Primedice.com | Since 2013 | Longest Running Crypto Casino | 113 BTC Jackpot!

[hui]

side note: rainbot just hit 3000 tips

FYI: There is a FAQ for Rainbot now: http://nopaste.info/40ec661cf6_nl.html

[1714758695]

1714758695

[1714758695]

1714758695

[1714758695]

1714758695

[1714758695]

1714758695

[1714758695]

1714758695

[zzaza]

side note: rainbot just hit 3000 tips

FYI: There is a FAQ for Rainbot now: http://nopaste.info/40ec661cf6_nl.html

Nicer one hui, im gonna advertise it in the chat when im online, hopefully more and more will learn the rainbot "rules"

[Monopoly]

i mean ive not seen anything like this in a while. how about anyone else? i apologise, as i did not ask for artik's permission to post the picture, but it was so weird i felt i had to

Did you photoshop that? Or create it by editing HTML?

The odds of losing 9 98% bets in a row are 1953 trillion to 1 against. ie. it didn't happen.

How you calculate ?
How many is The odds of losing 5 98% ?

[Thirdspace]

still need help to open primedice site...
tried combination with http, https, www and without www
my chrome keeps giving me error "ERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCH"
please can someone tell me what to do to fix this error

[Josepht]

i mean ive not seen anything like this in a while. how about anyone else? i apologise, as i did not ask for artik's permission to post the picture, but it was so weird i felt i had to

Did you photoshop that? Or create it by editing HTML?

The odds of losing 9 98% bets in a row are 1953 trillion to 1 against. ie. it didn't happen.

How you calculate ?
How many is The odds of losing 5 98% ?

Chance of losing one bet is 0.02
Chance of losing 5 bets in a row is 0.02^5=3.2*10^-9
It happens once every 1/(3.2*10^-9)=312.5 million times

[Monopoly]

i mean ive not seen anything like this in a while. how about anyone else? i apologise, as i did not ask for artik's permission to post the picture, but it was so weird i felt i had to

Did you photoshop that? Or create it by editing HTML?

The odds of losing 9 98% bets in a row are 1953 trillion to 1 against. ie. it didn't happen.

How you calculate ?
How many is The odds of losing 5 98% ?

Chance of losing one bet is 0.02
Chance of losing 5 bets in a row is 0.02^5=3.2*10^-9
It happens once every 1/(3.2*10^-9)=312.5 million times

It's wrong .
You always have 2% chance of losing in every bet and it's independent be in a row or not .
If you loss on your first bet , your second bet has got exactly same chance of losing .

[dooglus]

Chance of losing one bet is 0.02
Chance of losing 5 bets in a row is 0.02^5=3.2*10^-9
It happens once every 1/(3.2*10^-9)=312.5 million times

It's wrong .
You always have 2% chance of losing in every bet and it's independent be in a row or not .
If you loss on your first bet , your second bet has got exactly same chance of losing .

No, he's right.

The chance of N independent events all happening is equal to the product of their individual probabilities.

It's precisely *because* the rolls are independent that he can raise 0.02 to the 5th power to get the probability of 5 98% rolls all losing.

[kleineaap]

Chance of losing one bet is 0.02
Chance of losing 5 bets in a row is 0.02^5=3.2*10^-9
It happens once every 1/(3.2*10^-9)=312.5 million times

It's wrong .
You always have 2% chance of losing in every bet and it's independent be in a row or not .
If you loss on your first bet , your second bet has got exactly same chance of losing .

No, he's right.

The chance of N independent events all happening is equal to the product of their individual probabilities.

It's precisely *because* the rolls are independent that he can raise 0.02 to the 5th power to get the probability of 5 98% rolls all losing.

Dooglus is correct.

Math. Not even once.

[eden1]

how long till ref show up on dashboard?

[Monopoly]

Chance of losing one bet is 0.02
Chance of losing 5 bets in a row is 0.02^5=3.2*10^-9
It happens once every 1/(3.2*10^-9)=312.5 million times

It's wrong .
You always have 2% chance of losing in every bet and it's independent be in a row or not .
If you loss on your first bet , your second bet has got exactly same chance of losing .

No, he's right.

The chance of N independent events all happening is equal to the product of their individual probabilities.

It's precisely *because* the rolls are independent that he can raise 0.02 to the 5th power to get the probability of 5 98% rolls all losing.

I mean you could start betting and it happens after ninth bet & even happens after Ninety-eighth bet again .
It could happen 100 times in two thousand of bets continuously and low possibility doesn't guarantee it couldn't ( or didn't ) happens .

Did you photoshop that? Or create it by editing HTML?

The odds of losing 9 98% bets in a row are 1953 trillion to 1 against. ie. it didn't happen.

[dooglus]

Did you photoshop that? Or create it by editing HTML?

The odds of losing 9 98% bets in a row are 1953 trillion to 1 against. ie. it didn't happen.

I mean you could start betting and it happens after ninth bet & even happens after Ninety-eighth bet again .
It could happen 100 times in two thousand of bets continuously and low possibility doesn't guarantee it couldn't ( or didn't ) happens .

Yes, each bet is random. We're talking about the odds of such a streak happening.

There's a very very small chance that the sequence in the fake screenshot actually happened, but it is so slight that I'm certain it didn't happen.

2000 trillion is such a big number. It's more than a million times the number of bets that have ever happened on PrimeDice. In other words if PrimeDice ran for a million years at its current level of activity, you would still probably not see such a streak.

Given the ease with which screenshots can be faked, and the near impossibility of such a streak really happening, I'm prepared to say it didn't happen.

[yenzae0215]

how long till ref show up on dashboard?

it is instant 

[yenzae0215]

how long till ref show up on dashboard?

it is instant 

Some of mine are missing, yet I still get ref commission
Few little bugs there, eddy said he'll fix those soon

maybe some not listed are those who didnt set their passwords?

[MICRO]

Did you photoshop that? Or create it by editing HTML?

The odds of losing 9 98% bets in a row are 1953 trillion to 1 against. ie. it didn't happen.

I mean you could start betting and it happens after ninth bet & even happens after Ninety-eighth bet again .
It could happen 100 times in two thousand of bets continuously and low possibility doesn't guarantee it couldn't ( or didn't ) happens .

Yes, each bet is random. We're talking about the odds of such a streak happening.

There's a very very small chance that the sequence in the fake screenshot actually happened, but it is so slight that I'm certain it didn't happen.

2000 trillion is such a big number. It's more than a million times the number of bets that have ever happened on PrimeDice. In other words if PrimeDice ran for a million years at its current level of activity, you would still probably not see such a streak.

Given the ease with which screenshots can be faked, and the near impossibility of such a streak really happening, I'm prepared to say it didn't happen.

Math can give u some estimate but it doesn't mean much in real life. As proven by Hufflepuff . He wagered 60k btc and is in profit of 2000 when he should be in about -600 .

For that stuff i don't rely on math to much.

[LiQuidx]

Did you photoshop that? Or create it by editing HTML?

The odds of losing 9 98% bets in a row are 1953 trillion to 1 against. ie. it didn't happen.

I mean you could start betting and it happens after ninth bet & even happens after Ninety-eighth bet again .
It could happen 100 times in two thousand of bets continuously and low possibility doesn't guarantee it couldn't ( or didn't ) happens .

Yes, each bet is random. We're talking about the odds of such a streak happening.

There's a very very small chance that the sequence in the fake screenshot actually happened, but it is so slight that I'm certain it didn't happen.

2000 trillion is such a big number. It's more than a million times the number of bets that have ever happened on PrimeDice. In other words if PrimeDice ran for a million years at its current level of activity, you would still probably not see such a streak.

Given the ease with which screenshots can be faked, and the near impossibility of such a streak really happening, I'm prepared to say it didn't happen.

Math can give u some estimate but it doesn't mean much in real life. As proven by Hufflepuff . He wagered 60k btc and is in profit of 2000 when he should be in about -600 .

For that stuff i don't rely on math to much.

Exactly.. These are probabilities and that's where luck comes into play... On the long run you always tend to hit the probabilities though.

[ltcnim]

deposits not working? three confirmations and nothing shows up...

edit: credited..

[DarKSpectrE]

Wtf. Primedice doesn't let me withdraw my winnings for some reasons  

EDIT: "Withdrawals are currently unavailable due to maintenence or technical reasons." - Really?  

EDIT_2: Got it.

[ltcnim]

Wtf. Primedice doesn't let me withdraw my winnings for some reasons  

EDIT: "Withdrawals are currently unavailable due to maintenence or technical reasons." - Really?  

yepp, just also tried to withdraw, same message. but it just arrived at my wallet and it's subtracted from my balance!

[Stunna]

Did you photoshop that? Or create it by editing HTML?

The odds of losing 9 98% bets in a row are 1953 trillion to 1 against. ie. it didn't happen.

I mean you could start betting and it happens after ninth bet & even happens after Ninety-eighth bet again .
It could happen 100 times in two thousand of bets continuously and low possibility doesn't guarantee it couldn't ( or didn't ) happens .

Yes, each bet is random. We're talking about the odds of such a streak happening.

There's a very very small chance that the sequence in the fake screenshot actually happened, but it is so slight that I'm certain it didn't happen.

2000 trillion is such a big number. It's more than a million times the number of bets that have ever happened on PrimeDice. In other words if PrimeDice ran for a million years at its current level of activity, you would still probably not see such a streak.

Given the ease with which screenshots can be faked, and the near impossibility of such a streak really happening, I'm prepared to say it didn't happen.

It didn't happen from what I can see, notice the bet ID's are hidden and when we checked our DB we didn't find any streaks like that.

edit: confirmed fake from creator http://www.reddit.com/r/Primedice/comments/2lgzlc/thanks_stunna_and_edward/


Also occasional deposits are being a bit slow as of right now, they seem to be coming through within 1 confirmation in most cases, 2-3 in others.


Also a reminder: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=832301.0

3 days left to submit a video for the 4BTC competition


On a final note we fixed the intermittent lag issues, turns out an affiliate query was the culprit.

[ltcnim]

@Stunna: It looks like you limited the amount of bets per account. would it be possible to delay the request, instead of sending a 0 size reply (429)? this would benefit your backend also...