[POR]⚡ELECTRONEUM⚡Official Moderated Thread

[cryptocurrency_n00b]

I found an answer in a tweet that stated Hackerone finished their analysis and is currently compiling the report. Anyone able to confirm that? Don‘t know where such an information might come from. Maybe from telegram chat?
To be honest, I‘d prefer an official statement. But can that rumour be confirmed by anyone anyways?

[gsanjin]

what's going on with super nova  pool my hash rate is 6370 h/s went from 3-5 coins down to .6 per block in just the last two hr's

Suprnova is wrong pool. Some blocks are missing. Percentage 169%

Pool can't find every block, there's permanent DDoS on the pool(s) but the last hours are okay again

Think something is off last hour only made  4.81434792   while getting 1.4 to 0.9 coins per block  that would add up to more then the  4.81434792 I made if we hit 60 block in one hr  with hash rate of 7100 h/s

Did you see that total nethash rate is over 220 MH/s and difficulty is also 30% larger?

[johntwo]

Everyone knows this coin will easily hit over $1 in the near future.

No we don't know, we hope.  That would give it a market cap of $5 billion+, just behind Litecoin and ahead of Monero (assuming those don't gain at all).  Could happen but probably not.

Do you believe we will have the coin with the most users? If you do, why wouldnt we pass Litecoin with the coin with the most users?

I can see Bitcoin staying on top, even ETH but I dont see passing Ripple, BCH, and Litecoin being a problem. Sure it wil be a big deal. But around 60 million dollars, and a half million users already?

Dont see it being a problem.



Richard Ells:

NOBODY has seen scale this size from an ICO type event.
Largest Telegram group EVER
Largest contributor number ever!

Take a look at these stats of top 10 cryptocurrencies:

Bitcoin 3m+ users - http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/study-highlights-growing-significance-of-cryptocurrencies

Ethereum 1.6 wallets in April 2017 (2m+ Oct 17 – no definite figure found)

Ripple wallets: 285,000 (Aug 2017) (max users 300k)

Dash total wallets: 470,000 (Oct 2017) https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-dash-addresses.html (max users 470k)

Litecoin 1.2m wallets (Oct 2017) https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-litecoin-addresses.html

NEM 43397 wallets (Oct 2017) https://nemnodes.org/richlist/ (max users 43397)

Bitconnect 10142 wallets (Oct 2017) https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcc/#!rich (max number of users 10142)

IOTA 22,245 wallets (August 2017) https://medium.com/@IngoFiedler_96862/iota-distribution-update-after-snapshot-from-08th-august-2017-21e92cf15eea

Electroneum over 400,000 wallets (140,000+ holders of Electroneum - 120k contributors - many miners)

We have already overtaken some of the top 10 coins by user number - and we haven't even fully launched!

Electroneum has an exciting future - thanks for sharing it!

Stop bullshitting, etn doesn't have the largest telegram group, there is one with 35k+ members but I don't remember the name of the crypto currency, and I bet there are a lot more too.
 Anything said now doesn't matter until ETN team can actually do something first

Well, when you remember. Let me know.

*hint there isnt one.

In crypto or any other subject

ETN has the largest Telegram in the world. That is not opinion. That is a fact

HAHAHAHA

https://t.me/waxtokenannoucements

Here is one,
It has 30k members and etn doesn't 'yet'.
So your claim that 'etn has the largest Telegram in the world' was your ignorant opinion and not a fact

This is kind of bad that @contraband made these claims about telegram without proof and has now been proven wrong.  I think the value of ETN should not be affected because it has still achieved great things in capital and marketing.  But dev team should apologize and formally retract claims of being largest telegram group.

[joojoohe]

Hi.

I'm new on the suprnova pools.
I requested withdrawal from suprnova to my wallet at Cryptopia, when I try again I have this info "You already have one active manual payout request.".

Where can i see the transaction and the state of it on my dashboard?

Regards

you need to add your payment id...

Thanks for reply.

I put on my account on Suprnova;

My payment address:
Cryptopia_Exchange-xx3tWEB-20148xxxx

My payment ID:
43d826bbec4b7ff265rnaa116f95a50bbe792508dd0a1aee04031ce95b3f4df2

[Daveeoff2]

what's going on with super nova  pool my hash rate is 6370 h/s went from 3-5 coins down to .6 per block in just the last two hr's

Suprnova is wrong pool. Some blocks are missing. Percentage 169%

https://i.imgur.com/eIHH0CR.jpg

Pool can't find every block, there's permanent DDoS on the pool(s) but the last hours are okay again

Think something is off last hour only made  4.81434792   while getting 1.4 to 0.9 coins per block  that would add up to more then the  4.81434792 I made if we hit 60 block in one hr  with hash rate of 7100 h/s

Did you see that total nethash rate is over 220 MH/s and difficulty is also 30% larger?

it shows up in my pay outs per block . Pool shows we hit 60 blocks on the pool in one hr all my block payouts show up as 1.4 to 0.9 each block but I only show 4 coins for 60 payouts the math don't add up. Had my main account from  June 16, 2014  hi jacked been mining for the last 5 years now so I'm not a noob like my account shows me to be so if you see my old account post anything by the name of  Daveeoff they ripped off my account

[sorinslv]

you need etn payment address for cryptopia.

https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Deposit/Display?currency=ETN&returnUrl=/Home

[gsanjin]

what's going on with super nova  pool my hash rate is 6370 h/s went from 3-5 coins down to .6 per block in just the last two hr's

Suprnova is wrong pool. Some blocks are missing. Percentage 169%

Pool can't find every block, there's permanent DDoS on the pool(s) but the last hours are okay again

Think something is off last hour only made  4.81434792   while getting 1.4 to 0.9 coins per block  that would add up to more then the  4.81434792 I made if we hit 60 block in one hr  with hash rate of 7100 h/s

Did you see that total nethash rate is over 220 MH/s and difficulty is also 30% larger?

it shows up in my pay outs per block . Pool shows we hit 60 blocks on the pool in one hr all my block payouts show up as 1.4 to 0.9 each block but I only show 4 coins for 60 payouts the math don't add up

Don't watch first column, it is apsolutely wrong estimate and is same for all coins. Watch second (found) and third (valid) column - it shows currently 8 found blocks, 6 valid in last hour, 158 found, 151 valid in last 24 hours ...

[joojoohe]

Why the ETN doesn't show on whattomine?
I'm mining it since last 2 days.

I have to stop mining it? what do you think about?

[gsanjin]

Why the ETN doesn't show on whattomine?
I'm mining it since last 2 days.

I have to stop mining it? what do you think about?

Authors delisted it because a lot of luck variance causing wrong estimates. You can do calculation here - http://whattomine.com/coins/213-etn-cryptonight

[TOPBILL]

Why the ETN doesn't show on whattomine?
I'm mining it since last 2 days.

I have to stop mining it? what do you think about?

https://whattomine.com/coins/213-etn-cryptonight?utf8=✓&hr=1000000.0&p=0&fee=0.0&cost=0.0&hcost=0.0&commit=Calculate

[ocminer]

Why the ETN doesn't show on whattomine?
I'm mining it since last 2 days.

I have to stop mining it? what do you think about?

You can't really calculate because diff retarget is really weird..

[CryptoWhaler]

Seriously, does anyone know how many ETN actually got sold in the ICO?  Was it all 6 billion?

More around 5 Billion

I am not an ETN investor or ICO buyer, so I have no stake, you are all free to disagree with the following:

It seems like one way to avoid a crash on release of ICO funds is to tier the ICO fund release.  For example, release half up front, and half in another month.  Some ICO investors may not like that - I would totally understand if they dont want to wait more - but it might be better for all of them because it reduces the risk of price crash.

Thinking about it more, the current supply is also ~5 billion, so there's no obvious reason why releasing the 5 billion additional ICO coins should do anything worse than (temporarily) cut the price in half.  Everyone knows those ICO coins exist, so releasing them shouldn't change ETN's market cap.  Thus, the price should at worst go to half of what it is at the ICO wallet release (before any further movements), which isn't all that bad.  This is just a theory, of course.  There are other theories to cut both ways.  Some might say that the current price should already account for the sell pressure from ICO coins - therefore the price should fall by less than half.  Others might say that ICO investors are more willing to sell than miners because they already have a big return, in which case the price might more than halve.  I think overall half is a good expectation, but this is just a layperson's analysis.  Do not invest/mine more in ETN or any currency than you can afford to lose.

Just let the market runs its course without external interference.
Only demand and supply should determine how ETN will fair after wallets are active.
If it crashes, it crashes; if it holds, it holds.

[xzentorxz]

Why the ETN doesn't show on whattomine?
I'm mining it since last 2 days.

I have to stop mining it? what do you think about?

You can't really calculate because diff retarget is really weird..

if the calculation is based on the net hashrate the pool is showing (which is around 50% of the actual hashrate) the luck numbers arent that bad.

[Highspeed123]

News from Next.Exchange

ETN is expected to be listed on next.exchange on the 14th of December, NEXT tokenholders will have access to it.

https://next.exchange/?ref=OTM1MzI4MTYyNA

Must be a rumour, as Electroneum team said that would not happen anytime soon. Only if they had significant volume. They have an official update on their Facebook page.

https://www.facebook.com/pg/electroneum/posts/

[ocminer]

Why the ETN doesn't show on whattomine?
I'm mining it since last 2 days.

I have to stop mining it? what do you think about?

You can't really calculate because diff retarget is really weird..

if the calculation is based on the net hashrate the pool is showing (which is around 50% of the actual hashrate) the luck numbers arent that bad.

Ah, I almost forgot to fix that

[TheCryproMaster]

Will investors, and I mean those that actually bought into the ico not the lucky miners making money off this, have knowledge before everyone else of when the wallets will be open?

We should get the chance to trade first. Not shafted with the rest of those that clearly are doing this for quick profits.

[johntwo]

Seriously, does anyone know how many ETN actually got sold in the ICO?  Was it all 6 billion?

More around 5 Billion

I am not an ETN investor or ICO buyer, so I have no stake, you are all free to disagree with the following:

It seems like one way to avoid a crash on release of ICO funds is to tier the ICO fund release.  For example, release half up front, and half in another month.  Some ICO investors may not like that - I would totally understand if they dont want to wait more - but it might be better for all of them because it reduces the risk of price crash.

Thinking about it more, the current supply is also ~5 billion, so there's no obvious reason why releasing the 5 billion additional ICO coins should do anything worse than (temporarily) cut the price in half.  Everyone knows those ICO coins exist, so releasing them shouldn't change ETN's market cap.  Thus, the price should at worst go to half of what it is at the ICO wallet release (before any further movements), which isn't all that bad.  This is just a theory, of course.  There are other theories to cut both ways.  Some might say that the current price should already account for the sell pressure from ICO coins - therefore the price should fall by less than half.  Others might say that ICO investors are more willing to sell than miners because they already have a big return, in which case the price might more than halve.  I think overall half is a good expectation, but this is just a layperson's analysis.  Do not invest/mine more in ETN or any currency than you can afford to lose.

Just let the market runs its course without external interference.
Only demand and supply should determine how ETN will fair after wallets are active.
If it crashes, it crashes; if it holds, it holds.

It's difficult to predict the price of ETN at ICO wallet release. It can go up or down. We just have to wait and see.

https://next.exchange/?ref=OTM1MzI4MTYyNA

Well gee whiz, since no one can predict prices maybe no one should be allowed to discuss price theories anywhere on any forum for any coin.

Will investors, and I mean those that actually bought into the ico not the lucky miners making money off this, have knowledge before everyone else of when the wallets will be open?

We should get the chance to trade first. Not shafted with the rest of those that clearly are doing this for quick profits.

All it takes is one investor letting one of his miner buddies know that it's time to sell, and it may very well be that a huge sell-off occurs before investors can get their coins to exchange.  That does seem unfair to investors, but not sure what anyone can do about it.

[TOPBILL]

Seriously, does anyone know how many ETN actually got sold in the ICO?  Was it all 6 billion?

More around 5 Billion

I am not an ETN investor or ICO buyer, so I have no stake, you are all free to disagree with the following:

It seems like one way to avoid a crash on release of ICO funds is to tier the ICO fund release.  For example, release half up front, and half in another month.  Some ICO investors may not like that - I would totally understand if they dont want to wait more - but it might be better for all of them because it reduces the risk of price crash.

That would probably be considered to be market manipulation.

[fanji]

when will the electroneum website return to normal? whether to spend until the end of 2017? I hope the improvement will be completed as soon as possible before the end of the year

[dunedainbob]

Seriously, does anyone know how many ETN actually got sold in the ICO?  Was it all 6 billion?

More around 5 Billion

I am not an ETN investor or ICO buyer, so I have no stake, you are all free to disagree with the following:

It seems like one way to avoid a crash on release of ICO funds is to tier the ICO fund release.  For example, release half up front, and half in another month.  Some ICO investors may not like that - I would totally understand if they dont want to wait more - but it might be better for all of them because it reduces the risk of price crash.

Thinking about it more, the current supply is also ~5 billion, so there's no obvious reason why releasing the 5 billion additional ICO coins should do anything worse than (temporarily) cut the price in half.  Everyone knows those ICO coins exist, so releasing them shouldn't change ETN's market cap.  Thus, the price should at worst go to half of what it is at the ICO wallet release (before any further movements), which isn't all that bad.  This is just a theory, of course.  There are other theories to cut both ways.  Some might say that the current price should already account for the sell pressure from ICO coins - therefore the price should fall by less than half.  Others might say that ICO investors are more willing to sell than miners because they already have a big return, in which case the price might more than halve.  I think overall half is a good expectation, but this is just a layperson's analysis.  Do not invest/mine more in ETN or any currency than you can afford to lose.

Just let the market runs its course without external interference.
Only demand and supply should determine how ETN will fair after wallets are active.
If it crashes, it crashes; if it holds, it holds.

That would probably be considered to be market manipulation.

I don't disagree with either of these responses.  But for whatever reason, the devs did not release the 5 billion ICO coins at network launch.

I'm all for a free market, but the market has been and continues to be manipulated so long as 5 billion coins are technically part of the coin's supply but artificially held out of circulation.  I don't have a good solution to that.  

Edit: I do expect devs to announce that anyone on their team who has advance knowledge of the ICO coin release must agree not to trade in ETN 24 hours before and 24 hours after the release.  To not make such a promise would be blatantly unfair.  Of course, I don't know how it could possibly be enforced.