GWhisper
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:45:22 PM |
|
I just transferred 100 coins over - they were available within a couple of minute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
imginy
Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:47:27 PM |
|
I just transferred 100 coins over - they were available within a couple of minute.
How much you selling yours for? People seem to want them for nothing no cryptsy shame there not on bter or btce.
|
|
|
|
GWhisper
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:47:48 PM |
|
Seems I've hit the limit with the block explorer, too many records to display.
|
|
|
|
techbytes
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1054
Point. Click. Blockchain
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:48:13 PM |
|
BTCs Deposit to Cryptsy is taking forever. -tb-
|
|
|
|
GWhisper
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:48:25 PM |
|
I just transferred 100 coins over - they were available within a couple of minute.
How much you selling yours for? People seem to want them for nothing no cryptsy shame there not on bter or btce. My sell is @ .002 - testing the waters.
|
|
|
|
_rob
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:53:36 PM |
|
It's getting quite slow over there...
|
|
|
|
imginy
Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:54:23 PM |
|
I just transferred 100 coins over - they were available within a couple of minute.
How much you selling yours for? People seem to want them for nothing no cryptsy shame there not on bter or btce. My sell is @ .002 - testing the waters. yes I not really wanting to sell into them 0.0005 orders
|
|
|
|
ssshhh
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:56:10 PM |
|
update-23-05-2013 pushpool http://digi.cryptcoins.net | 1% | stratum | King Of Prussia, PA, United States (Verizon) http://dgc.turbocoin.us | 1% | stratum | Mount Carroll, IL, United States (Comcast) http://digitalcoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | Nuremberg , Germany (HETZNER) http://digicoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | San Antonio, TX, United States (Rackspace) p2pool http://pool.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Paris, France (kimsufi/OVH) http://poolnl.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Amsterdam, Netherlands (LeaseWeb) http://p2pool.dsync.net:21111 | 0% | Yaphank, NY, United States (Optimum) http://94.181.201.244:24397 | 0% | Kirov, Russian Federation (ER-Telecom) http://crypto-coins.de:8907 | 1% | Dusseldorf, Germany (myLoc) http://next.afraid.org:8119 | 2% | Paris, France (Free) http://54.227.253.120:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) http://107.20.222.119:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) There are some good p2pool's here but they are not peers to each other therefore defeating the principle of a peer 2 peer mining pool. Any idea's on how to resolve this?
|
|
|
|
schnebi
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:59:06 PM |
|
DGC seems to be great currency and i think it has a huge potential to became one of the major digital currencies. Developer is doing a great job. Keep it that way. I want to say that I am mining DGC from the beginning and i have tried almost all of these pools, but the best for me is http://crypto-coins.de:8907/static/ (I am located in EU). The reward was great (even more than i expected ). Its a pity that hash rate is only ~24MH/s. But after giving a try to that server located in France i have decided to get back to schnebi's pool. I hope more EU miners will come :-) On other pools i have weird payouts, sometimes i did not get paid for blocks, or reward was 50% lower then was from block found 5 minuts ago, even the fact i was still mining. It happend to me 2 times that my DGC address just dissapeared from payout list after receiving a payment few minutes ago and still mining. Last thing i want to say is that you should buy those grenaders http://www.bitgrenade.net/?coin_display=6Hell, I'm in the US and I mine on this pool because it is the only pool I've found that gives consistently good rewards. I'm making 2 coins per block mining 2.1 MHs, and we solve between 5 and 10 blocks per hour depending on luck. It has been extremely consistent, although there was some down-time in the past when we were getting 20-30 blocks an hour with higher hashes. Seems like your compliments are having success... Pool hashrate just raised for more than 20% in the last 30 minutes
|
|
|
|
fenican
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:08:49 PM |
|
I think all the DGC volume crashed cryptsy the site is loading like a snail in cement
|
|
|
|
imginy
Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:10:21 PM |
|
I think all the DGC volume crashed cryptsy the site is loading like a snail in cement
First time on the site and I have to say it sucks. There is one sale every 10mins and lots and lots of lag.
|
|
|
|
limbaugh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:11:41 PM |
|
I think all the DGC volume crashed cryptsy the site is loading like a snail in cement
First time on the site and I have to say it sucks. There is one sale every 10mins and lots and lots of lag. Time for Cryptsy to move the server off his laptop...
|
|
|
|
x3maniac
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:13:20 PM |
|
update-23-05-2013 pushpool http://digi.cryptcoins.net | 1% | stratum | King Of Prussia, PA, United States (Verizon) http://dgc.turbocoin.us | 1% | stratum | Mount Carroll, IL, United States (Comcast) http://digitalcoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | Nuremberg , Germany (HETZNER) http://digicoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | San Antonio, TX, United States (Rackspace) p2pool http://pool.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Paris, France (kimsufi/OVH) http://poolnl.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Amsterdam, Netherlands (LeaseWeb) http://p2pool.dsync.net:21111 | 0% | Yaphank, NY, United States (Optimum) http://94.181.201.244:24397 | 0% | Kirov, Russian Federation (ER-Telecom) http://crypto-coins.de:8907 | 1% | Dusseldorf, Germany (myLoc) http://next.afraid.org:8119 | 2% | Paris, France (Free) http://54.227.253.120:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) http://107.20.222.119:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) There are some good p2pool's here but they are not peers to each other therefore defeating the principle of a peer 2 peer mining pool. Any idea's on how to resolve this? you have to bootstrap other pools together from network.py p2pool.dsync.net:21111 is my personal (sort of) p2pool linked with bounceme.net
|
|
|
|
schnebi
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:13:32 PM |
|
update-23-05-2013 pushpool http://digi.cryptcoins.net | 1% | stratum | King Of Prussia, PA, United States (Verizon) http://dgc.turbocoin.us | 1% | stratum | Mount Carroll, IL, United States (Comcast) http://digitalcoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | Nuremberg , Germany (HETZNER) http://digicoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | San Antonio, TX, United States (Rackspace) p2pool http://pool.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Paris, France (kimsufi/OVH) http://poolnl.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Amsterdam, Netherlands (LeaseWeb) http://p2pool.dsync.net:21111 | 0% | Yaphank, NY, United States (Optimum) http://94.181.201.244:24397 | 0% | Kirov, Russian Federation (ER-Telecom) http://crypto-coins.de:8907 | 1% | Dusseldorf, Germany (myLoc) http://next.afraid.org:8119 | 2% | Paris, France (Free) http://54.227.253.120:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) http://107.20.222.119:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) There are some good p2pool's here but they are not peers to each other therefore defeating the principle of a peer 2 peer mining pool. Any idea's on how to resolve this? Hey man, yesterday my Pool crypto-coins.de was connected to the other P2Pool Nodes, but for some reason my Server was crashing when it was connected, and everybody got very much rejected shares. So i decided to cut the connection, because it made mining more efficient, I know, that actually thats not the principle of a p2Pool
|
|
|
|
sal002
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:20:19 PM |
|
Somebody should set an order to buy 1 DGC per 1 BTC on cryptsy to mess with coinchoose. 0.0001 BTC would suffice.
So that would be 0.0001 DGC? Won't work
|
|
|
|
sal002
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:21:04 PM |
|
Why ask when you know the answer...
Rhetorical question
|
|
|
|
x3maniac
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:22:01 PM |
|
update-23-05-2013 pushpool http://digi.cryptcoins.net | 1% | stratum | King Of Prussia, PA, United States (Verizon) http://dgc.turbocoin.us | 1% | stratum | Mount Carroll, IL, United States (Comcast) http://digitalcoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | Nuremberg , Germany (HETZNER) http://digicoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | San Antonio, TX, United States (Rackspace) p2pool http://pool.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Paris, France (kimsufi/OVH) http://poolnl.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Amsterdam, Netherlands (LeaseWeb) http://p2pool.dsync.net:21111 | 0% | Yaphank, NY, United States (Optimum) http://94.181.201.244:24397 | 0% | Kirov, Russian Federation (ER-Telecom) http://crypto-coins.de:8907 | 1% | Dusseldorf, Germany (myLoc) http://next.afraid.org:8119 | 2% | Paris, France (Free) http://54.227.253.120:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) http://107.20.222.119:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) There are some good p2pool's here but they are not peers to each other therefore defeating the principle of a peer 2 peer mining pool. Any idea's on how to resolve this? Hey man, yesterday my Pool crypto-coins.de was connected to the other P2Pool Nodes, but for some reason my Server was crashing when it was connected, and everybody got very much rejected shares. So i decided to cut the connection, because it made mining more efficient, I know, that actually thats not the principle of a p2Pool i think cause diff is so low connecting pools causes hash rates to go too fast people are not submitting fast enought. i was thinking of the same thing at 1st but since bounce is not that big i don't think it affected me that much
|
|
|
|
ssshhh
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:23:42 PM |
|
update-23-05-2013 pushpool http://digi.cryptcoins.net | 1% | stratum | King Of Prussia, PA, United States (Verizon) http://dgc.turbocoin.us | 1% | stratum | Mount Carroll, IL, United States (Comcast) http://digitalcoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | Nuremberg , Germany (HETZNER) http://digicoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | San Antonio, TX, United States (Rackspace) p2pool http://pool.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Paris, France (kimsufi/OVH) http://poolnl.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Amsterdam, Netherlands (LeaseWeb) http://p2pool.dsync.net:21111 | 0% | Yaphank, NY, United States (Optimum) http://94.181.201.244:24397 | 0% | Kirov, Russian Federation (ER-Telecom) http://crypto-coins.de:8907 | 1% | Dusseldorf, Germany (myLoc) http://next.afraid.org:8119 | 2% | Paris, France (Free) http://54.227.253.120:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) http://107.20.222.119:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) There are some good p2pool's here but they are not peers to each other therefore defeating the principle of a peer 2 peer mining pool. Any idea's on how to resolve this? you have to bootstrap other pools together from network.py p2pool.dsync.net:21111 is my personal (sort of) p2pool linked with bounceme.net yes, the "BOOTSTRAP_ADDRS=" but I have added all pools and have on 1 peer connected. I am thinking that the p2pools are using different P2P_PORT although I have append the port address to the bootstrap addresses. Still no more peers It may have something to do with different settings.. SHARE_PERIOD=15, # seconds target spacing CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares REAL_CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares TARGET_LOOKBEHIND=200, # shares coinbase maturity SPREAD=30, # blocks IDENTIFIER='be43F6b8c6927210'.decode('hex'), PREFIX='b587193ba6d4749a'.decode('hex'), P2P_PORT=5477, Will "IDENTIFIER=" or "PREFIX=" have any effect on the situation?
|
|
|
|
ssshhh
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:25:33 PM |
|
update-23-05-2013 pushpool http://digi.cryptcoins.net | 1% | stratum | King Of Prussia, PA, United States (Verizon) http://dgc.turbocoin.us | 1% | stratum | Mount Carroll, IL, United States (Comcast) http://digitalcoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | Nuremberg , Germany (HETZNER) http://digicoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | San Antonio, TX, United States (Rackspace) p2pool http://pool.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Paris, France (kimsufi/OVH) http://poolnl.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Amsterdam, Netherlands (LeaseWeb) http://p2pool.dsync.net:21111 | 0% | Yaphank, NY, United States (Optimum) http://94.181.201.244:24397 | 0% | Kirov, Russian Federation (ER-Telecom) http://crypto-coins.de:8907 | 1% | Dusseldorf, Germany (myLoc) http://next.afraid.org:8119 | 2% | Paris, France (Free) http://54.227.253.120:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) http://107.20.222.119:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) There are some good p2pool's here but they are not peers to each other therefore defeating the principle of a peer 2 peer mining pool. Any idea's on how to resolve this? Hey man, yesterday my Pool crypto-coins.de was connected to the other P2Pool Nodes, but for some reason my Server was crashing when it was connected, and everybody got very much rejected shares. So i decided to cut the connection, because it made mining more efficient, I know, that actually thats not the principle of a p2Pool cool. I had the same issue. I suspect all the p2pools are using various alt-coin p2pool forks with different settings for the same coin and maybe p2pool no like..
|
|
|
|
|