[ANN] Infinitecoin - IFC | V1.8 Released! *Mandatory Upgrade, upgrade ASAP*

[zackclark70]

Oh Ye of little Faith. IFC is the Crytpo dollar. Bitcoin was an instamine coin. Now its a corporate entity all of its own. It seems Bitcoin has lost its vision of decentralized currency. Something IFC has not.
BTC

How does this IFC council and it's gatekeeper make this coin any different ?

Did you forget how easily fisheater was willing to hand this over to that project infintite scam ?

Faith is for centralized authority luvin noobs. Lets give experience and common sense a go for a change.


[/quote

there was no handing anything over to project infinite it was completely separate to the actual coin 

project infinite itself was not a scam it would have worked well if snaz had not run away with all the project files the only person that got scammed was me as I was left to pay ahmed and threeip 1.5btc each + a £38 a month sever contract

IFC will soon start to have problems as the block reward starts to get smaller I suggest that people start thinking about how to solve that problem 
 

[Sustainable]

HippieTech I've got to be honest with your relentless with the arguments and wild accusations that basically don't mean anything, the coin has a fair distribution. The IFC council is to progress development and upgrade the coin, we are not gatekeepers someone has to lead the community of a coin, like any other coin. All we are trying to do is make the coin succeed and your negativity is relentless, I have no idea you have never been scammed by IFC no-one has treated you badly you just continue to damage the coin. Anyway from this point I just cannot take you seriously, I don't know why you decided to attack this coin and I probably never will. The mining process was fair (this is coming from a guy that didn't actually mine the coin in the first place/a member of the team who has given away millions to people in the IFC community and other communities).

Maybe try and help and add some value instead of bashing? You've been on this forum for 4 months trashing the coin, and even on the IFC forums trashing the coin. Personally I think you invested big and have been disappointed by no crazy growth as you expected.

Again, IFC has a large positive motion towards world integration and that of 3rd world countries so we are progressing that and services are being worked on in the background along with developments to improve the coding of the coin.

Thanks to everyone that keeps supporting!

[vivabnet]

Hi everybody

I upgraded to V1.8 and solo mining, also windows-qt synchronizes again sometime. I don't know, in this process, can i mine ? and how the way to stop it sync many times?

[captainfuture]

we changed our pools to stratum with vardiff.

please change your settings, we will close getwork soon.

https://coinex.pw/mining/pools/IFC

[Verlaufen]

Hello@all,

I am trying to start mining infinitecoin on Windows XP SP3.
I followed the steps in the very first post, and in step 3 I get this error:


The error-message says (google translation): Error setting up RPC port 9322: open: it has been used an address that is incompatible with the requested protocol.

I used for the infinitecoin.conf the posted sample (username and password set):
listen=1
daemon=1
server=1
rpcuser=**Yourusername**
rpcpassword=**Yourpassword**
rpcallowip=10.1.1.*
rpcport=9322
rpcconnect=127.0.0.1
addnode=xx.xx.xx.xx

What should I do to correct this?

Thanks in advance!

[vivabnet]

Hi everybody

I upgraded to V1.8 and solo mining, also windows-qt synchronizes again sometime. I don't know, in this process, can i mine ? and how the way to stop it sync many times?

who can help me pls?

[NaNaec]

Blockexplorer is down...

ask again,
now - 65536
november - 32768
dec - 16384
jan (2014) - 8192
feb - 2048
mar - 1024
apr - 512
may - 256
jun - 128
jul - 64
aug - 32
sep - 16
oct - 8
now - 4
dec - 2
jan (2015) - 1

and IFC will mine more than 1 year, right? down to 0.00000001? or we will have something like this: jan (2014) - 8192 and next feb - 0.00000001 (that is actually stopping the process)? Thank you.

[zackclark70]

Blockexplorer is down...

ask again,
now - 65536
november - 32768
dec - 16384
jan (2014) - 8192
feb - 2048
mar - 1024
apr - 512
may - 256
jun - 128
jul - 64
aug - 32
sep - 16
oct - 8
now - 4
dec - 2
jan (2015) - 1

and IFC will mine more than 1 year, right? down to 0.00000001? or we will have something like this: jan (2014) - 8192 and next feb - 0.00000001 (that is actually stopping the process)? Thank you.

you are right in a years time there will be nothing to keep people mining unless there are changes made to the coin

[TECSHARE]

Blockexplorer is down...

ask again,
now - 65536
november - 32768
dec - 16384
jan (2014) - 8192
feb - 2048
mar - 1024
apr - 512
may - 256
jun - 128
jul - 64
aug - 32
sep - 16
oct - 8
now - 4
dec - 2
jan (2015) - 1

and IFC will mine more than 1 year, right? down to 0.00000001? or we will have something like this: jan (2014) - 8192 and next feb - 0.00000001 (that is actually stopping the process)? Thank you.

Block explorer is fine. Additionally contrary to your "expert" opinion Zack the coin does not need to be changed. All that needs to happen is transaction fees need to be increased.

[zackclark70]

Blockexplorer is down...

ask again,
now - 65536
november - 32768
dec - 16384
jan (2014) - 8192
feb - 2048
mar - 1024
apr - 512
may - 256
jun - 128
jul - 64
aug - 32
sep - 16
oct - 8
now - 4
dec - 2
jan (2015) - 1

and IFC will mine more than 1 year, right? down to 0.00000001? or we will have something like this: jan (2014) - 8192 and next feb - 0.00000001 (that is actually stopping the process)? Thank you.

Block explorer is fine. Additionally contrary to your "expert" opinion Zack the coin does not need to be changed. All that needs to happen is transaction fees need to be increased.

does the tx fee not count as a change ?

[NaNaec]

Block explorer is fine. Additionally contrary to your "expert" opinion Zack the coin does not need to be changed. All that needs to happen is transaction fees need to be increased.

OК, can you answer pls, how long we will mine IFC with reward more than 0.00000001? Thank you.

[ANiceJewishBoy]

Will infinite coin really provide infinite possibility (not attacking, just wondering)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=321086.0

subbed

[anonymous_acc]

Could somebody share current valid nodes? I can't synchronize.

connection timeout
trying connection 73.113.167.173:9321 lastseen=307.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 214.58.27.204:9321 lastseen=179.7hrs
trying connection 68.42.103.11:9321 lastseen=356458.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 73.113.167.173:9321 lastseen=307.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 76.110.255.33:9321 lastseen=356458.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 214.58.27.204:9321 lastseen=179.7hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 86.150.227.43:9321 lastseen=356458.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 73.113.167.173:9321 lastseen=307.8hrs
Flushed 3 addresses to peers.dat  46ms
connection timeout
trying connection 178.32.218.153:47577 lastseen=356458.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 73.113.167.173:9321 lastseen=307.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 190.19.238.43:51178 lastseen=356458.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 214.58.27.204:9321 lastseen=179.7hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 54.214.242.109:39182 lastseen=356458.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 214.58.27.204:9321 lastseen=179.7hrs


{
    "version" : 1080000,
    "protocolversion" : 60001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "balance" : 0.00000000,
    "blocks" : 0,
    "connections" : 0,
    "proxy" : "",
    "difficulty" : 0.00024414,
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1380682485,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "mininput" : 0.00010000,
    "errors" : ""
}


Once, I thought, I've got luck, I was stuck on the block #244999.

All of three nodes publicized on official site are off.

[morphKET]

iNKRHMCo7gsFmPASLGpMMtfxyg5a1dQHXS

thanks for the share fellow human

[rlhead7173]

Blockexplorer is down...

ask again,
now - 65536
november - 32768
dec - 16384
jan (2014) - 8192
feb - 2048
mar - 1024
apr - 512
may - 256
jun - 128
jul - 64
aug - 32
sep - 16
oct - 8
now - 4
dec - 2
jan (2015) - 1

and IFC will mine more than 1 year, right? down to 0.00000001? or we will have something like this: jan (2014) - 8192 and next feb - 0.00000001 (that is actually stopping the process)? Thank you.

you are right in a years time there will be nothing to keep people mining unless there are changes made to the coin

I have been mining IFC off and on for a while because it was so profitable. It is now only about 75% as profitable as Litecoin to mine because the reward is now 32768. It will be half that next month and will be about 30% as profitable as Litecoin mining, based on current value. I honestly don’t see how this trend is sustainable. Even if transaction fees were higher, would they really be high enough to make it more profitable to mine than other coins? Maybe I am missing something here though.

[Stefan]

Yes, I was forked too. I had these parameters:

11:29:30

getmininginfo


11:29:30

{
"blocks" : 363996,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00024414,
"errors" : "WARNING: Displayed transactions may not be correct! You may need to upgrade, or other nodes may need to upgrade.",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 10577,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}


11:31:06

getpeerinfo


11:31:06

[
{
"addr" : "86.148.13.91:9321",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1383561060,
"lastrecv" : 1383561060,
"conntime" : 1383406365,
"version" : 60001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.8.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 365218,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "92.146.142.187:9321",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1383561048,
"lastrecv" : 1383561062,
"conntime" : 1383509667,
"version" : 60001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.8.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 368709,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "119.17.193.14:9321",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1383561047,
"lastrecv" : 1383561061,
"conntime" : 1383536398,
"version" : 60001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.8.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 369626,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "24.117.148.144:9321",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1383561058,
"lastrecv" : 1383561062,
"conntime" : 1383539409,
"version" : 60001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.8.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 369708,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "67.188.9.128:9333",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1383561057,
"lastrecv" : 1383560959,
"conntime" : 1383552261,
"version" : 70002,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.5.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 44431,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "197.237.61.188:9321",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1383561054,
"lastrecv" : 1383561062,
"conntime" : 1383555214,
"version" : 60001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.8.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 370266,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "186.14.172.238:9333",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1383561058,
"lastrecv" : 1383561058,
"conntime" : 1383557461,
"version" : 70002,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.5.1/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 284730,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "92.5.96.6:9321",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1383561038,
"lastrecv" : 1383561055,
"conntime" : 1383561000,
"version" : 60001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:1.8.0/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 370458,
"banscore" : 0
}
]

this means there were 8 nodes that may have been on the forked chain too, why? I always used to have 8 active connections
EDIT: After reverting to October backup it synced to main chain.
I suggest to improve the client in this way from GLD (idea of new defense system + fixes) to prevent unexpected forks:
https://www.gldtalk.org/index.php?topic=618.0

[bitezze]

Announcing http://bitezze.com an E-commerce business focused on the exchange of IFC and many other Crypto-Currency into tangible products and assets.



We currently carry Jewelry and Precious Metals in stock and ready to ship. Moreover, we intend to continually broaden our product offering to include a wide array consumer goods.



We founded Bitezze.com to sell Men’s and Women’s Jewelry as well as precious, semi-precious, and base metals in the form of coins, rounds, and ingots. Bitezze.com is an E-commerce business located in the United States.

Currently we accept at least 18 Crypto-currencies as well as US Dollars as a means of payment for your purchases.

Currencies Currently accepted:



US Dollar                   USD (Via Paypal)
Androids Tokens           ADT
Bitcoin                   BTC
Litecoin                   LTC
BBQCoin                   BQC   
CryptogenicBullion   CGB
Devcoin                   DVC   
Feathercoin            FTC
Infinitecoin                   IFC   
Krugercoin                   KGC
Namecoin                   NMC   
Redcoin                   RED
Peercoin                   PPC   
Starcoin                   STR
Terracoin                   TRC   
Worldcoin                   WDC
Primecoin                   XPM   
Novacoin                   NVC
Goldcoin                   GLD   
Megacoin                   MEC
Sexcoin                   SXC   
Zetacoin                   ZET



Visit us on Twitter https://twitter.com/Bitezze
         

[Wichmann]

Does not sync client. Stopped on the block 256523. Tell me how to fix this?

translate.google.

[Txslady]

iSVzoU1hGxfj2r5JCiiRGVvdB2H6Qh3WyW

Thanks

[TECSHARE]

I see the sock FUD squad is in full force.