|
GWhisper
|
 |
May 23, 2013, 12:45:22 PM |
|
I just transferred 100 coins over - they were available within a couple of minute.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"You Asked For Change, We Gave You Coins" -- casascius
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
imginy
Member
 Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:47:27 PM |
|
I just transferred 100 coins over - they were available within a couple of minute.
How much you selling yours for? People seem to want them for nothing no cryptsy shame there not on bter or btce. |
|
|
|
|
|
GWhisper
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:47:48 PM |
|
Seems I've hit the limit with the block explorer, too many records to display.
|
|
|
|
|
techbytes
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1054
Point. Click. Blockchain
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:48:13 PM |
|
BTCs Deposit to Cryptsy is taking forever.  -tb- |
|
|
|
|
GWhisper
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:48:25 PM |
|
I just transferred 100 coins over - they were available within a couple of minute.
How much you selling yours for? People seem to want them for nothing no cryptsy shame there not on bter or btce. My sell is @ .002 - testing the waters. |
|
|
|
|
_rob
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:53:36 PM |
|
It's getting quite slow over there...  |
|
|
|
|
imginy
Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:54:23 PM |
|
I just transferred 100 coins over - they were available within a couple of minute.
How much you selling yours for? People seem to want them for nothing no cryptsy shame there not on bter or btce. My sell is @ .002 - testing the waters. yes I not really wanting to sell into them 0.0005 orders |
|
|
|
|
|
ssshhh
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:56:10 PM |
|
update-23-05-2013 pushpool http://digi.cryptcoins.net | 1% | stratum | King Of Prussia, PA, United States (Verizon) http://dgc.turbocoin.us | 1% | stratum | Mount Carroll, IL, United States (Comcast) http://digitalcoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | Nuremberg , Germany (HETZNER) http://digicoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | San Antonio, TX, United States (Rackspace) p2pool http://pool.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Paris, France (kimsufi/OVH) http://poolnl.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Amsterdam, Netherlands (LeaseWeb) http://p2pool.dsync.net:21111 | 0% | Yaphank, NY, United States (Optimum) http://94.181.201.244:24397 | 0% | Kirov, Russian Federation (ER-Telecom) http://crypto-coins.de:8907 | 1% | Dusseldorf, Germany (myLoc) http://next.afraid.org:8119 | 2% | Paris, France (Free) http://54.227.253.120:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) http://107.20.222.119:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) There are some good p2pool's here but they are not peers to each other therefore defeating the principle of a peer 2 peer mining pool. Any idea's on how to resolve this? |
|
|
|
|
|
schnebi
|
|
May 23, 2013, 12:59:06 PM |
|
DGC seems to be great currency and i think it has a huge potential to became one of the major digital currencies. Developer is doing a great job.  Keep it that way. I want to say that I am mining DGC from the beginning and i have tried almost all of these pools, but the best for me is http://crypto-coins.de:8907/static/ (I am located in EU). The reward was great (even more than i expected   ). Its a pity that hash rate is only ~24MH/s. But after giving a try to that server located in France i have decided to get back to schnebi's pool. I hope more EU miners will come :-) On other pools i have weird payouts, sometimes i did not get paid for blocks, or reward was 50% lower then was from block found 5 minuts ago, even the fact i was still mining. It happend to me 2 times that my DGC address just dissapeared from payout list after receiving a payment few minutes ago and still mining. Last thing i want to say is that you should buy those grenaders  http://www.bitgrenade.net/?coin_display=6Hell, I'm in the US and I mine on this pool because it is the only pool I've found that gives consistently good rewards. I'm making 2 coins per block mining 2.1 MHs, and we solve between 5 and 10 blocks per hour depending on luck. It has been extremely consistent, although there was some down-time in the past when we were getting 20-30 blocks an hour with higher hashes. Seems like your compliments are having success... Pool hashrate just raised for more than 20% in the last 30 minutes |
|
|
|
|
|
fenican
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:08:49 PM |
|
I think all the DGC volume crashed cryptsy the site is loading like a snail in cement
|
|
|
|
|
imginy
Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 10
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:10:21 PM |
|
I think all the DGC volume crashed cryptsy the site is loading like a snail in cement
First time on the site and I have to say it sucks. There is one sale every 10mins and lots and lots of lag. |
|
|
|
|
limbaugh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1311
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:11:41 PM |
|
I think all the DGC volume crashed cryptsy the site is loading like a snail in cement
First time on the site and I have to say it sucks. There is one sale every 10mins and lots and lots of lag. Time for Cryptsy to move the server off his laptop... |
|
|
|
|
|
x3maniac
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:13:20 PM |
|
update-23-05-2013 pushpool http://digi.cryptcoins.net | 1% | stratum | King Of Prussia, PA, United States (Verizon) http://dgc.turbocoin.us | 1% | stratum | Mount Carroll, IL, United States (Comcast) http://digitalcoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | Nuremberg , Germany (HETZNER) http://digicoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | San Antonio, TX, United States (Rackspace) p2pool http://pool.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Paris, France (kimsufi/OVH) http://poolnl.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Amsterdam, Netherlands (LeaseWeb) http://p2pool.dsync.net:21111 | 0% | Yaphank, NY, United States (Optimum) http://94.181.201.244:24397 | 0% | Kirov, Russian Federation (ER-Telecom) http://crypto-coins.de:8907 | 1% | Dusseldorf, Germany (myLoc) http://next.afraid.org:8119 | 2% | Paris, France (Free) http://54.227.253.120:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) http://107.20.222.119:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) There are some good p2pool's here but they are not peers to each other therefore defeating the principle of a peer 2 peer mining pool. Any idea's on how to resolve this? you have to bootstrap other pools together from network.py p2pool.dsync.net:21111 is my personal (sort of) p2pool linked with bounceme.net |
|
|
|
|
|
schnebi
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:13:32 PM |
|
update-23-05-2013 pushpool http://digi.cryptcoins.net | 1% | stratum | King Of Prussia, PA, United States (Verizon) http://dgc.turbocoin.us | 1% | stratum | Mount Carroll, IL, United States (Comcast) http://digitalcoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | Nuremberg , Germany (HETZNER) http://digicoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | San Antonio, TX, United States (Rackspace) p2pool http://pool.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Paris, France (kimsufi/OVH) http://poolnl.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Amsterdam, Netherlands (LeaseWeb) http://p2pool.dsync.net:21111 | 0% | Yaphank, NY, United States (Optimum) http://94.181.201.244:24397 | 0% | Kirov, Russian Federation (ER-Telecom) http://crypto-coins.de:8907 | 1% | Dusseldorf, Germany (myLoc) http://next.afraid.org:8119 | 2% | Paris, France (Free) http://54.227.253.120:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) http://107.20.222.119:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) There are some good p2pool's here but they are not peers to each other therefore defeating the principle of a peer 2 peer mining pool. Any idea's on how to resolve this? Hey man, yesterday my Pool crypto-coins.de was connected to the other P2Pool Nodes, but for some reason my Server was crashing when it was connected, and everybody got very much rejected shares. So i decided to cut the connection, because it made mining more efficient, I know, that actually thats not the principle of a p2Pool |
|
|
|
|
|
sal002
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:20:19 PM |
|
Somebody should set an order to buy 1 DGC per 1 BTC on cryptsy to mess with coinchoose. 0.0001 BTC would suffice.
So that would be 0.0001 DGC? Won't work |
|
|
|
|
|
sal002
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:21:04 PM |
|
Why ask when you know the answer...
Rhetorical question |
|
|
|
|
|
x3maniac
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:22:01 PM |
|
update-23-05-2013 pushpool http://digi.cryptcoins.net | 1% | stratum | King Of Prussia, PA, United States (Verizon) http://dgc.turbocoin.us | 1% | stratum | Mount Carroll, IL, United States (Comcast) http://digitalcoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | Nuremberg , Germany (HETZNER) http://digicoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | San Antonio, TX, United States (Rackspace) p2pool http://pool.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Paris, France (kimsufi/OVH) http://poolnl.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Amsterdam, Netherlands (LeaseWeb) http://p2pool.dsync.net:21111 | 0% | Yaphank, NY, United States (Optimum) http://94.181.201.244:24397 | 0% | Kirov, Russian Federation (ER-Telecom) http://crypto-coins.de:8907 | 1% | Dusseldorf, Germany (myLoc) http://next.afraid.org:8119 | 2% | Paris, France (Free) http://54.227.253.120:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) http://107.20.222.119:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) There are some good p2pool's here but they are not peers to each other therefore defeating the principle of a peer 2 peer mining pool. Any idea's on how to resolve this? Hey man, yesterday my Pool crypto-coins.de was connected to the other P2Pool Nodes, but for some reason my Server was crashing when it was connected, and everybody got very much rejected shares. So i decided to cut the connection, because it made mining more efficient, I know, that actually thats not the principle of a p2Pool i think cause diff is so low connecting pools causes hash rates to go too fast people are not submitting fast enought. i was thinking of the same thing at 1st but since bounce is not that big i don't think it affected me that much |
|
|
|
|
|
ssshhh
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:23:42 PM |
|
update-23-05-2013 pushpool http://digi.cryptcoins.net | 1% | stratum | King Of Prussia, PA, United States (Verizon) http://dgc.turbocoin.us | 1% | stratum | Mount Carroll, IL, United States (Comcast) http://digitalcoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | Nuremberg , Germany (HETZNER) http://digicoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | San Antonio, TX, United States (Rackspace) p2pool http://pool.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Paris, France (kimsufi/OVH) http://poolnl.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Amsterdam, Netherlands (LeaseWeb) http://p2pool.dsync.net:21111 | 0% | Yaphank, NY, United States (Optimum) http://94.181.201.244:24397 | 0% | Kirov, Russian Federation (ER-Telecom) http://crypto-coins.de:8907 | 1% | Dusseldorf, Germany (myLoc) http://next.afraid.org:8119 | 2% | Paris, France (Free) http://54.227.253.120:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) http://107.20.222.119:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) There are some good p2pool's here but they are not peers to each other therefore defeating the principle of a peer 2 peer mining pool. Any idea's on how to resolve this? you have to bootstrap other pools together from network.py p2pool.dsync.net:21111 is my personal (sort of) p2pool linked with bounceme.net yes, the "BOOTSTRAP_ADDRS=" but I have added all pools and have on 1 peer connected. I am thinking that the p2pools are using different P2P_PORT although I have append the port address to the bootstrap addresses. Still no more peers It may have something to do with different settings.. SHARE_PERIOD=15, # seconds target spacing CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares REAL_CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares TARGET_LOOKBEHIND=200, # shares coinbase maturity SPREAD=30, # blocks IDENTIFIER='be43F6b8c6927210'.decode('hex'), PREFIX='b587193ba6d4749a'.decode('hex'), P2P_PORT=5477, Will "IDENTIFIER=" or "PREFIX=" have any effect on the situation? |
|
|
|
|
|
ssshhh
|
|
May 23, 2013, 01:25:33 PM |
|
update-23-05-2013 pushpool http://digi.cryptcoins.net | 1% | stratum | King Of Prussia, PA, United States (Verizon) http://dgc.turbocoin.us | 1% | stratum | Mount Carroll, IL, United States (Comcast) http://digitalcoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | Nuremberg , Germany (HETZNER) http://digicoinpool.com | 1% | getwork | San Antonio, TX, United States (Rackspace) p2pool http://pool.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Paris, France (kimsufi/OVH) http://poolnl.bounceme.net:24397 | 0% | Amsterdam, Netherlands (LeaseWeb) http://p2pool.dsync.net:21111 | 0% | Yaphank, NY, United States (Optimum) http://94.181.201.244:24397 | 0% | Kirov, Russian Federation (ER-Telecom) http://crypto-coins.de:8907 | 1% | Dusseldorf, Germany (myLoc) http://next.afraid.org:8119 | 2% | Paris, France (Free) http://54.227.253.120:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) http://107.20.222.119:9500 | 3% | Ashburn, VA, United States (Amazon) There are some good p2pool's here but they are not peers to each other therefore defeating the principle of a peer 2 peer mining pool. Any idea's on how to resolve this? Hey man, yesterday my Pool crypto-coins.de was connected to the other P2Pool Nodes, but for some reason my Server was crashing when it was connected, and everybody got very much rejected shares. So i decided to cut the connection, because it made mining more efficient, I know, that actually thats not the principle of a p2Pool cool. I had the same issue. I suspect all the p2pools are using various alt-coin p2pool forks with different settings for the same coin and maybe p2pool no like.. |
|
|
|
|
|
