xibeijan
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
 |
June 11, 2013, 10:26:48 AM |
|
Awesome! I am in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
June 11, 2013, 10:26:58 AM |
|
I'm glad that is it's back i liked the idea. I don't though think cpu only is a good way to go. I think something like digitial coin with perhaps a little more security and a really fair launch. Not saying digi wasn't fair since i can't remember the launch that well. But cpu only is just for those with amazon clusters and modded gpu miners.
|
|
|
|
xibeijan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 11, 2013, 10:27:14 AM |
|
Scrypt-Jane...Good call. That has worked out so well for YaCoin  Scrypt-jane - awesome choice! |
|
|
|
|
Boxman90
|
|
June 11, 2013, 10:30:39 AM |
|
Scrypt-jane will kill this coin, because the only thing standing in the way of GPU implementation is a decent coder. There are no hardware restrictions. I'm willing to bet my entire life crypto-earnings that at least one person has successfully implemented GPU support for scrypt-jane, but just has not released it to the public.
|
LTC: LKKy4eDWyVtSrQAJy7Qmmz61RaFY91D9yC BTC: 18fzdnCkuUNthCD8hM36UBGopFa9ij78gG
|
|
|
|
Mr.V
|
|
June 11, 2013, 10:34:07 AM |
|
stupidest Idea iv ever heard in my entire existence!
|
BTC:1NwEE7C2hVLSNGwSrFvsYgTrKddCvfhRwY
|
|
|
|
HuuHachu
|
|
June 11, 2013, 10:36:37 AM |
|
Scrypt-jane ? You mean Keccak and chacha as used in Yacoin ?
So those who already implemented them in their private version of GPU miners will benefit and others will get less than their power cost ? ... nice ^^
(especially if using the changing N factor from Yacoin and using the same initial value, GPU miners are around 100 times more powerful than CPU miners ...)
Around 10MH/s for a 7950 at low N ...
|
noble: 9mKQpsfLeabjFsPv3YR9zYoAVymDPyfjCp
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
June 11, 2013, 10:51:10 AM |
|
yup just forget Jane, digi seems to to be the best design so far. Perhaps just a little slower to clear up the orphan rate.
|
|
|
|
cre8r (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
June 11, 2013, 03:13:32 PM |
|
All right, what do you think about combination of BLAKE 512 and Salsa 64? Salsa 64 doesn't seem to have working GPU implementation yet. I personally don't think that it's exceptionally bad that scrypt-jane will be once mined on GPUs, at least (if you believe in what is said in corresponding topic) Litecoin's scrypt implementation is no more ASIC-proof. That's the way the technologies advance, no algorithm may be considered protected from such events.
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroponica
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
fml
|
|
June 11, 2013, 03:16:06 PM |
|
All right, what do you think about combination of BLAKE 512 and Salsa 64? Salsa 64 doesn't seem to have working GPU implementation yet. I personally don't think that it's exceptionally bad that scrypt-jane will be once mined on GPUs, at least (if you believe in what is said in corresponding topic) Litecoin's scrypt implementation is no more ASIC-proof. That's the way the technologies advance, no algorithm may be considered protected from such events.
Why cut out GPU miners at all? It's only $300 for a 7950...If you can't afford that, why are you bothering with Crypto at all? |
|
|
|
barwizi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 11, 2013, 03:29:16 PM |
|
the excuse of gpu implementation is plain stupid, so you want someone to 1, make coin 2 make binary 3 make gpu implementation 4 no premine 5 no instamine
have you ever spent time trying the first three? i'd support the blake 512 idea just to see if it works, but most of the whining here is childish, pump and dump squad gabble that's pulling cryptos behind. IF HE WANTS TO EXPERIMENT, LET HIM!!!
|
|
|
|
|
cre8r (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2013, 10:53:48 AM |
|
Okay, so now scrypt-jane is using BLAKE 512 and Salsa 64. Also I rewrote GetNfactor() to make Nfactor increase more uniform.
cpuminer for Onecoin is coming soon (it should be a lot faster on 64 bit machines than the built-in miner).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boxman90
|
|
June 12, 2013, 10:56:26 AM |
|
Soon™
|
LTC: LKKy4eDWyVtSrQAJy7Qmmz61RaFY91D9yC BTC: 18fzdnCkuUNthCD8hM36UBGopFa9ij78gG
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
June 12, 2013, 10:58:14 AM |
|
Okay, so now scrypt-jane is using BLAKE 512 and Salsa 64. Also I rewrote GetNfactor() to make Nfactor increase more uniform.
cpuminer for Onecoin is coming soon (it should be a lot faster on 64 bit machines than the built-in miner).
BotNetCoin would be a better choice as a name. |
|
|
|
|
|
Boxman90
|
|
June 12, 2013, 11:03:05 AM |
|
Should've just stuck with either scrypt or the original scrypt-jane (which are both GPU mineable and less prone to being fucked over by a botnet)
|
LTC: LKKy4eDWyVtSrQAJy7Qmmz61RaFY91D9yC BTC: 18fzdnCkuUNthCD8hM36UBGopFa9ij78gG
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
June 12, 2013, 11:09:19 AM |
|
All right, what do you think about combination of BLAKE 512 and Salsa 64? Salsa 64 doesn't seem to have working GPU implementation yet. I personally don't think that it's exceptionally bad that scrypt-jane will be once mined on GPUs, at least (if you believe in what is said in corresponding topic) Litecoin's scrypt implementation is no more ASIC-proof. That's the way the technologies advance, no algorithm may be considered protected from such events.
Yes, i agree, and of course it's your coin so up to you and i like the idea of the one coin. But if you just make it scrypt it is fairer to all since those that do not have the gpu implemented to mine those you mention will have a big advantage over those that don't. Most people here have gpu if they have a farm or just a few then yes that is a difference, but i guess they took the risk of investing so much in hardware and power. Anyway i will give it a go whatever and see what happens. Please post very specific instructions on how to mine upon launch if it is different to the usual scrypt mining we do in cgminer. thanks |
|
|
|
jeannie
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2013, 11:19:21 AM |
|
Interesting I will try to mine some. But what will be after Onecoin? Zerocoin?
|
|
|
|
cre8r (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2013, 11:26:32 AM |
|
Well, there are so many scrypt altcoins, and only one using scrypt-jane. I want Onecoin to be a bit more different to existing coins.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boxman90
|
|
June 12, 2013, 11:28:34 AM |
|
But you're using a different version of scrypt-jane now, right?
|
LTC: LKKy4eDWyVtSrQAJy7Qmmz61RaFY91D9yC BTC: 18fzdnCkuUNthCD8hM36UBGopFa9ij78gG
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
June 12, 2013, 11:28:47 AM |
|
Well, there are so many scrypt altcoins, and only one using scrypt-jane. I want Onecoin to be a bit more different to existing coins.
Ok cool  please post some good mining instructions up and i will aim my cpu's at it |
|
|
|
cre8r (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2013, 11:41:53 AM |
|
But you're using a different version of scrypt-jane now, right?
Yep. Well, there are so many scrypt altcoins, and only one using scrypt-jane. I want Onecoin to be a bit more different to existing coins.
Ok cool please post some good mining instructions up and i will aim my cpu's at it Sure, I'll do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
