer for Onecoin is coming soon (it should be a lot faster on 64 bit machines than the built-in miner).

BotNetCoin would be a better choice as a name.

Unofficial Waves topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2142722   |   My Waves address alias = magnet
Boxman90
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


View Profile
June 12, 2013, 11:03:05 AM
 #134

Should've just stuck with either scrypt or the original scrypt-jane (which are both GPU mineable and less prone to being fucked over by a botnet)

LTC: LKKy4eDWyVtSrQAJy7Qmmz61RaFY91D9yC   BTC: 18fzdnCkuUNthCD8hM36UBGopFa9ij78gG
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


View Profile
June 12, 2013, 11:09:19 AM
 #135

All right, what do you think about combination of BLAKE 512 and Salsa 64? Salsa 64 doesn't seem to have working GPU implementation yet. I personally don't think that it's exceptionally bad that scrypt-jane will be once mined on GPUs, at least (if you believe in what is said in corresponding topic) Litecoin's scrypt implementation is no more ASIC-proof. That's the way the technologies advance, no algorithm may be considered protected from such events.

Yes, i agree, and of course it's your coin so up to you and i like the idea of the one coin.

But if you just make it scrypt it is fairer to all since those that do not have the gpu implemented to mine those you mention will have a big advantage over those that don't. Most people here have gpu if they have a farm or just a few then yes that is a difference, but i guess they took the risk of investing so much in hardware and power.

Anyway i will give it a go whatever and see what happens. Please post very specific instructions on how to mine upon launch if it is different to the usual scrypt mining we do in cgminer.
thanks

████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
     ▄▄████████▄▄
   ▄██████████████▄
 ▄██████████████████▄
██████▀▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀▀█
██████     █████     █
██████     █████     █             ▄▄▄
██████     ▀▀▀▀▀     █        ███  ███
 ▀████                  ▄▄▄   ███  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄
   ▀██     ▄▄▄▄▄      ▄█████▄ ███  ███ ███  ███ ████████████▄
     ▀     █████      ███▄▄██ ███  ███ ███  ███ ███ ▀███ ▀███
           ▀▀███      ███▄▄▄  ███▄ ███ ███▄████ ███  ███  ███
               ▀       ▀████▀  ▀██ ███ ▀███▀███ ███  ███  ███
                   ▀█
████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
|
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
jeannie
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98



View Profile
June 12, 2013, 11:19:21 AM
 #136

Interesting I will try to mine some.  But what will be after Onecoin? Zerocoin?

cre8r
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100


View Profile
June 12, 2013, 11:26:32 AM
 #137

Well, there are so many scrypt altcoins, and only one using scrypt-jane. I want Onecoin to be a bit more different to existing coins.
Boxman90
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


View Profile
June 12, 2013, 11:28:34 AM
 #138

But you're using a different version of scrypt-jane now, right?

LTC: LKKy4eDWyVtSrQAJy7Qmmz61RaFY91D9yC   BTC: 18fzdnCkuUNthCD8hM36UBGopFa9ij78gG
cryptohunter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526


View Profile
June 12, 2013, 11:28:47 AM
 #139

Well, there are so many scrypt altcoins, and only one using scrypt-jane. I want Onecoin to be a bit more different to existing coins.

Ok cool Smiley please post some good mining instructions up and i will aim my cpu's at it Smiley  

████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
     ▄▄████████▄▄
   ▄██████████████▄
 ▄██████████████████▄
██████▀▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀▀█
██████     █████     █
██████     █████     █             ▄▄▄
██████     ▀▀▀▀▀     █        ███  ███
 ▀████                  ▄▄▄   ███  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄  ▄▄
   ▀██     ▄▄▄▄▄      ▄█████▄ ███  ███ ███  ███ ████████████▄
     ▀     █████      ███▄▄██ ███  ███ ███  ███ ███ ▀███ ▀███
           ▀▀███      ███▄▄▄  ███▄ ███ ███▄████ ███  ███  ███
               ▀       ▀████▀  ▀██ ███ ▀███▀███ ███  ███  ███
                   ▀█
████████
████████
████
████





████
████
████████
████████
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
|
█  ████▀  █
█  ██▀▄█  █
█  ▀▄███  █
█  ████▀  █
██▀▄█
▀▄███
████▀
██▀▄█

▀▄███

█  ████▀  █

█  ██▀▄█  █

█  ▀▄███  █

█  █████  █
cre8r
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 100


View Profile
June 12, 2013, 11:41:53 AM
 #140

But you're using a different version of scrypt-jane now, right?
Yep.
Well, there are so many scrypt altcoins, and only one using scrypt-jane. I want Onecoin to be a bit more different to existing coins.

Ok cool Smiley please post some good mining instructions up and i will aim my cpu's at it Smiley 
Sure, I'll do it.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!