CEKTAHT
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2017, 04:52:34 PM |
|
My line of thinking is basically that this is still a very virginal industry. I'm completely unconvinced that Zcash or Monero are better or more secure. All altcoins are yet equally to stand test of time... for that reason it makes sense to enter into equal amount of risk at a much lower entry price than at a much higher entry price. A couple of years from now we will know which altcoin had the most amount of bag holders - and I think we will all be very surprised - any one of them could have a ton of surprises up their sleeve. At worst I will only lose $100 worth of electricity with Signatum, what a travesty As for people claiming that Monero or Zcash is better, more secure and so on - that's what they all say... nobody knows that yet. As for dumping this coin, it's just dumping it into another crypto - and how do you know it's better? I think even the best cryptographers would find it difficult to make a deep risk assessment of one crypto currency over another - they are all at the same level right now. Look at QRL project, those guys are really thinking 10 steps ahead, mainnet launch in sep/oct, if signatum won't rise by then, I will sell it in favor of QRL
|
|
|
|
ishem
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
August 01, 2017, 05:29:13 PM |
|
My line of thinking is basically that this is still a very virginal industry. I'm completely unconvinced that Zcash or Monero are better or more secure. All altcoins are yet equally to stand test of time... for that reason it makes sense to enter into equal amount of risk at a much lower entry price than at a much higher entry price. A couple of years from now we will know which altcoin had the most amount of bag holders - and I think we will all be very surprised - any one of them could have a ton of surprises up their sleeve. At worst I will only lose $100 worth of electricity with Signatum, what a travesty As for people claiming that Monero or Zcash is better, more secure and so on - that's what they all say... nobody knows that yet. As for dumping this coin, it's just dumping it into another crypto - and how do you know it's better? I think even the best cryptographers would find it difficult to make a deep risk assessment of one crypto currency over another - they are all at the same level right now. Look at QRL project, those guys are really thinking 10 steps ahead, mainnet launch in sep/oct, if signatum won't rise by then, I will sell it in favor of QRL Thanks for the intro, that actually looks interesting
|
|
|
|
gurumeditation
|
|
August 01, 2017, 05:38:25 PM |
|
My line of thinking is basically that this is still a very virginal industry. I'm completely unconvinced that Zcash or Monero are better or more secure. All altcoins are yet equally to stand test of time... for that reason it makes sense to enter into equal amount of risk at a much lower entry price than at a much higher entry price. A couple of years from now we will know which altcoin had the most amount of bag holders - and I think we will all be very surprised - any one of them could have a ton of surprises up their sleeve. At worst I will only lose $100 worth of electricity with Signatum, what a travesty As for people claiming that Monero or Zcash is better, more secure and so on - that's what they all say... nobody knows that yet. As for dumping this coin, it's just dumping it into another crypto - and how do you know it's better? I think even the best cryptographers would find it difficult to make a deep risk assessment of one crypto currency over another - they are all at the same level right now. Look at QRL project, those guys are really thinking 10 steps ahead, mainnet launch in sep/oct, if signatum won't rise by then, I will sell it in favor of QRL QRL is maybe a good project on the paper, but I all I've seen until now is a internal war (classical ICO : we take the money then we fight, and we don't give a fuck about people who invested in) and a classical PoS test, nothing that can change the game so far. Also I am a little sceptical when I heard the word "quantum resistant". Hope things will go on a better way from now.
|
|
|
|
CEKTAHT
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2017, 05:44:06 PM |
|
My line of thinking is basically that this is still a very virginal industry. I'm completely unconvinced that Zcash or Monero are better or more secure. All altcoins are yet equally to stand test of time... for that reason it makes sense to enter into equal amount of risk at a much lower entry price than at a much higher entry price. A couple of years from now we will know which altcoin had the most amount of bag holders - and I think we will all be very surprised - any one of them could have a ton of surprises up their sleeve. At worst I will only lose $100 worth of electricity with Signatum, what a travesty As for people claiming that Monero or Zcash is better, more secure and so on - that's what they all say... nobody knows that yet. As for dumping this coin, it's just dumping it into another crypto - and how do you know it's better? I think even the best cryptographers would find it difficult to make a deep risk assessment of one crypto currency over another - they are all at the same level right now. Look at QRL project, those guys are really thinking 10 steps ahead, mainnet launch in sep/oct, if signatum won't rise by then, I will sell it in favor of QRL QRL is maybe a good project on the paper, but I all I've seen until now is a internal war (classical ICO : we take the money then we fight, and we don't give a fuck about people who invested in) and a classical PoS test, nothing that can change the game so far. Also I am a little sceptical when I heard the word "quantum resistant". Hope things will go on a better way from now. That's not true, they hired a social media manager 1 month before ICO, he got greedy and demenfed 33% of all funds, got fired, got upset and used social media to justify his hit article on medeum, devs didn't touch ICO funds yet, founderbis financings the project out of his pocket
|
|
|
|
gurumeditation
|
|
August 01, 2017, 05:53:56 PM |
|
My line of thinking is basically that this is still a very virginal industry. I'm completely unconvinced that Zcash or Monero are better or more secure. All altcoins are yet equally to stand test of time... for that reason it makes sense to enter into equal amount of risk at a much lower entry price than at a much higher entry price. A couple of years from now we will know which altcoin had the most amount of bag holders - and I think we will all be very surprised - any one of them could have a ton of surprises up their sleeve. At worst I will only lose $100 worth of electricity with Signatum, what a travesty As for people claiming that Monero or Zcash is better, more secure and so on - that's what they all say... nobody knows that yet. As for dumping this coin, it's just dumping it into another crypto - and how do you know it's better? I think even the best cryptographers would find it difficult to make a deep risk assessment of one crypto currency over another - they are all at the same level right now. Look at QRL project, those guys are really thinking 10 steps ahead, mainnet launch in sep/oct, if signatum won't rise by then, I will sell it in favor of QRL QRL is maybe a good project on the paper, but I all I've seen until now is a internal war (classical ICO : we take the money then we fight, and we don't give a fuck about people who invested in) and a classical PoS test, nothing that can change the game so far. Also I am a little sceptical when I heard the word "quantum resistant". Hope things will go on a better way from now. That's not true, they hired a social media manager 1 month before ICO, he got greedy and demenfed 33% of all funds, got fired, got upset and used social media to justify his hit article on medeum, devs didn't touch ICO funds yet, founderbis financings the project out of his pocket I don't know and I don't care about what happened, not my business. When you start working on a such project, that kind of things would not happen, especially when you ask people to bring funds. I still have interest in QRL however, I just wait for more concrete stuff now after the drama.
|
|
|
|
|
int64
|
|
August 01, 2017, 07:11:11 PM |
|
Nice project. Does anybody know when can we expect signatum to hit big exchanges like poloniex or bittrex? I will not sell it jet but it will be nice to have it on big exchange
|
▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ✔ ▶▶▶▶ Get Your Free Tokens Now ◀◀◀◀ First PoS Smart Contract Token ▓ PoSToken ▓ ✔ Free Airdrop ● No-ICO ● 100% Annual Interest First Year ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓ ✔ ANN ● WebSite ● Twitter ● Slack ● Whitepaper
|
|
|
CEKTAHT
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2017, 07:15:40 PM |
|
Nice project. Does anybody know when can we expect signatum to hit big exchanges like poloniex or bittrex? I will not sell it jet but it will be nice to have it on big exchange
I don't expect it to be listed on Polo anytime soon, they can barely handle their system running with the coins they have listed till now, but bittrex shouldn't be long..
|
|
|
|
slatanic2012
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2017, 07:21:51 PM |
|
guys, anyone having issues with TDP? I mean, ups and downs, not stable. using sp3 here, but with all the others same issue.
|
|
|
|
blissz
|
|
August 01, 2017, 07:31:17 PM |
|
This is really worth watching if you're interested in this coin. Looking at the whitepaper, every decision / choices made for the signatum coin seems to be really well considered.
|
|
|
|
mt55
|
|
August 01, 2017, 07:37:49 PM |
|
Why would you trust a rich list let alone believe that you could derive reliable info from it?
|
| | | Fast, Secure, and Fully
Decentralized Trading | BACKED BY: ─────────────────────────
| BINANCE ─────── LAB | & | █████████████████████████████████ █ ███ █▀ ▀█ ███▀▀▀▀▀████████ ████▀▀███▀ █ █ █████ ▄▄▄▄▄ █ ▀ █ ███ █ ██ █▄ ▀█ ██ █ ▄███ ██████ ███ █████ █ ██ ███ █ ████ ████ ▄ ███ █▄ ▄█▄ ▄█▄ ▀ ████▄ ▄█ ██ ██ ████████████████████████████████████████ |
|
|
| Whitepaper Medium Reddit
|
|
|
|
slatanic2012
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2017, 07:47:45 PM |
|
guys, anyone having issues with TDP? I mean, ups and downs, not stable. using sp3 here, but with all the others same issue.
I have issues with tdp bro, i have evga 1070 and i can't make it work with 80% PL :/ Im not good to clock the cards yeah, but seems to be in all the gpus...anyone have some solution?
|
|
|
|
blissz
|
|
August 01, 2017, 07:53:05 PM |
|
guys, anyone having issues with TDP? I mean, ups and downs, not stable. using sp3 here, but with all the others same issue.
I have issues with tdp bro, i have evga 1070 and i can't make it work with 80% PL :/ Im not good to clock the cards yeah, but seems to be in all the gpus...anyone have some solution? Try to run them with the lowest memclock you can set it. Then lower the TDP. At least you get a quite good hashrate for insane low wattage. I run my 1070's at 75 watt from the wall at 22 Mh/s
|
|
|
|
tardnoggle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2017, 08:07:29 PM |
|
guys, anyone having issues with TDP? I mean, ups and downs, not stable. using sp3 here, but with all the others same issue.
I have issues with tdp bro, i have evga 1070 and i can't make it work with 80% PL :/ Im not good to clock the cards yeah, but seems to be in all the gpus...anyone have some solution? Try to run them with the lowest memclock you can set it. Then lower the TDP. At least you get a quite good hashrate for insane low wattage. I run my 1070's at 75 watt from the wall at 22 Mh/s I'm running fairly stable on my 1080 over at suprnova. https://i.imgur.com/G5wjEwm.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/HbtSJmh.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/RTMIV8u.jpgEdit: Using this miner for the best speed currently. https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/tag/1.1
|
|
|
|
slatanic2012
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2017, 08:13:56 PM |
|
guys, anyone having issues with TDP? I mean, ups and downs, not stable. using sp3 here, but with all the others same issue.
I have issues with tdp bro, i have evga 1070 and i can't make it work with 80% PL :/ Im not good to clock the cards yeah, but seems to be in all the gpus...anyone have some solution? Try to run them with the lowest memclock you can set it. Then lower the TDP. At least you get a quite good hashrate for insane low wattage. I run my 1070's at 75 watt from the wall at 22 Mh/s I'm running fairly stable on my 1080 over at suprnova. https://i.imgur.com/G5wjEwm.jpgits too much stranger the tdp up and down http://imgur.com/a/xXmbB
|
|
|
|
blissz
|
|
August 01, 2017, 08:18:13 PM |
|
guys, anyone having issues with TDP? I mean, ups and downs, not stable. using sp3 here, but with all the others same issue.
I have issues with tdp bro, i have evga 1070 and i can't make it work with 80% PL :/ Im not good to clock the cards yeah, but seems to be in all the gpus...anyone have some solution? Try to run them with the lowest memclock you can set it. Then lower the TDP. At least you get a quite good hashrate for insane low wattage. I run my 1070's at 75 watt from the wall at 22 Mh/s I'm running fairly stable on my 1080 over at suprnova. its too much stranger the tdp up and down http://imgur.com/a/xXmbBI wouldn't bother that too much. Try to fully decrease your mem clocks. It will help your hashrate
|
|
|
|
newstb
|
|
August 01, 2017, 08:28:58 PM Last edit: August 02, 2017, 05:16:54 PM by newstb |
|
Works perfectly for me! I/m running Ubuntu 16.04 with Celeron G3900, and Cuda 8.0 and Nvidia 384. Thanks for the hard work palgin Post edited. I linked wrong miner, sorry for that.
|
|
|
|
blissz
|
|
August 01, 2017, 08:36:54 PM |
|
Ouch he stole quite a lot. 144k of SIGT so far. Maybe ask a mod to delete that link? by the way are u sure it was that miner?
|
|
|
|
tardnoggle
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
August 01, 2017, 08:45:33 PM |
|
Are you talking about what I just linked? I've got more affiliation with palgin and if the mine is stealing coins I haven't noticed. I've received all of my payouts.
|
|
|
|
uralcryptocoin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 1042
Merit: 328
SIGNATURE CREATION by uralcryptocoin
|
|
August 01, 2017, 08:48:04 PM |
|
.... I'm running fairly stable on my 1080 over at suprnova. .... .... You use miner at very high intensity for GTX1080 card (25), try to decrease it to 21-22. I use 21.5 and get about 36-37 Mh/s per GTX1080 card at 80% tdp
|
|
|
|
BTC Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System BTC A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the main benefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network. The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone.
|
|
|
|