🌎【ANN】【ICO】🌎 LWF - First decentralized logistics platform - 🌎

[wolfgb888]

The project seemed to be a serious one, but the marketing strategy isn’t worked out. For me as for a potential investor it’s very important that the project progresses qualitatively and the demand for coins increases. I hope that soon the founders of the company will reconsider the marketing campaign and make it better.

Why do you think that LWF has a poor marketing strategy? I wonna tell you that now the company plans to be advertised on the target channels, attract retailers and consumer agencies to the platform.

Well, I heard that already. Actually, this approach doesn’t suit me. Why was it impossible to work this point out better?

Such a marketing campaign is still planned to be held basing on the funds that the company has already managed to receive. If there’re more of funds collected, the marketing campaign will be supplemented.

What supplements are you talking about?

There’re a lot of supplements, each of them depends on the amount of money that the company will collect at the sale. You can find it in a white paper on page 21.

We already reached the soft cap and for the marketing we have : Adv campaign on targeted channels,
acquisition of retailers and consumer agencies. Creation of LWF gadgets for packagin. When reached the 300 bitcoin, for the marketing we will have: Sponsor Acquisition with brochure and gadget insertion for internal logistics. Increase of already existing Marketing operation.

Considering that the financing is taking place during the period of greater volatility of cryptocurrency, I see that the campaign ESP is continuing well.
The work of the team that builds synergies with other projects, the campaign on Twitter and Facebook, as well as on the forum. I see day after day the construction of this project.

[1715661660]

1715661660

[1715661660]

1715661660

[1715661660]

1715661660

[1715661660]

1715661660

[Veecker]

Good afternoon. I’ve heard that you’re planning to conduct targeted marketing campaigns in certain regions. Can you name these regions?

[dspencer]

What platforms does your mobile app support?

[bars_kz]

Is it true that you’re planning to open a handling facility in Moscow? Why did you choose this region?

[dort]

Hello. Can you name the exact timeframes of the launch of your logistics centers in Italy?

[dredson1983]

Someone know the actual or target ratio BTC/LWF or RDD/LWF or else, in order to have an idea of how many coins I will send to contribute to the project ?
I prefer not have a bad surprise after sending for exemple 100,000.00 RDD or 50.00BTC and receiving 3.0000000547 LWF in february with a signed postcard of the Team

I've read this... but don't really know what to expect.
If I send 50.000 RDD..... and receive "only" 0,2 LWF I think I'll be quite disapointed.

Priceper LWF :
The Price of the LWF token will depend upon the amount raised during the ICO and reaching the minimum funding goal of 50 BTC.
The full calculation details and examples can be found in the sections of this white paper for "Distribution Calculation Examples"


Thanks

Price of LWF isn't fixed. All 78000000 coins will be proportionally distributed among all contributors after TEC sale ends.
For example: if a total amount of 1000 bitcoin is reached, for each bitcoin contributed 78000 coin will be credited, (78.000.000/1000) so If you've contributed with 0.5 bitcoin you'll have 39.000 coin. Full calculation details and examples can be found on the LWF White Paper at the following URL: https://www.lwf.io/docs/lwfwhitepaperen.pdf . For reddcoin, we will consider the price of reddcoin in bitcoin at the time you supported the LWF. And between January 3 rd and January 9 th, reddcoin supporters will receive a 40 % bonus!

[polonium84]

Greetings. I’ve seen the info that you plan to open legal headquarters in several cities. What will their role in the operation of LWF be?

[wolfgb888]

Is it true that you’re planning to open a handling facility in Moscow? Why did you choose this region?

One of the aims of the LWF project is to offer services in those regions where today is full of gaps.
LWF implements a decentralized freight forwarding network which guarantees a comprehensive solution within our internal network.
The private freight forwarder will receive buyers’ packages at their homes or other predetermined locations and forward them. It will set the coverage limits
of its services and a selection of possible shipping methods with the relative delivery costs and times in addition to commission amounts by entering this
information into our system.
you can join the new network of forwarders by writing an email to support.

[waitsummer]

Can anyone tell me in which city the head office of the company will be located?

[enigmatical]

Facebook Bounty
Facebook Account URL: https://www.facebook.com/shivaji.choudhari.357
Friends : 2117

Week #5 25 Dec - 31 Dec 2017
Like and Repost
1) https://www.facebook.com/shivaji.choudhari.357/posts/306812486490361
2) https://www.facebook.com/shivaji.choudhari.357/posts/307849323053344
3) https://www.facebook.com/shivaji.choudhari.357/posts/309084316263178
Post
1) https://www.facebook.com/shivaji.choudhari.357/posts/306814643156812
2) https://www.facebook.com/shivaji.choudhari.357/posts/308524806319129

There is a bounty thread for LWF which these should be posted there, read the rules of the bounty: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2285038

[enigmatical]

Can anyone tell me in which city the head office of the company will be located?

From the white paper,  two fully operational facilities are already available and are located in Italy which is accessible to LWF. So depending on the amount raised, logistics centers would obviously start in Italy, then Canada,  India and Moscow. Refer to the white paper for more details.

[gavrosh]

It’s great that new technologies are being currently implemented into the area of logistic services. It will bring a lot of advantages in the future, but now I can’t see any differences between LWF and centralized logistic companies. The developers should work out the project better rather then create in rough-and-ready manner.

[defender77]

It’s great that new technologies are being currently implemented into the area of logistic services. It will bring a lot of advantages in the future, but now I can’t see any differences between LWF and centralized logistic companies. The developers should work out the project better rather then create in rough-and-ready manner.

LWF has an experienced team of developers which don’t make it offhand. They are aware of the necessary approach to the work. As for the absence of the changes, you’re wrong in this case. There’re lots of them. It’s logical ‘cause use of blockchain as a base of service’s operation provides a great number of advantages over centralized competitors.

[gavrosh]

It’s great that new technologies are being currently implemented into the area of logistic services. It will bring a lot of advantages in the future, but now I can’t see any differences between LWF and centralized logistic companies. The developers should work out the project better rather then create in rough-and-ready manner.

LWF has an experienced team of developers which don’t make it offhand. They are aware of the necessary approach to the work. As for the absence of the changes, you’re wrong in this case. There’re lots of them. It’s logical ‘cause use of blockchain as a base of service’s operation provides a great number of advantages over centralized competitors.

Oh yes, but I somehow haven’t noticed anything like that in LWF, at least, when reading the White Paper.

[liliiaolivia2017]

Who participated in the development of the technical part of this project?

[defender77]

It’s great that new technologies are being currently implemented into the area of logistic services. It will bring a lot of advantages in the future, but now I can’t see any differences between LWF and centralized logistic companies. The developers should work out the project better rather then create in rough-and-ready manner.

LWF has an experienced team of developers which don’t make it offhand. They are aware of the necessary approach to the work. As for the absence of the changes, you’re wrong in this case. There’re lots of them. It’s logical ‘cause use of blockchain as a base of service’s operation provides a great number of advantages over centralized competitors.

Oh yes, but I somehow haven’t noticed anything like that in LWF, at least, when reading the White Paper.

It means that you’ve read it not carefully enough. Lwf at least ensures scalable and safe space for provision of logistic services, and the info on supplies, feedback, forwarders involved and etc is managed to be collected in one place due to blockchain in order to prevent any losses. It’s impossible in centralized projects: that’s why it takes them a lot of time to find any data.

[devilini]

It’s great that new technologies are being currently implemented into the area of logistic services. It will bring a lot of advantages in the future, but now I can’t see any differences between LWF and centralized logistic companies. The developers should work out the project better rather then create in rough-and-ready manner.

LWF has an experienced team of developers which don’t make it offhand. They are aware of the necessary approach to the work. As for the absence of the changes, you’re wrong in this case. There’re lots of them. It’s logical ‘cause use of blockchain as a base of service’s operation provides a great number of advantages over centralized competitors.

Oh yes, but I somehow haven’t noticed anything like that in LWF, at least, when reading the White Paper.

It means that you’ve read it not carefully enough. Lwf at least ensures scalable and safe space for provision of logistic services, and the info on supplies, feedback, forwarders involved and etc is managed to be collected in one place due to blockchain in order to prevent any losses. It’s impossible in centralized projects: that’s why it takes them a lot of time to find any data.

It’s obvious that all these options won’t be introduced only due to blockchain, right? I believe that the developers should use any developments of their own in the project.

[dayasinfo]

It’s great that new technologies are being currently implemented into the area of logistic services. It will bring a lot of advantages in the future, but now I can’t see any differences between LWF and centralized logistic companies. The developers should work out the project better rather then create in rough-and-ready manner.

LWF has an experienced team of developers which don’t make it offhand. They are aware of the necessary approach to the work. As for the absence of the changes, you’re wrong in this case. There’re lots of them. It’s logical ‘cause use of blockchain as a base of service’s operation provides a great number of advantages over centralized competitors.

Oh yes, but I somehow haven’t noticed anything like that in LWF, at least, when reading the White Paper.

It means that you’ve read it not carefully enough. Lwf at least ensures scalable and safe space for provision of logistic services, and the info on supplies, feedback, forwarders involved and etc is managed to be collected in one place due to blockchain in order to prevent any losses. It’s impossible in centralized projects: that’s why it takes them a lot of time to find any data.

It’s obvious that all these options won’t be introduced only due to blockchain, right? I believe that the developers should use any developments of their own in the project.

You’re absolutely right. The developers of LWF gonna use unique and complex algorithms as a base of the operation of the system which are unavailable for any client.

[devilini]

It’s great that new technologies are being currently implemented into the area of logistic services. It will bring a lot of advantages in the future, but now I can’t see any differences between LWF and centralized logistic companies. The developers should work out the project better rather then create in rough-and-ready manner.

LWF has an experienced team of developers which don’t make it offhand. They are aware of the necessary approach to the work. As for the absence of the changes, you’re wrong in this case. There’re lots of them. It’s logical ‘cause use of blockchain as a base of service’s operation provides a great number of advantages over centralized competitors.

Oh yes, but I somehow haven’t noticed anything like that in LWF, at least, when reading the White Paper.

It means that you’ve read it not carefully enough. Lwf at least ensures scalable and safe space for provision of logistic services, and the info on supplies, feedback, forwarders involved and etc is managed to be collected in one place due to blockchain in order to prevent any losses. It’s impossible in centralized projects: that’s why it takes them a lot of time to find any data.

It’s obvious that all these options won’t be introduced only due to blockchain, right? I believe that the developers should use any developments of their own in the project.

You’re absolutely right. The developers of LWF gonna use unique and complex algorithms as a base of the operation of the system which are unavailable for any client.

Wow, that is it, that’s what I was talking about. Can you elaborate in these unique and complex algorithms?

[alcoholbtc]

Hi everybody. Tell me please, can I use Ltc to pay for TEC tokens?