[ANN] Signatum - New Algorithm - Fair Launch - No Premine

[Notyoursbuisness]

old gpu don't work... read last comments

but ......why?
i can understand slow speed (of sgminer as always) but lack of any accepted shares... its very strange.

[bullettrain]

Miner shows the following error if more than 1 card are installed

>sgminer.exe -n
[15:47:55] CL Platform vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
[15:47:55] CL Platform name: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing
[15:47:55] CL Platform version: OpenCL 2.0 AMD-APP (2348.3)
[15:47:55] Platform devices: 7
[15:47:55]      0       Ellesmere
[15:47:55]      1       Ellesmere
[15:47:55]      2       Ellesmere
[15:47:55]      3       Ellesmere
[15:47:55]      4       Ellesmere
[15:47:55]      5       Ellesmere
[15:47:55]      6       Ellesmere
[15:47:55] ATI ADL Overdrive5 API found.
[15:47:55] ATI ADL Overdrive6 API found.
[15:47:55] Found 42 logical ADL adapters
[15:47:55] GPU 0 assigned: iAdapterIndex:0 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_67DF&SUBSYS_E347174B&REV_C7_4&25A57E32&0&00E0A iBusNumber:2 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics                    
[15:47:55] GPU 1 assigned: iAdapterIndex:6 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_67DF&SUBSYS_E347174B&REV_C7_4&2DDC6CBB&0&00E1A iBusNumber:3 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics                    
[15:47:55] GPU 2 assigned: iAdapterIndex:12 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_67DF&SUBSYS_E347174B&REV_C7_4&36135B44&0&00E2A iBusNumber:4 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics                  
[15:47:55] GPU 3 assigned: iAdapterIndex:18 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_67DF&SUBSYS_E347174B&REV_C7_4&63638AD&0&0008A iBusNumber:1 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics                    
[15:47:55] GPU 4 assigned: iAdapterIndex:24 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_67DF&SUBSYS_E347174B&REV_C7_4&6AE6995&0&00E4A iBusNumber:10 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics                  
[15:47:55] GPU 5 assigned: iAdapterIndex:30 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_67DF&SUBSYS_E347174B&REV_C7_6&1CCB9A36&0&001800E3A iBusNumber:9 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics              
[15:47:55] GPU 6 assigned: iAdapterIndex:36 iPresent:1 strUDID:PCI_VEN_1002&DEV_67DF&SUBSYS_E347174B&REV_C7_6&2D3EE07A&0&000800E3A iBusNumber:7 iDeviceNumber:0 iFunctionNumber:0 iVendorID:1002 name:Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics              
[15:47:55] GPU 0 Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics hardware monitoring enabled
[15:47:55] ADL GPU 0 is Adapter index 0 and maps to adapter id -1132213824
[15:47:55] GPU 0 BIOS partno.: 113-2E3470U.X5W, version: 015.050.000.000, date: 2016/09/21 02:29
[15:47:55] Failed to ADL_Overdrive5_ODPerformanceLevels_Get
[15:47:55] GPU 1 Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics hardware monitoring enabled
[15:47:55] ADL GPU 1 is Adapter index 6 and maps to adapter id -1130381248
[15:47:55] GPU 1 BIOS partno.: 113-2E3470U.X5W, version: 015.050.000.000, date: 2016/09/21 02:29
[15:47:55] Failed to ADL_Overdrive5_ODPerformanceLevels_Get
[15:47:55] GPU 2 Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics hardware monitoring enabled
[15:47:55] ADL GPU 2 is Adapter index 12 and maps to adapter id -1059653248
[15:47:56] GPU 2 BIOS partno.: 113-2E3470U.X5W, version: 015.050.000.000, date: 2016/09/21 02:29
[15:47:56] Failed to ADL_Overdrive5_ODPerformanceLevels_Get
[15:47:56] GPU 3 Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics hardware monitoring enabled
[15:47:56] ADL GPU 3 is Adapter index 18 and maps to adapter id -1256926016
[15:47:56] GPU 3 BIOS partno.: 113-2E3470U.X51, version: 015.050.000.000, date: 2016/08/02 04:40
[15:47:56] Failed to ADL_Overdrive5_ODPerformanceLevels_Get
[15:47:56] GPU 4 Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics hardware monitoring enabled
[15:47:56] ADL GPU 4 is Adapter index 24 and maps to adapter id -950863680
[15:47:56] GPU 4 BIOS partno.: 113-2E3470U.X5W, version: 015.050.000.000, date: 2016/09/21 02:29
[15:47:56] Failed to ADL_Overdrive5_ODPerformanceLevels_Get
[15:47:56] GPU 5 Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics hardware monitoring enabled
[15:47:56] ADL GPU 5 is Adapter index 30 and maps to adapter id -987134336
[15:47:56] GPU 5 BIOS partno.: 113-2E3470U.X5W, version: 015.050.000.000, date: 2016/09/21 02:29
[15:47:56] Failed to ADL_Overdrive5_ODPerformanceLevels_Get
[15:47:56] GPU 6 Radeon (TM) RX 480 Graphics hardware monitoring enabled
[15:47:56] ADL GPU 6 is Adapter index 36 and maps to adapter id -1023380032
[15:47:56] GPU 6 BIOS partno.: 113-2E3470U.X5W, version: 015.050.000.000, date: 2016/09/21 02:29
[15:47:56] Failed to ADL_Overdrive5_ODPerformanceLevels_Get
[15:47:56] 7 GPU devices max detected

Drivers 17.5.2 (before 16.9.2). Another rig with the same setup works fine (asrock btc pro + rx480).
Claymore (eth) works without problems.

[el3f]

Ccminer SkunkSPmod1

Can you pls give me the link for ccminer SkunkSPmod1 ? Ty

[Moon2eth]

Pool.nm shit the bed. Time to abandon the pool.

[infinity7th]

Ccminer SkunkSPmod1

Can you pls give me the link for ccminer SkunkSPmod1 ? Ty

It's only for sale. 0.05 BTC

[saul.goodman]

Hey guys, we're doing a group buy for SP signatum skunk mod #2!   We're going in together at 0.01 btc each and we need 2 more people to join! PM if you're interested.

Regards

Yeah.. just wait longer and save your f**** 80 bucks... that you missed a lot more SIG/BTC in this time is another story  
...stupid.

Stop your F****G spam and respect the developers!
Nobody cares about your kiddy 20$-crew

[Gunbit]

Unfortunately i forgot my password for SIGT-wallet. Try nearly  all the possible combinations. Is there any way to recover my acces? Dont wanna lost a 10k sigt

[lucifercipher]

Dear developer
I have some doubts about you
who are you ?
Why are all your accounts new like Twitter and Github?
Especially this algorithm I think it's a Denarius "Tribus"

yes the algo is almost identical.. when I wrote the hashing module for hashbag (prior to their release of a hashing module) I noticed that it's technically the same thing with different algo names (and another algo added). i've never seen 80 bytes of an algo and 64 bytes of the others before Denarius, and then this week all the sudden comes 'SkunkHash + Raptor' where it is 80 bytes of one algo + 64 bytes of 3 other algos, and i have been wondering what Raptor is as I never added it to any hashing module however the blocks are accepted by the network just using the 4 algos: 80b skein, 64b cubehash fugue gost, no need for anything else

thats why i went to look in his own hashing module once he released it but it looks like a pretty close copy of ex_mac's hashing modules.. eg
https://github.com/signatumd/hashing-module/blob/master/skunkhashmodule.c
https://github.com/exmac/tribus-hash/blob/master/tribusmodule.c
only difference is where it says 'tribus' in the skunkhash it says 'skunkhash'

in the skunkhash.c hashing module:
https://github.com/signatumd/hashing-module/blob/master/skunkhash.c
https://github.com/exmac/tribus-hash/blob/master/tribus.c
only difference is that the hash functions used are different (however the first hash is still 80 bytes) and also the init calls are removed (they dont really do anything other than create the variables but you are supposed to use them for some fussy compilers) and they don't use constants for the hashes (again a thing you are supposed to do for max compiler support) and there is a fourth algo added at the end there, otherwise the functionality is identical to the tribus hashing module

and nowhere does it say raptor anywhere, so thats why I wonder what the hell this raptor algo is? searched on the net and didn't find anything about raptor algo

Totally different people. DNR is done by Carsen and Signatum is done by Gabriel.

[Vaccinus]

Prepare for the next pump. Probably higher than 5000 sats. There is a huge buy-support coming. Already back at 3100 sats

4 BTC worth a single buy order

not that sure, see the sell order up to 4k satoshi there are more than 10 btc there, and the buy orders look very tiny now, i think we are going to see a little stagnation phase first, the reward is still too high now, maybe after POW end

[demosdeath]

Can any one help me with those errors?
[12:36:57] Started sgminer 5.3.3
[12:36:57] * using Jansson 2.10
[12:36:57] WARNING: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT is not specified!
[12:36:57] WARNING: GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS is not specified!

this is my bat file:
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer.exe -k skunkhash -o stratum+tcp://sigt.pool.mn:8732 -u gogik.gogi -p 566 -I 20
pause

I'm using single RX 480 GPU

I've tried to change:
 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT and -I but it didn't work
And also I've tried to use --gpu-platform 0,1,2 but it didn't work either

[TestingGI]

Prepare for the next pump. Probably higher than 5000 sats. There is a huge buy-support coming. Already back at 3100 sats

4 BTC worth a single buy order

not that sure, see the sell order up to 4k satoshi there are more than 10 btc there, and the buy orders look very tiny now, i think we are going to see a little stagnation phase first, the reward is still too high now, maybe after POW end

If the masses want to pump a coin, they'll do it. Regardless of POW etc.

[lucifercipher]

Best is not to pump and let it rise by authentic value.

[CapeTownMinter]

Can any one help me with those errors?
[12:36:57] Started sgminer 5.3.3
[12:36:57] * using Jansson 2.10
[12:36:57] WARNING: GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT is not specified!
[12:36:57] WARNING: GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS is not specified!

this is my bat file:
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
sgminer.exe -k skunkhash -o stratum+tcp://sigt.pool.mn:8732 -u gogik.gogi -p 566 -I 20
pause

I'm using single RX 480 GPU

I've tried to change:
 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT and -I but it didn't work
And also I've tried to use --gpu-platform 0,1,2 but it didn't work either

https://github.com/signatumd/releases/blob/master/sigt-miner.zip
 download
rename config file called signatum.conf to sgminer.conf ,edit .... copy & past the following below & save dbl click sgminer.exe...restart pc before start.... I am mining 3 480's & 3 1050ti using win 8.1 and works fine.
 you may want to play around with the intensity ...480s take a min or two to fire up on I 22

{
  "pools": [
    {
      "url": "stratum+tcp://yiimp.ccminer.org:8433", (USE YOUR OWN)
      "user": "BEDKzQwi7xqpNz1bmLXCtuNFJbwSJKNYvd",(USEYOURowN)
      "pass": "x"
    }
  ],
  "profiles": [],
  "failover-only": true,
  "algorithm": "skunkhash",
  "device": "all",
  "intensity": "22",
  "temp-cutoff": "95",
  "temp-overheat": "85",
  "temp-target": "75",
  "gpu-memdiff": "0",
  "shares": "0",
  "kernel-path": "/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin",
  "api-mcast-port": "4028",
  "api-port": "4028",
  "debug-log": true,
  "expiry": "1",
  "failover-switch-delay": "60",
  "gpu-dyninterval": "7",
  "gpu-platform": "-1",
  "hamsi-expand-big": "4",
  "keccak-unroll": "0",
  "no-pool-disable": true,
  "no-client-reconnect": true,
  "queue": "0",
  "scan-time": "1",
  "tcp-keepalive": "30",
  "temp-hysteresis": "3",
  "vote": "0",
  "watchpool-refresh": "30"
}

[enkayz]

Totally different people. DNR is done by Carsen and Signatum is done by Gabriel.

That wasn't the point I was trying to make =p

[konqueror]

On the official Signatum Explorer getnetworkhashps returns

There was an error. Check your console.

Is there any other public API where I can get the current network hashrate?

Look at the explorer API call section

That is the exact place where I get the error

[lucifercipher]

Totally different people. DNR is done by Carsen and Signatum is done by Gabriel.

That wasn't the point I was trying to make =p

You will see clones everywhere. If you look at it generally and from a technical point of view as you said, all are clones of bitcoin. SIGT has also been forked in other git repos so maybe you will expect similar projects originating from this after all.

[lucifercipher]

On the official Signatum Explorer getnetworkhashps returns

There was an error. Check your console.

Is there any other public API where I can get the current network hashrate?

Look at the explorer API call section

That is the exact place where I get the error

The iquidus explorer issue perhaps. When you do "getmininginfo" it shows the hashrate there. In this view, you can see it is 1.1 Terahash

Code:


{
"blocks" : 10066,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 10923.41672961,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414,
"search-interval" : 0
},
"blockvalue" : 250000000000,
"netmhashps" : 1117040.89557794,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 19,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 201450203685701,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 201450203685701
},
"stakeinterest" : 5000000,
"testnet" : false
}

[konqueror]

On the official Signatum Explorer getnetworkhashps returns

There was an error. Check your console.

Is there any other public API where I can get the current network hashrate?

Look at the explorer API call section

That is the exact place where I get the error

The iquidus explorer issue perhaps. When you do "getmininginfo" it shows the hashrate there. In this view, you can see it is 1.1 Terahash

Code:


{
"blocks" : 10066,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 10923.41672961,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414,
"search-interval" : 0
},
"blockvalue" : 250000000000,
"netmhashps" : 1117040.89557794,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 19,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 201450203685701,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 201450203685701
},
"stakeinterest" : 5000000,
"testnet" : false
}

It works. Thank you!

[humpi]

^are you scammer?

knock it off please

[bokiminer]

Dear developer
I have some doubts about you
who are you ?
Why are all your accounts new like Twitter and Github?
Especially this algorithm I think it's a Denarius "Tribus"

yes the algo is almost identical.. when I wrote the hashing module for hashbag (prior to their release of a hashing module) I noticed that it's technically the same thing with different algo names (and another algo added). i've never seen 80 bytes of an algo and 64 bytes of the others before Denarius, and then this week all the sudden comes 'SkunkHash + Raptor' where it is 80 bytes of one algo + 64 bytes of 3 other algos, and i have been wondering what Raptor is as I never added it to any hashing module however the blocks are accepted by the network just using the 4 algos: 80b skein, 64b cubehash fugue gost, no need for anything else

thats why i went to look in his own hashing module once he released it but it looks like a pretty close copy of ex_mac's hashing modules.. eg
https://github.com/signatumd/hashing-module/blob/master/skunkhashmodule.c
https://github.com/exmac/tribus-hash/blob/master/tribusmodule.c
only difference is where it says 'tribus' in the skunkhash it says 'skunkhash'

in the skunkhash.c hashing module:
https://github.com/signatumd/hashing-module/blob/master/skunkhash.c
https://github.com/exmac/tribus-hash/blob/master/tribus.c
only difference is that the hash functions used are different (however the first hash is still 80 bytes) and also the init calls are removed (they dont really do anything other than create the variables but you are supposed to use them for some fussy compilers) and they don't use constants for the hashes (again a thing you are supposed to do for max compiler support) and there is a fourth algo added at the end there, otherwise the functionality is identical to the tribus hashing module

and nowhere does it say raptor anywhere, so thats why I wonder what the hell this raptor algo is? searched on the net and didn't find anything about raptor algo

Totally different people. DNR is done by Carsen and Signatum is done by Gabriel.

Actually, it's totally the same, so that "Gabriel" is plagiarist of Carsens work

You missed a key difference:  denarius is a premine scam =) SIGT has no premine. It could be a 1:1 carbon copy of denarius and be superior due to no premine.

SIGT only has about 2 500 000 instamine