grnbrg
|
|
July 08, 2014, 02:45:26 AM |
|
I had an odd deposit to my LRM address this afternoon. On looking into it, it appears the 1Sochi(....) spammer is back. And this time he's paying the transaction fee to make his spam attractive enough to be added to the blockchain. And therefore permanent.... So. If you see a deposit for 1 satoshi to your LRM address, check the sender. It's (almost certainly) not LRM, and is instead this guy. Just FYI.... https://blockchain.info/address/1SochiWwFFySPjQoi2biVftXn8NRPCSQCgrnbrg.
|
|
|
|
CumpsD
|
|
July 08, 2014, 06:26:27 AM |
|
Some context?
|
|
|
|
Mindsync Miner
Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
An independent miner.
|
|
July 08, 2014, 08:56:08 AM |
|
Ugh! Such a waste. Good thing storage doubles pretty fast.
|
You'll know me as dgiors in some other forums. LTC: LWUQSovF76vTPoCnoH9NzfChX6dxQ6Qra7 BTC: 1MQLfiKA5A6goEiSwMdVyVvFw4YgCj489V
|
|
|
canibalbranco
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
July 12, 2014, 08:09:30 PM |
|
Waiting a week of luck. My team lost 7 x 1 and is enough for me!
|
|
|
|
Lab_Rat (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2014, 08:24:34 PM |
|
Dividends:
Mined: BTC3.9015437 Per Contract: BTC0.00002212
Bonus: BTC10.95053712 Per Contract: BTC0.00006209
Total Per Contract: BTC0.00008421
|
|
|
|
sparky999
|
|
July 12, 2014, 08:37:29 PM |
|
Update on Bitfury franchise??
|
|
|
|
fractal02
|
|
July 12, 2014, 09:30:39 PM |
|
Dividends:
Mined: BTC3.9015437 Per Contract: BTC0.00002212
Bonus: BTC10.95053712 Per Contract: BTC0.00006209
Total Per Contract: BTC0.00008421
Thank you LabRat. Still no email from BFL about some Cloud ?
|
|
|
|
Lab_Rat (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2014, 09:56:23 PM |
|
Dividends:
Mined: BTC3.9015437 Per Contract: BTC0.00002212
Bonus: BTC10.95053712 Per Contract: BTC0.00006209
Total Per Contract: BTC0.00008421
Thank you LabRat. Still no email from BFL about some Cloud ? Nothing yet...
|
|
|
|
Lab_Rat (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2014, 09:56:46 PM |
|
Update on Bitfury franchise??
Can't quite comment yet as nothing is finalized.
|
|
|
|
canibalbranco
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:05:49 PM |
|
Thank you LabRat!
|
|
|
|
Mindsync Miner
Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
An independent miner.
|
|
July 12, 2014, 10:25:30 PM |
|
Any stance you care to share on Bitmain? I went in for one of the new S3 miners. Seems like a nice option for individuals but perhaps not ideal for the big boys.
|
You'll know me as dgiors in some other forums. LTC: LWUQSovF76vTPoCnoH9NzfChX6dxQ6Qra7 BTC: 1MQLfiKA5A6goEiSwMdVyVvFw4YgCj489V
|
|
|
Lab_Rat (OP)
|
|
July 12, 2014, 11:20:01 PM |
|
Any stance you care to share on Bitmain? I went in for one of the new S3 miners. Seems like a nice option for individuals but perhaps not ideal for the big boys.
I met the guys from Bitmain, and know people who are happy with their S1 and S2's, but we don't have any. Another company I think may be a great option is Spondoolies. Spondoolies will have pretty good power cons., but the ship date isn't now like the S3's... These are all things to take into consideration and need to be weighed by whomever is doing the purchasing.
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Yackimoff
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
July 13, 2014, 12:58:05 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
btcrealm
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 1
|
|
July 13, 2014, 02:30:31 PM |
|
Any stance you care to share on Bitmain? I went in for one of the new S3 miners. Seems like a nice option for individuals but perhaps not ideal for the big boys.
I met the guys from Bitmain, and know people who are happy with their S1 and S2's, but we don't have any. Another company I think may be a great option is Spondoolies. Spondoolies will have pretty good power cons., but the ship date isn't now like the S3's... These are all things to take into consideration and need to be weighed by whomever is doing the purchasing. Thanks for the updates! Its nice seeing you on here every week giving updates on whats going on even if there isn't much. I've bugged the guys from Bitmain about making cards for their S2s based on the new 28nm chip. I haven't heard anything back but in my opinion that is the way to go with their products (if they do that). I have had problems twice now where I've had to physically remove power from an S2, let it sit, then power it back up and the cards showed up and mined properly. But I have no other complaints. Spondoolies look nice but I haven't done that much research into them. I'm not interested in an SP10 and their SP30s are on preorder. The SP30 is however the best THs/$$ value IF it was shipping today, it beats out the AntMiner S3 by a little bit and does not require external power supplies. I still haven't heard anything from BFL either.
|
|
|
|
Lab_Rat (OP)
|
|
July 13, 2014, 05:20:44 PM |
|
Any stance you care to share on Bitmain? I went in for one of the new S3 miners. Seems like a nice option for individuals but perhaps not ideal for the big boys.
I met the guys from Bitmain, and know people who are happy with their S1 and S2's, but we don't have any. Another company I think may be a great option is Spondoolies. Spondoolies will have pretty good power cons., but the ship date isn't now like the S3's... These are all things to take into consideration and need to be weighed by whomever is doing the purchasing. Thanks for the updates! Its nice seeing you on here every week giving updates on whats going on even if there isn't much. I've bugged the guys from Bitmain about making cards for their S2s based on the new 28nm chip. I haven't heard anything back but in my opinion that is the way to go with their products (if they do that). I have had problems twice now where I've had to physically remove power from an S2, let it sit, then power it back up and the cards showed up and mined properly. But I have no other complaints. Spondoolies look nice but I haven't done that much research into them. I'm not interested in an SP10 and their SP30s are on preorder. The SP30 is however the best THs/$$ value IF it was shipping today, it beats out the AntMiner S3 by a little bit and does not require external power supplies. I still haven't heard anything from BFL either. I am speaking to Spondoolies through a trusted third party on a large deal that would drop the price much further for the SP30's, but I'm not sure exactly where it's going to go for us with that deal. Really, you haven't heard anything from them either...? SHOCKER... /sarcasm
|
|
|
|
Lab_Rat (OP)
|
|
July 13, 2014, 05:23:54 PM |
|
That relies on the fact that coinprism doesn't go down for money trans issues like any other exchange as they're managing the payout system... Would just put us back in the boat were in now with direct payment of contracts, which with the automation I have up right now is just as easy as clicking a button anyway.
|
|
|
|
Alex Yackimoff
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
July 13, 2014, 07:17:21 PM |
|
That relies on the fact that coinprism doesn't go down for money trans issues like any other exchange as they're managing the payout system... Would just put us back in the boat were in now with direct payment of contracts, which with the automation I have up right now is just as easy as clicking a button anyway. Well, it's true in some degree that it's them who manages the dividend payment system. But I actually want to draw your attention at coinprism as trading and trustless ownership management solution. It's OpenAssets protocol which is claimed to be complete and open, meaning that theoretically we are not bound to coinprism.com. Though, currently there is not very much of alternative implementations. You could still pay dividends using your own system if you'll manage to somehow update the list of contract holders based on colored coins holders. Coinprism gives you such a list, by the way. That said, I've played today with coinprism, issued some colored coins and transfered them. These two transactions with OP_RETURN are not confirmed for a day already. Moreover, I can't even see them on blockchain.info. Guys definetely have some issues yet and are yet to improve their services and interface. But in theory, such a solution looks promising as the OpenAssets protocol becomes more widespread.
|
|
|
|
Lab_Rat (OP)
|
|
July 14, 2014, 02:39:00 AM |
|
That relies on the fact that coinprism doesn't go down for money trans issues like any other exchange as they're managing the payout system... Would just put us back in the boat were in now with direct payment of contracts, which with the automation I have up right now is just as easy as clicking a button anyway. Well, it's true in some degree that it's them who manages the dividend payment system. But I actually want to draw your attention at coinprism as trading and trustless ownership management solution. It's OpenAssets protocol which is claimed to be complete and open, meaning that theoretically we are not bound to coinprism.com. Though, currently there is not very much of alternative implementations. You could still pay dividends using your own system if you'll manage to somehow update the list of contract holders based on colored coins holders. Coinprism gives you such a list, by the way. That said, I've played today with coinprism, issued some colored coins and transfered them. These two transactions with OP_RETURN are not confirmed for a day already. Moreover, I can't even see them on blockchain.info. Guys definetely have some issues yet and are yet to improve their services and interface. But in theory, such a solution looks promising as the OpenAssets protocol becomes more widespread. I played with it too, but didn't quite go as far as you. Give it time and something may become available open source and manageable by individuals and companies to where it's not through a 3rd party.
|
|
|
|
Bargraphics
|
|
July 14, 2014, 02:00:15 PM |
|
Might want to save BTC for a possible rainy day...
|
|
|
|
|