hsrminer - Nvidia mining software for various algos by palgin&alexkap

[palgin]

BTW palgin, now I'll be a bit off-topic.
Are you sure, that your BTC address in your signature is working?
Because I can't find it in any block explorer.

Ha, yes, it's not working at all, wrong input 
I'll change it, thank you for telling me.

[antantti]

BTW palgin, now I'll be a bit off-topic.
Are you sure, that your BTC address in your signature is working?
Because I can't find it in any block explorer.

Ha, yes, it's not working at all, wrong input 
I'll change it, thank you for telling me.

Also Bitcoin Core average transfer fee right now is $41...

[palgin]

BTW palgin, now I'll be a bit off-topic.
Are you sure, that your BTC address in your signature is working?
Because I can't find it in any block explorer.

Ha, yes, it's not working at all, wrong input 
I'll change it, thank you for telling me.

Also Bitcoin Core average transfer fee right now is $41...

Tulip market returns

[UrsaUrsa]

BTW palgin, now I'll be a bit off-topic.
Are you sure, that your BTC address in your signature is working?
Because I can't find it in any block explorer.

Ha, yes, it's not working at all, wrong input 
I'll change it, thank you for telling me.

Also Bitcoin Core average transfer fee right now is $41...

Tulip market returns

Yeah, diversify a bit, I don't mind sending some donations your way but not BTC for sure

[palgin]

Yeah, diversify a bit, I don't mind sending some donations your way but not BTC for sure

If continue offtopic, what makes exactly Bitcoin so valuable?

Fast network? - no.
Anonymity? -no.
Smart scripting support? - no.
IRL use in any sphere? - no.

The only thing that makes Bitcoin valuable is that everyone's talking about it and everybody wants to buy it.

I can put my ETH address, but I don't think anyone will send any too

It's just signature without any obligation to make my posts more visible in thread, don't think I'll receive even 0.00001 in 1000 years.

Donation scheme *sucks* when you want to be paid, only well-standing devs can afford "playing" with it, when you don't know when you'll hit bottom (it's still not visible), like in my case, is it's quite hard to use this.

"Donation" scheme is working when you offer something for it (as ICOs, for example), these guys are selling air and get millions, human psychology, we can't do anything about it. When it comes to miners, the first question that appears in head: "hey, normal soft/good speed, how to turn this f***ing devfee off?"  

Because mining software doesn't give you anything but ephemere tokens/coins that you can sell with some profit.
After that you just pay, pay for electicity, pay for hardware, pay for servicing this hardware, pay for property your rigs are located at, pay for additional cooling systems in some cases and so on. Why do you need to pay this random guy too?

You'll never get wealthy by telling truth, being philantropic or going straight. You'll barely make your ends, dreaming about your retirement plan and what benefit you bring to society you live in.

Like it's said: "Ask a millionaire about every million he earned, he will tell you about any, except the first one"

Just my thoughts, I ask everyone not to associate it with hsrminer, but any opinion counts.

[UrsaUrsa]

Yeah, diversify a bit, I don't mind sending some donations your way but not BTC for sure

If continue offtopic, what makes exactly Bitcoin so valuable?

Fast network? - no.
Anonymity? -no.
Smart scripting support? - no.
IRL use in any sphere? - no.

The only thing that makes Bitcoin valuable is that everyone's talking about it and everybody wants to buy it.

I can put my ETH address, but I don't think anyone will send any too

It's just signature without any obligation to make my posts more visible in thread, don't think I'll receive even 0.00001 in 1000 years.

Donation scheme *sucks* when you want to be paid, only well-standing devs can afford "playing" with it, when you don't know when you'll hit bottom (it's still not visible), like in my case, is it's quite hard to use this.

"Donation" scheme is working when you offer something for it (as ICOs, for example), these guys are selling air and get millions, human psychology, we can't do anything about it. When it comes to miners, the first question that appears in head: "hey, normal soft/good speed, how to turn this f***ing devfee off?"  

Because mining software doesn't give you anything but ephemere tokens/coins that you can sell with some profit.
After that you just pay, pay for electicity, pay for hardware, pay for servicing this hardware, pay for property your rigs are located at, pay for additional cooling systems in some cases and so on. Why do you need to pay this random guy too?

You'll never get wealthy by telling truth, being philantropic or going straight. You'll barely make your ends, dreaming about your retirement plan and what benefit you bring to society you live in.

Like it's said: "Ask a millionaire about every million he earned, he will tell you about any, except the first one"

Just my thoughts, I ask everyone not to associate it with hsrminer, but any opinion counts.

You are absolutely right and I think the 1% dev fee is the way forward. At the end of the day if my rig makes 50 dollars a day, you get 50 cents. I would not be making the 50 dollars without your software, i'd be making let's say 47. Is it worth it for me? Yes. Is it worth it for you? Yes. 1% dev fee is the right amount, 2% is debatable and a 0.05btc upfront is.. well it's worth it when you have over 20 rigs.

Btw, you should still consider that discord chat. Having a community behind your miner is not a bad thing.

[antantti]

If continue offtopic, what makes exactly Bitcoin so valuable?

Fast network? - no.
Anonymity? -no.
Smart scripting support? - no.
IRL use in any sphere? - no.

The only thing that makes Bitcoin valuable is that everyone's talking about it and everybody wants to buy it.

True, I must admit there's at least one person who doesn't want to buy it, love to speculate and squeeze € out of it though.

I can put my ETH address, but I don't think anyone will send any too

ETH sucks too, slow and expensive to use, far from world computer. Just like with BTC I was a believer once...

It's just signature without any obligation to make my posts more visible in thread, don't think I'll receive even 0.00001 in 1000 years.

Donation scheme *sucks* when you want to be paid, only well-standing devs can afford "playing" with it, when you don't know when you'll hit bottom (it's still not visible), like in my case, is it's quite hard to use this.

"Donation" scheme is working when you offer something for it (as ICOs, for example), these guys are selling air and get millions, human psychology, we can't do anything about it. When it comes to miners, the first question that appears in head: "hey, normal soft/good speed, how to turn this f***ing devfee off?"  

Because mining software doesn't give you anything but ephemere tokens/coins that you can sell with some profit.
After that you just pay, pay for electicity, pay for hardware, pay for servicing this hardware, pay for property your rigs are located at, pay for additional cooling systems in some cases and so on. Why do you need to pay this random guy too?

You'll never get wealthy by telling truth, being philantropic or going straight. You'll barely make your ends, dreaming about your retirement plan and what benefit you bring to society you live in.

Like it's said: "Ask a millionaire about every million he earned, he will tell you about any, except the first one"

Just my thoughts, I ask everyone not to associate it with hsrminer, but any opinion counts.

Sad but so true. I really like the concept of blockchain but last almost two years have made me even more cynical old fart.

Lets Pump.

PS. If you need some funding there is always yetanotherico.com. Just add your address and money starts flowing in

[palgin]

True, I must admit there's at least one person who doesn't want to buy it, love to speculate and squeeze € out of it though.

ETH sucks too, slow and expensive to use, far from world computer. Just like with BTC I was a believer once...

Sad but so true. I really like the concept of blockchain but last almost two years have made me even more cynical old fart.

Lets Pump.

PS. If you need some funding there is always yetanotherico.com. Just add your address and money starts flowing in

Yeah, ETH has wider functionality, but I agree, slow and expensive + hardforking like a crazy rabbit. Devs are trying, but concept is still far from real world use.

yetanotherico.com - ahahhaa, you made my evening, that's how it rolls 

[abudfv2008]

Чтo нa тecтoвoй, чтo нa oбычнoй 1080 Ti зaгpyжeны нa 100%, oднaкo нa тecтoвoй cкaчки энepгoпoтpeблeния peжe. C тeми жe нacтpoйкaми чacтoт вмecтo 3892 kH/s имeeм нa тecтoвoй нa 200 kH/s мeньшe...

Burn them

It's not good blower type GPU. Striks or Gamerock should do better

[alarmod]

10 вeнтилятopoв в cиcтeмникe cдeлaли eгo пoчти вepтoлётoм, вceгo 16 штyк, ecли cчитaть тe, чтo нa видeoкapтax.

[Alex-007]

1080ti working in cuda 9 better!!!
You miner dont give 1700> only 1300

[happenZ]

Tested with NeoScrypt, my results:

hsr miner reported speed: 1335kH/s
poolside reported speed:   1150kH/s

KlausT miner reported speed : 1350kH/s
poolside reported speed: 1300kH/s

GTX 1070 @2126/3347

What pool, what time period? Zero info.

It remembers me discussion when people wrote to Claymore:"Hey, when your miner is switching to devfee mining it gets more shares, you're bullshitting us!"

FYI: each share has it's value, pool sets this parameter mininum size according to your speeds in order to lower network load on server. When you start mining, you start from pools minimal set difficulty, then pool starts adjusting. If you start from 64, you get shares in seconds, stats go smoothly. Check in 40 mins - diff set in 1500+, you can get 1 share once in couple of minutes, but it's higher valued one. Pool calculates speed depending on timeline and value of shares received during that period. Period is configured by pool owner.

You're trying to tell I'm bullshitting speeds? Then give proofs, not bare words. This is hard work of mine and I'll fight for it.

And it's not ccminer, so settings from ccminer won't give you good results in all cases, everyone has different hardware and different conditions, one can afford PL 120%, one needs to shrink PL to 60% to lower bills or heat.

You took your time and configured ccminer, you don't want to take your time and select proper settings for hsrminer, so use ccminer and be happy    

Besides that you behave like a 12 year old child and imply things i have never stated (Why so aggressive ?), i tested the new version again.

https://i.imgur.com/2D9vUuM.png

And thanks for the quick breakdown on shares. Didn't know that 

[Alex-007]

Hi, thanks for your interest, but in fact you're not right.

We've started this project specially to get rid of GPL licensed code and possible legal problems, all kernels in hsrminer are my intellectual property, which I have full right not to publish in source code format. You can say style smells like ccminer, but style similarity is not GPL violation, it's the same as, for example, saying that "Daimler AG" is violating "WAG Group" licenses because their cars also have steering wheels and doors. And program clearly says it was "inspired" by ccminer and EWBF's equihash miner.

This project is not related to any kind of "optimisation" as ccminer-palginmod was. If it was so, why we're losing devfee and not releasing new algos for weeks? ccminer-palginmod had many algos "optimised", why not publish them? Hsrminer kernels are homebrew, and it takes me tons of time (really, I get up at 7AM and go to bed at midnight, spending hours in front of screen) to create something faster than existing software offers. Also, palginmod had no movement since 9th of August this year if you look at github.

It's your right to use this software or not, just to close any speculation around GPL and my violation of it, I'm removing all palginmod binaries from Github, just right time to do it.

Thank you again for raising this question and have a nice day!

Excellent work !!!
But I have 1 qwestion: Why i have problems in RIG with 8 GPU? With 2Gpu in anather RIG it Working !!
Driwer 388.71

 INFO : [01:33:49] : NVML monitoring enabled, continue...
 INFO : [01:33:49] : 8 GPUs found/specified, initializing miner...
 INFO : [01:33:50] : MESSAGE FROM SERVER: welcome on ALTMINER.NET - happy mining!
 INFO : [01:33:50] : Share difficulty reset -- 256 (0.00391)
 INFO : [01:33:50] : New block #3426 received, new difficulty is 441.081
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1298 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1299 : out of memory.

But it working with cuda 9

[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1511.39 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #4: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1492.73 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #7: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1487.99 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #1: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1541.18 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #3: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1528.19 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #6: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1518.99 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #5: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1514.14 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:07] accepted: 3/3 (diff 0.007), 12.12 MH/s ye

[P00P135]

Tested with NeoScrypt, my results:

hsr miner reported speed: 1335kH/s
poolside reported speed:   1150kH/s

KlausT miner reported speed : 1350kH/s
poolside reported speed: 1300kH/s

GTX 1070 @2126/3347

What pool, what time period? Zero info.

It remembers me discussion when people wrote to Claymore:"Hey, when your miner is switching to devfee mining it gets more shares, you're bullshitting us!"

FYI: each share has it's value, pool sets this parameter mininum size according to your speeds in order to lower network load on server. When you start mining, you start from pools minimal set difficulty, then pool starts adjusting. If you start from 64, you get shares in seconds, stats go smoothly. Check in 40 mins - diff set in 1500+, you can get 1 share once in couple of minutes, but it's higher valued one. Pool calculates speed depending on timeline and value of shares received during that period. Period is configured by pool owner.

You're trying to tell I'm bullshitting speeds? Then give proofs, not bare words. This is hard work of mine and I'll fight for it.

And it's not ccminer, so settings from ccminer won't give you good results in all cases, everyone has different hardware and different conditions, one can afford PL 120%, one needs to shrink PL to 60% to lower bills or heat.

You took your time and configured ccminer, you don't want to take your time and select proper settings for hsrminer, so use ccminer and be happy    

Besides that you behave like a 12 year old child and imply things i have never stated (Why so aggressive ?), i tested the new version again.



And thanks for the quick breakdown on shares. Didn't know that 

Wait why are you pulling 251w on a 1070 lol

[malthrax]

Excellent work !!!
But I have 1 qwestion: Why i have problems in RIG with 8 GPU? With 2Gpu in anather RIG it Working !!
Driwer 388.71

 INFO : [01:33:49] : NVML monitoring enabled, continue...
 INFO : [01:33:49] : 8 GPUs found/specified, initializing miner...
 INFO : [01:33:50] : MESSAGE FROM SERVER: welcome on ALTMINER.NET - happy mining!
 INFO : [01:33:50] : Share difficulty reset -- 256 (0.00391)
 INFO : [01:33:50] : New block #3426 received, new difficulty is 441.081
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1298 : out of memory.
Cuda error in func 'neoscrypt_cpu_init' at line 1299 : out of memory.

But it working with cuda 9

[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #0: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1511.39 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #4: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1492.73 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #7: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1487.99 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #1: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1541.18 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #3: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1528.19 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #6: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1518.99 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:04] GPU #5: ASUS GTX 1080 Ti, 1514.14 kH/s
[2017-12-27 01:36:07] accepted: 3/3 (diff 0.007), 12.12 MH/s ye

Read the first post in the thread - this question has been asked, and answered, multiple times in the past 48 hours.

[Alex-007]

Excellent work !!!
But I have 1 qwestion: Why i have problems in RIG with 8 GPU? With 2Gpu in anather RIG it Working !!

Alex-007, фaйл пoдкaчки yвeличь, в пepвoм пocтe pacпиcaнo.

80000, and dont working !!!!

[happenZ]

Tested with NeoScrypt, my results:

hsr miner reported speed: 1335kH/s
poolside reported speed:   1150kH/s

KlausT miner reported speed : 1350kH/s
poolside reported speed: 1300kH/s

GTX 1070 @2126/3347

What pool, what time period? Zero info.

It remembers me discussion when people wrote to Claymore:"Hey, when your miner is switching to devfee mining it gets more shares, you're bullshitting us!"

FYI: each share has it's value, pool sets this parameter mininum size according to your speeds in order to lower network load on server. When you start mining, you start from pools minimal set difficulty, then pool starts adjusting. If you start from 64, you get shares in seconds, stats go smoothly. Check in 40 mins - diff set in 1500+, you can get 1 share once in couple of minutes, but it's higher valued one. Pool calculates speed depending on timeline and value of shares received during that period. Period is configured by pool owner.

You're trying to tell I'm bullshitting speeds? Then give proofs, not bare words. This is hard work of mine and I'll fight for it.

And it's not ccminer, so settings from ccminer won't give you good results in all cases, everyone has different hardware and different conditions, one can afford PL 120%, one needs to shrink PL to 60% to lower bills or heat.

You took your time and configured ccminer, you don't want to take your time and select proper settings for hsrminer, so use ccminer and be happy    

Besides that you behave like a 12 year old child and imply things i have never stated (Why so aggressive ?), i tested the new version again.

https://i.imgur.com/2D9vUuM.png

And thanks for the quick breakdown on shares. Didn't know that  

Wait why are you pulling 251w on a 1070 lol

NeoScrypt is power hungry, i guess. lol

This was tested with 2126MHz Core & 4252MHz Memory clocks at 126% power limit on a MSI 1070 Gaming Z, don't ask me why i get at peak 260 watts. Other algos are far less power hungry, usually with these clocks i'm between 75% and 90% power limit (silicon lottery).

[alarmod]

Tyт ecть вecьмa явнaя зaвиcимocть oт cлoжнocти нa NeoScrypt. Ecли фикcиpoвaть, тo cкopocть нa paзныx нacтpoйкax cyщecтвeннo oтличaeтcя. Пoэкcпepимeнтиpyйтe. Ha pигe c тpeмя 1070-ми и oднoй 1080Ti экcпepимeнтaльнo пoдoбpaл oптимaльнoe знaчeниe - 512. Bмecтo 5.2 MH/s выдaётcя cтaбильнo 5.4 MH/s. Пoчти 4% pocт...

A вooбщe, нa этoм мaйнepe пapa мoиx 1060-ыx выдaёт пoчти cтoлькo жe, cкoлькo и oднa 1080Ti. Mecтo oптимизaции...

[palgin]

Besides that you behave like a 12 year old child and imply things i have never stated (Why so aggressive ?), i tested the new version again.



And thanks for the quick breakdown on shares. Didn't know that  

Everyone has good and bad days, it was my bad one, sorry if I abused you. But every medal has 2 sides.

From your side: OK, I've tested it, result sucks, let's post it.

From my side: Oh, new post, wait... This guy is kidding? Fake hashrate, really? He took his time to write this here, but but didn't even tried confiruring. Attack!

So sorry for any inconveniences, in average situation I'd just ignore your post, but not that day.

i have change the paging memory size but still have some crashing after some time

i have two gtx 1060 6g

work fine with ccminer but lower hashrate so try to find why it crash

Have you tried both test and release versions (test can be found on GitHub directly in the same folder, no links in thread) ?

[papampi]

Q: Linux support?
A: Planned, I'll provide Linux binaries once I set up developement machine for *nix.

Cant wait for Linux version to include it in nvOC default miners.
Keep up the good work.