mroctopus
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 174
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2018, 08:02:35 AM |
|
What is the problem of CNv7? If you want larger hashrate number, why don't choose SHA256 as POW algorithm same as Bitcoin? What lmao? Your comment makes no sense. The hash increase is all relative. We're forking to prevent 51% attacks and timestamp manipulation. Our network is relatively small in comparison to XMR or ETN. People have been attacking MSR with large nicehash orders (CN7 orders). This fork will move us away from CN7 and kick nicehashers out. Excellent move. We will see a much more stable network post fork. So, the reason from CNv7 to CNfast is to kick nicehashers out by using a less common POW algorithm?
|
|
|
|
wudafuxup
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2018, 08:52:48 AM |
|
What is the problem of CNv7? If you want larger hashrate number, why don't choose SHA256 as POW algorithm same as Bitcoin? What lmao? Your comment makes no sense. The hash increase is all relative. We're forking to prevent 51% attacks and timestamp manipulation. Our network is relatively small in comparison to XMR or ETN. People have been attacking MSR with large nicehash orders (CN7 orders). This fork will move us away from CN7 and kick nicehashers out. Excellent move. We will see a much more stable network post fork. So, the reason from CNv7 to CNfast is to kick nicehashers out by using a less common POW algorithm? It's the same reason XTL is also forking away from nicehash. Nicehash is pure cancer thanks to a few toxic A-holes with large sums of BTC who use the massive hashrate to attack smaller projects. It's the same reason more projects are moving to CN-Heavy aswell. I mean look at all the 51% attacks that have been happening recently. Bitcoin Gold, Litecoin Cash, Verge, ZenCash ect.. Where do you think those tards got the massive multi algorithm (SHA-256, Equihash, Blake2s, Lyra2c2..) hashrate from? Yup, nicehash. Nicehash is pure aids, I'm glad we're making this move. It was awesome when they got hacked, pitty they didn't close down for good.
|
I like crypto
|
|
|
Raven89
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2018, 12:33:47 PM |
|
What is the problem of CNv7? If you want larger hashrate number, why don't choose SHA256 as POW algorithm same as Bitcoin? What lmao? Your comment makes no sense. The hash increase is all relative. We're forking to prevent 51% attacks and timestamp manipulation. Our network is relatively small in comparison to XMR or ETN. People have been attacking MSR with large nicehash orders (CN7 orders). This fork will move us away from CN7 and kick nicehashers out. Excellent move. We will see a much more stable network post fork. So, the reason from CNv7 to CNfast is to kick nicehashers out by using a less common POW algorithm? It's the same reason XTL is also forking away from nicehash. Nicehash is pure cancer thanks to a few toxic A-holes with large sums of BTC who use the massive hashrate to attack smaller projects. It's the same reason more projects are moving to CN-Heavy aswell. I mean look at all the 51% attacks that have been happening recently. Bitcoin Gold, Litecoin Cash, Verge, ZenCash ect.. Where do you think those tards got the massive multi algorithm (SHA-256, Equihash, Blake2s, Lyra2c2..) hashrate from? Yup, nicehash. Nicehash is pure aids, I'm glad we're making this move. It was awesome when they got hacked, pitty they didn't close down for good. It's not necessary Nicehash fault, it could also be big pool owners, the problem is that more coins are using the same algo and the attack is pretty easy to do. Way to go Masari for changing the algo !
|
|
|
|
omega0
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 159
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 07, 2018, 07:35:16 PM |
|
The PoW change seems a good choice, there are too many coins with the same algorithm.. it's a security problem
|
|
|
|
MugsyCrawler
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 08, 2018, 01:48:07 PM |
|
Good topic, i read it all. Let's buy some Mazari!!
|
|
|
|
wudafuxup
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 08, 2018, 01:56:17 PM |
|
Good topic, i read it all. Let's buy some Mazari!!
You read it all after registering 2 minutes ago ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
I like crypto
|
|
|
MugsyCrawler
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 08, 2018, 05:31:44 PM |
|
Good topic, i read it all. Let's buy some Mazari!!
You read it all after registering 2 minutes ago ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) You don't need to be registered to read topics, dohh.
|
|
|
|
SlimShadyMmp
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 103
COMBO 2.0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 08, 2018, 06:16:57 PM |
|
Anyone with link to wp no link on the first page
|
|
|
|
valgandar
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 08, 2018, 11:39:46 PM |
|
Anyone with link to wp no link on the first page
From OP: "Future features will include uncle mining (using the DECOR+ protocol) and a pending whitepaper regarding a Blocktree protocol which is aimed at solving on-chain scalability."
|
|
|
|
|
ZachE84
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 11, 2018, 05:30:12 PM |
|
how to mine? xmr-stak using monerov7 does not work. All shares rejected
|
|
|
|
RinceWind84
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 263
Merit: 12
HODL! If it isn't a grudge...
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 12, 2018, 12:06:05 AM Last edit: June 12, 2018, 12:16:49 AM by RinceWind84 |
|
how to mine? xmr-stak using monerov7 does not work. All shares rejected
If you follow the link in the post right above yours. You will find that the fork will be on block 204000 and that the new algo be called CN-fast. Last block: 198842 So not quite there yet EDIT: I just now realize that there was a previous fork... sorry about that. Not sure why Monero7 is not working for you..
|
|
|
|
|
LoDoCrypto
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 12, 2018, 04:26:16 AM |
|
how to mine? xmr-stak using monerov7 does not work. All shares rejected
If you're not already using 2.4.5, update to that and select Masari as the algo. It will switch to CN-Fast at block 204,000.
|
|
|
|
MugsyCrawler
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 13, 2018, 02:32:02 PM |
|
Do i need to update the GUI wallet for the upcoming fork ? Can someone help with link please.
|
|
|
|
|
lilaj4de
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 13, 2018, 07:42:41 PM |
|
In any event, will the data or tracking related to a particular user be not available, that is, will Masari always guarantee user privacy?
|
|
|
|
Gavri1a
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 13, 2018, 08:28:32 PM |
|
how to use remote nodes in the GUI Wallet? where could I find the list of remote nodes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|