Bitcoin Forum
November 13, 2024, 06:16:10 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 [138] 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 ... 243 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Just-Dice.com : now with added CLAMs : Play or Invest  (Read 454767 times)
tucenaber
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 337
Merit: 252


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 03:38:44 PM
 #2741

EDIT: Can you explain this in more detail?

Quote
I'm told that the expected number of rolls before you see a 28 loss streak is around 514 million, but I don't know why.

/.../

Also, using simulation, I tried to figure out the number of rolls you need to make to have a 50% chance of seeing a streak of length N.  It looks to me like the number is about sqrt(2) times smaller than the above numbers, and so we need to have seen 410M/sqrt(2) = 290M rolls to have a 50% chance of seeing a streak of length 28.

Since we've seen 357M rolls, we presumably have a greater than 50% chance of seeing such a streak.

This is pretty low quality research I did using simulation.  The sqrt(2) thing in particular is very dodgy.

An exact formula can be found here: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/59738/probability-for-the-length-of-the-longest-run-in-n-bernoulli-trials

and a more useful approximation here: http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/56637.html

The answer seems to be 284 million rolls.
TwinWinNerD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001


CEO Bitpanda.com


View Profile WWW
June 06, 2014, 03:43:50 PM
 #2742

EDIT: Can you explain this in more detail?

Quote
I'm told that the expected number of rolls before you see a 28 loss streak is around 514 million, but I don't know why.

/.../

Also, using simulation, I tried to figure out the number of rolls you need to make to have a 50% chance of seeing a streak of length N.  It looks to me like the number is about sqrt(2) times smaller than the above numbers, and so we need to have seen 410M/sqrt(2) = 290M rolls to have a 50% chance of seeing a streak of length 28.

Since we've seen 357M rolls, we presumably have a greater than 50% chance of seeing such a streak.

This is pretty low quality research I did using simulation.  The sqrt(2) thing in particular is very dodgy.

An exact formula can be found here: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/59738/probability-for-the-length-of-the-longest-run-in-n-bernoulli-trials

and a more useful approximation here: http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/56637.html

The answer seems to be 284 million rolls.

Thank you! Very intresting read.

dooglus (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333



View Profile
June 06, 2014, 09:48:46 PM
 #2743

The answer seems to be 284 million rolls.

The question isn't:

"how many rolls do we need so that I have a >50% chance of seeing a streak of length L or longer",

or

"how many rolls do we need so that the expected longest streak is of length L".

The question is:

"we have seen N rolls, what is my chance of seeing a streak of length L or longer?"

Which is kind of the same thing, but in the opposite direction, and apparently much harder to calculate.

Just-Dice                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   Play or Invest                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   1% House Edge
Azlan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 10:00:33 PM
 #2744


Consider rolling a 6 sided die until you roll a six.  The expected number of rolls to get a six is 6.


True, but incomplete - according to the small sample bias - rare events (<0.5) go 'unseen' more often then expected when the number of observations is small. Im sure the links offered by others goes into this.

Take your die: You want to roll a six. You roll 6 times. Whats the probability of not seeing the six?
5/6 ^ 6 = 33.48% So a third of the time (with six observations) you will not see the 6 at all.

It gets better. Imagine a 1000 sided die. You bet against the outcome "1000" and you roll exactly 1000 times.
The probability of getting away with it (not seeing the '1000' even once) is 0.999 ^ 999 = 36.8%

Many of your players are implementing this logic with bets with 98% chance of winning. The small sample bias predicts that, in 100 rolls, they will lose less then expected.

Since there is no free sandwich in life you can guess what happens the other 63.2% of the time you roll the 1000 sided die 1000 times..... You will see the rare outcome ('1000') one *or more* times.

Back to a streak of 28 reds (p=0.5). If you expect it to happen 1 in 236M rolls, the small sample bias (relative to the probability) predicts you will see such a steak once *or more* 63% of the time in 236M rolls but wont see it at all ~36% of the time.

M_acchi
dooglus (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333



View Profile
June 06, 2014, 10:26:26 PM
 #2745


Consider rolling a 6 sided die until you roll a six.  The expected number of rolls to get a six is 6.


True, but incomplete

Only because you deleted the next line that I wrote:

But if you only roll 4 times, you have about a 51% of seeing a six, even though you've rolled less than the expected number.

The whole point I am making is that there is a difference between "the expected number of rolls to see a 6" and "the number of rolls you need to have a 50% chance of seeing a 6".

Take your die: You want to roll a six. You roll 6 times. Whats the probability of not seeing the six?
5/6 ^ 6 = 33.48% So a third of the time (with six observations) you will not see the 6 at all.

Read about what "expected value" means.

It sounds like you think it means "most likely value", but it doesn't.

Take your 1000 sided die.  Let's play a game.  If you roll a 6, you win a million dollars, but if you roll anything else, you lose a dollar.

What's the expected value of rolling the die?  Almost every time you roll (99.9% of the time), you lose a dollar.  So you 'expect' to lose almost every time.

But that's not what expected value means.  Your expected value for each roll is +$999.001:

(1 * 1e6 - 999 * 1) / 1000 = 999.001

Just-Dice                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   Play or Invest                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   1% House Edge
Azlan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 06, 2014, 11:08:24 PM
 #2746



The whole point I am making is that there is a difference between "the expected number of rolls to see a 6" and "the number of rolls you need to have a 50% chance of seeing a 6".



Agreed, and its a point worth making.

Read about what "expected value" means.

Just looked it up. Seems to mean the average. But expected value misses VERY important stuff. For example, the expected value of playing 6 rounds of russian roulette (1 bullet in 6 chambers and spinning the barrel EACH time...so its like the die) ...
... is that you are 1/6 dead. Not very useful info.

Im saying something similar to you - that its more interesting that with 6 plays (1 bullet) you will live 33% of the time.

You are asking about 50%.

with 5 plays, you live 5/6 ^ 5 =  40% of the time
and, as you pointed out, with 4 plays 5/6 ^ 4 = 48% of the time.

But that's not what expected value means.  Your expected value for each roll is +$999.001:
(1 * 1e6 - 999 * 1) / 1000 = 999.001

yes, but thats the average and assumes infinite rolls.
given finite rolls (like 1000 for example), the more interesting fact pertains to your question about 50% ..... and the answer is greater then 500 rolls (for 1/1000 event).

...its 692 rolls (.999 ^ 692)= 50% : the chance of seeing it one or more times



iWin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 01:09:32 AM
 #2747

Not sure if it's been asked before but will there ever be an autobet on this site?
vinboy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 01:49:34 AM
 #2748

hi
https://just-dice.com/ seems to be down at the moment? or is it just me?
BayAreaCoins
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4004
Merit: 1250


Owner at AltQuick.com


View Profile WWW
June 07, 2014, 01:55:03 AM
 #2749

hi
https://just-dice.com/ seems to be down at the moment? or is it just me?


just you

https://AltQuick.com/exchange/ - Trade altcoins & Bitcoin Testnet coins with real Bitcoin. Fast, private, and easy!
https://AltQuick.com/Faucet/ Load your AltQuick exchange account with free Bitcoins & Testnet every 10 minutes.
TwinWinNerD
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1001


CEO Bitpanda.com


View Profile WWW
June 07, 2014, 01:56:35 AM
 #2750

hi
https://just-dice.com/ seems to be down at the moment? or is it just me?


just you

yeah its up for me too.

vinboy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 01:58:40 AM
 #2751

ok.. tried to connect thru a VPS and it worked..
dooglus (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333



View Profile
June 07, 2014, 03:15:49 AM
 #2752

Not sure if it's been asked before but will there ever be an autobet on this site?

I don't think it's a good idea.

Why would you want a program to bet for you on a site where there's no winning strategy?

If you dislike playing enough that you do want to actually do it, perhaps you should stop playing.

You can just send your coins directly to my donation address in the FAQ if you want to get rid of them quickly.  Smiley

Just-Dice                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   Play or Invest                 ██             
          ██████████         
      ██████████████████     
  ██████████████████████████ 
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████
    ██████████████████████   
        ██████████████       
            ██████           
   1% House Edge
hodlmybtc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
June 07, 2014, 03:30:57 AM
 #2753

Hey dooglus,

Just wanted to compliment you on the site, awesome concept, I just invested nearly all my BTC.

According to http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/27hk9o/someone_calling_themselves_theymos_is_gambling/ I should have done it earlier haha.

Keep up the good work!
seuntjie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1717
Merit: 1125



View Profile WWW
June 07, 2014, 09:59:17 AM
 #2754

Not sure if it's been asked before but will there ever be an autobet on this site?

Dooglus will probably never implement his own, but there are a few 3rd party bots you can use. Here is one:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=307425

MoneyGod
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 07, 2014, 05:16:31 PM
 #2755

Not sure if it's been asked before but will there ever be an autobet on this site?

Dooglus will probably never implement his own, but there are a few 3rd party bots you can use. Here is one:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=307425
But I don't think these bots are helpful for these games because these most of games depend on luck also

chaosPT
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 07, 2014, 05:53:25 PM
 #2756

Not sure if it's been asked before but will there ever be an autobet on this site?

Dooglus will probably never implement his own, but there are a few 3rd party bots you can use. Here is one:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=307425
But I don't think these bots are helpful for these games because these most of games depend on luck also

The bot are for more gambler to come over , Do JD have any whale these day ?
Yuki1988
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 614
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 07, 2014, 06:05:34 PM
 #2757

The bot are for more gambler to come over , Do JD have any whale these day ?

Someone with an account name "theymos" lost hundreds of btc in JD yesterday. Smiley
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/27hk9o/someone_calling_themselves_theymos_is_gambling

boumalo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1018


View Profile WWW
June 07, 2014, 08:00:53 PM
 #2758

Not sure if it's been asked before but will there ever be an autobet on this site?

I don't think it's a good idea.

Why would you want a program to bet for you on a site where there's no winning strategy?

If you dislike playing enough that you do want to actually do it, perhaps you should stop playing.

You can just send your coins directly to my donation address in the FAQ if you want to get rid of them quickly.  Smiley

Some players love to autobet, it is actually fun and casinos are about giving fun to their clients

BTW I have been re-reading the first pages of this thread, it is fun, it brings us back

freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1090


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 10:02:26 AM
 #2759

The bot are for more gambler to come over , Do JD have any whale these day ?

Someone with an account name "theymos" lost hundreds of btc in JD yesterday. Smiley
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/27hk9o/someone_calling_themselves_theymos_is_gambling

That would explain why I thought a whale died or something when the bankroll went up 2.1% over the last 4 days
Although if Theymos was actually gambling his donations that would be one way of giving back  Grin

Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
boumalo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1018


View Profile WWW
June 08, 2014, 11:12:33 AM
 #2760

The bot are for more gambler to come over , Do JD have any whale these day ?

Someone with an account name "theymos" lost hundreds of btc in JD yesterday. Smiley
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/27hk9o/someone_calling_themselves_theymos_is_gambling

That would explain why I thought a whale died or something when the bankroll went up 2.1% over the last 4 days
Although if Theymos was actually gambling his donations that would be one way of giving back  Grin

It is obviously not the real Theymos Grin

If he was betting he would use a nickname Wink The bitcointalk cold wallet addresses can be checked for balance

Pages: « 1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 [138] 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 ... 243 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!