[ANN] Bitcoin Cash - Pro on-chain scaling

how is a block size change and a different adjustment algo superior code? its the same code. i think you mean to say same code but superior parameter change ov course in your opinion else you are stating it as fact when of course you arent the authority to state such as truth

Superior Performance and Superior Protection from a death spiral = Superior CODE !

I state Logic , when if you can reason logically , you see it as factual and truthful because you can see it also.

╥Aztek

By the way the addition of segshit into core coin , with its anyone can send address, is definitely INFERIOR to the original design.

incorrect. you stated superior code this is a statement made of fact.

saying the current difficulty adjustment algo allows x which i believe means y. this is a statement of logic without making it sound like you state fact.

you should start prefacing you comments with i believe. without that you are indeed stating it as fact when its not. its not someone taking it as factual. if you structure your sentences as stating fact then thats what it is. its not others taking it the wrong way. if you think that to be the case then you are indeed saying how the english language functions in sentences and use is wrong. this isnt the case at all.

I doubt it's even worth discussing with Aztek. Anyone who fails to understand that on-chain scalability solutions are short-term and no real improvement to the code is completely blind. I'd like to point to Antonopoulos here who correctly says that any solution improving scalability linearly is no solution to crypto's real problems. We need exponential scalability and increasing the block size is no such solution.

So you literally say Bill Gates was right: stay on 640K - or eMail you prefer to stay at max 1MB ?

This is exactly a 'restricted view by day = today" - this is not Bitcoin's idea.

Bitcoin is open to all scaling - it's an open system to all competitive solutions and such simply cannot include any limitations.

Limitations come into by physical and economical boundaries by default - and scaling boundaries cannot be part of any base protocol.

So relax and watch what dimensions of scaling are out there....

So you literally say that any scaling solution should be exploited? Do you know why cars don't drive 300 Mph? Because they couldn't? Or because there comes a massive security risk with that? What do you think? Will they never go that fast? Yes they will, once it's certain that anyone's security doesn't suffer from scaling to higher potential speed.