MGK-
|
|
December 21, 2013, 10:44:59 PM |
|
IS PrimeDice down?
|
|
|
|
Gaukler
Member
Offline
Activity: 136
Merit: 15
|
|
December 22, 2013, 09:43:16 PM |
|
new update
Profit= 415 x 0.00001 = 0.00415 The max unbalance between wind and lose was = 65 (lose) / 35 (win) did anyone see a bigger unbalance (anyway, for my system no problem)
|
|
|
|
Stunna
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1279
Primedice.com, Stake.com
|
|
December 22, 2013, 10:27:43 PM Last edit: December 23, 2013, 04:00:50 AM by Stunna |
|
PrimeDice is provably fair currently and all bets can be verified. This process however is not as convenient as it could be, the developer of pd2 didn't quite understand what I meant when I asked him to add in nonces and thus the system somewhat relies on users setting a client seed. The majority of the posts here are plain fud and made by people with little understanding of cryptography so I never paid much attention to them, but some users brought some strong points to my attention.
Now that we're once again working on big updates for the site, we will be issuing a new provably fair system in PD3 which will be coming out in the next few weeks. This system will most likely be based off JD's, I'll also be running an open beta of the new site so anyone will have the opportunity to scrutinize this system and any other security aspects of the site prior to launch.
Also, I'd like to offer a bounty to anyone that helps us develop a more convenient/user friendly provably fair system. I believe provably fair is heavily flawed at the moment as most users have great difficulty calculating their rolls and rely on third party tools to do so, or in most cases don't calculate them at all. I'd like to be more transparent with the community, and hopefully these changes and the pd3 open beta will be a step towards that.
Regards,
Stunna
|
|
|
|
sampathneo
|
|
December 23, 2013, 01:47:49 AM Last edit: December 23, 2013, 01:59:09 AM by sampathneo |
|
|
|
|
|
Gaukler
Member
Offline
Activity: 136
Merit: 15
|
|
December 23, 2013, 08:38:43 PM |
|
update... The system is against the player.. 100%.. i had a unbalance between win/lose about 15% Win / 85% lose over 30 minutes... you can calculate it -> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/StandardabweichungSo for me its done... never ever agin..
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
December 24, 2013, 08:22:15 AM |
|
update... The system is against the player.. 100%.. i had a unbalance between win/lose about 15% Win / 85% lose over 30 minutes... you can calculate it -> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/StandardabweichungSo for me its done... never ever agin.. Winnings won't be normally distributed, but binomially distributed. How many bets did you make, and at what percentage to win each bet was made?
|
|
|
|
Gaukler
Member
Offline
Activity: 136
Merit: 15
|
|
December 24, 2013, 09:22:36 PM Last edit: December 25, 2013, 01:00:20 AM by Gaukler |
|
update... The system is against the player.. 100%.. i had a unbalance between win/lose about 15% Win / 85% lose over 30 minutes... you can calculate it -> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/StandardabweichungSo for me its done... never ever agin.. Winnings won't be normally distributed, but binomially distributed. How many bets did you make, and at what percentage to win each bet was made? if you calculate it with my bet (850 bet), then you can be sure, that is not fair system.. let me explain a little bit more .. example of win / lose my math was wrong, i will post tomorrow
|
|
|
|
Acidyo
|
|
December 25, 2013, 12:46:05 AM |
|
update... The system is against the player.. 100%.. i had a unbalance between win/lose about 15% Win / 85% lose over 30 minutes... you can calculate it -> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/StandardabweichungSo for me its done... never ever agin.. Winnings won't be normally distributed, but binomially distributed. How many bets did you make, and at what percentage to win each bet was made? if you calculate it with my bet (850 bet), then you can be sure, that is not fair system.. let me explain a little bit more .. example of win / lose +---+--+-----++---+----+----++----- 25 lose / 9 win = 73.5% lose to 16.5% win so after 850xbet, i got a 85% lose / 15% win or in other words 722 lose to 118 win so do you think that is normal ?? In my point of view, that is not normal... so game is against player. What was your win chance %? I've had 19 losses in a row on autobets and not complained. I just now started reading this thread and oh my god are my eyes bleeding from all the whines and accusations. Even if you are playing on 50% win chance, it's a 50% chance to lose on every roll, doesn't mean you HAVE to win the next one just cause you lost 5 in a row. It's still a 50% chance to lose. Some people need to start using their heads. In dice games you either go big from the start and quit once you win, or lose it all and leave. With time the system (the 1% house cut) will bust you eventually.
|
|
|
|
Stunna
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3192
Merit: 1279
Primedice.com, Stake.com
|
|
December 25, 2013, 12:52:10 AM |
|
if you calculate it with my bet (850 bet), then you can be sure, that is not fair system..
let me explain a little bit more ..
example of win / lose
+---+--+-----++---+----+----++----- 25 lose / 9 win = 73.5% lose to 16.5% win
so after 850xbet, i got a 85% lose / 15% win or in other words 722 lose to 118 win
so do you think that is normal ?? In my point of view, that is not normal... so game is against player.
Mind sharing your username?
|
|
|
|
Gaukler
Member
Offline
Activity: 136
Merit: 15
|
|
December 25, 2013, 01:21:25 PM |
|
sorry about my english....
anyway Lets talk about the dices again.
First: - I don't say, that the developer of dices had programed something against the player. - And i don't want my btc back.. it was a small amount just to test. (0,025BTC)
Since 10 years, i play roulette in online casinos. There is also a similar bet you can do on red/black and house edge (the Zero) like dices
What i also can tell you, there are good and bad "random generators".
So i did some test regarding the "standard deviation" on dices. And the result is, that this random generator is a bad random generator. But that is just my opinion !!!
Bad random generator = the standard deviation is greater thus normal.
Conclusion: So you can play dices and you can win, if the dices running on your side. And then you can win more than normal. (More than a good random generator will generate) But if the dices are not on your side, then you can also loose more than normal.
I hope, that will explain my last post's
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
December 29, 2013, 12:36:43 PM |
|
sorry about my english....
anyway Lets talk about the dices again.
First: - I don't say, that the developer of dices had programed something against the player. - And i don't want my btc back.. it was a small amount just to test. (0,025BTC)
Since 10 years, i play roulette in online casinos. There is also a similar bet you can do on red/black and house edge (the Zero) like dices
What i also can tell you, there are good and bad "random generators".
So i did some test regarding the "standard deviation" on dices. And the result is, that this random generator is a bad random generator. But that is just my opinion !!!
Bad random generator = the standard deviation is greater thus normal.
Conclusion: So you can play dices and you can win, if the dices running on your side. And then you can win more than normal. (More than a good random generator will generate) But if the dices are not on your side, then you can also loose more than normal.
I hope, that will explain my last post's
I understand what you mean, I just can't tell if you're right. This is not a subject about which an opinion means much. If you post a history of the "chance to win" for your bets (eg 30% to 50% or 75%) and how many bets you made, I can tell you how likely your results were.
|
|
|
|
Dabs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1912
The Concierge of Crypto
|
|
December 29, 2013, 01:47:12 PM |
|
And if any of the "dices" random generators are bad, then you can just flip it and make it good for the player. Just bet the other way and you will have the "dices" on your side.
So instead of losing more than normal, you should be winning more than normal.
|
|
|
|
Gaukler
Member
Offline
Activity: 136
Merit: 15
|
|
December 29, 2013, 05:10:57 PM |
|
And if any of the "dices" random generators are bad, then you can just flip it and make it good for the player. Just bet the other way and you will have the "dices" on your side.
So instead of losing more than normal, you should be winning more than normal.
Did you read my conclusion ? Conclusion: So you can play dices and you can win, if the dices running on your side. And then you can win more than normal. (More than a good random generator will generate) But if the dices are not on your side, then you can also loose more than normal. I did around 4000 bet i think... for me enough
|
|
|
|
AirFlame
|
|
January 18, 2014, 12:32:42 PM |
|
Ok this game is so scam i had 12 and then 14 looses same day in a row ! If You flip the coin you will have more chance to win than playing this shitty game. If i have no luck then I should die a long time ago on sidewalk crushed by the plane falling from the sky... or driving a car on highway and smashed by the train that have derailed and moved to the highway. Proof picturer nr1: Proof picturer nr2:
|
|
|
|
AirFlame
|
|
January 18, 2014, 12:51:37 PM |
|
Ok this game is so scam i had 12 and then 14 looses same day in a row ! If You flip the coin you will have more chance to win than playing this shitty game. If i have no luck then I should die a long time ago on sidewalk crushed by the plane falling from the sky... or driving a car on highway and smashed by the train that have derailed and moved to the highway. Proof picturer nr1: Proof picturer nr2: Show picture with 20 loses in a row at 90%, then speak Please... flip the coin in the air 12-14 times and check if You get 12-14 times tails
|
|
|
|
AirFlame
|
|
January 18, 2014, 01:11:53 PM |
|
flip the coin 20000 times and come back. 12,14,22,25 is normal with 49.5%
Spin your doge 20000 times and come back..
|
|
|
|
murraypaul
|
|
January 20, 2014, 11:20:18 AM |
|
If You flip the coin you will have more chance to win than playing this shitty game. Yes, you will, because this game has a house edge. That shouldn't be a surprise.
|
BTC: 16TgAGdiTSsTWSsBDphebNJCFr1NT78xFW SRC: scefi1XMhq91n3oF5FrE3HqddVvvCZP9KB
|
|
|
b!z
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1010
|
|
January 20, 2014, 11:22:30 AM |
|
Ok this game is so scam i had 12 and then 14 looses same day in a row ! If You flip the coin you will have more chance to win than playing this shitty game. If i have no luck then I should die a long time ago on sidewalk crushed by the plane falling from the sky... or driving a car on highway and smashed by the train that have derailed and moved to the highway. Proof picturer nr1: http://i42.tinypic.com/24mvxv5.jpgProof picturer nr2: http://i41.tinypic.com/j8i6pf.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variance
|
|
|
|
murraypaul
|
|
January 20, 2014, 11:24:58 AM |
|
flip the coin 20000 times and come back. 12,14,22,25 is normal with 49.5%
Spin your doge 20000 times and come back.. According to your screenshots, you've made over 378 million bets. With that many bets, losing 14 in a row at some point isn't surprising.
|
BTC: 16TgAGdiTSsTWSsBDphebNJCFr1NT78xFW SRC: scefi1XMhq91n3oF5FrE3HqddVvvCZP9KB
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
January 20, 2014, 12:04:06 PM |
|
flip the coin 20000 times and come back. 12,14,22,25 is normal with 49.5%
Spin your doge 20000 times and come back.. According to your screenshots, you've made over 378 million bets. With that many bets, losing 14 in a row at some point isn't surprising. No, that's the total number of bets at the site. Your point stands though.
|
|
|
|
|