[ANN] [ICO] Xwin – CryptoBet betting platform based on blockchain

[bradpeterson]

$7.5m it is perfect, but I think for their reach $4-5m at the end of ICO. Also, most of the ICO collect the same. But I already said that. In addition, the team reported that the project is developing regardless of the results ICO.

That's exactly what I was talking about. Talking about other ICO do you mean just similar projects or ICO's in general?

[iMaker]

This platform with a lot of advantages in comparison with traditional services for betting: transparency, security, confidentiality, stability. I believe that the project will be successful.

[karasuri]

$7.5m it is perfect, but I think for their reach $4-5m at the end of ICO. Also, most of the ICO collect the same. But I already said that. In addition, the team reported that the project is developing regardless of the results ICO.

That's exactly what I was talking about. Talking about other ICO do you mean just similar projects or ICO's in general?

 ICO's ofc. As I know "similar projects" aren't survive or it was a scam and I don't follow that so Idk how their ICO going

[MelisaMoris]

2715185 USD and it is more now haha
I wonder what the result will be at the end of ICO. We can bet, just like do with bitcoin rate for fun. Also, it will be funnier if we can bet in Xwin for BTC rate for real

They are aimed for $7.5m but I've read that they will implement project anyway. To my mind $2.7 is still good considering that there's one more week of ICO.

In any case, the project produced a resonance, media platforms write about xwin, the uniqueness and relevance of the project are already the basis for implementing this project in life

[MelisaMoris]

This platform with a lot of advantages in comparison with traditional services for betting: transparency, security, confidentiality, stability. I believe that the project will be successful.

The project is really successful at this stage and investments are growing, but it is also important whether it will be realized at the proper level, let's see ...

[lennox_dan]

Guys how do you feel about participating in several ICO projects at once? Is it profitable or too costly?

[bradpeterson]

Guys how do you feel about participating in several ICO projects at once? Is it profitable or too costly?

Why not if you are sure in projects success and have enough money for it.

[karasuri]

Guys how do you feel about participating in several ICO projects at once? Is it profitable or too costly?

This is okay, but it takes more time, which is logical. This is if you include a bounty. But in general, it makes no sense to participate only one ICO. On the contrary, it is best to participate many of them. Some of them will grow, but others will not so you will be in plus at the end of.

[lennox_dan]

Guys how do you feel about participating in several ICO projects at once? Is it profitable or too costly?

This is okay, but it takes more time, which is logical. This is if you include a bounty. But in general, it makes no sense to participate only one ICO. On the contrary, it is best to participate many of them. Some of them will grow, but others will not so you will be in plus at the end of.

And especially considering that different ICO work in different activities.

[dspencer]

Guys how do you feel about participating in several ICO projects at once? Is it profitable or too costly?

Profitable if you know what you're doing, costly if you have no clue what money is. To vastly narrow it down.

[karasuri]

This is okay, but it takes more time, which is logical. This is if you include a bounty. But in general, it makes no sense to participate only one ICO. On the contrary, it is best to participate many of them. Some of them will grow, but others will not so you will be in plus at the end of.

And especially considering that different ICO work in different activities.

Yes, also If ICO were from the same sphere, it is better to choose the most promising project. But yes, better too choose what you understand

[bradpeterson]

Yes, also If ICO were from the same sphere, it is better to choose the most promising project. But yes, better too choose what you understand

I totally agree with you because if you don't understand some sphere you'll only lose your money.

[dspencer]

And especially considering that different ICO work in different activities.

Yes, also If ICO were from the same sphere, it is better to choose the most promising project. But yes, better too choose what you understand

You could always go for multiple projects with different ideas, approach methods etc. It's actually safer since, statistically speaking, there's less chance that every single project goes down.

[bradpeterson]

You could always go for multiple projects with different ideas, approach methods etc. It's actually safer since, statistically speaking, there's less chance that every single project goes down.

There's a lot of project nowadays so without good knowledge it can be hard to determine if project will be successful.

[lennox_dan]

Guys how do you feel about participating in several ICO projects at once? Is it profitable or too costly?

Profitable if you know what you're doing, costly if you have no clue what money is. To vastly narrow it down.

I mean if one of the projects would have troubles, it won't be profitable for users.

[dspencer]

Profitable if you know what you're doing, costly if you have no clue what money is. To vastly narrow it down.

I mean if one of the projects would have troubles, it won't be profitable dor users.

That's why it's a good idea to spread the money you want to invest with between different projects.

[bradpeterson]

That's why it's a good idea to spread the money you want to invest with between different projects.

But if you are 100% sure in project success you will get more money than if you spread them between few projects.

[lennox_dan]

Profitable if you know what you're doing, costly if you have no clue what money is. To vastly narrow it down.

I mean if one of the projects would have troubles, it won't be profitable dor users.

That's why it's a good idea to spread the money you want to invest with between different projects.

But you need to invest carefully. How likely is it to find a not very good project, what can't be profitable, you think?

[MelisaMoris]

Profitable if you know what you're doing, costly if you have no clue what money is. To vastly narrow it down.

I mean if one of the projects would have troubles, it won't be profitable dor users.

That's why it's a good idea to spread the money you want to invest with between different projects.

definitely yes, but you first need to study white paper and in general the prospects of this project

[lennox_dan]

definitely yes, but you first need to study white paper and in general the prospects of this project

Well, but you can't estimate like new project by the WhitePaper often. Maybe there're other ways to understand whether all will be fine?