Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 12:10:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 [262] 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 »
  Print  
Author Topic: -  (Read 451970 times)
Lab_Rat (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 599
Merit: 502

Token/ICO management


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2014, 01:26:14 AM
 #5221

...but the case against you is a good one...

I would like to know your legal expertise that claims this.  Just for curiosity's sake.

runam0k
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001


Touchdown


View Profile
September 09, 2014, 04:27:22 PM
 #5222

I would like to know your legal expertise that claims this.  Just for curiosity's sake.
I'm a securities lawyer, albeit debt side and not US qualified.  None of my posts should be construed by you or anyone else as legal advice. Smiley
goddardnet
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 09, 2014, 08:40:52 PM
 #5223

AntMiner and Spondoolies have similarly priced hardware at similar power cons so I've looked into both as they both have Oct delivery dates as of this time.

To any conspiracy theorists out there claiming I have blown the BFL refund or it doesn't exist, please remove yourself from these forums and go bother someone else.  It was guaranteed by the end of the month but I'll be bugging them for it tomorrow as the sooner the better.  I also feel that they are going to try to royally screw us on the BTC rate so I may have to go after them on this.

Did you get an update on the refund, be good to get this moving... (aside from background noise!!)
Lab_Rat (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 599
Merit: 502

Token/ICO management


View Profile WWW
September 10, 2014, 04:13:40 AM
 #5224

AntMiner and Spondoolies have similarly priced hardware at similar power cons so I've looked into both as they both have Oct delivery dates as of this time.

To any conspiracy theorists out there claiming I have blown the BFL refund or it doesn't exist, please remove yourself from these forums and go bother someone else.  It was guaranteed by the end of the month but I'll be bugging them for it tomorrow as the sooner the better.  I also feel that they are going to try to royally screw us on the BTC rate so I may have to go after them on this.

Did you get an update on the refund, be good to get this moving... (aside from background noise!!)

Kind of, but I'm not sure what to make of it.  Hopefully it comes in this week or next and not the very last day it's allowed to under their terms.  I'm going to lean on them with high hopes that things will go as smooth as they can.

sparky999
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 473
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 10, 2014, 08:59:22 AM
 #5225

Why did it even come to a court case?
Endlessa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 11, 2014, 10:04:06 PM
 #5226

Why did it even come to a court case?

Lol way to kill a thread there Sparky . . haha Wink
Endlessa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 12, 2014, 06:08:59 PM
 #5227

DISCLAIMER: This information is supplied for the sake of discussion, not for legal reference.  While the documents are from PACER (federal case database) and I do my best to be accurate, I am not a lawyer.  As always, any information needed for legal reasons should be sought through a lawyer of your own.

As we have not heard much from LRM, here's an update on what I'm seeing in PACER on the Docket report (starting to find my way around the site):

---------------------

Date Filed   #   Docket Text
08/26/2014   1    COMPLAINT against Zachary Dailey and Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number TPA-25346) filed by Merlin Fisher-Levine, Nathanael Flachsbart, Jakub Vondrak, Mark Boehler, Brandon Gordon, Curtis Greene, Russ Henderson, Derek Piper, Byron McDonald, Christopher Galido, Jesse Lobb and James Kolonusz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(LYB) (Entered: 08/27/2014)

08/26/2014   2    SUMMONS issued as to Zachary Dailey and Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC. Additional summons issued as to Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC at alternate address. (LYB) (Entered: 08/27/2014)

09/05/2014   3    NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 2 (AO) (Entered: 09/05/2014)

09/08/2014   4    RETURN of service executed on 9/5/2014 by Merlin Fisher-Levine, Nathanael Flachsbart, Jakub Vondrak, Mark Boehler, Brandon Gordon, Curtis Green, Russ Henderson, Derek Piper, Byron McDonald, Christopher Galido, Jesse Lobb, James Kolonusz as to Zachary Dailey. (Hopkins, Christopher) (Entered: 09/08/2014)

09/08/2014   5    RETURN of service executed on 8/27/2014 by Merlin Fisher-Levine, Nathanael Flachsbart, Jakub Vondrak, Mark Boehler, Brandon Gordon, Curtis Green, Russ Henderson, Derek Piper, Byron McDonald, Christopher Galido, Jesse Lobb, James Kolonusz as to Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC. (Hopkins, Christopher) (Entered: 09/08/2014)

09/08/2014   6    RETURN of service executed on 9/5/2014 by Merlin Fisher-Levine, Nathanael Flachsbart, Jakub Vondrak, Mark Boehler, Brandon Gordon, Curtis Green, Russ Henderson, Derek Piper, Byron McDonald, Christopher Galido, Jesse Lobb, James Kolonusz as to Zachary Dailey. (Hopkins, Christopher) (Entered: 09/08/2014)

09/09/2014   7    NOTICE of Service on Defendants by Mark Boehler, Merlin Fisher-Levine, Nathanael Flachsbart, Christopher Galido, Brandon Gordon, Curtis Green, Russ Henderson, James Kolonusz, Jesse Lobb, Byron McDonald, Derek Piper, Jakub Vondrak re 3 Notice of designation of track (Hopkins, Christopher) (Entered: 09/09/2014)

---------------------

For those of you who aren't familiar with the process of federal civil cases (I certainly wasn't), I found the following link very informative:
http://www.businesslawbasics.com/chapter-9-steps-civil-case

I have some new documents (including a pdf of the docket report) to post that correspond to the events in the docket report. I will post again with links after I post them to the file sharing site.

Some people suggested a donation address for my efforts to keep everyone informed.  I always feel odd about donation request for something I do for the community, but it does take a lot of my time and a small amount of my money to provide, so I decided that was a fair thing and have established 1QGfG2oEQ9vvJLEZ4W3BCtdL7DbYJRXHzz for these purposes.  Thanks for the suggestion, I'd have never thought of it. If you are cash/BTC poor, no worries, I just want peeps to have the information.

Stay tuned, more to come. Along with some fun filled discussion I'm sure.
Endlessa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 12, 2014, 06:35:43 PM
 #5228

DISCLAIMER: This information is supplied for the sake of discussion, not for legal reference.  While the documents are from PACER (federal case database) and I do my best to be accurate, I am not a lawyer.  As always, any information needed for legal reasons should be sought through a lawyer of your own.

LRM Case 8:2014-cv-02091 Report
Civil Cover Sheet: https://byteshot.com/giVM4Z
------

Docket Report URL: https://byteshot.com/eedECj

---------------------

Date Filed   #   Docket Text
08/26/2014   1    COMPLAINT against Zachary Dailey and Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number TPA-25346) filed by Merlin Fisher-Levine, Nathanael Flachsbart, Jakub Vondrak, Mark Boehler, Brandon Gordon, Curtis Greene, Russ Henderson, Derek Piper, Byron McDonald, Christopher Galido, Jesse Lobb and James Kolonusz. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(LYB) (Entered: 08/27/2014)

Documents:
Complaint: https://byteshot.com/AgLMlQ/
Exhibit 1: https://byteshot.com/zjkJpS/
Exhibit 2: https://byteshot.com/vnZR23/

----

08/26/2014   2    SUMMONS issued as to Zachary Dailey and Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC. Additional summons issued as to Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC at alternate address. (LYB) (Entered: 08/27/2014)

Documents:
https://byteshot.com/mqNnMO

----

*****************
NEW EVENTS
*****************

09/05/2014   3    NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - Track 2 (AO) (Entered: 09/05/2014)

Documents:
https://byteshot.com/BegN6x

----

09/08/2014   4    RETURN of service executed on 9/5/2014 by Merlin Fisher-Levine, Nathanael Flachsbart, Jakub Vondrak, Mark Boehler, Brandon Gordon, Curtis Green, Russ Henderson, Derek Piper, Byron McDonald, Christopher Galido, Jesse Lobb, James Kolonusz as to Zachary Dailey. (Hopkins, Christopher) (Entered: 09/08/2014)

Documents:
https://byteshot.com/35ulzi

----

09/08/2014   5    RETURN of service executed on 8/27/2014 by Merlin Fisher-Levine, Nathanael Flachsbart, Jakub Vondrak, Mark Boehler, Brandon Gordon, Curtis Green, Russ Henderson, Derek Piper, Byron McDonald, Christopher Galido, Jesse Lobb, James Kolonusz as to Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC. (Hopkins, Christopher) (Entered: 09/08/2014)

Documents:
https://byteshot.com/dks9Wv

----

09/08/2014   6    RETURN of service executed on 9/5/2014 by Merlin Fisher-Levine, Nathanael Flachsbart, Jakub Vondrak, Mark Boehler, Brandon Gordon, Curtis Green, Russ Henderson, Derek Piper, Byron McDonald, Christopher Galido, Jesse Lobb, James Kolonusz as to Zachary Dailey. (Hopkins, Christopher) (Entered: 09/08/2014)

Documents:
https://byteshot.com/rDnorn

----

09/09/2014   7    NOTICE of Service on Defendants by Mark Boehler, Merlin Fisher-Levine, Nathanael Flachsbart, Christopher Galido, Brandon Gordon, Curtis Green, Russ Henderson, James Kolonusz, Jesse Lobb, Byron McDonald, Derek Piper, Jakub Vondrak re 3 Notice of designation of track (Hopkins, Christopher) (Entered: 09/09/2014)

Documents:
https://byteshot.com/JFjpDT

----

*****************
REPORT CHANGES
*****************

09.12.14 - Formalized a format that is usable on the forums
---------------------

Donate: 1QGfG2oEQ9vvJLEZ4W3BCtdL7DbYJRXHzz

I will use this format in the future, let me know if it's too clumsy.  I'll only post new section going forward, unless somebody requests a full report in the main thread or via PM.
Endlessa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 12, 2014, 07:23:09 PM
 #5229

So . . .how I interpret this, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, is they've attempted to serve summons 3 times.  They haven't actually been able to serve Zach.  They've gotten Zach's mom or somebody named Donna.  I'm curious as to why Zach or his attorney(s)  haven't seemed to make themselves available for service.  My understanding is they have to serve Zach, otherwise the judge will eventually allow it to occur via a public notice (at least that's how it works in divorce *cough, from my personal experience*, which is also civil).  Though I personally think this tends to annoy the heck out of the judge.  It would be nice, imo, to see a formal response from LRM.  Anyhoo, I am learning a lot and fascinated by how readily the courts make this information available.  The more ya know. . .etc. . .  


Edit: Ty for the donation Smiley keeps me motivated Smiley
grnbrg
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 509
Merit: 500

Official LRM shill


View Profile
September 12, 2014, 07:42:54 PM
 #5230

So . . .how I interpret this, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, is they've attempted to serve summons 3 times.  They haven't actually been able to serve Zach.  They've gotten Zach's mom or somebody named Donna.

IANAL, but...  Don't the service receipts seem to indicate that the summons were accepted on Zach's behalf?

Thanks for making the effort to do this, BTW.  I'm sure Zach's lawyers have threatened to murder him with a spoon if comments publicly about the case, so this may be the only way we get any information until it's all over....


grnbrg.
Endlessa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 12, 2014, 08:01:11 PM
 #5231


IANAL, but...  Don't the service receipts seem to indicate that the summons were accepted on Zach's behalf?


I'm not sure that accepting on behalf of someone else counts as being served, unless you are an agent of the company or representative (attorney, power of attorney, etc).  Though I could be absolutely wrong about this, it's just my little nooblet understanding of the process and limited experience with divorce.  My divorce was relatively civilized, but I do know that public (i.e. posting in a newspaper) notice can be used, if the person isn't found.  Hopefully somebody who is a lawyer/has the legal knowledge can answer that or I can ask on a legal forum somewhere.



Thanks for making the effort to do this, BTW.  I'm sure Zach's lawyers have threatened to murder him with a spoon if comments publicly about the case, so this may be the only way we get any information until it's all over....


grnbrg.


NP,  I personally had to do it for sanity and I has sad when the beautiful transparent world of bitcoin is cluttered with confuscation from outside sources.  It makes me happy when I can help the community Smiley

lol, I have no doubt that Zach can't speak a word about it.  I'm sure it's a short hairs kind of situation. Wink

-- Endlessa


P.S. Woooo my name has color now too Smiley Cheesy
Endlessa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 12, 2014, 08:06:53 PM
 #5232

Oh just realized what you meant by Zach can't talk, by response I meant the legal response to the court they file within 21 days after being served, not expecting Zach to answer here.
Lab_Rat (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 599
Merit: 502

Token/ICO management


View Profile WWW
September 13, 2014, 04:49:15 PM
 #5233

So . . .how I interpret this, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, is they've attempted to serve summons 3 times.  They haven't actually been able to serve Zach.  They've gotten Zach's mom or somebody named Donna.  I'm curious as to why Zach or his attorney(s)  haven't seemed to make themselves available for service.  My understanding is they have to serve Zach, otherwise the judge will eventually allow it to occur via a public notice (at least that's how it works in divorce *cough, from my personal experience*, which is also civil).  Though I personally think this tends to annoy the heck out of the judge.  It would be nice, imo, to see a formal response from LRM.  Anyhoo, I am learning a lot and fascinated by how readily the courts make this information available.  The more ya know. . .etc. . .  


Edit: Ty for the donation Smiley keeps me motivated Smiley

In the midst of all of this, I have been moving as the lease on my condo (slight hint that I'm not misappropriating funds) ended in mid Aug.  I was not hiding from anyone, they were just looking in the wrong places.

I was served the paperwork Sat. that you posted all the docs by some guy trying to be sneaky parking around the corner and wearing shorts/t-shirt (which I found funny as I was waiting for them, not hiding from them.)

BTW, I would like to thank you Endlessa for a few things you've done as I can't comment and it's better to have truthful information out there rather than trolls and speculators.

Lab_Rat (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 599
Merit: 502

Token/ICO management


View Profile WWW
September 13, 2014, 04:51:29 PM
 #5234

Oh just realized what you meant by Zach can't talk, by response I meant the legal response to the court they file within 21 days after being served, not expecting Zach to answer here.

There will likely be multiple responses before one of true importance is even worth sharing.  I'll ask my lawyers if I should share or just let you guys pull from public records...

Lab_Rat (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 599
Merit: 502

Token/ICO management


View Profile WWW
September 13, 2014, 05:13:25 PM
 #5235

Distributions Paid

Mined: BTC2.06467953
Per Contract: BTC0.00001158
   
Bonus: BTC6.60199899
Bonus Per contract: BTC0.00003702

Lab_Rat (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 599
Merit: 502

Token/ICO management


View Profile WWW
September 13, 2014, 06:00:53 PM
 #5236

Slightly off topic, but can someone else follow this chain and tell me who they think this belongs to?  I have a feeling and I don't like it.

https://blockchain.info/address/1Drt3c8pSdrkyjuBiwVcSSixZwQtMZ3Tew

smracer
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1055
Merit: 1020



View Profile
September 13, 2014, 06:34:30 PM
 #5237

Slightly off topic, but can someone else follow this chain and tell me who they think this belongs to?  I have a feeling and I don't like it.

https://blockchain.info/address/1Drt3c8pSdrkyjuBiwVcSSixZwQtMZ3Tew

Mt Gox.
fractal02
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 14, 2014, 05:27:42 PM
 #5238

Slightly off topic, but can someone else follow this chain and tell me who they think this belongs to?  I have a feeling and I don't like it.

https://blockchain.info/address/1Drt3c8pSdrkyjuBiwVcSSixZwQtMZ3Tew

What kind of feeling ? About what ? Please explain LabRat, i don't get it about this BTC movement.
elitenoob
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 14, 2014, 05:46:42 PM
 #5239

Damn a riddle...always been bad at those Cheesy
Endlessa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 14, 2014, 06:10:09 PM
 #5240

So . . .how I interpret this, somebody correct me if I'm wrong, is they've attempted to serve summons 3 times.  They haven't actually been able to serve Zach.  They've gotten Zach's mom or somebody named Donna.  I'm curious as to why Zach or his attorney(s)  haven't seemed to make themselves available for service.  My understanding is they have to serve Zach, otherwise the judge will eventually allow it to occur via a public notice (at least that's how it works in divorce *cough, from my personal experience*, which is also civil).  Though I personally think this tends to annoy the heck out of the judge.  It would be nice, imo, to see a formal response from LRM.  Anyhoo, I am learning a lot and fascinated by how readily the courts make this information available.  The more ya know. . .etc. . .  


Edit: Ty for the donation Smiley keeps me motivated Smiley

In the midst of all of this, I have been moving as the lease on my condo (slight hint that I'm not misappropriating funds) ended in mid Aug.  I was not hiding from anyone, they were just looking in the wrong places.

I was served the paperwork Sat. that you posted all the docs by some guy trying to be sneaky parking around the corner and wearing shorts/t-shirt (which I found funny as I was waiting for them, not hiding from them.)

BTW, I would like to thank you Endlessa for a few things you've done as I can't comment and it's better to have truthful information out there rather than trolls and speculators.

Oh, were you forced from the condo? If so, my condolences.   I was under the understanding you were moving to a newly purchased house. Did all  that fall through or something? A random public record flew by that made me wonder.

NP on the report, I just want to see through the chaos Smiley  I'd love to see direct information posted from you guys, but I understand the need to not comment publicly, as well.  Anything your lawyers deem appropriate to post would be an additional and appreciated bit of information for us we can rely on.
Pages: « 1 ... 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 [262] 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!