[ANN] [QRK] Quark | Core 0.10 upgrade

[dE_logics]

"...blah blah blah..."

Now , let's wait for the quak supporters to tear this post into pieces.
After they dump all their coins on the market

I fully expect to be ripped a new A-hole but it saddens me to see people suckered like this.
If we consolidated all the money/time/hashing power going into the 100+ altcoins into just 5 or 6 unique, transparent and legitimate altcoins they would all prosper more and faster.

Seriously, red dwarf coins? UScoin? Hoboknickels?
Honestly can you imagine a mother of two going into a grocery store to buy baby formula, the cashier asks her how she would like to pay and she says"

"I would like to pay in Hobo Knickels please".

...
Nope. If it has no future, what the fuck are you doing developing the coin, mining the coin or buying the coin? Enough is enough, the more altcoins we have the more we weaken the concept.

Only 1 will survive. The government and people will choose.

As of POS -- Bitcoin has to die.

[Max Guevara]

You want to release a global currency but only create a fair entry-point for "tens of thousands"?

Almost every crypto-currency released in the last year has been released on bitcointalk.

[TheMightyX]

Bye bye Quacks

ha ha you poor children think , we were relying on a single exchange that is going to list us anyhow ?

wow when you take a break from WOW , do you find the world strange and amusing ? do you find it hard to focus on one thing for more than 20 seconds ?

ha ha - you think people care what you think , that is the cutest part-

instead of shitting on people why don't you offer some actual debate?
Every single thing that comes out of your mouth just proves how much of a shill you are for quark.
You obviously hold a considerable amount of quarks, enough so that you are blind to the reality of the situation.
Maybe you are in on it? Maybe you just got lucky.
I think if I had a couple million quarks, I too, would shill for this perverse system.

Because hey, if it makes me rich, it can't be that bad right?

[digitalindustry]

QRK has been premined? - this topic has been beaten to dead. leave it alone please. anytime there a dump, many more happy investors.

network has not been improved? I not a tech guy but I can tell how well my wallet working. the difficulty rate tell me how strong QRK network is.

QRK concept (inflation) is really good. it find the balance to keep the system going forever.

to be specific the Reward is an "equilibrium" to try to aim for a fixed supply as opposed to a harshly deflationary design like say Bitcoin - LTC etc.

This also allows Quark to benefit its users with - fee free payment or ultra low fee payment.

[Robert Lewandowski]

Bye bye Quacks

ha ha you poor children think , we were relying on a single exchange that is going to list us anyhow ?

wow when you take a break from WOW , do you find the world strange and amusing ? do you find it hard to focus on one thing for more than 20 seconds ?

ha ha - you think people care what you think , that is the cutest part-

instead of shitting on people why don't you offer some actual debate?
Every single thing that comes out of your mouth just proves how much of a shill you are for quark.
You obviously hold a considerable amount of quarks, enough so that you are blind to the reality of the situation.
Maybe you are in on it? Maybe you just got lucky.
I think if I had a couple million quarks, I too, would shill for this perverse system.

Because hey, if it makes me rich, it can't be that bad right?

[TheMightyX]

You want to release a global currency but only create a fair entry-point for "tens of thousands"?

Almost every crypto-currency released in the last year has been released on bitcointalk.

The place is not the problem, the instamine is.
Two years into bitcoin you could still get bitcoins without having to risk capital. 6 months into quark? 96% of all quarks mined. So anyone getting in within the last 6 months has 0% risk other than their time/electricity costs. Everyone else has to pay.
Also your "fair distribution" model (if it can even be called a model) is so beyond flawed. Do you really think the majority of all coins have switched hands and there's this even distribution? please.
Trading volume follows in an order of magnitude higher the trading capital.
200 Million trade volume = 20 million exchanged.
In fact, I could just trade the same 1 million back and forth to myself.

[digitalindustry]

Bye bye Quacks

ha ha you poor children think , we were relying on a single exchange that is going to list us anyhow ?

wow when you take a break from WOW , do you find the world strange and amusing ? do you find it hard to focus on one thing for more than 20 seconds ?

ha ha - you think people care what you think , that is the cutest part-

instead of shitting on people why don't you offer some actual debate?
Every single thing that comes out of your mouth just proves how much of a shill you are for quark.
You obviously hold a considerable amount of quarks, enough so that you are blind to the reality of the situation.
Maybe you are in on it? Maybe you just got lucky.
I think if I had a couple million quarks, I too, would shill for this perverse system.

Because hey, if it makes me rich, it can't be that bad right?

thing is but Mightyx - i talk and maybe you are too stupid to listen - ?

I explained how the system functioned many times - its been gone over multiple times  , did you struggle with your ABC's ?

Quark is and was the best distributed - it will only be better distributed in the future - it has a fee free/ultra low fee design for its investors / users .

It has a Forum that just surpassed 3000 full members and thousands of other guests - the "how to buy" passed 20,000 hits -

Our Volume breaks exchanges -   we love freedom and free markets -

We get new small and medium investors every day .

any other questions ?

[digitalindustry]

You want to release a global currency but only create a fair entry-point for "tens of thousands"?

Almost every crypto-currency released in the last year has been released on bitcointalk.

The place is not the problem, the instamine is.
Two years into bitcoin you could still get bitcoins without having to risk capital. 6 months into quark? 96% of all quarks mined. So anyone getting in within the last 6 months has 0% risk other than their time/electricity costs. Everyone else has to pay.
Also your "fair distribution" model (if it can even be called a model) is so beyond flawed. Do you really think the majority of all coins have switched hands and there's this even distribution? please.
Trading volume follows in an order of magnitude higher the trading capital.
200 Million trade volume = 20 million exchanged.
In fact, I could just trade the same 1 million back and forth to myself.

how would I get Bitcoin without risking capital  ?

I'll just wait here for the explanation -  (this should be good chess master)

[digitalindustry]

and we back to 4th. my coffee really nice.  

Wait 5 hours, until Americans wake up and dump.
I'd recommend u to sell fast

Sooner and more they sell, sooner you will buy much more

I already bought over 100btc worth, but of prices are going down, then i'm in for another 100 btc worth.  

Picked up another 100,000 during the recent fall. Thanks everyone!

Great to hear mate , wait until we have direct fiat access !

You improving that website?

within days - had some delays -

[dE_logics]

Bye bye Quacks

ha ha you poor children think , we were relying on a single exchange that is going to list us anyhow ?

wow when you take a break from WOW , do you find the world strange and amusing ? do you find it hard to focus on one thing for more than 20 seconds ?

ha ha - you think people care what you think , that is the cutest part-

instead of shitting on people why don't you offer some actual debate?
Every single thing that comes out of your mouth just proves how much of a shill you are for quark.
You obviously hold a considerable amount of quarks, enough so that you are blind to the reality of the situation.
Maybe you are in on it? Maybe you just got lucky.
I think if I had a couple million quarks, I too, would shill for this perverse system.

Because hey, if it makes me rich, it can't be that bad right?

Oh, you're like this guy --

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1rr4eg/keiser_promoting_another_scamcoin_pump_and_dump/cdq23iy

Ok, what points do you have against Quarks?

[TheMightyX]

Bye bye Quacks

ha ha you poor children think , we were relying on a single exchange that is going to list us anyhow ?

wow when you take a break from WOW , do you find the world strange and amusing ? do you find it hard to focus on one thing for more than 20 seconds ?

ha ha - you think people care what you think , that is the cutest part-

instead of shitting on people why don't you offer some actual debate?
Every single thing that comes out of your mouth just proves how much of a shill you are for quark.
You obviously hold a considerable amount of quarks, enough so that you are blind to the reality of the situation.
Maybe you are in on it? Maybe you just got lucky.
I think if I had a couple million quarks, I too, would shill for this perverse system.

Because hey, if it makes me rich, it can't be that bad right?

thing is but Mightmax - i talk and maybe you are too stupid to listen - ?

I explained how the system functioned many times - its been gone over multiple times  , did you struggle with your ABC's ?

Quark is and was the best distributed - it will only be better distributed in the future - it has a fee free/ultra low fee design for its investors / users .

It has a Forum that just surpassed 3000 full members and thousands of other guests - the "how to buy" passed 20,000 hits -

Our Volume breaks exchanges -   we love freedom and free markets -

We get new small and medium investors every day .

any other questions ?

Yes, do you believe the shit that comes out of your mouth?
Because it's working for you its good?

[majic]

Interesting to see that 80% of altcoins are massively down atm. Quark is no exception, let's wait until Monday before we judge things

[lx001]

I always buy at most expensive prices. They always go down while I sleep

[r3wt]

this coin is a stain. that is all

[huyha123]

this coin is a stain. that is all

care to explain OR better yet say ONE coin better and reason.

[TheMightyX]

You want to release a global currency but only create a fair entry-point for "tens of thousands"?

Almost every crypto-currency released in the last year has been released on bitcointalk.

The place is not the problem, the instamine is.
Two years into bitcoin you could still get bitcoins without having to risk capital. 6 months into quark? 96% of all quarks mined. So anyone getting in within the last 6 months has 0% risk other than their time/electricity costs. Everyone else has to pay.
Also your "fair distribution" model (if it can even be called a model) is so beyond flawed. Do you really think the majority of all coins have switched hands and there's this even distribution? please.
Trading volume follows in an order of magnitude higher the trading capital.
200 Million trade volume = 20 million exchanged.
In fact, I could just trade the same 1 million back and forth to myself.

how would I get Bitcoin without risking capital  ?

I'll just wait here for the explanation -  (this should be good chess master)

by mining? was that supposed to be a "OMG I got you I'm so leet!" moment?
Two years into bitcoin you could mine with an old laptop and still get coins.
I'm still debating with myself whether its even worth the use of explaining to you what fair distribution actually means.

[Max Guevara]

The place is not the problem, the instamine is.
Two years into bitcoin you could still get bitcoins without having to risk capital. 6 months into quark? 96% of all quarks mined. So anyone getting in within the last 6 months has 0% risk other than their time/electricity costs. Everyone else has to pay.

If you mine bitcoins you still pay for your equipment and electricity, so you still risk capital. You'll find that mining price and buying price is closely related.

The fact is, bitcoin is still very much an inflationary currency (where the definition of inflation used is "an increase in money supply").

The economic idea behind this model is to have a relative constant money supply. The yearly 0.5% inflation (i.e. increase in money supply) is to reward miners to keep the network going and to replace coins that get lost (e.g. lost wallets).

[r3wt]

Bye bye Quacks

ha ha you poor children think , we were relying on a single exchange that is going to list us anyhow ?

wow when you take a break from WOW , do you find the world strange and amusing ? do you find it hard to focus on one thing for more than 20 seconds ?

ha ha - you think people care what you think , that is the cutest part-

instead of shitting on people why don't you offer some actual debate?
Every single thing that comes out of your mouth just proves how much of a shill you are for quark.
You obviously hold a considerable amount of quarks, enough so that you are blind to the reality of the situation.
Maybe you are in on it? Maybe you just got lucky.
I think if I had a couple million quarks, I too, would shill for this perverse system.

Because hey, if it makes me rich, it can't be that bad right?

Oh, you're like this guy --

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1rr4eg/keiser_promoting_another_scamcoin_pump_and_dump/cdq23iy

Ok, what points do you have against Quarks?

It's a worthless, frontloaded scamcoin with obscene block rewards, designed to reward early investors/miners. quark is a clone of sifcoin anyway, which actually made the innovations. Secure coin is no better than quark, since baritus removed the quark copyrights, but atleast it has realistic block rewards.

[NUFCrichard]

Hi

To respond to some of these claims:

I pushed for an audit of the blockchain (http://forum.qrk.cc/thread/368/auditing-block-chain), and what we've found (http://forum.qrk.cc/thread/568/quark-faqs-compiling-fact-sheet) is incredibly disheartening.

The fact is the distribution of Quark similar to Litecoin, Namecoin and Peercoin:

http://forum.qrk.cc/thread/681/top-100-wallet-concentration

A few people mined 95% of all quarks in a very short period of time.

Quark was announced on Bitcointalk where probably tens of thousands of users had the opportunity to mine from the very first block.

There was no "pre-mine".

This is not true for a lot of other alt-coins.

The period of mining is similar to Infinitecoin, Extremecoin and numerous other altcoins.

The code had not been touched in 5 months. No infrastructure. No nothing.

Untrue. Regular checkpoints were added and bug fixes were done.

https://github.com/MaxGuevara/quark/commits/master/src

In terms of infrastructure. Seed nodes were provided, Quark was sucessfully submitted to coinpayments.net, etc.

Kolin Evans was never a "Quark Developer" (as he claimed to be in the Bill Still interview). That was a lie - Quark "enthusiast" would have been a more appropriate title.

Kolin is a Quark enthusiast.

Max, originator, has no interest in Quark leadership or development - would rather relegate such to the community to decide on a consensus basis.

I still stand by Quark belonging to its community.

Regards
Max

I wish that Max was the mouth of Quark as well as the developer.  A nice, cool, calm answer to all the points made.  You didn't put anyone down, no holier than thou BS.  Good work.  

[r3wt]

this coin is a stain. that is all

care to explain OR better yet say ONE coin better and reason.

there are many coins that are better than this one. none of them are cpu coins, which are a de-evolution in cryptocurrency. the point of cryptography is to increase entropy, not the time it takes to solve for x.