[ANN][ROI] ROI Coin | CPU Only Solo Mining | 15% POS | 18.07% Term Deposit

[DisasterFaster]

Estimated date is far away from correct date, for example, I made a deposit to 365 days in January 29, 2018, and it's estimated to May 13, 2019 which is 464 days by today. Is everything ok?

Yes everything is okay. When you do a term deposit the release date is based on the block chain having a block run every 2 minutes. Well because of the MIDAS algorithm and difficulty adjustment the block timing tends to run more than 2 minutes and last time I heard it was averaging something like 142 seconds.

When we think of time we think in hours, days, weeks, months etc. But the code thinks in terms of so many blocks. The code doesn't think of 1 day as 24 hours but rather it thinks of 1 day as 720 blocks. The code doesn't think of 1 year as 365 days but rather 262,800 blocks.

If you term deposit for 1 year you are term depositing for 262,800 blocks and it will take longer than 365 days for that many blocks to be added to the chain because the blocks are happening slower than 2 minutes if that makes sense.

We have increased the term deposit rates to offset this. Also, if you really want closer to a 1 year term deposit you can average the block timing and then term deposit the coins for X amount of blocks that should get you closer to the time frame you have in mind.

[AlexHilgertBRA]

Estimated date is far away from correct date, for example, I made a deposit to 365 days in January 29, 2018, and it's estimated to May 13, 2019 which is 464 days by today. Is everything ok?

Yes everything is okay. When you do a term deposit the release date is based on the block chain having a block run every 2 minutes. Well because of the MIDAS algorithm and difficulty adjustment the block timing tends to run more than 2 minutes and last time I heard it was averaging something like 142 seconds.

When we think of time we think in hours, days, weeks, months etc. But the code thinks in terms of so many blocks. The code doesn't think of 1 day as 24 hours but rather it thinks of 1 day as 720 blocks. The code doesn't think of 1 year as 365 days but rather 262,800 blocks.

If you term deposit for 1 year you are term depositing for 262,800 blocks and it will take longer than 365 days for that many blocks to be added to the chain because the blocks are happening slower than 2 minutes if that makes sense.

We have increased the term deposit rates to offset this. Also, if you really want closer to a 1 year term deposit you can average the block timing and then term deposit the coins for X amount of blocks that should get you closer to the time frame you have in mind.

Got it! I figured out that I'll need to deposit approximately 270 days for reach 1 real year with 227.5% of interest, at this time.

Thank you!

[cobfor]

It seems that miners didn't pick it up, but Coinspool pool is available for mining using IP address, instead of DNS address.

I hope nicehash won't jump there right away  but for the rest of fellow miners, you can use command like this:

hodlminer.exe -t 10 -q -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://45.77.223.74:3042 -u mywalletaddress -p x

Again, instead of using:

hodlminer.exe -q -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3042 -u mywalletaddress -p x

USE

hodlminer.exe -q -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://45.77.223.74:3042 -u mywalletaddress -p x

[dvbb]

It seems that miners didn't pick it up, but Coinspool pool is available for mining using IP address, instead of DNS address.

I hope nicehash won't jump there right away  but for the rest of fellow miners, you can use command like this:

hodlminer.exe -t 10 -q -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://45.77.223.74:3042 -u mywalletaddress -p x

Again, instead of using:

hodlminer.exe -q -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3042 -u mywalletaddress -p x

USE

hodlminer.exe -q -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://45.77.223.74:3042 -u mywalletaddress -p x

Already I shared the IP before 2days. But right now the mining there is not profitable. In last 12 Hours the pool mined just 2 blocks , probably because the hash rate in Opti is 220KH

[Paddy321]

Why is not profitable? Yes, the pool hasrate is low and less blocks are found. However the found blocks are shared by less miners. Am I missing something here?

[Iame3]

If you do not hicehash block, then the coin will have no future.

And how do you work that out? A up to date CPU can get 800-1000 hs on this coin if set up correct.

That will get you around 400-700 coins a day with the hash that is on the network at the min. The nice hash miners do not seem to be dumping all the coins they mine. Most new coins that have nice hash on them get all mined coins dumped. Thats not happening.

So how do you work out the coin will have no future? Thats like looking at Magi (XMG) and saying it has no future because it has nice hash miners on it. Yet Magi is doing very well even when the more hash that is put on magi the less coins it will pump out over each block. Yet more and more hash is put on to magi.

Anyone can mine this coin and make more coins. That is the point in ROI even someone who has just 100hs with 130kh on the network can make 17-20 coins a day depositing them for 12 months with the 15% APR ontop will make the miner from 135 to 161 coins a day with just 100hs. The point in ROI is to get a return on investment and even the smallest of investment will get a nice return no matter how small it is.

The guy with 70KH on the pool at the min has invested his own money to mine. He has got at this point 68876 from his hash on the pool. This is his ROI. He can dump them on a exchange and sell them to get some money back or he can keep them and deposet them to get even more coins from his investment.

Roi is one of the very few ALT coins out there that is on exchanges and yet there is not a large supply of coins on the exchange.

Cryptohub has just 53896 coins
CoinsMarked (once back online) has just 90960

Thats just 144,856 coins for a coin that is just 4 months old that is nothing. Miners are hodling the coin. Not dumping the coin. This will push value of the coin up because the demand is good. And the supply is low.

You can always invest more in the coin if you wish. With nicehash or you could get more systems to mine the coin.

But in no way is nicehash going to kill this coin. If anything its going to help the coin gain value and a much needed supply to buy on exchanges.

Maybe you would care to elaborate how you think nicehash will make this coin have no future?

Raster.

The Raster, I think he claimed exactly the opposite or he claimed the same you said:

"If you do not hicehash block, then the coin will have no future."

LOL which is it haha

Which is it?

Hmmmm.....

How about this....

Such Nicehash - Much Hashrate - So coin mining - Not future - Wow  

I am Disaster Faster and I approve this message

I can agree with the arguments, but please - don't cheat. I mean "Mining: CPU Only Solo Mining From The Wallet With One Mouse Click".
With average (I mean cheap) CPU I'm getting 40-50h/s. 800-1000h/s? We are looking into the monsters' category for 500-1000$/CPU. I have no problem starting a miner (unfortunately link is absent in the front page) and pointing it to optiminer pool. But to solo mine with such CPU would take >1 week. It would be nice to provide links and ask people not to mine solo, unless you want to see bunch of bored persons waiting for their first block to be finally mined. Can you agree with such logic?

[dvbb]

Why is not profitable? Yes, the pool hasrate is low and less blocks are found. However the found blocks are shared by less miners. Am I missing something here?

1 block ~ $0.05. 12 Hours - 2 blocks .  5 miners - 6 KH. Definitely it's profitable but for electricity company
Just right now, Opti get almost whole mining power. After CoinsPool fix their DNS issue, situation will change probably.

[RinceWind84]

Yes, it's a xeon e5 2650 v4 es (es means engineering sample). Hyper threading is disabled by me in the bios.

Alright. I think you should try enabling HT and try mining 24 threads instead of 12 and see where that takes you.
Also it is quite interesting what you experience when removing one ram block. I think this the first time I hear of CPU being bottle-necked by ram when mining ROI. But it sure does sound like that is what is happening here
Maybe you could achieve even higher hashrates if you played around with running several instances of the miner. Like 4 instances running each 6 threads. Hence utilizing 4Gb of ram instead of just 1.
Exited to hear your results!

I did some tests with HT
In benchmark without HT i have a max. of 850h/s and with HT it's close to 1000h/s

Curious, i ran 4 instances, as you said, each instance with 6 threads and i see 270-280h/s on each instance.

So it seems that HT should be on for you. Your CPU is a beast and will probably draw some serious watts. Maybe this should be taken into account, depending on your price of electricity.

[itscoinguide]

What is the max supply of this coin? Can't seem to find it in your whitepaper, website or in this thread..? Thanks

[maxente]

Yes, it's a xeon e5 2650 v4 es (es means engineering sample). Hyper threading is disabled by me in the bios.

Alright. I think you should try enabling HT and try mining 24 threads instead of 12 and see where that takes you.
Also it is quite interesting what you experience when removing one ram block. I think this the first time I hear of CPU being bottle-necked by ram when mining ROI. But it sure does sound like that is what is happening here
Maybe you could achieve even higher hashrates if you played around with running several instances of the miner. Like 4 instances running each 6 threads. Hence utilizing 4Gb of ram instead of just 1.
Exited to hear your results!

I did some tests with HT
In benchmark without HT i have a max. of 850h/s and with HT it's close to 1000h/s

Curious, i ran 4 instances, as you said, each instance with 6 threads and i see 270-280h/s on each instance.

So it seems that HT should be on for you. Your CPU is a beast and will probably draw some serious watts. Maybe this should be taken into account, depending on your price of electricity.

The maximum TDP of the processor is 105W. I can not do over clock because the multiplier is locked and if i try to increase cpu voltage or increase bus speed it freezes or blue screen and then system restarts. So i will leave it as it is.
I didn't do any real measurements, but i gues the whole system (CPU, motherboard, vga,hdd) consume about 150 -170w/h.

[RinceWind84]

Yes, it's a xeon e5 2650 v4 es (es means engineering sample). Hyper threading is disabled by me in the bios.

Alright. I think you should try enabling HT and try mining 24 threads instead of 12 and see where that takes you.
Also it is quite interesting what you experience when removing one ram block. I think this the first time I hear of CPU being bottle-necked by ram when mining ROI. But it sure does sound like that is what is happening here
Maybe you could achieve even higher hashrates if you played around with running several instances of the miner. Like 4 instances running each 6 threads. Hence utilizing 4Gb of ram instead of just 1.
Exited to hear your results!

I did some tests with HT
In benchmark without HT i have a max. of 850h/s and with HT it's close to 1000h/s

Curious, i ran 4 instances, as you said, each instance with 6 threads and i see 270-280h/s on each instance.

So it seems that HT should be on for you. Your CPU is a beast and will probably draw some serious watts. Maybe this should be taken into account, depending on your price of electricity.

The maximum TDP of the processor is 105W. I can not do over clock because the multiplier is locked and if i try to increase cpu voltage or increase bus speed it freezes or blue screen and then system restarts. So i will leave it as it is.
I didn't do any real measurements, but i gues the whole system (CPU, motherboard, vga,hdd) consume about 150 -170w/h.

Ok. I merely meant that whether it is good idea to leave HT-on, depends on how much higher your total power draw is by doing so compared to leaving it off. Some CPU's go above intel's stated TDP. Around 1Khash/s for ~160 watt seems fine though

[cobfor]

Why is not profitable? Yes, the pool hasrate is low and less blocks are found. However the found blocks are shared by less miners. Am I missing something here?

1 block ~ $0.05. 12 Hours - 2 blocks .  5 miners - 6 KH. Definitely it's profitable but for electricity company
Just right now, Opti get almost whole mining power. After CoinsPool fix their DNS issue, situation will change probably.

It might be slightly challenging for some people to change the way they mine but Coinspool is working fine if you use their IP instead of DNS name.

Coinspool web site is accessible this way   http://45.77.223.74

There are 8 people mining at the moment:  http://45.77.223.74/workers_roicoin

As I wrote yesterday,  instead of using:

hodlminer.exe -q -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://stratum.coinspool.cu.cc:3042 -u mywalletaddress -p x

USE

hodlminer.exe -q -a hodl -o stratum+tcp://45.77.223.74:3042 -u mywalletaddress -p x

[sugi88999]

my wallet did't sync, it show no block source, what happend how to fix it, i have 6 active connection

[DisasterFaster]

my wallet did't sync, it show no block source, what happend how to fix it, i have 6 active connection

Which wallet version are you running?

[SfilD]

Good day to all!

I apologize for the bad english.
A Windows version of the purse ROIcoin-qt_x64_v1120 was installed on my computer, on which 600 coins (5 addresses of 120 coins) were coined in a solo. 02/03/2018 the purse has completely stopped syncing, after that the upgrade was carried out according to the instructions to the version ROIcoin-qt-v113-hotfix1. After synchronization, only the first transaction (120 coins) remained in the purse, i.e. now the balance of the new wallet is 120 ROI.

The old version of the wallet shows the presence on the balance of >600 coins, 5 addresses and the date of the transaction:

RDcLe5k4GcqDUoogz2LQZbs4o81XpALdbJ
RRJpfdSAM9f1FuenimxLuJ9emoBKq7oVv9
RVxjGxt1QqQqwGtjyewTKULkC73dA9DTaV
RTRqtobyaxJ8YG17dwFcS8AkwzuwRk1X9y

RJ6gE3By4DCoEP9YEz1jcqyPcHExMyuuJg


Checking 4 addresses on the block-explorer, on which the other 480 coins were scanned, showed that such addresses do not exist:

RDcLe5k4GcqDUoogz2LQZbs4o81XpALdbJ
RRJpfdSAM9f1FuenimxLuJ9emoBKq7oVv9
RVxjGxt1QqQqwGtjyewTKULkC73dA9DTaV
RTRqtobyaxJ8YG17dwFcS8AkwzuwRk1X9y

I ask you, please, help to return the lost 480 coins!

Sincerely.

[CryptoMarv]

Good day to all!

I apologize for the bad english.
A Windows version of the purse ROIcoin-qt_x64_v1120 was installed on my computer, on which 600 coins (5 addresses of 120 coins) were coined in a solo. 02/03/2018 the purse has completely stopped syncing, after that the upgrade was carried out according to the instructions to the version ROIcoin-qt-v113-hotfix1. After synchronization, only the first transaction (120 coins) remained in the purse, i.e. now the balance of the new wallet is 120 ROI.

The old version of the wallet shows the presence on the balance of >600 coins, 5 addresses and the date of the transaction:

RDcLe5k4GcqDUoogz2LQZbs4o81XpALdbJ
RRJpfdSAM9f1FuenimxLuJ9emoBKq7oVv9
RVxjGxt1QqQqwGtjyewTKULkC73dA9DTaV
RTRqtobyaxJ8YG17dwFcS8AkwzuwRk1X9y

RJ6gE3By4DCoEP9YEz1jcqyPcHExMyuuJg


Checking 4 addresses on the block-explorer, on which the other 480 coins were scanned, showed that such addresses do not exist:

RDcLe5k4GcqDUoogz2LQZbs4o81XpALdbJ
RRJpfdSAM9f1FuenimxLuJ9emoBKq7oVv9
RVxjGxt1QqQqwGtjyewTKULkC73dA9DTaV
RTRqtobyaxJ8YG17dwFcS8AkwzuwRk1X9y

I ask you, please, help to return the lost 480 coins!

Sincerely.

If the block height in your wallet is the same as on the block explorer at the moment, then the coins are lost. You have mined them in the "wrong fork", and this fork is dead now.

[TheRaster]

If you do not hicehash block, then the coin will have no future.

And how do you work that out? A up to date CPU can get 800-1000 hs on this coin if set up correct.

That will get you around 400-700 coins a day with the hash that is on the network at the min. The nice hash miners do not seem to be dumping all the coins they mine. Most new coins that have nice hash on them get all mined coins dumped. Thats not happening.

So how do you work out the coin will have no future? Thats like looking at Magi (XMG) and saying it has no future because it has nice hash miners on it. Yet Magi is doing very well even when the more hash that is put on magi the less coins it will pump out over each block. Yet more and more hash is put on to magi.

Anyone can mine this coin and make more coins. That is the point in ROI even someone who has just 100hs with 130kh on the network can make 17-20 coins a day depositing them for 12 months with the 15% APR ontop will make the miner from 135 to 161 coins a day with just 100hs. The point in ROI is to get a return on investment and even the smallest of investment will get a nice return no matter how small it is.

The guy with 70KH on the pool at the min has invested his own money to mine. He has got at this point 68876 from his hash on the pool. This is his ROI. He can dump them on a exchange and sell them to get some money back or he can keep them and deposet them to get even more coins from his investment.

Roi is one of the very few ALT coins out there that is on exchanges and yet there is not a large supply of coins on the exchange.

Cryptohub has just 53896 coins
CoinsMarked (once back online) has just 90960

Thats just 144,856 coins for a coin that is just 4 months old that is nothing. Miners are hodling the coin. Not dumping the coin. This will push value of the coin up because the demand is good. And the supply is low.

You can always invest more in the coin if you wish. With nicehash or you could get more systems to mine the coin.

But in no way is nicehash going to kill this coin. If anything its going to help the coin gain value and a much needed supply to buy on exchanges.

Maybe you would care to elaborate how you think nicehash will make this coin have no future?

Raster.

The Raster, I think he claimed exactly the opposite or he claimed the same you said:

"If you do not hicehash block, then the coin will have no future."

LOL which is it haha

Which is it?

Hmmmm.....

How about this....

Such Nicehash - Much Hashrate - So coin mining - Not future - Wow  

I am Disaster Faster and I approve this message

I can agree with the arguments, but please - don't cheat. I mean "Mining: CPU Only Solo Mining From The Wallet With One Mouse Click".
With average (I mean cheap) CPU I'm getting 40-50h/s. 800-1000h/s? We are looking into the monsters' category for 500-1000$/CPU. I have no problem starting a miner (unfortunately link is absent in the front page) and pointing it to optiminer pool. But to solo mine with such CPU would take >1 week. It would be nice to provide links and ask people not to mine solo, unless you want to see bunch of bored persons waiting for their first block to be finally mined. Can you agree with such logic?

I uderstand what you are saying. I was saying amd razen 1800 can do 900hs on 50% power at 3.6ghz. I don't think this CPU is out of the class of the home user. My friend has one in his gaming rig. I connected to it with team viewer and set it off mining. The CPU was not in turbo. I think it did very well.

I also understand that with 50hs on the wallet little old Mavis is not going to get many if any blocks when there is a lot of network hash like there has been.

So it is a case of mining on the pool to get coins. My own earning is down. I have dropped from 20 to 30 coins a block to just 0.4 coins a block. But its not such a bad thing with the term deposit. I'm a holder and don't sell my coins that often.

Its still a good coin to mine and has a lot to offer for the little guy out there.

I do see where you are coming from.

[SfilD]

Good day to all!

I apologize for the bad english.
A Windows version of the purse ROIcoin-qt_x64_v1120 was installed on my computer, on which 600 coins (5 addresses of 120 coins) were coined in a solo. 02/03/2018 the purse has completely stopped syncing, after that the upgrade was carried out according to the instructions to the version ROIcoin-qt-v113-hotfix1. After synchronization, only the first transaction (120 coins) remained in the purse, i.e. now the balance of the new wallet is 120 ROI.

The old version of the wallet shows the presence on the balance of >600 coins, 5 addresses and the date of the transaction:

RDcLe5k4GcqDUoogz2LQZbs4o81XpALdbJ
RRJpfdSAM9f1FuenimxLuJ9emoBKq7oVv9
RVxjGxt1QqQqwGtjyewTKULkC73dA9DTaV
RTRqtobyaxJ8YG17dwFcS8AkwzuwRk1X9y

RJ6gE3By4DCoEP9YEz1jcqyPcHExMyuuJg


Checking 4 addresses on the block-explorer, on which the other 480 coins were scanned, showed that such addresses do not exist:

RDcLe5k4GcqDUoogz2LQZbs4o81XpALdbJ
RRJpfdSAM9f1FuenimxLuJ9emoBKq7oVv9
RVxjGxt1QqQqwGtjyewTKULkC73dA9DTaV
RTRqtobyaxJ8YG17dwFcS8AkwzuwRk1X9y

I ask you, please, help to return the lost 480 coins!

Sincerely.

If the block height in your wallet is the same as on the block explorer at the moment, then the coins are lost. You have mined them in the "wrong fork", and this fork is dead now.

Thanks, very sorry.

[StinkyS4L]

V1.13 hotfix is blocked as malicious in several antivirus software on my cpu. Is there a timeframe for release of 1.14?

[ocminer]

I've added a pool for ROI:

https://roi.suprnova.cc

have fun mining !