WAVES PLATFORM VS ETH PLATFORM

[Adykingcity]

I've seen that these two smart contracts are often used, and the ETH is widely used more often than WAVES. What is the difference between the two platforms?

[1714775027]

1714775027

[1714775027]

1714775027

[1714775027]

1714775027

[peschi]

I've seen that these two smart contracts are often used, and the ETH is widely used more often than WAVES. What is the difference between the two platforms?

Waves is not a smart contract plattform - it is a plattform to issue tokens on a very, very simple way (tokens dont have any functionality).

Waves also has a so called DEX (decentralised exchange), where you can trade the tokens of the waves plattform.

[arthurbonora]

I believe that the ethereum platform with the ERC20 tokens give more credibility to the project

[Moana]

I believe that the ethereum platform with the ERC20 tokens give more credibility to the project

This is certainly sure for the moment, but it is a pity, because waves is a more user friendly interface. The day that waves should add smart contracts features the game could change.

[xaxistech]

It is more interesting when an ICO is using a Ethereum contract, waves is a very good project, and their dex is very good too, but it is difficult to use it since it is a little big buggy. But i see that a lot of ICO's are using Waves technology to develop their coins, and a lot of them are having success. I think that more people needs to accostumbrate to use Waves, it is a very promising one, and a new way to develop coins.

[bitkanu]

I've seen that these two smart contracts are often used, and the ETH is widely used more often than WAVES. What is the difference between the two platforms?

The ethereum was having the more complex code rather than waves platform, as far as i know a lot of the exchange sites was easily to added the ethereum token rather than the waves assets and that makes the waves just look a crap for me.

[mangodream]

Waves is just the opposite to ETH probably. What ETH do is develop Bitcoin scripting, do everything using contracts, it’s very fundamental but makes certain things very complicated. Waves took another road, where things are simpler, very easy to add all functionality you need using plug-ins, don’t have to code complicated contracts. Also waves focus is on mass adoption, specifically target two markets : fiat transfers on blockchain and crowdfunding on blockchain. They are very ripe for disruption, and waves will be offering a product for a very general audience, basically the main end-user client is just a plugin you can install from Chrome.

[Adykingcity]

I've seen that these two smart contracts are often used, and the ETH is widely used more often than WAVES. What is the difference between the two platforms?

Waves is not a smart contract plattform - it is a plattform to issue tokens on a very, very simple way (tokens dont have any functionality).

Waves also has a so called DEX (decentralised exchange), where you can trade the tokens of the waves plattform.

means the ETH token is more complex than the token of the waves. 

It is more interesting when an ICO is using a Ethereum contract, waves is a very good project, and their dex is very good too, but it is difficult to use it since it is a little big buggy. But i see that a lot of ICO's are using Waves technology to develop their coins, and a lot of them are having success. I think that more people needs to accostumbrate to use Waves, it is a very promising one, and a new way to develop coins.

Some people are more happy to use waves and some are using ETH, but I see many more ETH enthusiasts

I've seen that these two smart contracts are often used, and the ETH is widely used more often than WAVES. What is the difference between the two platforms?

The ethereum was having the more complex code rather than waves platform, as far as i know a lot of the exchange sites was easily to added the ethereum token rather than the waves assets and that makes the waves just look a crap for me.

Like MGO they have a problem on their wallet, which you say is very true

Waves is just the opposite to ETH probably. What ETH do is develop Bitcoin scripting, do everything using contracts, it’s very fundamental but makes certain things very complicated. Waves took another road, where things are simpler, very easy to add all functionality you need using plug-ins, don’t have to code complicated contracts. Also waves focus is on mass adoption, specifically target two markets : fiat transfers on blockchain and crowdfunding on blockchain. They are very ripe for disruption, and waves will be offering a product for a very general audience, basically the main end-user client is just a plugin you can install from Chrome.

But look at waves have no enthusiasts at all, most people prefer to use ETH.
Facts speak

[Sungoku]

if you look at the battle between the ethereum platform and waves I think the win is ethereum,
why? because the ethereum is in great demand by the masses

[peschi]

I've seen that these two smart contracts are often used, and the ETH is widely used more often than WAVES. What is the difference between the two platforms?

Waves is not a smart contract plattform - it is a plattform to issue tokens on a very, very simple way (tokens dont have any functionality).

Waves also has a so called DEX (decentralised exchange), where you can trade the tokens of the waves plattform.

means the ETH token is more complex than the token of the waves. 

It is more interesting when an ICO is using a Ethereum contract, waves is a very good project, and their dex is very good too, but it is difficult to use it since it is a little big buggy. But i see that a lot of ICO's are using Waves technology to develop their coins, and a lot of them are having success. I think that more people needs to accostumbrate to use Waves, it is a very promising one, and a new way to develop coins.

Some people are more happy to use waves and some are using ETH, but I see many more ETH enthusiasts

I've seen that these two smart contracts are often used, and the ETH is widely used more often than WAVES. What is the difference between the two platforms?

The ethereum was having the more complex code rather than waves platform, as far as i know a lot of the exchange sites was easily to added the ethereum token rather than the waves assets and that makes the waves just look a crap for me.

Like MGO they have a problem on their wallet, which you say is very true

Waves is just the opposite to ETH probably. What ETH do is develop Bitcoin scripting, do everything using contracts, it’s very fundamental but makes certain things very complicated. Waves took another road, where things are simpler, very easy to add all functionality you need using plug-ins, don’t have to code complicated contracts. Also waves focus is on mass adoption, specifically target two markets : fiat transfers on blockchain and crowdfunding on blockchain. They are very ripe for disruption, and waves will be offering a product for a very general audience, basically the main end-user client is just a plugin you can install from Chrome.

But look at waves have no enthusiasts at all, most people prefer to use ETH.
Facts speak

I think its not about enthusiasts - its about the project needs.
If you need a complex smart contract, then got to ETH or an other blockchain which is providing it.

Waves is for simple Tokens with no functionality. You need 1 minute to issue your tokens.

[hermawanda]

eth platform is very better, eth have a bigger communty compared waves

[leea-1334]

I believe that the ethereum platform with the ERC20 tokens give more credibility to the project

Not necessarily. Do you know that the majority of ICO scams are actually using ERC20 tokens? Did you know that Ethereum is now more popular than Bitcoin as the crypto currency of choice for criminal activities (just behind Monero)?

Of course, this doesn't mean ETH is bad, just as Bitcoin wasn't bad even if terrorists use it, but if you're saying that simply using ERC20 gives the project credibility, I highly doubt it. WAVES has a verified token system that works by some verification of the creators and project. I trust that much more!

[Sullivan456]

I think it's intended purpose is supposed to be making token creation on their chain very easy. I suppose that puts them in direct competition with Ethereum and some of the Eth token ICOs.
However, there's projects like Zrcoin that are both tokens on ETH and on WAVES. So I think the business case is that if you want to create tokens very quickly - use Waves. If you want to do more complex things with the tokens (like using Solidity) - you could later somehow bridge your tokens between both Waves and Ethereum. I think the biggest unseen use case from that might be the commodities market, maybe even product inventories for companies at some stage.

[sweerty1]

Currently Ether platform is million years better. Waves is just simpler platform. Also they are going to follow ether's road to smart contract (I suppose). Waves is going to be good for sure but Eth is too big already.

[Beicin]

They are vastly different from one another, you can't even compare the two. Ethereum aims to be EVERYTHING basically, while Waves is pretty limited as a platform to issue tokens.

[bittraffic]

There had been a lot of ICOs under WAVES platform already and tokens were released using the mass pay feature of the platform which is why waves can somehow take a huge market, it has its own ecosystem with a whole kid of tokens that will soon also be as big as ETH. Both are all platforms the only difference is that ETH was created the first.

[Lucky_U]

Waves platform is more simple and development is too slow.
In October Waves will lunch Waves Client 1.0 and Waves NG protocol.

[kryptqnick]

Waves is just the opposite to ETH probably. What ETH do is develop Bitcoin scripting, do everything using contracts, it’s very fundamental but makes certain things very complicated. Waves took another road, where things are simpler, very easy to add all functionality you need using plug-ins, don’t have to code complicated contracts. Also waves focus is on mass adoption, specifically target two markets : fiat transfers on blockchain and crowdfunding on blockchain. They are very ripe for disruption, and waves will be offering a product for a very general audience, basically the main end-user client is just a plugin you can install from Chrome.

Thanks, I guess this is a very good explanation. Waves is indeed easier to use, there're even videos on youtube showing how easy it is to create a token on this platform. And it's written on Java mostly, so that is also an advantage above ethereum. Nevertheless, I believe that waves will never beat eth if both stay alive, because eth is just too popular already and people trust it more.

[JasonXG]

I don't know. I support both. ETH needs some competition and that is what waves is doing. Maybe its the next ETH ? Will it increase in value like ETH did ? Who knows, but I guess we will find out soon.

Lately there are so many ETH platform based tokens coming out all the time.

[ludbega]

Waves platform is more simple and development is too slow.
In October Waves will lunch Waves Client 1.0 and Waves NG protocol.

Thanks God,
Finally an informed person. !Nice to meet you !

Frankly, this conversation is indecent. Waves is clearly not at the end of his pretensions where Ether shows signs of fatigue.

For me both have their reason to be but the competition with the two will only begin: D Waves is likely to be an all-in-one sad enough for Ethereum. (Which I am always curious to measure integrity)